@article {1055, title = {Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {7}, year = {2017}, month = {02/2017}, pages = {27-34}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, abstract = {Living labs deploy contemporary open and user-centred engagement processes in real-world contexts where all relevant stakeholders are involved and engaged with the endeavour to create and experiment with different innovations. The approach is evidently successful and builds on the perspective that people have a democratic right to have influence over changes that might affect them, such as those brought about by an innovation. In this article, we will reflect on and discuss a case in which end users took part in the development of a method that stimulates learning and adoption of digital innovations in their own homes while testing and interacting with it. The results show that, when end users were stimulated to use the implemented innovation through different explicit assignments, they both increased their understanding of the situation as well as changed their behaviour. Living lab processes are complex and dynamic, and we find that it is essential that a living lab have the capability to adjust its roles and actions. We argue that being reflective is beneficial for innovation process managers in living labs because it allows them to adjust processes in response to dynamic circumstances. }, keywords = {action research, Apollon, context, digital innovations, end users, innovation process, Living lab, research process}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1055}, url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1055}, author = {Anna St{\r a}hlbr{\"o}st and Marita Holst} }