%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2022 %T The Diffusion of Blockchain as a General Purpose Technology Driving Digital Transformation %A Jason Windawi %K blockchain %K digital %K general purpose technology %K innovation %K institutions %K transformation %X Digital transformation as a process is integrally linked to the creation and diffusion of a set of general purpose technologies (GPTs) that provide both the motive force, as well as the means, for the transformation of existing industries and the creation of entirely new ones. This article takes as its subject the diffusion of one such technology - blockchain - and explores the relationship between the Schumpeterian innovation at the core of its diffusion and digital transformation as a macro process. Theoretically, I work from Rogers' definition of diffusion as a locally heterogeneous process in which variation in a new technology’s use and adaptation are driven by the decisions of entrepreneurs working in specific contexts, as well as Schumpeter's concept of innovation as a form of recombination. I explore variation in these processes of innovation and recombination across three broad clusters of implementations: Digital Economies, Extra-Institutional Trust, and Digital Finance. I find that each of these clusters is marked by a distinct form of innovation defined by differing patterns of recombination with other digital GPTs, and by the role that institutions and institutional actors play in this variation. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 12 %P 22010201 %8 05-2022 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1478 %N 1/2 %1 Princeton University and Rook DAO A. Jason Windawi is a blockchain researcher and the Organizational and Design Lead at Rook DAO. He recently completed a PhD in Sociology at Princeton University, where his dissertation research examined blockchain technology as a form of digital transformation, as well as new forms of organization and governance involved in its implementation. He holds an MA in Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences from Columbia University and an AB in Political Science from Stanford University. %& - %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1478 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2021 %T A Cross-Pollination of Ideas about Distributed Ledger Technological Innovation through a Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral lens: Insights from the Blockchain Technology Symposium ’21 %A Victoria L. Lemieux %A Atefeh Mashatan %A Rei Safavi-Naini %A Jeremy Clark %K blockchain %K decentralization %K decentralized finance %K decentralized health %K decentralized identity %K decentralized supply chains %K distributed ledgers %K innovation %K technology adoption %K technology management %X Blockchain Technology Symposium 2021 (BTS'21) is a forum where academic researchers, industry professionals, and decision makers came together to present recent advancements, discuss adoption barriers, tackle common challenges, and explore future roadmaps surrounding blockchain and its related technologies such as consensus algorithms, smart contracts, cryptocurrencies, and distributed ledger technologies generally. As a follow-up to BTS'18 and BTS'20, which were hosted by Ryerson University and The Fields Institute, and by popular demand, BTS 2021 gathered a diverse audience from academia, industry, and policy makers to engage in a dialogue around crucial topics in the adoption of blockchain technology, with the aim of cross-fertilizing ideas from these communities to address the challenges and seize the opportunities brought forward by this promising technology. BTS'21 featured multidisciplinary and multi-sectoral talks and presentations on four major themes: (1) decentralized finance (DeFi), (2) decentralized identity, (3) decentralized health and (4) decentralized supply chain management. This article provides reflections on some of the key insights found in the BTS’21 presentations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 11 %P 58-66 %8 06/2021 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1445 %N 6 %1 University of British Columbia Dr. Victoria Lemieux is an Associate Professor of Archival Science at the University of British Columbia’s School of Information and Founder and Co-Lead of Blockchain@UBC, a multidisciplinary blockchain research and education cluster at UBC. %2 Ryerson University Dr. Atefeh (Atty) Mashatan is an Associate Professor of Professor of Information Technology Management and the founder and director of the Cybersecurity Research Lab (CRL) at Ryerson University. She holds the Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Quality of Security Framework for Internet-of-Things (IoT). %3 University of Calgary Dr. Rei Safavi-Naini is the NSERC/Telus Industrial Research Chair and Alberta Innovates Strategic Chair in Information Security. She is a co-founder of the Institute for Security, Privacy and Information Assurance at the University of Calgary and served as its Director until January 2019. Her research interests are cryptography and information security. %4 Concordia University Dr. Jeremy Clark is an Associate Professor at the Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, where he holds the NSERC/Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton/Catallaxy Industrial Research Chair in Blockchain Technologies. %& 58 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1445 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2021 %T Editorial: Insights (January 2021) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K Digital disruption %K digital ecosystem %K eCommerce %K ecosystem %K FAIR %K Global eCom %K innovation %K Innovation management %K innovation process %K internationalization %K interoperability %K knowledge %K opportunity %K roadmap %K scientometrics %K small business %K sustainability %K text mining %K university cooperation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 11 %P 3 %8 01/2021 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1416 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. His PhD is from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He interned at the S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, St. Petersburg, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He worked for the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. His current research interests are distributed ledger technology (blockchain) systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1416 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2021 %T Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab %A Katharina De Vita %A Riccardo De Vita %K co-creation %K innovation %K Innovation management %K Living lab %K Open innovation %X Living Labs (LLs) are complex multi-stakeholder environments that enable real-life testing and experimentation of products, services, and systems. Despite increasing attention by practitioners as well as policymakers, and growing scholarly interest in the field, the literature exploring congruency between organisational objectives and outcomes when utilising LLs is still scarce. To fill this gap, a qualitative case study is employed to gain an in-depth understanding of objectives and project outcomes of organisations utilising LLs. The LL JOSEPHS® was chosen as this study's empirical context, in which 14 different projects were analysed. In-depth interviews revealed eight categories of measurable project outcomes: market acceptance, price acceptability, exposure, product testing, market intelligence, legitimisation, method testing, and networking. This study not only highlights what companies have achieved in comparison to their original project objectives, but also identifies additional unplanned outcomes that they accomplished. The findings offer important project-level insights into the potential and limitations of LLs. The results form a basis upon which to develop a better understanding of how innovation performance can be nurtured in LLs. Insights from the study may also help firms and facilitators by providing a deeper understanding of LLs at an individual project-level, and by articulating potential objectives and outcomes associated with organisations' involvement in LLs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 11 %P 6-20 %8 12/2021 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1461 %N 9/10 %1 University of Greenwich Katharina De Vita is Lecturer in Creativity and Innovation in the Department for Systems Management and Strategy at the University of Greenwich Business School. Prior to joining the University of Greenwich, she was Research Associate at the Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (CSTI) at the University of Cambridge. Katharina holds a PhD from the University of Cambridge and a master’s degree from the London School of Economics. Her main research interests are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. She has published journal articles, conference papers, and blogs on living labs. %2 University of Greenwich Riccardo De Vita is Associate Professor in Management at the University of Greenwich, where he is also Head of Department – Human Resources and Organisational Behaviour. Riccardo obtained his PhD at Universita’ Carlo Cattaneo – LIUC. Riccardo’s research interests lie in the field of innovation management, higher education management, and organisational networks. He regularly takes part in commissioned research projects, where he applies his expertise in Social Network Analysis. Riccardo has extensive leadership experience in both the public and private Higher Education sector. %& 6 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1461 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2021 %T The Interplay of Digital Transformation and Collaborative Innovation on Supply Chain Ambidexterity %A Sara Abdalla %A Koichi Nakagawa %K collaboration %K digital transformation %K innovation %K resource-based view. %K supply chain ambidexterity %K supply chain management %X This study aims at investigating the impact of digital transformation on the efficiency and adaptability of a supply chain (SC). It also identifies the role of collaborative innovation as a catalyst in these relationships. Survey data from Japanese manufacturing companies was examined using hierarchical multiple regression analysis to test the study’s hypotheses. According to the results, collaborative innovation with SC members, that is, suppliers and customers, strengthens the impact of digital transformation on adaptability, but not on efficiency. In contrast, collaborative innovation with market participants, such as competitors and partners, reinforces the positive relationship between digital transformation and efficiency, with no evidence supporting its effect on the innovation-adaptability relationship. These findings encourage firms to widen the scope of their collaborative innovation activities to include different types of partners. For firms with limited abilities to conduct such complex collaboration projects, the findings can assist managers in making well-informed decisions to include partners that accommodate prioritized organizational goals. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 11 %P 45-56 %8 03/2021 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1428 %N 3 %1 University of Khartoum Sara Abdalla is a Management and Business Administration Lecturer at the University of Khartoum, Sudan, where she received her B.Sc. in Business Administration and MBA degree. She won the Japanese Government (MEXT) Scholarship in 2018 and joined the Graduate School of Economics at Osaka University. After a one-year research studentship, she is currently conducting her Ph.D. in Business Administration. Her research is mainly situated in the field of operations management, with a focus on innovation and technology. She has been awarded the Best Student Paper Award at the ITMC conference in September 2019 and was part of the winning team of the Hult Prize Osaka University On-Campus Program in December 2019. Her recent contributions have been presented at the 32nd EBES conference in August 2020 and the ISPIM Connects Global conference in December 2020. %2 Yasashii Business Lab Koichi Nakagawa is the president of Yasashii Business Lab, Japan. He received a PhD in Economics from The University of Tokyo. After working on innovation education as an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, he started his own business. Now he studies and practice as a consultant the management of innovation and corporate strategy. Also, he tries to provide academic knowledge on the YouTube. %& 45 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1428 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2021 %T SMEs and the Innovation Management Process: A multi-level process conceptual framework %A Angelo Dossou-Yovo %A Christian Keen %K innovation %K Innovation management %K innovation process %K small business %X The aim of this paper is to propose a conceptual framework to manage the innovation process in small businesses. It is based on research from 11 case studies in the Montreal software industry using contingency and resource dependency theories. This conceptual framework provides a view of the innovation process that differs from the linear approach often used in many studies to investigate innovation in small and medium sized businesses (SMEs). The linear approach considers the process as a set of activities that includes developing from one stage to another, while depending on the previous one. We conceptualize the innovation process in small businesses as an interactive process that involves a set of six subprocesses and several keys points of resources mobilization, which requires interacting with both internal and external business actors. Successful mobilization of innovation resources at all key points determines the success or failure of SMEs' innovation processes. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 11 %P 22-33 %8 01/2021 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1414 %N 1 %1 York University Dr. Angelo Dossou-Yovo is Associate Professor in the Department of International Studies at York University (Toronto, Canada) where he teaches Management and Entrepreneurship in the dual degree program in International Studies and Business Administration, a program jointly offered with emLyon Business School (France). His research interests focus on the processes of opportunity recognition, growth and innovation in small and medium sized businesses in the information technology industry as well as innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems. %2 Laval University Laval University Christian Keen, PhD is an Assistant Professor at the Département de Management, Université Laval, Canada. Christian has an extensive research and working experience in Europe, Latin America, and North America. Before joining Université Laval, Dr. Keen was Director Graduate Program in Finance at Universidad ORT Uruguay and member of the Department of Marketing & Management at University of Southern Denmark. His professional experience includes being member of several the Board of Directors of private companies and NGOs. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, and international business. His research interests are in the areas of international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, emerging economies, and rapidly growing firms. Christian is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, and associated editor of TIM Review and European Journal of Family Business. He has presented his research in several international conferences such as AIB, AOM, EIBA, and has also published papers in those areas. %& 22 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1414 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: Insights (December 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K 5G technology; Bitcoin %K blockchain %K business model %K business model innovation %K crypto assets %K cryptocurrencies %K Diem %K Diem Association %K digital currency %K distributed ledger technology %K Facebook %K fiat currencies %K financial inclusion %K Financial industry %K front-end %K ideation %K innovation %K Libra %K local currencies %K Management Model %K not-for-profit %K research center %K strategic foresight %K strategy %K technology firms; project portfolio management %K tokenization; product innovativeness %K visioning %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3-3 %8 12/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1410 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. His PhD is from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He interned at the S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, St. Petersburg, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He worked for the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. His current research interests are distributed ledger technology (blockchain) systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1410 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: Insights (January 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K AI %K artificial intelligence %K B2B sales %K big data %K business-to-business sales %K data-based value %K digital solutions %K ecosystem %K ecosystems %K Ethics %K Gujarat State %K Indian IT industry %K innovation %K IT clusters %K Knowledge Innovation clusters %K Networks Analysis %K regional development %K Roboethics %K Smart robot %K strategy %K Systematic literature review %K technology %K value capture %K value creation %K value sales %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3-4 %8 01/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1298 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Dr. Stoyan Tanev has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. PhD from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science. Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council and Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems. Promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1298 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: Insights (June 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K Bitcoin %K blockchain %K crowdfunding %K crypto assets %K cryptocurrencies %K developing countries. %K distributed ledger technology %K Employeedriven innovation %K entrepreneurial finance %K entrepreneurship %K Ethereum %K Financial industry %K FinTech %K ICOs %K IEO %K innovation %K intellectual property rights %K internationalization %K IT industry %K job autonomy %K mining industry %K moral hazard %K need for autonomy %K new company %K Porter's Five Forces framework %K regulation %K scaling company value %K scaling-up %K self-leadership %K signaling %K SME %K STO %K sustainability %K technological environment %K technology %K technology readiness %K token offering %K token sales %K tokenization %K value proposition %K value proposition alignment %K venture capital %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3-4 %8 06/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1363 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. He completed a PhD from the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He was affiliated with the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. He is a promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1363 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: ISPIM Bangkok (August 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K Basic research %K biotech startups. %K co-working %K Conceptual research %K disruption %K incubators %K innovation %K Integrative marketing %K investors %K knowledge-sharing %K Open marketing %K organizational capabilities %K Pharmaceutical companies %K roles %K service ecosystems %K service entities %K service-dominant logic %K stakeholders %K strategic marketing %K strategy-innovation link %K structured literature review %K triadic relationships %K University and Public research institute %K value co-creation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3 %8 08/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1380 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. He completed a PhD from the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He was affiliated with the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. He is a promoter and builder of distributed ledger technology (blockchain) systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1380 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Embracing Product Innovativeness in Technology Firms: The Impact of Management Model Principles %A Pınar Büyükbalcı %A Esin Ertemsir %A Zayneb Boukari %K innovation %K Management Model %K Product innovativeness %K Technology firms %X Extending the debate on how to enable and manage innovation requires a discussion of the potential beneficial impact of management models and corresponding principles. In this paper, we draw on literature involving product innovativeness and management models to propose that product innovativeness is facilitated and influenced by practices and principles traceable in different management models. We test our hypotheses with data from a sample of high technology firms. Findings suggest that management models and principles have varying impacts on product innovativeness. Specifically, we found the principles of obliquity, emergence, and intrinsic motivation as significant enablers of product innovativeness, along with extrinsic motivation. Also, each management model differently impacted and fostered product innovativeness. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 31-45 %8 12/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1408 %N 12 %1 Yildiz Technical University Pınar Büyükbalcı is an Associate Professor at Yildiz Technical University – Department of Business Administration, Istanbul. Her research spans entrepreneurship (international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship ecosystems, subsidiary level entrepreneurship), innovation strategies and multinational network structure. She is also the co-author of five books, including case studies on management and entrepreneurship. %2 Yildiz Technical University Esin Ertemsir is an Assistant Professor at Yildiz Technical University - Department of Business Administration, Istanbul. She previously held a position as a visiting doctoral student at the British University in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Her research interests include innovation, creativity, and human resource management, as well as interdisciplinary studies such as innovative approaches to management education. %3 Istanbul Commerce University Zayneb Boukari is a Ph.D. student at Istanbul Commerce University. She obtained an undergraduate degree in Business Administration and a master’s degree in Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Yıldız Technical University. Her current research interests include entrepreneurship, innovation, business models, and exporting. She is supported by a Tübitak 2215 program scholarship. %& 31 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1408 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Human-Centered Design for Collaborative Innovation in Knowledge-based Economies %A Tiago Filipe Pereira da Silva %A João Paulo Coelho Marques %K co-creation %K design thinking %K Human-Centered Design %K innovation %K ME310 %K new product development %K Project-based Learning %K University-Industry Collaboration %X This research explores a university-industry collaboration based on the case study of an innovation project based on Stanford University's ME310 Design Innovation program. The Porto Design Factory and IKEA Industry joined forces to tackle a problem using what has come to be called a human-centered design approach. The case study provides an understanding of outcomes that reveal the potential of using a human-centered design approach to solve technical problems while enhancing customer experience. It also identifies the benefits that each institution gained by collaborating. The outcomes show that companies benefit from building interfaces with external partners, and that universities are relevant players in the innovation ecosystem, satisfying their third mission of being entrepreneurial institutions. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %8 09/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1385 %N 9 %1 Sonae MC IT Labs Tiago Silva has a master’s degree in Business Management from the Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra and an international post-graduate certificate in Product and Service Innovation (ME310) from the Polytechnic Institute of Porto in collaboration with Stanford University and SUGAR Network. Currently working at Sonae MC, a Portuguese retail company, he is part of an innovation and experimentation team - IT Labs. His interests are in Innovation Management, Human-Centered Design and Entrepreneurship. %2 Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra João Paulo Coelho Marques obtained the Ph.D. in Industrial Management at University of Aveiro-Portugal (2005). His master’s degree is in Management, at Lisbon School of Economics and Management - Lisbon University (1997). He has been a Professor at Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra - Portugal, since 1990, where he coordinated the M.Sc. Course in Business Management between 2009 and 2015, and the undergraduate course of Commerce and International Economics Relations between 2017 and 2020. He has been a researcher at a Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness, and Public Policies at the University of Aveiro since 2007. Having published more than 20 scientific papers and 2 books, his main interests are in Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship, triple helix innovation and Business Incubators. %& 5 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1385 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T More for Less? Sharing Economy as a Driver of Public Welfare Innovation %A Eva Pallesen %A Marie Aakjær %K innovation %K public sector %K sharing economy %K technology %K welfare state %X This article investigates sharing economy as a path to welfare innovation. It is based on a case where a digital platform is activated in order to support sharing among citizens with lung disease, and thereby increase health and well-being. The case exemplifies how sharing economy currently is taken up by public actors in the attempt to prolong the goals of the public sector beyond itself. This implies drawing everyday sharing practices into a new middle between formal organization and private relations. In a critical response to literature on sharing economy that tends to reduce "sharing" to "transaction", the article draws attention to how sharing entangles with hopes, fears, and affectual engagements of everyday life, and to how it interacts with technology in unforeseen ways and beyond anticipated outcomes. Based on the analysis, the article concludes that there may be good reasons for public welfare authorities to engage in facilitating sharing among citizens. This is not because it is likely to provide "more for less" in relation to predetermined goals, but rather because it can open up other kinds of welfare outcomes that cannot be produced by public organizations themselves. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 19-27 %8 05/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1353 %N 5 %1

University College Absalon Eva Pallesen is Docent (Senior Associate Professor), PhD in Center of Management and Experience Design at University College Absalon, Denmark. Her research focuses on welfare innovation, management and entrepreneurship in the public sector. She has published in international journals such as Organization Studiesand Methodological Innovations. Before entering academia, she worked as Head of Methodology Department in the Danish Evaluation Institute and as Head of Section in the Danish Ministry of Education.

%2

University College Absalon Marie Aakjær is Associate Professor, PhD in Center of Management and Experience Design at University College Absalon, Denmark. Marie has a background in design and her research areas cover social innovation, learning and co-creation with particular interest in the interaction among citizens, civil society and public sector organizations. She has published in international journals such as International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, and Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management.

%& 19 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1353 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Project Portfolio Management in the Front-End of Innovation of Research Centers: a Literature Review %A Rui Nuno Castro %A João José Pinto Ferreira %K front-end %K ideation %K innovation %K not-for-profit %K Project Portfolio Management %K research center %X The beginning of an innovation process, also known as “front-end of innovation” (FEI), counts as an essential contributor to the successful development of new products and for their market appeal. Nevertheless, while helpful procedures and techniques for developing new products are well-known and widely applied, FEI is still an understudied area, and models for managing it are not yet commonly used in technology-oriented companies. FEI, also known as "fuzzy front end", can even be "fuzzier" in not-for-profit research centers. That is because the focus of these centers is advancing of scientific knowledge, rather than commercializing the results of those activities. This study summarizes the insights from a literature review on the topic of “project portfolio management” (PPM) in relation to innovation and, more specifically, with FEI and its components of ideation, innovation management, innovation strategy, foresight, and incremental or radical innovation. The authors selected and reviewed content from 170 papers published in SCOPUS prior to February 2019. The discussion uses a theoretical framework called "Front-End of Innovation Integrative Ontology (FEI2O)" to assist in framing the discussion. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 46-59 %8 12/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1409 %N 12 %1 Fraunhofer Portugal Rui Nuno Castro holds a degree in Electrical and Computers Engineering from the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP) since 1996, and a M.Sc. in Digital Communication Systems and Technology from Chalmers University of Technology, in Sweden, in 1999. In 1998-1999 he was a researcher at Ericsson Radio Systems AB in Sweden, where he developed his Master Thesis named “Dynamic Resource Management for Wavelength Division Multiplexing Networks”. Between 2000 and 2004, as a researcher at INESC Porto, he actively participated in several projects in the IST framework. Between 2005 and 2010, he was co-founder and Chief Operations Officer at Nonius Software, a Portuguese SME. In 2010, he joined Fraunhofer Portugal as a researcher. He is, since October 2011, R&D Group Leader at Fraunhofer Portugal. His current research interests are in the field of Innovation and Technology Management. %2 University of Porto João José Pinto Ferreira holds a Licenciatura in Electrical Engineering and Computers at Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP) in 1987; MSc Electrical Engineering and Computers at FEUP in 1991; Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computers at FEUP in 1995; Habilitation in Industrial Engineering and Management in April 2011. He has held several positions at the FEUP: 1987-1995: Assistant Lecturer; 1995-2003: Assistant Professor; 2003-today: Associate Professor. At FEUP (1997-2000) also he was Member of the Executive Board of the Electrical Engineering Department and is, since 2004, the Director of the Master Program of Innovation and Technological Entrepreneurship. Has supervised MSc and Ph.D. students in the areas of Electrical Engineering and Computers, Informatics Engineering and Industrial Engineering and Management. He is Co-Editor-in-Chief and co-founder of the Journal of Innovation Management (http://open-jim.org). His research focuses on the Front-End of Innovation and on its synergies with the early stages of the entrepreneurial activity. %& 47 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1409 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights %A Saurav Pathak %A Etayankara Muralidharan %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K intellectual property rights %K technology %X In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI) that comprise novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, use of these leads to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI and its positive effect is felt through easy accessibility of the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to the understanding of the effect of strong IPR regimes on the different stages of the innovation process. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 5-13 %8 06/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1364 %N 6 %1 Xavier University Saurav Pathak, is an associate professor of innovation and entrepreneurship in the Williams College of Business at Xavier University. Pathak received his first Ph.D., in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida (2007) and another in entrepreneurship from the Imperial College Business School, London (2011). After his doctorate from University of Florida in 2007, he returned to India and was part of a tech-start-up named Zeus Numerix Private Limited that was incubated in the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai. There he held the position of Lead Scientist and was instrumental in developing simulation software for India’s aviation industry and commercial nuclear power plants. He also holds a master’s in mechanical engineering (ME) degree from Ohio University (2003) and a Bachelor in ME from Birla Institute of Technology, India (2001). Dr. Pathak’s research revolves around cross-country comparative entrepreneurship and focuses on examining the influences of higher-order contextual factors on individual-level entrepreneurial behaviors. Recently, he has started looking into how culture-specific emotional intelligence, including perceived well-being, shapes such behaviors differently across cultures. His ongoing research projects also include predicting entrepreneurial coping strategies and self-control based on entrepreneur’s level of emotional intelligence. %2 MacEwan University Etayankara Muralidharan is an Associate Professor of Management at MacEwan University, Canada. He received his PhD in 2013 from the University of Manitoba in Canada. His research interests are in organizational crisis management and entrepreneurship. His research has been recently published in Journal Business Ethics, Business & Society, Sustainability, Cross-Cultural Management, Journal of Small Business Management, International Business Review, Thunderbird International Business Review, Management Research Review, International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, Current Topics in Management, and has been presented at and appeared in the proceedings of the Academy of Management, Academy of International Business, Babson Entrepreneurship Conference (BCERC) and the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada. %& 5 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Using Foresight to Shape Future Expectations in Circular Economy SMEs %A Anne-Mari Järvenpää %A Iivari Kunttu %A Mikko Mäntyneva %K circular economy %K foresight %K innovation %K PESTEL %K SMEs %X Future foresight in business plays a central role in firms’ strategic planning, innovation, and product development activities. This is particularly true for the firms that are operating in rapidly changing business environments, in which a firm may obtain significant competitive advantages by coming up with new innovations and customer solutions. This article studies future foresight mechanisms and practices in innovative SMEs operating in circular economy–related industries. The future demands set by legislation and regulation, consumer buying behaviour, and environmental consciousness, all have a strong impact on an SME’s future horizon, in which there may be prosperous business opportunities as well as several challenges. This paper presents a qualitative case study conducted on seven Finnish circular economy-oriented SMEs. The case study reveals that the SMEs in this industrial sector are quite active in foresight activities, and that they have developed a variety of practices for effectively utilizing foresight information in their product development and strategic planning activities. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 42-51 %8 07/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1374 %N 7 %1 University of Vaasa Anne-Mari Järvenpää holds a MEng degree in Industrial Service Business (2010) and a BEng degree in Information Technology (2005) from the Häme University of Applied Sciences (HAMK), Finland. Currently, she is studying a PhD degree in Industrial Management at the University of Vaasa, Finland. Her research topic relates to the circular economy and industrial symbiosis. She is working as a senior lecturer at HAMK on the Degree Programme in Information and Communication Technology, Bioeconomy. %2 HAMK Dr. Iivari Kunttu holds a PhD degree in Information Technology from the Tampere University of Technology (TUT; 2005) and a PhD degree in Economics (management) from the University of Vaasa, Finland (2017). Currently he acts as Principal Research Scientist in HAMK. During 2012-2017 he held an assistant professor position in the Department of Management of the University of Vaasa. He has also held several R&D manager and R&D process development specialist positions in the Nokia Corporation and has held project manager positions in TUT. His current research interests include R&D and innovation management, data analysis, and business development, as well as digital services. His works have been published in such international journals as Pattern Recognition Letters, Machine Vision Applications, Optical Engineering, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Annals of Long-term Care, Technovation, Industry and Innovation, and Technology Innovation Management Review. %3 HAMK Dr. Mikko Mäntyneva holds a PhD degree in Strategic Management from TUT (2004). Currently he is the Principal Research Scientist at HAMK. His research focuses on smart services, innovation management, knowledge management, and customer relationship management. He has authored several scientific articles as well as six books on various management topics. %& 42 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1374 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Which Factors Influence a Company’s Evaluation of the Contribution of Basic Research to Innovation? %A Hiromi S. Nagane %A Koichi Sumikura %K Basic research %K Biotech start-ups %K innovation %K Pharmaceutical companies %K University and Public research institute %X This paper empirically analyses how individuals in companies evaluate the contributions of basic research by universities and public research institutes to industry from multiple perspectives: manager as a spokesperson of the company (science-based industry or others), position within the company (managers or inventors), affiliations of inventors (large pharmaceutical companies or biotech start-ups), and educational background. This paper focuses on the case of Japan. Questionnaire surveys were sent to managers and inventors in established companies and start-ups across several industries. This study found that, 1) the more science-oriented the company, the higher their managers evaluate academic research, 2) inventors evaluate academic research more highly than managers, 3) inventors from biotech start-ups evaluate academic research more highly than inventors from large companies in the pharmaceutical industry, and 4) the more advanced their educational background, the more highly inventors evaluate academic research. This study suggests that 'closeness to science' is an important factor for companies to evaluate contributions of basic research to innovation. The findings also suggest that problems within the current educational system are an indirect cause of the innovation crisis in Japan. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 38-51 %8 08/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1379 %N 8 %1 Chiba University Hiromi S. Nagane is Professor of Graduate School of Social Sciences at the Chiba University in Japan. She earned her Ph.D. in Economics from Hitotsubashi University. Her research interests are health economics, economics of innovation, science and technology policy, higher education policy, and industry-academia collaboration. She has published articles about health regulations, the relation between firms’ performance and absorptive capacity, the productivity of academic articles, leading scientists, and so on. She also received a category award for her article about science and technology policy from the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2020. She holds the post of visiting scholar of the National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). %2 National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) Koichi Sumikura is Deputy Director, GiST Program, GRIPS Professor. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Tokyo Graduate School for Engineering in 1998 and is now a visiting assistant at the University of Tokyo's Research Unit. His specialty is in intellectual property rights, bio-technology, and industry-academia collaboration. He is a visiting scholar of NISTEP. %& 39 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1379 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Are High-Tech Companies More Competitive Than Others? An Empirical Study of Innovative and Exporting French SMEs %A Manon Enjolras %A Mauricio Camargo %A Christophe Schmitt %K export %K innovation %K multiple-case study %K SMEs %K technological intensity %X The main objective of this research work is to question the relationship between the technological intensity of SMEs (defined by the share of R&D expenditure in turnover, according to the OECD) and their growth potential (defined by their innovation and export capabilities). Through a multiple case study conducted with a panel of nine French SMEs, and through an analysis combining a qualitative approach (illustrative cases study) and a quantitative one (multidimensional statistical methods), several hypotheses were tested. Finally, this study points out that technological intensity, as defined by the OECD, is not directly correlated with the growth potential of SMEs. On the other hand, a company’s technological intensity would have an impact on the way it manages its innovation and internationalization process, and thus the way it manages its internal practices. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 33-48 %8 01/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1210 %N 1 %1 Université de Lorraine Manon Enjolras is a Researcher in Industrial System Engineering at the Université de Lorraine in Nancy, France, where she is working on the innovation and internationalization capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). She also holds a PhD from the Université de Lorraine in addition to an Engineering degree in Project Management and Innovation Management and a Master’s degree in Innovation Management, both from the Université de Lorraine’s Ecole Nationale Supérieure en Génie des Systèmes et Innovation (ENSGSI). Her main research interests are related to multicriteria decision-making and multivariate data analysis methodologies applied to SMEs, especially the capability evaluation metrics for innovation, internationalization, and the protection of industrial property. %2 Université de Lorraine Mauricio Camargo is a Professor at the Ecole Nationale en Génie des Systèmes Industriels (ENSGSI) at the Université de Lorraine in Nancy, France. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and a PhD on Automatics of Industrial and Human Systems at the Université de Valenciennes et de Hainaut Cambresis in France. Professor Camargo’s main research interests are new product development, design-to-cost, and design and interdisciplinarity. His recent research concerns the application of multi-objective evolutionary techniques to evaluate product performance and innovativeness. %3 Université de Lorraine Christophe Schmitt is a Professor in Entrepreneurship at the Université de Lorraine (IAE de Metz and CEREFIGE), he holds the research Chair “Entreprendre”, and he is responsible for PeeL (the Lorraine Student Entrepreneurship Pole). He is also an Associate Professor at the Louvain School of Management in Belgium and at the “Haute Ecole de Gestion” of Fribourg in Switzerland. His articles and books mostly concern the notion of value design and knowledge building for action as well as the development of entrepreneurial practices. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1210 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Austria %A Erich Prem %K AI %K AI innovation management %K artificial intelligence %K Austria %K innovation %K SME %X It has been claimed that Artificial Intelligence (AI) carries enormous potential for service and product innovation. Policy makers world-wide nowadays aim to foster environments conducive for AI-based innovation. This paper addresses the current lack of empirical data for evidence-based innovation policies and the management of AI-based innovation. It focuses on “AI and innovation management” in addressing the question whether innovation that is based on new AI technology requires a management approach different from other forms of IT innovation. We present results from a study of Austrian companies on the degree of use and implementation of AI, and on challenges related to AI-based innovation management. This study used a keyword-list approach to define “Artificial Intelligence” and to find AI-based innovation projects in research databases. These projects facilitated the identification of experts from organisations developing AI-based innovation. In total, eleven experts were interviewed about their AI-based innovation activities. The results show that AI is a very fast emerging technology that is being applied in many sectors. A broad range of innovative solutions are being developed and some have already reached the market. Specific AI business models are, however, less clear and still developing. Companies are facing multiple challenges from regulation to human resources and data collection. Managing AI-based innovation will be particularly difficult for smaller enterprises, where problems are often more pronounced than in larger industries. Explicit challenges for managing AI-based innovations include the necessary attention to managing expectations and ensuring historic metadata expertise essential for many AI-based solutions. Policies to support AI-based innovation therefore should focus on human aspects. This includes increasing the availability of AI experts, but also concerns the development of new job profiles, such as experts in AI training. AI innovators also require clear AI regulation and research investments in key challenges, such as explainable AI. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 5-15 %8 12/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1287 %N 12 %1 eutema gmbH Dr. Erich Prem is chief RTI strategy advisor and CEO of eutema GmbH. He is an expert in international research and innovation management with a focus on information technology. Erich Prem is a certified managerial economist and works scientifically in artificial intelligence, research politics, innovation research, and epistemology. He has published more than 70 scientific articles and was a guest researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He received his Dr. phil. (epistemology) from the University of Vienna, and his Dr. tech. (computer science) from TU Vienna, where he also completed his master’s in computer science (Dipl. Ing). He received his MBA in General Management from Donau University. He is a lecturer at TU Vienna’s Informatics Innovation Center. %& 5 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1287 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Bridging Participatory Policy Trends and Research Traditions through Social Innovation %A Malin Lindberg %A Daniel Hallencreutz %A Anna Tengqvist %K action research %K co-creation %K innovation %K participatory research %K social innovation %X This study explores whether social innovation may serve as a bridge between participatory policy trends and research traditions when striving for improved societal relevance and impact of research and innovation (R&I). Despite their shared aim of relevance and impact through civic involvement, European R&I policies and participatory action research approaches seldom refer to each other or harness each other’s resources. The study advances the knowledge regarding how the participatory elements in the policies and research approaches relate through a participatory case study of a joint R&I process to develop a model for social innovation support in Sweden. The case study helps distinguish potential synergies between various degrees of involvement advocated in the policies and research approaches, as well as between the reliance on trending policy concepts vs. scientific notions of validity. Social innovation is perceived as a potential bridge between these elements, as it draws upon participatory academic traditions, while simultaneously tapping into current policy trends of co-creation, in the development of new approaches and solutions to societal challenges. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 27-36 %8 04/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1231 %N 4 %1 Luleå University of Technology Malin Lindberg is a Professor at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, where he specializes in participatory action research, in which knowledge is developed jointly by researchers and societal stakeholders. Her main topic of interest is inclusive forms of innovation and organization, with specific focus on social innovation, participatory innovation, and sustainable development. She has published several studies on policies, support, and management of inclusive innovation and organization in international anthologies and journals, for example, the International Journal of Innovation Management, the International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, the International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, and the European Public & Social Innovation Review. %2 WSP Daniel Hallencreutz is a Senior Consultant for WSP in Sweden. He specializes in participatory processes of regional development with a scholarly base in human geography. His main topic of interest is mechanisms of growth and societal change in clusters and innovation systems in various industrial and geographical contexts. His PhD thesis scrutinized growth patterns in Swedish clusters of design-intensive and cultural-products industries, such as multimedia, fashion, and music. He has managed several participatory evaluation processes of regional and national clusters and innovation systems, for example, in the European Regional Development Fund. %3 WSP Anna Tengqvist is a Senior Consultant for WSP in Sweden. She specializes in participatory processes of social sustainability, equality management, and gender mainstreaming. One of her main topics of interest is social innovation development and support, and in this area she has managed several co-creative evaluations of multi-actor platforms and projects on regional level. She has also managed several participatory model development processes for gender equality, equal opportunities, intersectionality, and accessibility in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. This work includes the development of a European standard for gender mainstreaming in the European Social Fund. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1231 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals %A Magnus Hoppe %K action research %K bibliography %K case study %K innovation %K journals %K participative %K participatory action research %X With the aim to help innovation researchers choose outlets for articles based on participatory and action research methods, this article describes and discusses publication patterns of action research. A bibliographic study of 33 innovation journals ranked 4, 3, 2, and 1 in the 2018 Academic Journal Guide is complemented by a case study of this journal, the Technology Innovation Management Review, as an example of an established open access journal in the field with a wider scope and target group. From these two studies, we learn that the overall trend is towards more publications of action research articles in a diversity of outlets. Indirectly, the study supports the general view that articles striving towards adding practical relevance to research are becoming more frequent. There is no support for the notion that more renowned and higher-ranked journals would be more hesitant to accept articles with action research methods. The study also notes that there are interesting outlets beside those highly ranked and indexed in more conventional ways. The conclusion reached is that we lack a clear answer to the question of what are the best outlets for those of us who are interested in both innovation and action research. Instead, the study invites us to reflect upon what kind of impact we want to have and then act accordingly. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 66-77 %8 04/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1234 %N 4 %1 Mälardalen University Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board, and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1234 %0 Map %D 2019 %T Connected Health Innovation: Data Access Challenges in the Interface of AI Companies and Hospitals %A Laura Kemppainen %A Minna Pikkarainen %A Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen %A Jarmo Reponen %K artificial intelligence %K connected health %K Data access %K data management %K governance %K information mobility %K innovation %K orchestration %K patient- centered %X The purpose of this paper is to explore the challenges and potential solutions regarding data access for innovation in the realm of connected health. Theoretically, our study combines insights from data management and innovation network orchestration studies, taking thereby a new approach into issues that have emerged in these research streams. Empirically, we study these issues in the context of a development endeavor involving an AI-driven surgery journey solution in collaboration with hospitals and companies. Our study indicates that the challenges and solutions in data access can be categorised according to the level where they emerge: individual, organisational, and institutional. Depending on the level, the challenges require solutions to be searched from different categories. While solutions are generally still scarce, organizational level solutions seem The purpose of this paper is to explore the challenges and potential solutions regarding data access for innovation in the realm of connected health. Theoretically, our study combines insights from data management and innovation network orchestration studies, taking thereby a new approach into issues that have emerged in these research streams. Empirically, we study these issues in the context of a development endeavor involving an AI-driven surgery journey solution in collaboration with hospitals and companies. Our study indicates that the challenges and solutions in data access can be categorised according to the level where they emerge: individual, organisational, and institutional. Depending on the level, the challenges require solutions to be searched from different categories. While solutions are generally still scarce, organizational level solutions seem to hold wide-ranging potential in addressing many challenges. By discussing these dynamics, this paper provides new knowledge for academics and practitioners on the challenges and solutions for data access and management in networked contexts. The greatest challenges among healthcare providers and health technology companies lay on uncertainties and interpretations concerning regulation, data strategy, and guidelines. Creating guidelines for data use and access in a hospital can be a first step to creating connected health innovations in collaboration with AI companies. For their part, these companies need to put effort into gaining in-depth knowledge and understanding of the processes and standards in healthcare context. Our paper is one of the first to combine data management and innovation network orchestration literatures, and to provide empirical evidence on data access related issues in this setting.to hold wide-ranging potential in addressing many challenges. By discussing these dynamics, this paper provides new knowledge for academics and practitioners on the challenges and solutions for data access and management in networked contexts. The greatest challenges among healthcare providers and health technology companies lay on uncertainties and interpretations concerning regulation, data strategy, and guidelines. Creating guidelines for data use and access in a hospital can be a first step to creating connected health innovations in collaboration with AI companies. For their part, these companies need to put effort into gaining in-depth knowledge and understanding of the processes and standards in healthcare context. Our paper is one of the first to combine data management and innovation network orchestration literatures, and to provide empirical evidence on data access related issues in this setting. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 43-55 %8 12/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1291 %N 12 %1 University of Oulu M.Sc. Laura Kemppainen is a Doctoral Candidate at Martti Ahtisaari Institute of Global Business and Economics at the AACSB accredited Oulu Business School, Finland. She holds a M.Sc. in Marketing from Oulu Business School. Laura's research interests include platform business models, human-centered personal data management, digital innovations and value creation. In her doctoral dissertation, the aim is to build understanding about the creation, capture and co-creation of value in the emerging data- and platform-driven ecosystems through the lens of service-dominant logic of marketing. %2 VTT Technical Research Centre & University of Oulu Minna Pikkarainen, is a joint Connected Health professor of VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland and University of Oulu / Oulu Business School, Martti Ahtisaari Institute and Faculty of Medicine. As a professor of connected health Minna is doing on multidisciplinary research on innovation management, service networks and business models in the context of connected health service co-creation. Professor Pikkarainen has extensive record of external funding, her research has been published large amount of journal and conference papers e.g. in the field of innovation management, software engineering and information systems. During 2006-2012 Professor Minna Pikkarainen has been working as a researcher in Lero, the Irish software engineering research centre, researcher in Sirris, collective “centre of the Belgian technological industry” and business developer in Institute Mines Telecom, Paris and EIT (European Innovation Technology) network in Paris and Helsinki. Her key focus areas as a business developer has been in healthcare organizations. Previously, Minna’s research has been focused on the areas of agile development, software innovation and variability management. %3 University of Oulu Dr. Pia Hurmelinna is a Professor of Marketing, especially International Business at the Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, and an Adjunct Professor (Knowledge Management) at the Lappeenranta University of Technology, School of Business and Management. She has published over 70 refereed articles in journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, Industrial and Corporate Change, Industrial Marketing Management, International Business Review, R&D Management, and Technovation. She has contributed to book chapters, over 160 conference papers, and other scientific and managerial publications. She is a member of editorial boards of, e.g., Industrial Marketing Management and Journal of Innovation Management. She also has been serving as a quest editor and a reviewer for many journals and conferences. Most of her research has involved innovation management and appropriability issues, including examination of different knowledge protection and value capturing mechanisms. The research covers varying contexts like internationalization and inter-organizational collaboration. %4 University of Oulu Jarmo Reponen, MD, PhD, Radiologist and Professor of Practice in Health Information Systems at Research Group of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology (MIPT), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland. He has more than 30 years of experience in implementing and teaching the usage of digital systems in health care environment. His current research focus is on assessment of hospital information systems from a clinical perspective, including studies of user experience, decision support systems and artificial intelligence. %& 43 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1291 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Action Research (April 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Magnus Hoppe %A Erik Lindhult %K action research %K innovation %K participative %K participatory research %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-6 %8 04/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1228 %N 4 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Mälardalen University Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. %3 Mälardalen University Erik Lindhult (Ph.D.) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1228 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Action Research (May 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Magnus Hoppe %A Erik Lindhult %K action research %K innovation %K participative %K participatory research %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-5 %8 05/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1236 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Mälardalen University Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. %3 Mälardalen University Erik Lindhult (Ph.D.) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1236 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Celebrating Innovation in Florence (October 2019) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K behavioural economics %K behavioural science %K bibliometric analysis %K business models %K Buyer-Supplier Relationships %K choice architecture %K collaboration %K consumer-to-business %K Content creator-based business models %K content creators %K creativity management %K digital platforms %K digital technologies %K digital transformation %K Digital user involvement %K digitalization %K digitization %K disruption %K e-commerce %K human-centered data economy %K IIoT %K Industry 4.0 %K innovation %K innovation policy %K intellectual commerce %K Living lab %K mission-led science %K multisided platforms %K personal data %K research impact %K social commerce %K Supplier Integration %K taxonomy %K user-generated content %B Technology Innovation Management Review %V 9 %P 3-4 %8 10/2019 %G eng %N 10 %1

Technology Innovation Management Review

Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).
Dr. Stoyan Tanev has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.

%2

Technology Innovation Management Review

Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. PhD from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science. Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council and Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems. Promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services.

%& 3 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Insights (February 2019) %A Chris McPhee %K digital innovation %K digital transformation %K innovation %K innovation ecosystems %K management %K sharing economy %K technology %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-4 %8 02/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1214 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1214 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Insights (June 2019) %A Chris McPhee %K action research %K development projects %K digitization %K innovation %K management innovation %K women entrepreneurs %K women managers %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-3 %8 06/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1244 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1244 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Insights (November 2019) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K artificial intelligence %K competitive advantage %K cybersecurity %K deep learning %K Deepfake %K design rules %K digitalization %K entrepreneurial ecosystems %K entrepreneurial university %K entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurship education %K fake news %K innovation %K international entrepreneurship %K leadership %K Learning Capabilities %K marketing %K motivation %K new venture teams %K quadruple helix %K sanctions %K SMEs %K teamwork %K triple helix %K university business incubation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-4 %8 11/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1278 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).
Dr. Stoyan Tanev has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. PhD from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science. Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council and Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems. Promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1278 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Living Labs (March 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Anna Ståhlbröst %A Abdolrasoul Habibipour %A Mari Runardotter %A Diana Chronéer %K accelerators %K business models %K frameworks %K innovation %K living labs %K Open innovation %K stakeholders %K sustainability %K tools %K UN Sustainable Development Goals %K urban living labs %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-5 %8 03/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1220 %N 3 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Luleå University of Technology Anna Ståhlbröst is the Chair Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Her research interests focus on the possibilities and challenges with the ongoing digital transformation for people, organizations, and society. In particular, she is interested in the citizen perspective when digital service innovations are developed within the context of urban living labs for smart cities and regions. Her research is related to different application areas such as smart cities and regions, crowdsourcing, everyday use, and online privacy. Her research has been published in several international journals, conference proceedings, and books. %3 Luleå University of Technology Abdolrasoul Habibipour is a PhD student in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden and is a User Engagement Expert at Botnia Living Lab, Sweden. His research focuses on user engagement in living lab context, with a particular emphasis on users’ motivations and needs. Abdolrasoul has experience teaching and supervising students at the undergraduate and postgraduate level and also serves as a reviewer in various international conferences and scientific journals. He has been involved in international innovation and research projects such as Privacy Flag and USEMP projects and is currently working in UNaLab and U4IoT projects, all of which are financed by the European Commission. %4 Luleå University of Technology Mari Runardotter is a PhD in Social Informatics from the Luleå University of Technology. Since 2009 she has been working as Senior Lecturer, at the division Computer Science, at Luleå University of Technology. Her research focuses on social, societal and organizational effects of IT, primarily in the area of e-government and e-governance. She is also interested in issues related to availability and accessibility of cultural heritage materials. In her research Runardotter uses theories and methods that emphasize social, societal, cultural, organizational and gender aspects in the interaction between humans and information systems. %# Luleå University of Technology Diana Chronéer is an Associate Professor in the Information Systems department at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden. She teaches organizational development through IT and sustainable business models from a digital perspective. Her main research interests are in the areas of digital service innovation, business model development, information logistics, and project management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1220 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Technology Commercialization and Entrepreneurship (January 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Ferran Giones %A Dev K. Dutta %K commercialization %K digitalization %K e-leadership %K entrepreneurship %K framework %K innovation %K internationalization %K legitimacy %K management %K SMEs %K startups %K technology %K technology intensity %K ventures %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-8 %8 01/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1207 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 University of Southern Denmark Ferran Giones is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. He received his PhD from La Salle – Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain. His research field is technology entrepreneurship, where he explores how and when technological progress transforms into entrepreneurial activity, and how this entrepreneurial activity results in sustainable organizations and innovative ecosystems. %3 University of New Hampshire Dev K. Dutta is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship in the Management Department at the University of New Hampshire in the United States. His research and teaching focus on the intersection of entrepreneurship and innovation, especially the way these concepts apply at the firm and ecosystem levels. Dev has over 25 research publications in his field in peer-reviewed journals as well as books, book chapters, and research monographs. He also holds national certifications as an academic coach and facilitator in technology entrepreneurship, innovator mindset, lean launch pad, and design thinking (MIT and Stanford D-School). Before joining academia, Dev worked for 15 years as a corporate strategy consultant for several large Indian IT multinationals. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1207 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T The Impact of Digitalization and Resources on Gaining Competitive Advantage in International Markets: Mediating Role of Marketing, Innovation and Learning Capabilities %A Yan Yin Lee %A Mohammad Falahat %K competitive advantage %K digitalization %K innovation %K international entrepreneurship %K Learning Capabilities %K marketing %K SMEs %X International Entrepreneurship as a field of studies depends on digitalization as an essential factor that drives internationalization. Riding on the wave of digitalization, firms can produce and market their products and services globally through digital platforms with reduced costs and time savings. Yet, digitalization as a determinant of competitive advantages for small and medium enterprises in international markets is rarely examined. This study fills the gap by testing the direct and indirect effects of digitalization on enterprise, specifically focusing on price, product and service advantages in digitalized international markets. Based on the data collected from 143 exporting SME manufacturers in Malaysia, results from our analysis revealed that digitalization has no direct effect on competitive advantage, but rather has strong indirect effects on product and service advantages. Managers and policymakers can thus leverage digitalization to improve their company's internationalization plans according to its intended competitive strategies. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 26-39 %8 11/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1281 %N 11 %1
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman 

Yan Yin Lee is a scholarship recipient funded by Malaysia’s Ministry of Education (MoE) under FRGS scheme (FRGS/1/2017/SS01/UTAR/02/3) at the Faculty of Accountancy and Management (FAM), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Sungai Long campus, Malaysia. She received the Best Graduate Award in the School of Applied Physics from the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), majoring in Applied Physics and minoring in Management Studies. She has been a Senior Management Consultant and trainer in Quality and Environmental Management Systems for over ten years and has consulted more than 100 companies from various industries. She is currently pursuing her Masters of Philosophy. Her research interests include SME internationalisation, SME digitalization, and government support programs.

 

%2
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
 
Mohammad Falahat is currently at the Faculty of Accountancy and Management (FAM), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Sungai Long campus, Malaysia. He is the Chairperson for the Centre for Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSDCSR) in Business at UTAR. He was awarded a grant to conduct research in the field of International Entrepreneurship by Malaysia’s Ministry of Education (MoE) under FRGS scheme (FRGS/1/2017/SS01/UTAR/02/3). He holds a Doctorate of Business Administration from Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) where he received a Gold Medal Award for the Best Doctor of Business Administration. His interests cover SMEs internationalisation, International Entrepreneurship, business strategies, and born global. His academic work has been presented at international conferences as well as published in reviewed journals and books.
%& 26 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1281 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Innovation Ecosystems as Structures for Value Co-Creation %A Sanna Ketonen-Oksi %A Katri Valkokari %K ecosystems %K innovation %K platforms %K value co-creation %X Despite the many recent discussions on “innovation ecosystems” as well as on open innovation or other co-innovation models, a more in-depth understanding of the multi-actor processes of value co-creation remains rather scarce. Hence, in this case study, we provide significant novel insight about innovation ecosystems as structures enabling multi-actor value co-creation in real-life innovation ecosystems. Based on our empirical findings, we identified two key principles: 1) in order to encourage the active participation of ecosystem actors in the value co-creation process, efforts must be made to ensure a clear vision and a shared value base on which the ecosystem activities can be built and 2) facilitation is needed to support the ecosystem actors to make new connections and to share their knowledge and resources in concrete ways. Most importantly, the more diversity there is among the ecosystem actors, the greater the support for innovativeness within the value co-creation process. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 25-35 %8 02/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1216 %N 2 %1 Talent Vectia Oy Sanna Ketonen-Oksi works as a futurist-in-residence at Talent Vectia Oy (Espoo, Finland), a company offering strategic consulting and training services for organizations interested in renewal and new growth. With broad experience in EU-funded research, development, and innovation projects, often in university-industry collaboration, and based on her PhD studies on the service-dominant logical view on value co-creation and innovation, she sees that more understanding about innovation as a process of multi-actor collaboration is still needed. The growing complexity and dynamism of the innovation ecosystems is also an integral part of developing organizational futures orientation. %2 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Katri Valkokari is a Research Manager working in the business, innovation, and foresight research area at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. She has over 15 years of experience in both research and practical development work on business networks, ecosystems, and networked business operations. She has, for example, held the post of programme manager in the large FIMECC (GP4V) and DIMECC (REBUS) research programmes, and worked for many industry companies, large and small. Katri has published several articles, managerial guidebooks and other publications related to collaboration models, innovation, and knowledge management as well as sustainability. When it comes to ecosystems and networks, Valkokari believes versatility is the key to creating true impact. When networks are formed openly, they can be a powerful tool for solving many of society’s problems. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1216 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T A Management Innovation Approach to Project Planning %A Haven Allahar %K innovation %K management innovation %K management innovation tools %K scenario planning %K strategic foresight %X Innovation is viewed as indispensable to the economic and social development of countries, and the subject has been widely researched. The initial research focused on the development of new products and services by firms applying technological initiatives. The concept has expanded to cover many domains and features of innovation that led to innovation in non-technological areas, currently referred to as “management innovation”. Many tools were developed by management specialists and gurus such as strategic planning, vision and mission statements, benchmarking, customer-satisfaction measurement, and outsourcing to target performance improvements in firms. The output of this article is a project development planning model that integrates management innovation tools related to the field of project planning as a novel approach tested by a consulting firm over several applications. The article has implications for managers, consultants, and professionals involved in the design, planning, and implementation of a varied range of development projects. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 4-13 %8 06/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1245 %N 6 %1 University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago Haven Allahar has served for over 25 years as an Adjunct Lecturer in entrepreneurship and innovation, and a coach of MBA teams’ capstone projects at the Arthur Lok Jack Global School of Business of the University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago. Haven has a wide academic and specialized training background in Economics (BSc, Jamaica), Entrepreneurship and Management (MA and DBA, US), Industrial Project Planning, Financing, and Management (UK and Poland). Haven served for over 40 years in senior management and CEO positions in companies involved in project planning and management, SME development, and urban development. Haven, along with two partners, owned and operated for 15 years a consulting firm that provided project planning, design, and management services to a variety of clients in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean. Haven’s research interests are in broad areas of business and management, and his publications are available at Academia.edu or ResearchGate. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1245 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Multidimensional Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Innovation %A Sergey A. Yablonsky %K Advanced Analytics %K AI maturity %K AI value chain %K Artificial Intelligence (AI) %K big data %K enterprise platform %K innovation %X This is a critical time for the development and adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The field has existed since the 1950s and is only now emerging as viable for commercial markets. Many enterprises are placing bets on AI that will determine their future. Today AI innovation becomes useful when it enriches decision-making that is enhanced by applying Big Data (BD) and Advanced Analytics (AA), with some element of human interaction using digital platforms. This research investigates an opportunity for cross-fertilization between AI, BD, and AA with related disciplines. The paper aims to investigate the potential relationship of AI, BD, and AA with digital business platforms. In doing so, it develops a multidimensional BD-driven AI innovation taxonomy framework with an AA/BD/AA innovation value chain, related levels of BD, and analytics maturity improvement. This framework can be used with a focus on data-driven human-machine relationships, and applying AI at different levels of data driven automation maturity. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 16-28 %8 12/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1288 %N 12 %1 St. Petersburg State University Sergey Yablonsky, PhD in computer science, is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University in St. Petersburg, Russia. Author of more than 200+ publications. Co-creator of the Russian WordNet and the Russicon language processor, and linguistic resources licensed by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Phoenix Int. (USA), Franklin Electronic Publishers (USA) etc. Engaged in 35 national and international research projects in Russia, and across Europe. Research interests include Digital Economy, Digital Business and Entrepreneurship; Multisided Platforms and Markets; Artificial Intelligence, Digital marketing; Big Data Governance; Computer linguistics and text mining; Semantic and Social Web. Courses taught: Data Governance (Bachelor Program); Digital marketing (Bachelor Program); Digital Commerce (Bachelor Program); Digital Business (Master Program); Smart Business Transformation in the Digital Age (CEMS Block Seminar); Multi-Sided Platforms and Innovation in a Global Era (CEMS Block Seminar); Digital Economy (EMBA). Visiting professor at WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business) in Austria, Stockholm Business School, Stockholm university in Sweden, Aalto University in Finland, Lappeenranta University of Technology in Finland, Hame University of Applied Sciences in Finland. %& 16 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1288 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Navigating Boundaries in Additive Manufacturing through Action Research %A Katharina Ruckstuhl %A Rafaela C. C. Rabello %A Sally Davenport %K action research %K critical orientation %K innovation %K science %K SfTI %K transformative praxis %X Action research – both as praxis but also from a critical orientation – can elaborate modes of action, identifying the borders and margins that act as both the productive spaces for collaboration as well as the fuzzy areas that require reflection and clarification. In this exploratory case study, action research is used to follow an additive manufacturing project team in real time as it navigates fuzzy areas to integrate knowledge to produce commercializable science innovation in one of New Zealand’s National Science Challenges (NSC): Science for Technological Innovation – Kia Kotahi Mai: Te Ao Pūtaiao me Te Ao Hangarau (SfTI). Through action research as praxis and as critical orientation, we have identified key mechanisms in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research for commercialization, particularly in the context of New Zealand’s indigenous Māori people. Our preliminary analysis indicates that an explicit understanding of the fuzzy spaces can help teams find creative and collaborative means to navigate the productive but challenging “interstices of disciplines” (Mengis et al., 2018) to produce science innovation and discoveries and to galvanize relationships with industry and Māori participants. The findings also indicate that action research can promote structural, relational, and knowledge changes within teams, helping them solve complex problems in real time. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 7-16 %8 04/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1229 %N 4 %1 University of Otago Katharina Ruckstuhl is an Associate Dean at the Otago Business School, University of Otago, New Zealand. She also holds a PhD from Otago. Dr Ruckstuhl co-leads the “Building New Zealand’s Innovation Capacity” social science research of the National Science Challenge, Science for Technological Innovation. She is also the Vision Mātauranga (Māori knowledge) leader, a “Theme” that crosses all of the Challenge’s research activities. She has published in the areas of: Māori language; resource extraction in Māori territories; Māori entrepreneurship in SMEs; Indigenous science and technology; and Indigenous knowledge. %2 University of Otago Rafaela C. C. Rabello holds a PhD in Social Investment in the oil and gas sector and a Master’s degree in Education, awarded with distinction by the University of Otago, New Zealand. Rafaela also holds a BA in Psychology from the University Center of Brasilia, Brazil. Rafaela has worked within the fields of corporate social responsibility – in the oil and gas sector – and education for more than 10 years. She has published in the areas of: corporate social responsibility; social investment in the oil and gas sector; higher education and good teaching and effective learning methodologies in higher education. %3 Victoria University of Wellington Sally Davenport is a Professor of Management at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Sally is the Director of the New Zealand National Science Challenge “Science for Technological Innovation” (SfTI). Sally’s academic life began as a research chemist, but she now has research interests covering the commercialization of scientific research, entrepreneurship and the growth of high-tech firms, innovation strategy, and policy. Sally has previously led major research projects on competitive advantage in New Zealand firms, into organizations, and networks in biotechnology. Sally is a Commissioner with the New Zealand Productivity Commission and is also an Adjunct Professor in the College of Business and Economics at the Australian National University, a Fellow of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management, and a member of Global Women. In 2018, she was made a Member of the New Zealand Order of Merit for her services to science. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1229 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Urban Living Labs: Towards an Integrated Understanding of their Key Components %A Diana Chronéer %A Anna Ståhlbröst %A Abdolrasoul Habibipour %K definition %K innovation %K key components %K Living lab %K nature-based solutions %K NBS %K ULL %K UNaLab %K urban living lab %X In today’s ongoing urbanization and escalating climate change, there is an increasing demand on cities to be innovative and inclusive to handle these emerging issues. As an answer to these challenges, and in order to generate and adopt sustainable innovations and nature-based solutions in the urban areas, the concept of urban living labs has emerged. However, to date, there is confusion concerning the concept of the urban living lab and its key components. Some interpret the urban living lab as an approach, others as a single project, and some as a specific place – and some just do not know. In order to unravel this complexity and better understand this concept, we sought to identify the key components of an urban living lab by discussing the perspective of city representatives in the context of an urban living lab project. To achieve this goal, we reviewed previous literature on this topic and carried out two workshops with city representatives, followed by an open-ended questionnaire. In this article, we identify and discuss seven key components of an urban living lab: governance and management structure; financing models; urban context; nature-based solutions; partners and users (including citizens); approach; and ICT and infrastructure. We also offer an empirically derived definition of the urban living lab concept. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 50-62 %8 03/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1224 %N 3 %1 Luleå University of Technology Diana Chronéer is an Associate Professor in the Information Systems department at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden. She teaches organizational development through IT and sustainable business models from a digital perspective. Her main research interests are in the areas of digital service innovation, business model development, information logistics, and project management. %2 Luleå University of Technology Anna Ståhlbröst is the Chair Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Her research interests focus on the possibilities and challenges with the ongoing digital transformation for people, organizations, and society. In particular, she is interested in the citizen perspective when digital service innovations are developed within the context of urban living labs for smart cities and regions. Her research is related to different application areas such as smart cities and regions, crowdsourcing, everyday use, and online privacy. Her research has been published in several international journals, conference proceedings, and books. %3 Luleå University of Technology Abdolrasoul Habibipour is a PhD student in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden and is a User Engagement Expert at Botnia Living Lab, Sweden. His research focuses on user engagement in living lab context, with a particular emphasis on users’ motivations and needs. Abdolrasoul has experience teaching and supervising students at the undergraduate and postgraduate level and also serves as a reviewer in various international conferences and scientific journals. He has been involved in international innovation and research projects such as Privacy Flag and USEMP projects and is currently working in UNaLab and U4IoT projects, all of which are financed by the European Commission. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India (January 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A Punit Saurabh %K emerging markets %K entrepreneurship %K India %K innovation %K rural %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 01/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1128 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Nirma University Punit Saurabh is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management & Entrepreneurship at Nirma University’s Institute of Management in Ahmedabad, India. Previously, he was a senior faculty member at the International Centre for Entrepreneurship and Career Development (ICECD) in Ahmedabad, India. Punit received his PhD from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India, in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship development. He has hands-on experience in managing government innovation and entrepreneurship funding programs and is also involved with the academic aspects of entrepreneurship. His research interests include innovation management and entrepreneurship development, and he has varied experience in product funding and commercialization. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1128 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Innovation Strategy and Practice (November 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K best practice %K collaboration %K creativity %K cybersecurity %K framework %K information security %K innovation %K innovation ecosystems %K maturity model %K method %K model %K practice %K research %K research institutions %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-3 %8 11/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1194 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1194 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Insights (March 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K analytics %K big data %K business models %K closed innovation %K ecosystems %K emerging economies %K innovation %K internationalization %K Internet of Things %K Open innovation %K technology startups %K value creation %K value propositions %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 03/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1141 %N 3 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1141 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Insights (May 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K business models %K co-creation %K drop out %K entrepreneurship %K facilitation %K innovation %K internationalization %K lean global startups %K living labs %K services %K servitization %K stakeholders %K users %K value propositions %K value-in-use %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 05/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1154 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1154 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A Seppo Leminen %A Dimitri Schuurman %A Mika Westerlund %A Eelko Huizingh %K analysis %K constructs %K cultural space %K definition %K ENoLL %K framework %K innovation %K ISPIM %K lean startup %K library %K living labs %K methodology %K stakeholder %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-6 %8 12/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1200 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Pellervo Economic Research, Aalto University, and Carleton University Seppo Leminen is a Research Director at Pellervo Economic Research in Finland, and he serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and as an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics in Finland and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. He is serving as an associate editor in the BRQ Business Research Quarterly, on the editorial board of the Journal of Small Business Management, as a member of the Review Board for the Technology Innovation Management Review, and on the Scientific Panel of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Prior to his appointment at Aalto University, he worked in the ICT and pulp and paper industries. %3 imec.livinglabs Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead of the Business Model and User Research Team at imec.livinglabs. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University in Belgium. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. He is also active in the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) and in the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) as a living labs specialist. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. %4 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %# University of Groningen Eelko Huizingh is an Associate Professor of Innovation Management and Director of the Innovation Centre of Expertise Vinci at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. He is founder of Huizingh Academic Development, offering workshops academic research and academic writing to increase the publishing performance of academics. He is also the Director of Scientific Affairs for the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). His academic research focuses on the intersection of innovation and entrepreneurship, marketing, and information technology. He has authored over 350 articles, has edited more than 30 special issues of journals, and has published several textbooks. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Transdisciplinary Innovation (August 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A Martin Bliemel %A Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer %K innovation %K interdisciplinary %K learning %K multidisciplinary %K practice %K transdisciplinarity %K transdisciplinary %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-6 %8 08/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1173 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 University of Technology Sydney Martin Bliemel is the Director of the Diploma in Innovation at the new Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). Martin holds a BSc (Mechanical Engineering) and MBA from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and a PhD in Business from Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. His research interests include entrepreneurial networks, accelerators, education, research commercialization, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and the entrepreneurial university. His research has been published in several prestigious journals including Nature Nanotechnology, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Education+Training, the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, and the Entrepreneurship Research Journal, where one of his articles on entrepreneurship education is the journal’s most downloaded article. Martin is a recipient of the nationally competitive Office of Learning and Teaching Citation. %3 University of Technology Sydney Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer is a Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Her research interests span the fields of human-centred design, systemic design, and public and social sector innovation. As a lecturer, she is responsible for coordinating part of the transdisciplinary degree Bachelor of Creative Intelligence and Innovation. Mieke holds a Master of Science degree in Industrial Design Engineering from Delft University of Technology and a PhD on the topic of user-centred design from the University of Twente, both in the Netherlands. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1173 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T From Importing Innovations to Co-Producing Them: Transdisciplinary Approaches to the Development of Online Land Management Tools %A Alex Baumber %A Graciela Metternicht %A Peter Ampt %A Rebecca Cross %A Emily Berry %K adaptive %K co-production %K collaboration %K decision-support %K innovation %K land management %K tools %K transdisciplinary %X While traditional approaches to innovation diffusion often assume that innovations come from outside a local system, transdisciplinary co-production offers an alternative paradigm in which local stakeholders are engaged as co-producers of innovations. The use of digital online tools for agriculture, conservation, and citizen science is an area of expanding opportunities, but landholders are often dependent on tools developed outside their local communities. This article looks at the potential for transdisciplinary co-production to be used as a framework for more participatory development of digital online land management tools, with a case study from the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. This research has implications beyond rural land management to other industries and contexts where reflexive and integrative strategies are needed to overcome barriers to stakeholder participation and engagement with new technologies. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 16-26 %8 08/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1175 %N 8 %1 University of Technology Sydney Alex Baumber is a Scholarly Teaching Fellow in the Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney, Australia. He has undertaken collaborative research on a range of rural sustainability issues, including revegetation, bioenergy, agroforestry, wildlife management, and carbon accounting. Research grants include projects on Landholder Collaboration (NSW Environmental Trust), Low Carbon Tourism (CRC for Low-Carbon Living 2013–2015), Optimising Revegetation Management for Regent Honeyeater Recovery (NSW Environmental Trust 2013–2016), the Central Tablelands Agroforestry Bioenergy Project (RIRDC and DAFF 2010–12), and the Barrier Ranges Sustainable Wildlife Enterprise Trial (RIRDC 2006–2009). %2 University of New South Wales Graciela Metternicht is a Professor in the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. She has expertise and experience in land degradation assessment and monitoring, ecosystem-based approaches to land use planning, and sustainable development. Her prior and current work includes working with UN Environment, the UNCCD, and as a reviewer of major reports of the Convention of Biological Diversity and of the State of the Environment Australia Report 2016. Metternicht has experience in leading multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral projects in environmental assessment and management, including the Collaborative Planning Support Tools for Optimising Farming Systems (funded by the Australian Research Council). %3 University of Sydney Peter Ampt is a Lecturer in Natural Resource Management and Extension at the University of Sydney, Australia. He has expertise in participatory research, which seeks to integrate production and conservation, including as a lead investigator for the project Landholder Collaboration for Landscape-scale Conservation (NSW Environmental Trust 2016–18). His roles include manager of the Future of Australia’s Threatened Ecosystems (FATE) program and steering committee member for the Communities in Landscapes (CiL) project, which aimed at improving the management of Box Gum grassy woodlands under the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country program. Ampt’s track record includes participatory research projects such as the Central Tablelands Agroforestry Bioenergy Project (RIRDC and DAFF 2010–12) and the Barrier Ranges Sustainable Wildlife Enterprise Trial (RIRDC 2006–2009). %4 University of Sydney Rebecca Cross is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Sydney, Australia. She has led the development of participatory social research methodology for the Landholder Collaboration project (NSW Environmental Trust) and has worked on several projects including Communities in Landscapes (CiL) (funded by Caring for Our Country, 2010–2012) and Mining and Biodiversity Offsetting in Agricultural Landscapes in Mudgee, NSW and the Burdekin, QLD (UNSW, 2014). %# University of New South Wales Emily Berry provided support for social research and coordination of the project Landholder Collaboration for Landscape-scale Conservation (NSW Environmental Trust 2016–18). She holds a Master of Philosophy degree in Environmental Management from the University of New South Wales and has also undertaken research into landholder perceptions of land degradation in the Far West NSW, private land conservation in NSW, and cultural land management in the NSW Central Tablelands. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1175 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T In Competition with Oneself: A Qualitative Inquiry into Amazon’s Entrepreneurial Culture %A Dev K. Dutta %K corporate entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurial culture %K entrepreneurial orientation %K innovation %K qualitative methods %X Utilizing a historiographic approach based on Amazon’s Letters to Shareholders (LTS) over a twenty-year timeframe (1997–2016), this article identifies the discerning features of the company’s entrepreneurial culture that enabled it to become one of today’s most innovative organizations. A content analysis of the LTS while coding for underlying theoretical themes reveals Amazon’s entrepreneurial culture has been increasingly celebrating a spirit of “Self-Competition”, and by embracing ideas such as “Day 1 Mentality”, “Customer Centricity”, and “Human Capital Focus”. The study findings have useful insights for entrepreneurs, founding teams, and corporate managers engaged in developing an entrepreneurial culture within their own organizations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 5-14 %8 06/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1161 %N 6 %1 University of New Hampshire Dev K Dutta is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship in the Management Department at the University of New Hampshire in the United States. His research and teaching focus on the intersection of entrepreneurship and innovation, especially the way these concepts apply at the firm and ecosystem levels. Dev has over 25 research publications in his field in peer-reviewed journals as well as books, book chapters, and research monographs. He also holds national certifications as an academic coach and facilitator in technology entrepreneurship, innovator mindset, lean launch pad, and design thinking (MIT and Stanford D-School). Before joining academia, Dev worked for 15 years as a corporate strategy consultant in some of the largest Indian IT multinationals. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1161 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Inclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces: The Role of Systems and Networks %A Jeremy de Beer %A Vipal Jain %K biohacker spaces %K biohacking %K biotechnology %K crowdfunding %K inclusive innovation %K innovation %K law %K regulation %K social networks %X In this article, we examine the development of biohacker spaces and their impact on innovation systems through the lens of inclusive innovation. Examining issues associated with people, activities, outcomes, and governance, we observe that biohacker spaces offer an alternative approach to biotechnological research outside the orthodox walls of academia, industry, and government. We explain that harnessing the full innovative potential of these spaces depends on flexible legal and regulatory systems, including appropriate biosafety regulations and intellectual property policies and practices, and organic, community-based social and financial networking. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 27-37 %8 02/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1137 %N 2 %1 University of Ottawa Jeremy de Beer is a Full Professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology, and Society. He is a Senior Research Associate at the IP Unit, University of Cape Town and a co-founding director of the Open African Innovation Research network, Open AIR. He is online at www.JeremydeBeer.com. %2 University of Ottawa Vipal Jain is a Juris Doctor candidate (2018) at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section. She is a member of the Open African Innovation Research (Open AIR) network’s New and Emerging Researcher Group, focusing on intellectual property law issues in Canada and elsewhere. She holds a BSc from the University of Toronto, where she specialized in Genetics and Biotechnology. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1137 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Key Constructs and a Definition of Living Labs as Innovation Platforms %A Mika Westerlund %A Seppo Leminen %A Christ Habib %K constructs %K definition %K ENoLL %K innovation %K living labs %K platform %X Despite the growing popularity of using living labs as innovation platforms and the increasing scholarly attention toward the topic, still relatively little is known about many of their central characteristics. We use a qualitative research approach to identify key constructs of living labs and to understand how these constructs show up in the operation of living labs. So doing, we used theoretical constructs from the literature on user innovation, co-creation, and living labs to analyze a sample of membership applications to the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL). The results from the content analysis of 40 applications revealed nine key constructs that are characteristic to living labs: 1) objective, 2) governance, 3) openness, 4) stakeholders, 5) funding, 6) value, 7) communications, 8) infrastructure, and 9) methods. These key constructs provide new insight that helps us to provide a definition of living labs as innovation platforms. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 51-62 %8 12/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1205 %N 12 %1 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %2 Pellervo Economic Research, Aalto University, and Carleton University Seppo Leminen is a Research Director at Pellervo Economic Research in Finland, and he serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and as an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics in Finland and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. He is serving as an associate editor in the BRQ Business Research Quarterly, on the editorial board of the Journal of Small Business Management, as a member of the Review Board for the Technology Innovation Management Review, and on the Scientific Panel of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Prior to his appointment at Aalto University, he worked in the ICT and pulp and paper industries. %3 Carleton University Christ Habib is an MASc graduate from the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He also holds a BEng in Biomedical and Electrical Engineering. Christ has experience working in the public and private sectors, working closely with clients and managing large-scale projects; he has been offering management-consulting services for SMEs; and he is currently a systems engineer at General Dynamics. He is passionate about business development; systems, processes, operations, marketing, and analytics; and understanding user/client needs for innovation development. He was awarded the engagement leadership award by popular vote through the Mindtrust program for his facilitation skills in managing collaborative work. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T The Library Living Lab: A Collaborative Innovation Model for Public Libraries %A Fernando Vilariño %A Dimosthenis Karatzas %A Alberto Valcarce %K cultural spaces %K innovation %K library %K Living lab %K participatory %K public spaces %K technology %X New models of governance advance towards participatory schemes in which citizens not only play an active role in decision-making processes but also the processes by which new products and services are defined and introduced. In parallel, technological innovations, and the new horizons of creativity that they allow, open a huge range of options to innovation in all areas of society, particularly in the cultural field. Under these two premises – participation and innovation – the Library Living Lab initiative was born at the Public Library of Miquel Batllori Volpelleres in Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona. The Library Living Lab is a space that gathers all stakeholders around the public library with the aim of exploring new methods and tools that allow us to enjoy culture both individually and collectively. This article describes how technology can be an enabling factor in a citizen-initiated grassroots project. The project implements a complete model of inter-institutional collaboration with all relevant actors around the living lab working group. The specific challenges of developing an open, flexible, and inter-connected space are identified, and the interaction dynamics based on a challenge–action–return methodology definition are described through practical examples. Our conclusions tackle the challenges of a horizon for the implementation of innovation initiatives – such as living labs – in public spaces. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 17-25 %8 12/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1202 %N 12 %1 Computer Vision Centre and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Fernando Vilariño is Associate Director of the Computer Vision Centre and Associate Professor at the Universtitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He holds a PhD in Computer Vision and is a Lecturer in Machine Learning and Robotics. He is Co-Founder of the Library Living Lab in Barcelona, and he is President of the European Network of Living Labs. In 2014, he received a Google Research Award in the line of Eye-Tracking Interaction. %2 Computer Vision Centre and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Dimosthenis Karatzas is Associate Director of the Computer Vision Centre and Associate Professor at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He holds a PhD in Computer Vision and is a Lecturer in Artificial Intelligence. He is Co-Founder of the Library Living Lab in Barcelona. In 2013, Dimosthenis received the prestigious IAPR/ICDAR Young Investigator Award and, in 2016, he received the Google Research Award in the line of Machine Perception. %3 President of the Association of Neighbours of Volpelleres Alberto Valcarce is President of the Association of Neighbours Volpelleres in Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona. He is a lawyer and holds an MSc degree in Water Management. He participated in the inception, design, and implementation of the Library Living Lab in Barcelona. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1202 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Mixing Practices to Create Transdisciplinary Innovation: A Design-Based Approach %A Kees Dorst %K disciplines %K innovation %K practice %K transdisciplinarity %K transdisciplinary education %X As the problems that are our organizations are facing become more complex, dynamic, and networked, they will need to become more flexible in their ability to respond. These complex networked problem situations often cannot be tackled from a single-discipline perspective, and thus transdisciplinary innovation – that is, innovation across and between disciplinary fields – is becoming more important. But how can we achieve innovation in those in-between spaces, when all of our knowledge and established approaches are held within the disciplines? In this article, we look beyond the limiting confines of traditional disciplines by seeing them as collections of smaller units of action: practices. After a foray into the anatomy of practices, we discuss how a design-based approach to transdisciplinary thinking creates a framework for the mixing of practices, articulating new insights and creating new possibilities for action in the space between the established professions. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 60-65 %8 08/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1179 %N 8 %1 University of Technology Sydney Kees Dorst was trained as an Industrial Design Engineer at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Currently, he is Professor of Design Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney’s Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation in Australia, where he is also the Founding Director of the university’s Design Innovation and Designing Out Crime research centres. He lectures at universities and design schools throughout the world. He has published many articles and several books – including Understanding Design (2006), Design Expertise (with Bryan Lawson, 2009), Frame Innovation – Create New Thinking by Design (MIT Press, 2015), Designing for the Common Good (2016), and Notes on Design – How Creative Practice Works (2017). %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1179 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T A Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities %A Pekka Buttler %K communities %K creativity %K innovation %K practice %K research method %K teamwork %X Explaining innovation – even merely spotting it actually happening – is difficult. In this article, I introduce an industry-friendly approach that will enable practitioners and researchers alike to observe, interpret, and understand the different types of creativities – the raw materials necessary for innovation – that happen in creative communities. The Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities (PMSCC) is based on theories developed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. However, unlike mainstream practice-oriented methods, the PMSCC does not necessitate the use of theory-heavy conceptualizations; instead, it focuses on the everyday, creative micro-interactions in communities. As I describe in this article, the PMSCC offers practitioners and researchers an effective way to gain new insights into an otherwise relatively opaque process. Besides outlining the method, I also present results from a research project utilizing the PMSCC, showing how the method can produce worthwhile findings, foster new insights, and help practitioners hone their creative processes. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 22-31 %8 11/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1197 %N 11 %1 Hanken School of Economics Pekka Buttler, M.Sc. (Econ), is a doctoral student at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, where he is researching conceptual design in IT projects. His other academic interests range from leading knowledge work to software business management. Besides research, Pekka involves himself in teaching and consulting by utilizing his more than 15 years of experience within the IT industry. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1197 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T A Strategic Management Maturity Model for Innovation %A Ferhat Demir %K business model %K innovation %K maturity model %K strategic management %X Even though strategic management is highly critical for all types of organizations, only a few maturity models have been proposed in the business literature for the area of strategic management activities. This article updates previous studies and presents a new conceptual model for assessing the maturity of strategic management in any organization. The Strategic Management Maturity Model for Innovation (S3M-i) is composed of six maturity levels with seven dimensions. The main contribution of the S3M-i is to put innovation into the agenda of strategic management. The main objective of this study is to propose a model to align innovation with business strategies. This article suggests that innovation (new breakthrough products/services and business models) is the only way of creating sustainable growth, and strategy studies cannot ignore this aspect. Maturity models should embrace innovation to respond to the dynamic business environment and rapidly changing customer behaviours. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 13-21 %8 11/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1196 %N 11 %1 Ferhat Demir is a management lecturer, trainer, and consultant. He studied Industrial Engineering at the Sakarya University in Adapazarı, Turkey. He received his Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree from Kennesaw State University and his Master of Public Policy (MPP) degree from Georgia State University in the United States. His fields of expertise and research interests include strategic management, innovation strategies, competitiveness, business models, and organizational design. He has diverse experience with large corporations, SMEs, non-profit organizations, and governmental institutions. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1196 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Supporting Self-Determined Indigenous Innovations: Rethinking the Digital Divide in Canada %A Jasmin Winter %A Justine Boudreau %K digital %K Indigenous %K innovation %K makerspaces %K technology %X This article seeks to revisit dominant narratives of digital technological development in Indigenous communities in Canada. By prioritizing Indigenous voices and drawing from concepts of self-determination and sovereignty, this analysis reorients discourse surrounding the “digital divide” towards a strength-based approach that positions Indigenous peoples as innovators and creators, not just consumers, of digital technologies. This article begins with a discussion of how dominant media has used technology and technological imagery to misrepresent Indigenous cultures and perpetuate colonial biases, and emphasizes the importance of making space for Indigenous future imagery. Following this is a discussion of digital storytelling and virtual landscapes, showcasing a small sample of Indigenous initiatives online, in video game and app development, and in augmented and virtual reality. Finally, this article considers the potential of “makerspaces” as a framework for future action to bridge theory and practice. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 38-48 %8 02/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1138 %N 2 %1 First Nations Technology Council Jasmin Winter is a recent graduate of the Master’s in Development Practice program at the University of Winnipeg, which stands on Treaty 1 territory. Originally from Vancouver, on the unceded lands of Coast Salish peoples, Jasmin was raised by a European father and a Chinese mother. This article contains material from a Major Research Paper that was graciously supervised by Dr. Julie Nagam. Jasmin completed a field placement with the Initiative for Indigenous Futures in the summer of 2017, and was a research assistant for the Transactive Memory Keepers project. She is currently working for the First Nations Technology Council in British Columbia. She is incredibly grateful to have had these opportunities to support Indigenous-determined innovations. %2 University of Ottawa Justine Boudreau completed her undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ottawa, Canada, and is now working on a Master’s degree in Electronic Business Technologies. During the last three years, she has spent her time playing with new technology and diversifying her knowledge. She spent almost two years working with the Maker Mobile delivering workshops and integrating new curriculum for robotics and women in science and engineering. She then moved on to work for the uOttawa Richard L'Abbé Makerspace while teaching and running the first and second year engineering design courses run through the Makerlab. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1138 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T To Internationalize or Not to Internationalize? A Descriptive Study of a Brazilian Startup %A Flavia Luciane Scherer %A Italo Fernando Minello %A Cristiane Krüger %A Andréa Bach Rizzatti %K entrepreneurial %K innovation %K internationalization %K startups %K technology %X This study examines the failed internationalization experience of a Brazilian high-tech startup. The research methodology of the study is descriptive and aims to explore whether this startup should re-internationalize, despite an unsuccessful first experience. Based on interviews with the founders, it was found that the initial internationalization took place in an incipient way, in the heat of the moment. The lack of success with the initial internationalization did not shake the directors of the startup, who aim to return to internationalization, now in a consolidated way and counting on the advice of an investor. Despite its bitter first experience, should the startup try again? Through an analysis of the lessons learned from the startup’s initial failure and insights from its consideration of a possible second attempt, this study contributes to the literature on competitiveness, internationalization, and international entrepreneurship. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 38-46 %8 03/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1145 %N 3 %1 Federal University of Santa Maria Flavia Luciane Scherer is an Associate Professor in the Graduate Program in Administration at the Federal University of Santa Maria in southern Brazil. She received her doctorate in Administration in 2007 from the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, focusing on international business, consolidation, and strategic administration. In recent years, she has focused especially on studying the internationalization of companies, technological innovations, and strategic management. %2 Federal University of Santa Maria Italo Fernando Minello is an Adjunct Professor of the Post-Graduate Program in Administration at the Federal University of Santa Maria in southern Brazil. He received his PhD in Management in 2010 from the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of the University of São Paulo, Brazil, focusing on business failure. His current research focuses on entrepreneurial behaviour and business failure. He has also studied and published articles and books on the topics of resilient behaviour, behavioural entrepreneurial characteristics, entrepreneurial intent and attitude, and startups. %3 Federal University of Santa Maria Cristiane Krüger is a doctoral student in the Postgraduate Program in Administration of the Federal University of Santa Maria in southern Brazil. She is currently studying entrepreneurial behaviour and entrepreneurial intent. Her work experience was acquired through the practice of teaching and research in entrepreneurship. %4 Federal University of Santa Maria Andréa Bach Rizzatti is a master’s student in the Postgraduate Program in Administration of the Federal University of Santa Maria in southern Brazil. She is currently studying organizational strategy and internationalization. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1145 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T A Topic Modelling Analysis of Living Labs Research %A Mika Westerlund %A Seppo Leminen %A Mervi Rajahonka %K big data %K data mining %K innovation %K Living lab %K living laboratory %K research trends %K text analytics %K topic modeling %K topic modelling %X This study applies topic modelling analysis on a corpus of 86 publications in the Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review) to understand how the phenomenon of living labs has been approached in the recent innovation management literature. Although the analysis is performed on a corpus collected from only one journal, the TIM Review has published the largest number of special issues on living labs to date, thus it reflects the advancement of the area in the scholarly literature. According to the analysis, research approaches to living labs can be categorized under seven broad topics: 1) Design, 2) Ecosystem, 3) City, 4) University, 5) Innovation, 6) User, and 7) Living lab. Moreover, each topic includes a set of characteristic subtopics. A trend analysis suggests that the emphasis of research on living labs is moving away from a conceptual focus on what living labs are and who is involved in their ecosystems to practical applications of how to design and manage living labs, their processes, and participants, especially users, as key stakeholders and in novel application areas such as the urban city context. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 40-51 %8 07/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1170 %N 7 %1 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %2 Aalto University Seppo Leminen is an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics in Finland and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. He is serving as an associate editor in the BRQ Business Research Quarterly, on the editorial board of the Journal of Small Business Management, as a member of the Review Board for the Technology Innovation Management Review, and on the Scientific Panel of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Prior to his appointment at Aalto University, he worked in the ICT and pulp and paper industries. %3 South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences XAMK Mervi Rajahonka, DSc (Econ), works as an RDI Advisor at the Small Business Center (SBC), currently a part of the South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences XAMK, Finland, and she is an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She has been working at the SBC for about 10 years. She earned her doctoral degree in Logistics from the Department of Information and Service Economy at Aalto University School of Business in Helsinki, Finland. She also holds a Master’s degree in Technology from the Helsinki University of Technology and a Master’s degree in Law from the University of Helsinki. Her research interests include sustainable logistics and supply chain management, business models, service modularity, and service innovations. Her research has been published in a number of journals in the areas of logistics, services, and operations management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1170 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Accelerating Research Innovation by Adopting the Lean Startup Paradigm %A Kaisa Still %K commercialization %K context %K innovation %K innovation acceleration %K innovation paradox %K lean startup %K research %K research organization %K VTT %X Converting scientific expertise into marketable products and services is playing an increasingly important role in the launching of new ventures, the growth of existing firms, and the creation of new jobs. In this article, we explore how the lean startup paradigm, which validates the market for a product with a business model that can sustain subsequent scaling, has led to a new process model to accelerate innovation. We then apply this paradigm to the context of research at universities and other research organizations. The article is based on the assumption that the organizational context matters, and it shows how a deeper understanding of the research context could enable an acceleration of the innovation process. We complement theoretical examples with a case example from VTT Technical Research Institute of Finland. Our findings show that many of the concepts from early-acceleration phases – and the lean startup paradigm – can also be relevant in innovation discussions within the research context. However, the phase of value-proposition discovery is less adequately addressed, and that of growth discovery, with its emphasis on building on a scalable, sustainable business does not seem to be addressed with the presented innovation approaches from the research context. Hence, the entrepreneurial activities at the research context differ from those in startups and internal startups in established organizations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 32-43 %8 05/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1075 %N 5 %1 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Kaisa Still is a Senior Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. She has extensive experience of innovation management gained within a research organization and a university, in a startup and in growth companies, as well as in a business incubator. Supporting collaboration, co-creation and innovation with technology continues to be at the core of her interests. Her current work concentrates on platforms and innovation ecosystems, accelerating innovation activities, and digital opportunities. Combined with the policy perspective, her work extends to private and public organizations, in regional and global contexts. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1075 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017) %A Chris McPhee %A Seppo Leminen %A Mika Westerlund %A Dimitri Schuurman %A Pieter Ballon %K action research %K business-to-business %K emotions %K innovation %K living labs %K needsfinding %K operations %K reflection %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-6 %8 02/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1052 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Seppo Leminen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Finland and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management in the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Management Decision, the International Journal of Technology Management, the International Journal of Technology Marketing, the International Journal of Product Development, and the Technology Innovation Management Review, among many others. %3 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %4 imec.livinglabs Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation. %# imec.livinglabs Pieter Ballon is the Academic Lead of imec.livinglabs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and Director of the research group imec-SMIT at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1052 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Platforms and Ecosystems (September 2017) %A Chris McPhee %A Ozgur Dedehayir %A Marko Seppänen %K digital transformation %K ecosystems %K innovation %K orchestrators %K platform economy %K platforms %K stakeholders %K startups %K strategy %K technology %K value creation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-5 %8 09/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1101 %N 9 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Queensland University of Technology Ozgur Dedehayir is the Vice-Chancellor’s Research Fellow at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia. Dr. Dedehayir received his PhD in Technology Strategy from the Tampere University of Technology (TUT), Finland. His research focuses on the creation and the dynamics of change in innovation ecosystems. He has published in various journals in the technology and innovation management field, including Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, and Technovation. %3 Tampere University of Technology Marko Seppänen, PhD, is a Full Professor in the field of Industrial Management at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. Prof. Seppänen is an expert in managing value creation in business ecosystems, business concept development, and innovation management. In his latest research, he has examined, for example, platform-based competition in business ecosystems and innovation management in business networks. His research has appeared in high-quality peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Product Innovation Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, the Journal of Systems and Software, and the International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1101 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Educational Involvement in Innovative University–Industry Collaboration %A Leena Kunttu %K academic involvement %K educational involvement %K innovation %K knowledge transfer %K university–industry collaboration %X The positive link between university research and industrial innovation has been widely recognized among academics and industrial practitioners. A remarkable volume of previous research emphasizes the importance of the transfer of academic knowledge into the industrial domain. In this sense, it is surprising that the role of university education is an almost neglected topic in the research concerning university–industry collaboration, despite education and the creation of knowledge being a primary goal of universities and providing great potential in terms of improving competences. This study presents a case study that analyzes educational involvement in nine long-term university–industry relationships. In all the cases, the research collaboration between industrial firm and university research group is directly associated with close educational involvement. The aim of the case analysis is to understand mechanisms and practices of educational collaboration that facilitate relational learning and innovation development in university–industry relationships. The forms of educational involvement studied in this article include student projects, thesis projects, jointly organized courses, and tailored degree courses. The findings of the study reveal a number of educational collaboration practices that may facilitate relational learning, creation of new knowledge, as well as innovation development in university–industry relationships. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 14-22 %8 12/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1124 %N 12 %1 University of Vaasa Leena Kunttu is an innovation researcher at the University of Vaasa in Finland. She received her PhD degree in Information Technology from the Tampere University of Technology, Finland, in 2006. From 2007 to 2012, she served as Senior Manager in an area of innovation at the Nokia Corporation. During her career in Nokia, she led a number of collaborative projects between the company and external research institutes, such as universities. She also led and participated in projects that collected and analyzed field data from end users and customers to provide inputs for R&D. Since 2015, Dr. Kunttu has served as a researcher in the area of innovation at the University of Vaasa, while also carrying out PhD studies in industrial innovation. Her current research interests include university–industry collaboration, educational involvement, and the commercialization of university technologies. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1124 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Innovation by Collaboration between Startups and SMEs in Switzerland %A Fabio Mercandetti %A Christine Larbig %A Vincenzo Tuozzo %A Thomas Steiner %K collaboration co-operation %K innovation %K matchmaking %K SMEs %K startups %X Open innovation is key to the success of many companies. It is based on the intelligent use of all possible resources, including collaborations with parties outside the firm. Although it is well known that large companies foster and use startups as experiments in their innovation process, little is known about similar activities with small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The aim of this article is to report the results of research done in Switzerland on startups and SMEs. It reveals that most startups know that they must co-operate with other companies from the very beginning of their existence, and that both sides have difficulties in performing a systematic search for possible partners. Hence, to encourage the collaborative development of innovative solutions, we propose building bridges between startups and SMEs, making the identification of possible users of new technologies (SMEs) more accessible to startups, as well as making startups more identifiable by SMEs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 23-31 %8 12/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1125 %N 12 %1 Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture Fabio Mercandetti is a Professor at the Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture in Switzerland. He holds an MSc in Chemical Engineering from the Technical University (Politecnico) of Turin, Italy, he has held different management positions up to the Executive Committee in global companies, where he led the Operations and/or the Corporate development function. He teaches in Engineering Bachelor and Masters programmes. His applied research focuses on both operational excellence and lean manufacturing, to help companies, particularly SMEs, to improve and increase their business. This includes finding and rightly approaching co-operation opportunities. %2 Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture Christine Larbig is a Professor at the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts Information Technology in Switzerland. She earned her doctoral degree in Management from Cass Business School City University in London, England, and she earned her Master’s in Management from Ashridge Management College in Berkhamsted, England. At the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, she teaches operations management and researches in the realm of service and social innovation as well as social informatics. %3 Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture Vincenzo Tuozzo is graduate of the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU) in Switzerland, where he obtained a BA degree in International Management and Economics. He has been active in the area of innovation management and collaboration. With the support of Fabio Mercandetti, Professor of Operations Management at HSLU, and Prof. Dr. Christine Larbig, Professor of Social Innovation at HSLU, he has been researching the theory of open innovation and its practice between startups and SMEs in Switzerland. The focus of their current research lies in recognizing co-operation opportunities and prescribing measures on how to promote such collaborations with the aim of enhancing the innovation processes of startups and SMEs. %4 Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture Thomas Steiner is a business product developer who, in 2016, completed his Bachelor`s degree studies in Business Engineering Innovation at the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU) in Switzerland. Within an industrial project at the HSLU, supported by Fabio Mercandetti, Professor of Operations Management at the HSLU, he researched the possibilities and needs for collaboration between startups and SMEs in Switzerland. His current professional activities at an SME focus on issues such as innovation management, lean product development, and business modelling. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1125 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies %A Katri Valkokari %A Marko Seppänen %A Maria Mäntylä %A Simo Jylhä-Ollila %K actors %K collaboration %K ecosystems %K innovation %K orchestration %K positioning %K roles %K strategy %X This article explores how firms can orchestrate innovation ecosystems to enhance collaboration for innovation among different actors. Most previous research on ecosystems has focused on firm-level strategies to operate in an ecosystem rather than the composition or orchestration of an ecosystem as a whole. However, finding the balance between the self-interests of involved actors is critical in order to create collaborative settings that induce different parties to jointly develop and put their best efforts into a joint endeavour. Thus, we undertook a qualitative study with 35 case companies from the metal and engineering industries, each of whom was interested in developing their position in ecosystems and improving their relational business practices. The findings suggest that there is an essential ecosystem competence that is needed by all actors in an ecosystem, regardless of their position, and that is the ability to manage dynamic strategic interactions related to innovation. This competence enables them to ensure the future vitality of the ecosystem and their own business. These results highlight the need for managers to profile their own company’s role in an ecosystem in relation to the type of ecosystems, while simultaneously evaluating the ecosystem’s ability and potential to survive. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 12-24 %8 03/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1061 %N 3 %1 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Katri Valkokari is a Research Manager at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland in the Business, Innovation and Foresight research area. Over the past 15 years, she has carried out several development projects concerning different networked business arrangements (ecosystems, networks, partnerships, and firms). In 2009, Katri completed her doctoral thesis on business network development. She has published several international and national articles in the research areas of business network management, collaboration, organizational knowledge, and innovation management. %2 Tampere University of Technology Marko Seppänen, PhD, is Vice Dean for Education at the Faculty of Business and Built Environment, and is a Full Professor in the field of industrial management at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. He is an expert in managing value creation in business ecosystems, business concept development, and innovation management. In his latest research, he has examined platform-based competition in business ecosystems and innovation management in business networks. His research has appeared in high-quality peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Product Innovation Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, the Journal of Systems and Software, and the International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. %3 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Maria Mäntylä (MSc Admin) is a Research Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland in the Innovations, Economy & Policy team. She obtained her master’s degree in Local and Regional Governance from the University of Tampere, Finland, in 2015. She also studied Social Sciences of Sport in the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Maria has been involved in various national and international research projects regarding innovation research, especially in the area of regional innovation systems. She is currently writing her doctoral thesis on sports technologies and innovation ecosystems at the University of Tampere. %4 Elisa Corporation Simo Jylhä-Ollila (MSc Tech) is an Analyst in Elisa Corporation’s Industrial IoT department. He holds a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from Tampere University of Technology, Finland. Previously, he worked as a research assistant in Tampere University of Technology and worked in Elisa’s research team before moving into his current position in the company. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1061 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Platforms for Innovation and Internationalization %A Erik Stavnsager Rasmussen %A Nicolaj Hannesbo Petersen %K globalization %K innovation %K internationalization %K lean and global startups %K lean startup %K platform %X The high-tech global startup has many challenges related to both innovation and internationalization. From a Danish cluster of Welfare Tech firms, eight innovative and international firms were selected and interviewed. Such firms typically have to be agile and operate in virtual networks in almost all parts of their value chains. This article contributes to the understanding of how innovation and internationalization to a great extent are interlinked. The firms have developed a core product or service offering, which the firms often describe as “a platform”. Around the platform, they develop their products and services for new customers and users in new countries. The firms have to sustain a strong focus on the platform while at the same time developing their platform solution for new products, new customers, and new markets. This pivoting makes it possible to use the platform in a new context but is highly demanding for the firms. They need to be extremely agile and fast-moving but at the same time still to have a focus on the core of the firm: the platform. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 23-31 %8 05/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1074 %N 5 %1 University of Southern Denmark Erik S. Rasmussen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Marketing and Management at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. He received his PhD in 2001 from the University of Southern Denmark, focusing on fast-internationalizing small and medium-sized firms. His research focuses especially on international entrepreneurship and born-global firms. In recent years, he has particularly focused on studying international entrepreneurs that can avoid domestic path dependence by establishing ventures that, from the beginning, develop routines for a multi-cultural workforce, coordinate resources across nations, and target customers in several geographic places simultaneously. Furthermore, he has published a number of articles about lean and global startups combining the lean startup and born-global theories. %2 University of Southern Denmark Nicolaj Hannesbo Petersen is a PhD student in the Department of Marketing and Management at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. A particular focus of the project is on innovation and internationalization processes anchored in the structure of relationships among SMEs. The network perspective is concentrated on a Danish publicly funded welfare/health technology cluster. Central aspects of the work include how and why embedded opportunities and constraints evolve and are made sense of through the network for economic action. Nicolaj’s work experience was gained from practice through innovation consultancy in the venture capitalist industry. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1074 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Reflecting on 10 Years of the TIM Review %A Chris McPhee %A Teemu Santonen %A Ahmed Shah %A Ali Nazari %K business %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K journal %K management %K open source %K OSBR %K research %K scientometric analyses %K technology %K TIM Review %K topic %K topic modelling %X In July 2007, the first issue of this journal was published under the banner of the Open Source Business Resource. Re-launched with a broader scope in 2011 as the Technology Innovation Management Review, the journal now celebrates its 10th anniversary. In this article, we review the 10-year history of the journal to examine what themes have been covered, who has contributed, and how much the articles have been read and cited. During those 10 years, the journal has published 120 monthly issues, including more than 800 publications by more than 800 international authors from industry, academia, the public sector, and beyond. As discovered with topic modelling, the journal has covered seven themes: open source business, technology entrepreneurship, growing a business, research approaches, social innovation, living labs, and cybersecurity. Overall, the website has attracted over 1 million readers from around the world – 31% from Asia, 30% from the Americas, 26% from Europe, 8% from Africa, and 5% from Oceania – with over 25,000 readers now accessing the site each month. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 5-20 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1087 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Teemu Santonen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences in Finland and is leading Laurea’s Centre for Applied Research and Development (CARD) in the area of Service Design and Open Innovation. At Laurea, he has personally initiated and managed various research projects achieving 2.5 M EUR in cumulative funding. He received his PhD (Econ.) degree in Information Systems Science from Aalto University in Finland in 2005 and has published or presented over 50 papers in international peer-refereed journals and at conferences. Currently, his research interests focus on social network analysis (SNA), Scientometrics”, and innovation management. At Laurea, Santonen has also filed several invention disclosures that have resulted in a startup company and one patent. The Finnish Inventor Support Association has honoured Santonen’s novel crowdsourcing project as the best school-related innovation in Finland. He is also a scientific panel member of ISPIM (The International Society for Professional Innovation Management) and is a former board member of Finnish Strategic Management Society. Prior to his academic career, Santonen worked for over a decade as a consultant and development manager in leading Finnish financial, media, and ICT sector organizations. %3 Global Cybersecurity Resource, Carleton University Ahmed Shah holds a BEng in Software Engineering from Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Canada, and an MEng in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Ahmed has experience working in a wide variety of research roles at the VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation, the Global Cybersecurity Resource, and Carleton University. %4 Global Cybersecurity Resource, Carleton University Ali Nazari is a consultant in the field of information technology and software applications. Ali holds a BSc degree in Computer Science from Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran, Iran, and an MSc degree in Technology Information Management from Payam Noor University, also in Tehran. Currently, he is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management Program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He has 7 years of experience in data analysis, design, and development of IT/software applications and 10 years of experience with planning, consulting, and managing IT/software issues. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1087 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities %A Seppo Leminen %A Mervi Rajahonka %A Mika Westerlund %K city %K co-creation %K collaborative innovation %K innovation %K Living lab %K networks %K Open innovation %K smart city %K third-generation %X Many cities engage in diverse experimentation, innovation, and development activities with a broad variety of environments and stakeholders to the benefit of citizens, companies, municipalities, and other organizations. Hence, this article discusses such engagement in terms of next-generation living lab networks in the city context. In so doing, the study contributes to the discussion on living labs by introducing a framework of collaborative innovation networks in cities and suggesting a typology of third-generation living labs. Our framework is characterized by diverse platforms and participation approaches, resulting in four distinctive modes of collaborative innovation networks where the city is: i) a provider, ii) a neighbourhood participator, iii) a catalyst, or iv) a rapid experimenter. The typology is based on an analysis of 118 interviews with participants in six Finnish cities and reveals various ways to organize innovation activities in the city context. In particular, cities can benefit from innovation networks by simultaneously exploiting multiple platforms such as living labs for innovation. We conclude by discussing implications to theory and practice, and suggesting directions for future research. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 21-35 %8 11/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1118 %N 11 %1 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Seppo Leminen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences in Espoo, Finland, and he serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Management Decision, the International Journal of Technology Management, the International Journal of Technology Marketing, the International Journal of Product Development, and the Technology Innovation Management Review, among many others. %2 South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences XAMK Mervi Rajahonka, DSc (Econ), works as an RDI Advisor at the Small Business Center (SBC), currently a part of the South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences XAMK, Finland, and as an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She has been working at the SBC for about 10 years, participating in numerous EU-funded projects. She earned her doctoral degree in Logistics from the Department of Information and Service Economy at Aalto University School of Business in Helsinki, Finland. She also holds a Master’s degree in Technology from the Helsinki University of Technology and a Master’s degree in Law from the University of Helsinki. Her research interests include sustainable logistics and supply chain management, high-tech and service business models, service modularity, and service innovations. Her research has been published in a number of journals in the areas of logistics, services, and operations management. %3 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor of Technology Innovation Management at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Audience Commodification: A Source of Innovation in Business Models %A Datis Khajeheian %K audience commodification %K business model %K innovation %K technology entrepreneurship %K value marketing %X This article reports on a research project aimed at developing a business model by changing the value-creation mechanism. The essence of this change is to persuade customers to perform actions in favour of the service provider. Such actions include responding to advertising clips to unlock value. The business model was generated from the concept of audience commodification and is based on the idea of looking at users as a source of a tradeable asset in business-to-business markets. Here, attention and actions are the assets that users pay to access the proposed value. The research includes two phases of surveys and experimentation. In the first phase, the tendency and acceptance level of users towards watching advertisements to unlock value are measured. In the next phase, a platform prototype is developed to test and understand user actions towards receiving value. The sample includes 52 users of different nationalities who were seeking relationships on an online dating platform. Results revealed that users accept advertising and will perform requested actions if they can perceive the delivered value. Practical implications of this research include insights to help move away from the current “view-based” advertising model toward new models of partnership with users in the value-creation process. This research may also stimulate further research into developing sustainable business models based on advertising revenue. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 40-47 %8 08/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1010 %N 8 %1 Aalborg University Datis Khajeheian is a lecturer in the Center for Communication, Media and Information Technologies in Aalborg University of Denmark. He earned his PhD in Media Management and his MA in Entrepreneurship with a specialty in New Venture Creation. Datis is Head of the special interest group of “Emerging Media Markets” in the European Media Management Association. His mission is to lead academic and practical research to understand the emergence of new markets and opportunities in niche areas for international media companies. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1010 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Review and Future Research Agenda %A Kamal Sakhdari %K corporate entrepreneurship %K established firms %K innovation %K strategic renewal %K venturing %X The overarching theme of corporate entrepreneurship literature is to understand why some firms are able to generate higher levels of corporate entrepreneurship than others. While the extant literature has greatly advanced our understanding of entrepreneurial activities by established firms, less effort has been made to systematically review the literature to help us identify missing links and knowledge in prior studies. To address this gap, this article critically reviews previous important studies on corporate entrepreneurship and then develops a framework integrating previous research. Finally, the article suggests five potentially worthwhile avenues for future research. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-18 %8 08/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1007 %N 8 %1 University of Tehran Kamal Sakhdari is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD in Business and Entrepreneurship from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, institutional theory, and international business. He is also a member of the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research (ACE) at the QUT Business School. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1007 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Creating Brand India: Strategies, Issues, and Challenges %A Alok Chakrawal %A Pratibha Goyal %K Brand India %K challenges %K economic growth %K entrepreneurship %K government initiatives %K innovation %K Make in India %X Just like a product, person, or institution, a country also has an impression in the minds of people. A brand distinguishes the product of one seller from those of the others. With the Indian Prime Minister's recent call to "Make in India", brand building is receiving more attention and momentum in the country. India is the largest democratic country with the highest GDP, and it is becoming a favourable destination for the global investment giants. But, despite various strengths and successes in image building, the country faces challenges in creating a sustainable, conducive environment for making India a production hub of the world. Bureaucracy, corruption, delay in clearance of business proposals, ethical standards and work culture, tax reforms, political interventions, socio-economic barriers, regionalism, etc. are some of the challenges that must be coped with. This article examines these various issues and challenges that must be overcome in creating Brand India. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-9 %8 05/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/985 %N 5 %1 Saurashtra University Alok Chakrawal is a Professor of Commerce and Business Administration, and the Coordinator of the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at Saurashtra University in Rajkot, India. He holds MCom and PhD degrees, for which he was awarded a Gold Medal upon graduation followed by a Junior Research Fellowship from the University Grants Commission. He is an accomplished international speaker and award-winning author of academic papers and books, particularly in the domain of stress management. He has been the General Manager and Director of SKSE Securities Ltd., Rajkot, and Controller of Examination of Saurashtra University. He also sits on various boards and committees at national and international levels. %2 Punjab Agricultural University Pratibha Goyal is Professor and Director of the School of Business Studies at Punjab Agricultural University in Ludhiana, India. She received her MBA from Guru Nanak Dev University in, Amritsar, India, and her PhD from Punjabi University in Patiala, India. She began her career as a Deputy Manager of Human Resources in a leading industry. Her immense love for mentoring young minds saw a shift in her career when she joined the faculty of Management in Punajbi University, Patiala, and later in Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. She has been the Principal Investigator of three major research projects of the University Grants Commission and has participated in several national seminars, conferences, and symposia. She is on the Board of Directors of Hero Cycles Limited. She has authored five internationally acclaimed books, besides being Executive Editor of the Effective Management journal. She has published several notable research papers in national and international journals and has guided many scholars in their research projects. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/985 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Developing a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem in Regional Australia %A Troy Haines %K Australia %K Cairns %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K incubation %K innovation %K mentorship %K regional %K startups %K theSPACE %X Technology is enabling change at an ever increasing pace, not only in urban contexts, but also in regional centres, where the Internet in particular is enabling entrepreneurs to compete in the global marketplace despite the size and remoteness of their home cities or towns. In regional Australia, the challenges of high unemployment, fading traditional industries, a lack of economic diversity, and a "brain drain" of talent to urban centres highlight the need for novel economic development strategies. Innovation and entrepreneurship are highlighted as potential solutions, but both require knowledge and support to be successful. In this article, the author shares lessons learned as an entrepreneur and through the ongoing development of a self-sustaining startup and innovation ecosystem in the remote region of Cairns, Australia. The model described in this article is now being applied to other regions in Australia, where trained champions are driving the development of startup and innovation ecosystems adapted to regional needs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 24-32 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/994 %N 6 %1 theSPACE Australasia Troy Haines is Co-Founder and CEO of theSPACE Australasia in Cairns, Australia. He is also a Startup and Innovation Coach who has worked with hundreds of entrepreneurs across Australia to help them commercialize their ideas. Amongst many awards, he was named Innovation Champion in 2014 by the Minister of Innovation and Premier of Queensland. He was also inducted into the Queensland Government Innovation Wall of Fame for his work in building the North Queensland startup and innovation ecosystem. Troy and the team at theSPACE have developed startup and innovation programs, which they deliver across a wide audience, from high school students and SMEs to government (and everyone in between). He holds a Bachelor's degree in Business (Marketing) from Australia's Charles Sturt University and is currently working towards a Master's degree in Applied Innovation and Entrepreneurship from the University of Adelaide. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/994 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers %A Omar Valdez-de-Leon %K business %K business transformation %K digital %K digital transformation %K digitization %K disruptive technologies %K innovation %K maturity model %K telecommunications %X Industries across the spectrum are being faced with a fundamental change: digital transformation. The telecommunications industry is no exception. For communications service providers, this transformation started some time ago with the emergence of so-called over-the-top (OTT) services such as WhatsApp and Skype. However, in spite of such transformation being underway, there is a lack of frameworks and tools to help communications service providers navigate such radical change. This article presents the findings of a research project to develop such a framework: the digital maturity model for telecommunications service providers. The model aims to offer a structured view of digital transformation that is specific to the context and challenges of the telecommunications industry and that can be used as a standard to help communications service providers benchmark themselves against peers or themselves as they advance their transformation. This article describes the need for the model and the methodology used to develop it, and it offers recommendations on how to use the model and further develop it as our understanding of digital transformation evolves. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 19-32 %8 08/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1008 %N 8 %1 Ericsson Omar Valdez-de-Leon is a Senior Consultant within the Global Consulting and Systems Integration practice at Ericsson. He is a practitioner in the area of innovation and digitization of products and services and, over the years, he has worked across the IT and telecommunications industry in companies such as Bosch, Logica-CGI, Elster, Vodafone, and Ericsson, with a focus on new business initiatives grounded in emerging technologies. He holds an MSc in Technology & Innovation Management from SPRU in the University of Sussex, UK, and an MBA from Manchester Business School. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1008 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia (June 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K Australia %K design-led innovation %K ecosystem %K entrepreneurship %K hidden innovation %K high-growth startups %K innovation %K innovation catalyst %K ISPIM %K job creation %K National Innovation and Science Agenda %K policy %K regional innovation management %K regions %K strategic management %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/991 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/991 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Innovation in Tourism (November 2016) %A Chris McPhee %A David Guimont %A Dominic Lapointe %K action research %K boundary objects %K co-creation %K crowdsourcing %K innovation %K living labs %K smart cities %K smart destinations %K technology %K tourism %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-5 %8 11/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1029 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio) David Guimont is a Teacher-Researcher at the Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup in Quebec, Canada, where he is associated with the Recreation and Leadership Training Department and the Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio). He holds a master’s degree in Tourism Management and Development from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). %3 Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) Dominic Lapointe is a Professor in the Department of Urban Studies and Tourism at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) in Canada, where he is the Director of the Tourism and Hospitality Management Undergraduate program. His research addresses development and environmental issues with the use of critical theory, especially in the fields of tourism, conservation, and the environment. He holds a doctoral degree in Regional Development from the Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR). %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1029 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Insights (October 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K boundary objects %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurial university %K entrepreneurship %K growth ambitions %K innovation %K knowledge integration %K startups %K strategy %K tacit knowledge %K teaching %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 10/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1022 %N 10 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1022 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Managing Innovation (April 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K creativity %K cybersecurity %K entrepreneurship %K frugal innovation %K innovation %K managing innovation %K national culture %K Open innovation %K projects %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 04/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/976 %N 4 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/976 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Employment Dynamics of Australian Entrepreneurship: A Management Perspective %A Luke Hendrickson %A Stan Bucifal %A Antonio Balaguer %A David Hansell %K Australia %K creative destruction %K employment %K entrepreneurship %K high growth %K innovation %K management %K productivity %K startup %X This article attempts to draw together the literature on high-growth firms and management capability using Australian Government data from the Expanded Analytical Business Longitudinal Database. We tracked cohorts of new micro-sized firms (startups) over five years from birth. Compared with startups that had a low employment growth trajectory, medium- and high-growth micro-startups exhibited higher financial performance, higher innovation activity, and a greater propensity to seek external (debt or equity) finance. From a management perspective, medium- and high-growth startups were also significantly more likely to monitor and assess their performance across a wider range of performance indicators. High-growth micro-startups exhibited significantly higher operational process and organizational/managerial innovation, a higher likelihood of foreign ownership, and a greater demand for equity finance than medium-growth micro-startups. This data is consistent with other evidence that suggests that sustained high growth comes from superior strategic management and may suggest an ongoing role for government policy in building firm management capability in order to foster employment growth. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 33-40 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/995 %N 6 %1 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Luke Hendrickson is Manager of Innovation Research in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he is focused on innovation and measuring the performance of the national innovation system. He is principally responsible for delivering the Government’s annual Australian Innovation System Report, which is now in its seventh year. Luke’s general work interests are in the areas of productivity and competitiveness and how innovative entrepreneurship drives these outcomes across all sectors of the economy. He also has a particular interest in the economics of complexity, measuring management capability, and business eco-innovation. Luke holds a PhD from the Australian National University in Canberra. %2 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Stan Bucifal is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the field of industry policy, productivity, and innovation. He has experience in industry policy development, cost-benefit analysis applied to carbon emission abatement, and conducting research into intangible capital and the geography of innovation. Stan holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business from the Queensland University of Technology, where he majored in Economics and Finance (QUT), and a Master’s degree in Public Policy, specializing in industry strategy, from the Australian National University in Canberra. %3 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Antonio Balaguer is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the fields of innovation, management, and technological change. Antonio was initially trained as chemist and holds a PhD in Political Economy and Asian Studies from Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, and a postgraduate diploma in Public Policy from the Australian National University in Canberra. %4 Australian Bureau of Statistics David Hansell is a Researcher with the Australian Bureau of Statistics, where he has worked since 2008. His main research interests include productivity of exiting and entering firms, and characteristics associated with high-productivity firms. David has an Honours degree in Asian history from the Australian National University in Canberra and a Masters of Economics degree from Macquarie University in Sydney. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/995 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Empowering Local Tourism Providers to Innovate through a Living Lab Process: Does Scale Matter? %A David Guimont %A Dominic Lapointe %K action research %K destination management %K innovation %K level %K living labs %K scale %K socio-territorial action %K territoriality %K tourism %X A destination management organization looking to integrate technology into its tourism offering tasked a living lab with engaging tourists and tourism providers in the process. At the end of the two-year initial funding period for an action research project, the process is a success and stakeholders are engaged in the innovation ecosystem. But what is next? By observing participants and gathering feedback from stakeholders through a Policy Delphi panel, the outcomes of the project and the intentions and actions of the tourism providers and other parties were identified. Innovation capacity has increased: spin-offs were created and stakeholders have embraced open and collaborative innovation. Now, stakeholders are determined to make the process sustainable by finding other funding sources. But what should be the level of cooperation and intervention? What level can best foster innovation and knowledge retention? A case study combining a grid of characteristics and levels of analysis for living labs was used to identify one key question: for a living lab in tourism, does scale matter? This article will explore that question and will contribute to the understanding of the living lab as a model of socio-territorial action. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 18-25 %8 11/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1031 %N 11 %1 Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio) David Guimont is a Teacher-Researcher at the Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup in Quebec, Canada, where he is associated with the Recreation and Leadership Training Department and the Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio). He holds a master’s degree in Tourism Management and Development from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). %2 Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) Dominic Lapointe is a Professor in the Department of Urban Studies and Tourism at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) in Canada, where he is the Director of the Tourism and Hospitality Management Undergraduate program. His research addresses development and environmental issues with the use of critical theory, especially in the fields of tourism, conservation, and the environment. He holds a doctoral degree in Regional Development from the Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR). %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1031 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T A Framework for Sustainable Circular Business Model Innovation %A Maria Antikainen %A Katri Valkokari %K business canvas %K business model %K case study %K circular economy %K innovation %K sustainability %X The circular economy concept is a novel economic model aiming to foster sustainable economic growth, boost global competitiveness, and generate new jobs. In order to make the circular economy mainstream, radical and systemic innovation is needed. Currently, a majority of the business modelling tools and methods lack at least some of the identified and needed elements for innovating business models in a circular economy. In this article, we build a framework for sustainable circular business model innovation by adding important perspectives: recognizing trends and drivers at the ecosystem level; understanding value to partners and stakeholders within a business; and evaluating the impact of sustainability and circularity. We present the results of a case study with a startup company, which was designed to test the framework and provide a concrete example of its usage and future development needs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-12 %8 07/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1000 %N 7 %1 VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) Maria Antikainen is a Senior Scientist at VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) in the Business, Innovation and Foresight research area. She is also an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Industrial Management at Tampere University of Technology, where she specializes in innovation in business networks. Maria’s main research areas are the circular economy and sustainable business models and new business opportunities enabled by the Internet of Things. During her 14 years of experience in research, Maria has been initiating, conducting, and managing numerous research and development projects with research partners, companies, and public funding organizations such as Tekes and the European Union. Maria holds a PhD in Technology Management from the Tampere University of Technology (2011) and a PhD in Marketing from the University of Tampere (2007). %2 VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) Katri Valkokari is a Principal Scientist at VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) in the Business, Innovation and Foresight research area. Over the past 15 years, she has carried out several development projects concerning different networked business arrangements (ecosystems, networks, partnerships, and firms). In 2009, Katri completed her doctoral thesis on business network development. She has published several international and national articles in the research areas of business network management, collaboration, organizational knowledge, innovation management, and sustainability. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1000 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Innovation Rhetoric and Reality: An Introduction to the TIM Review's Special Issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia %A Rowena Barrett %K Australia %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K National Innovation and Science Agenda %X In this introduction to the Technology Innovation Management Review's special issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia, Guest Editor Rowena Barrett reflects on the perceptions of "innovation", both in terms of its evolving concepts and terminology (the rhetoric) and its frontline application (the reality). Prompted by the recent launch and ongoing implementation of Australia Government's National Innovation and Science Agenda's, this special issue focuses on insights into innovation and entrepreneurship from the Australian context. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-10 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/992 %N 6 %1 Queensland University of Technology Rowena Barrett is Head of the School of Management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. She has played leading roles in organizing, managing, and administering research in universities in Australia and the United Kingdom. Rowena holds a PhD from the University of Melbourne, Australia, on industrial relations in smaller firms, and she has spent many years investigating the ways people in smaller firms are managed and how those firms are organized. She has a sizeable portfolio of research publications including books, book chapters, journal articles, as well practitioner papers and reports. Her research has been funded by university, industry, and government sources in Australia and the United Kingdom. She has extensive experience in teaching in the areas of management, human resource management, and industrial relations, while she has supervised over 10 PhDs to successful completion. She has also held numerous board and council member positions, both within and beyond academia. In 2015, Rowena chaired the ISPIM Innovation Summit "Changing the Innovation Landscape", which took place at QUT in Brisbane, Australia, from 6–9 December. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/992 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Priority Systems at Theme Parks from the Perspective of Managers and Customers %A Gilda Hernandez-Maskivker %A Gerard Ryan %K innovation %K managers %K priority queues %K theme parks %K tourism %K tourist behaviour %K waiting time %X Waiting times are becoming an increasingly important customer-experience challenge in theme parks. The seemingly ever-present problem of long queues for rides and attractions is being tackled by the development of priority systems. These innovations allow customers to join an alternative queue that bypasses the congestion faced by regular customers. In other words, by paying extra, customers can purchase the right to be served sooner. Such systems are becoming prevalent, but there is a lack of empirical research into priority systems at theme parks in the academic and management literature, which suggests that in-depth empirical analysis is necessary in order to understand the consumer decision-making process when making this purchase. This article examines priority systems at theme parks both from the viewpoint of park management and of customers. To address this gap, we surveyed nearly 1,000 customers at a major theme park in Spain and conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 theme park managers to assess both customer and manager attitudes towards waiting generally and priority systems specifically. Our results reveal that these priority systems facilitate market segmentation. When theme parks offer this "wait or pay" option, different groups of customers are identified based on their attitudes: those who wait in regular lines and those who are willing to pay to avoid lines. Thus, this innovative system creates an important source of new revenue while also improving the customer experience by reducing waiting times and minimizing congestion. Following a discussion of our results, we offer practical recommendations to managers who need to address the challenges of waiting times in theme parks and wish to improve both profits and customer experiences by implementing a priority system. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 40-47 %8 11/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1034 %N 11 %1 Rovira i Virgili University Gilda Hernandez-Maskivker is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Management at Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain. She has a PhD in Tourism and Leisure and a Master's degree in Analytical Techniques and Innovation in Tourism, both from Rovira i Virgili University. Her main research line is on waiting times in tourism services and tourist behaviour. Gilda has also collaborated with the Maldives National University Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Studies in Malé, Maldives; HTSI-ESADE in Barcelona, Spain; Ostelea-EAE in Barcelona; and the European University School for Tourism in Milan, Italy. %2 Rovira i Virgili University Gerard Ryan is an Associate Professor and accredited Full Professor (ANECA, Spain) in Marketing at Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain, and he is a Visiting Fellow at Cornell University in Ithaca, USA. He is a founding member of FHOM, which is part of the Catalan government’s map of official research groups. He is on the editorial advisory board of the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, la Revista Escritos Contables y de Administración, and the Irish Journal of Management. He is a regular reviewer and an award recipient of the Emerald Group for his research. His main research interests are consumers, time, and waiting. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1034 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T A Process for Co-Creating Shared Value with the Crowd: Tourism Case Studies from a Regional Innovation System in Western Switzerland %A Vincent Grèzes %A Béatrice Girod Lehmann %A Marc Schnyder %A Antoine Perruchoud %K business models %K co-creation %K crowdsourcing %K innovation %K regional innovation system %K shared value %K tourism %K tourism cluster %X Despite the presence of a regional innovation system, the gross value added attributed to tourism in the Swiss region of Valais is declining. Innovation policies fostering private initiatives and collaboration between companies, researchers, and coaching services have been reinforced recently, and policy instruments are in place to support strategic industries. However, no incitement instrument is dedicated to supporting the co-creation and the creation of shared value through local actors. This article presents a co-creation process of shared value and the lessons learned while implementing a new mode of innovation and entrepreneurship in two case studies in the peripheral region of Valais, Switzerland. The aim of the process is the co-creation of shared value-based business models, with an emphasis on the use of crowdsourcing to find new ways to create shared value. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 32-39 %8 11/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1033 %N 11 %1 University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland Vincent Grèzes is a Professor of Business Administration at the University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland in Sierre. He holds a PhD in Political Science and joined the Entrepreneurship & Management Institute of the University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland in 2011. Vincent has professional experience in the areas of business intelligence, and industry and strategic market research. His current research areas are business and tourism innovation, creation of shared value, and regional development. %2 University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland Béatrice Girod Lehmann is a Scientific Collaborator at the Institute of Entrepreneurship & Management of the University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland in Sierre. She has participated in several research projects aimed at developing solutions for SMEs and has worked on various topics such as the internationalization of SMEs in the French part of Switzerland, technological innovation, the functional economy, and fostering the entrepreneurial spirit. She is also involved in the BusiNETvs project, a platform for innovation and entrepreneurship for academics and professionals from the Valais, and is the Executive Head of the MAS HES-SO in Quality & Strategy Management. Béatrice holds a UAS degree in Business Administration and a Master of Advanced Studies in Quality & Strategy Management. %3 University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland Marc Schnyder is a Professor of Tourism and Business Administration at the University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland in Sierre, where he is also the Head of the Institute of Tourism. He holds a French/German bilingual license from the University of Fribourg, specializing in economic and financial policy. After a one-year internship at the Swiss National Bank (SNB) in Zurich in the field of banking economy, he wrote a doctoral thesis at the University of Fribourg on the theme of investment theory. He was then a Research Assistant at the Private Hochschule Wirtschaft PHW Bern, where he worked in the field of applied research and development. His current research areas are tourist innovation process, international tourism issues, tourism policy, and the regional economy. %4 University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland Antoine Perruchoud is a Professor at the University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland in Sierre and is Head of the Entrepreneurship & Management Institute. He is committed to training and supporting young entrepreneurs, and he is one of the initiators and directors of the university's Entrepreneurship Business Experience Program. The goal of this interdisciplinary training program is to foster and promote innovation and entrepreneurship among future graduates through the university's "school enterprise". Antoine graduated in Economics and Social Sciences from the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and holds a master's degree from Western Washington University in the United States. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T A Proposed Approach for Idea Selection in Front End of Innovation Activities %A Andrew N. Forde %A Mark S. Fox %K FEoI %K front end of innovation %K idea selection %K innovation %K multi-criteria decision making %K possible worlds %K real options %K stochastic models %X Current research indicates that the idea evaluation processes of many firms are ad hoc or intuitive, with very few firms having defined methods. We propose a new approach to select the best ideas to pursue amidst different probable versions of the future. In support of "front end of innovation" processes, the approach emphasizes the formation of requirements for any idea that can be prioritized and measured against possible future worlds. This approach is currently conceptual; future work will develop the approach into a methodology that can be tested using real-world problems. This article will be relevant to those who are exploring novel methods and approaches to selecting the best idea within their particular domains. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 48-55 %8 08/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1011 %N 8 %1 University of Toronto Andrew N. Forde is a PhD student in Industrial and Information Engineering at the University of Toronto, Canada. His research focuses on using possible-world analysis and engineering ontologies to establish utility functions that can accurately predict the usefulness of an idea in the future. His work is being co-sponsored by Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS) and a Toronto-based technology firm, IMC. %2 University of Toronto Mark S. Fox is the Distinguished Professor of Urban Systems Engineering at the University of Toronto, Canada. He is a Professor of Industrial Engineering with a cross appointment in the Department of Computer Science, Director of the new Centre for Social Services Engineering, and Head of the Enterprise Integration Laboratory. Dr. Fox received his BSc in Computer Science from the University of Toronto in 1975, and in 1983 received his PhD in Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, United States. In 1979, he was a founding member of the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University as well as the founding Director of the Intelligent Systems Laboratory within the Institute. He is a past AAAI councillor and co-founder of the AAAI Special Interest Group in AI in Manufacturing. Dr. Fox has published over 200 papers. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1011 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T The Smart City Ecosystem as an Innovation Model: Lessons from Montreal %A Mohamed Reda Khomsi %K ecosystem %K innovation %K Montreal %K smart cities %K smart destination %K stakeholders %X Innovations are not confined to new technologies designed to improve the manufacturing processes of a product or the provision of a service. In a context of postmodernity, the new innovation paradigm calls on organizations to choose the best innovation strategies for their broader purposes. Today, such strategies usually involve adopting organizational structures that enable better collaboration with the stakeholders of an ecosystem. This article focuses on the smart city of Montreal – selected as the 2016 Intelligent Community of the Year by the Intelligent Community Forum – as a model of innovation. The aim is to understand the distinction between "the smart city" and "the smart destination", despite the omnipresence of tourism projects in smart city development plans. Among the key lessons are the importance of engaging tourism stakeholders and the role of a dedicated organization to develop and implement the city's unique vision. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 26-31 %8 11/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1032 %N 11 %1 Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) Mohamed Reda Khomsi is a Professor of Tourism Governance and E-Tourism at the Department of Urban Studies and Tourism in the School of Management at the Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada. His research focuses on smart destinations, online distribution, governance models, and the assessment of the hallmark tourist event. Mohamed is the author of over a dozen articles and book chapters on these topics. He is currently investigating various examples of smart cities and smart destinations in Canada with the aim to highlight the particular features of the Canadian model. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1032 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T TIM Lecture Series – Insights from Success and Failure in Technology Businesses %A Chris McPhee %A Peter Carbone %A Sean Silcoff %K Blackberry %K book launch %K innovation %K insights %K lessons %K management %K Nortel %K Research in Motion %K technology %K technology innovation management review %K TIM Review %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 36-39 %8 02/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/967 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Peter Carbone is a successful executive known for his thought leadership, business acumen, and technology leadership. He is often called on to address new business and technology challenges. Peter is a pathfinder with a track record of creating innovative solutions, strategically managing technology and innovation, successfully launching and running new businesses, and leading business development initiatives. Peter has held CTO, R&D, and senior business positions in several high-tech companies, and he has led or been directly involved with several technology company acquisitions. Peter has been engaged as technical advisor to startups, is part of the faculty of an entrepreneur development program that has created >100 new companies, and has been on the boards of US-based Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) and a not-for-profit economic development company. He is past Vice-Chair of the Executive Committee of the Information Technology Association of Canada (ITAC) and Chair of an ITAC committee, which is focused on the Global Competitiveness of Canada’s Knowledge Economy. Peter is also a member of the Advisory Board and Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %3 The Globe & Mail Sean Silcoff is co-author of Losing the Signal and a business writer with The Globe & Mail, Canada's National Newspaper. During his 21-year career in journalism and communications, he has covered just about every area of business, from agriculture to the credit crisis, toys to airplane manufacturing and steel to startups. He previously worked at the National Post as well as Canadian Business Magazine, where he oversaw publication of the inaugural edition of the Rich 100, the magazine’s annual survey of Canada’s wealthiest people. Sean is a two-time winner of the National Newspaper Award, the Montreal Economic Institute Economic Education Prize and the Hon. Edward Goff Penny Memorial Prize for Young Canadian Journalists. He led The Globe & Mail’s coverage of the fall of BlackBerry. Sean has a business degree from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and a journalism degree from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/967 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Underground Innovation: How to Encourage Bootlegging Employees to Disclose Their Good Ideas %A Kamal Sakhdari %A Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi %K bootlegging %K corporate entrepreneurship %K hidden ideas %K innovation %K qualitative research method %K R&D departments %X Employees are increasingly considered as the origin of many corporate entrepreneurial ideas. Research on “bootlegging” posits that individuals often resort to hidden activities to elaborate their initial ideas and bring them to fruition. The origins and causes of bootlegging behaviour are well argued in the literature. Yet, less is known about what drives bootleggers to uncover their hidden ideas. This research uses field data from in-depth interviews with innovators in R&D departments in different industries of Iran to identify factors stimulating bootleggers to reveal their underground ideas. We identified five groups of factors at individual, managerial, firm, industrial, and idea levels, explaining the revealing stage of bootlegging behaviour. The findings provide a better understanding of the later phases of bootlegging behaviour and the possible role of context-specific factors such as cultural and religious beliefs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-12 %8 03/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/970 %N 3 %1 University of Tehran Kamal Sakhdari is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD in Business and Entrepreneurship from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, institutional theory, and international business. He is also a member of the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research (ACE) at the QUT Business School. %2 University of Tehran Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi holds a Master's degree in Entrepreneurship from the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, and organizational behaviour. He has been working in the telecommunication industry for several years, and is now conducting a research project on bootlegging behaviour focusing on cultural and institutional factors. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/970 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Why National Culture Should Be at the Heart of Innovation Management %A Tony Smale %K creativity %K implementation %K initiation %K innovation %K national culture %X Over a period of decades, a substantial body of knowledge has accumulated that correlates national culture and socially and economically important behaviour, including innovation practice. National culture is an interconnected web of mental models that is shared by national groups and transcends the individual. It is highly influential in moderating the cognition and behaviour of groups and individuals. Different resources, including cognition and behaviour, are required at the different stages of the innovation process, and the context, including national culture (within which innovation is practiced), is an important consideration in designing strategy. Because innovation is a psychological and social process, understanding how national culture moderates that cognition and behaviour within the different stages of the innovation process and how the wider innovation ecosystem impacts innovation practice is central to understanding, strategizing and managing the innovation process. However, there has been limited application of this knowledge by practitioners. Therefore, this article examines the importance of national culture from a practitioner perspective, distilling the managerial implications and providing a list of questions that serve as a checklist to enable practitioners to analyze the implications of their own national and organizational context. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 18-25 %8 04/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/978 %N 4 %1 Forté Management Tony Smale is a Principal Management Consultant with Forté Management, an independent thinking New Zealand business, consulting, coaching, and training practice. Tony began life as a laboratory scientist and manager. He holds an MBA from Henley Business School at the University of Reading, United Kingdom, and is accredited as an Economic Development Professional. Tony’s MBA dissertation was entitled The Impact of National Culture on New Zealand’s Innovation Outcomes. Since then, he has complemented that work by nearly a decade exposing and testing the arguments in the dissertation with innovation, management, and economic development professionals across many nations and especially working with them to explain and reconcile the dilemmas and conflicts that they encounter in their work and personal lives, both living and working in their home countries and especially as immigrants in foreign cultures. He is an experienced speaker and has completed a number of international engagements including at the UNFCCC, the OECD LEED Forum, and subsequently serving on an OECD Expert Panel. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/978 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Editorial: 100th Issue (November 2015) %A Chris McPhee %K 3D printing %K born-global firms %K collaborative innovation %K cybersafety %K cybersecurity %K cyberspace %K future research %K innovation %K lean global startups %K lean startups %K management %K Open innovation %K social innovation %K supply chains %K technology %K technology innovation management review %K TIM Review %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 3-4 %8 11/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/939 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/939 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Editorial: Creativity in Innovation (July 2015) %A Chris McPhee %K creativity %K ideation %K innovation %K knowledge %K leadership %K management %K processes %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 3-4 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/908 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/908 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Editorial: Innovation Tools and Techniques (March 2015) %A Chris McPhee %A Brendan Galbraith %A Nadia Noori %K innovation %K lean %K living labs %K management %K processes %K project management %K risk %K signalling %K smart cities %K systems engineering %K techniques %K technology entrepreneurship %K tools %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 3-5 %8 03/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/876 %N 3 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Ulster University Business School Brendan Galbraith is a Senior Lecturer at the Ulster University Business School in Northern Ireland. Brendan has led national and prestigious European research and innovation projects with a combined value of more than £4 million and his work has been presented in the European Commission, European Parliament, Northern Ireland Assembly and a wide range of national media outlets including the BBC. Brendan’s research has appeared in R&D Management, Technovation, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, and the International Journal of Operations and Productions Management. Brendan is the Book Reviews Editor for Technology Analysis and Strategic Management and has served on the European Network of Living Labs Leadership Portfolio Group. %3 La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Nadia Noori is a Researcher and PhD Candidate at the Fundación Privada Universidad Y Tecnología – FUNITEC La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull in Barcelona, Spain. She started her PhD in Crisis Management Networks in 2013 as part of the Marie Curie – ITN project. Her research work in crisis management is in the area of organizational collaboration and coordination complex networks. She holds BSc and MSc degrees in Computer and Control Engineering from Baghdad University, Iraq, and an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Before commencing her PhD studies, Nadia was a Platforms and Product Manager at Coral CEA, a Canadian not-for-profit organization and open innovation network focused on building platform-based ecosystems. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/876 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Establishing New Codes for Creativity through Haute Cuisine: The Case of Ferran Adrià and elBulli %A Ignasi Capdevila %A Patrick Cohendet %A Laurent Simon %K ambidexterity %K creative process %K creativity %K elBulli %K exploitation %K exploration %K Ferran Adrià %K gastronomy %K haute cuisine %K innovation %X Ferran Adrià is one of the most recognized chefs in the world. His restaurant, elBulli, was awarded five times the title of the Best Restaurant in the World. Through an analysis of the last 30 years of the creative journey of elBulli, this contribution highlights that Adrià and his team of chefs succeeded in articulating two different processes: i) a process of creativity that aimed at defining a new “school” of high cuisine and ii) a process of innovation that was expressed by the new gastronomic experiences offered to the (happy few) customers of the restaurant until its closure in 2011. A careful examination of the coupling and decoupling of these two processes shows how they fueled each other, and how the management of the organization (through a specific type of ambidexterity) was conducive to the adequate articulation of the two processes. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 25-33 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/911 %N 7 %1 Paris School of Business Ignasi Capdevila is an Associate Professor at PSB Paris School of Business in France, and he is a member of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub at HEC Montréal, Canada, where he obtained his PhD. Ignasi also holds three engineer diplomas from Spain and France, in addition to an Executive MBA from ESADE Business School in Barcelona, Spain. His research interests include localized knowledge creation and transfer, and creativity and innovation management in organizations and in urban environments. Prior to his academic career, Ignasi gained twelve years of experience in the automotive industry in Spain, France, Germany, and Sweden, during which time he was responsible for the development of new products and projects. %2 HEC Montréal Patrick Cohendet is a Professor in the Department of International Business at the HEC Montréal business school in Montreal, Canada, where he is also the Co-Director of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub. His research interests include the economics of innovation, knowledge management, and the economics of knowledge and creativity. He is the author of numerous articles and books including La Gestion des connaissances: firmes et communautés de savoir (2006) and The Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities (2004). He was principal investigator of numerous research projects at BETA, a research lab at the University of Strasbourg, France, studying the economic and social impact of new technologies. He has conducted a series of economic studies on innovation for different firms and organizations, notably for the European Commission, the OECD, the Council of Europe, and the European Space Agency. %3 HEC Montréal Laurent Simon is an Associate Professor in the Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the HEC Montréal business school in Montreal, Canada, where he is also the Co-Director of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub. His current research focuses on characterizing the management of techno-creative projects and the study of creative environments and practices, the management of creative projects, creative communities, "creative cities", and the determinants of creativity in innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/911 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects %A Olivier Rits %A Dimitri Schuurman %A Pieter Ballon %K business model %K collaboration %K innovation %K living labs %K user research %K value network %K value proposition %X Business model and living lab research both have similar objectives – to maximize the probability of successful market introduction of innovative solutions – be it through different means. Yet, there are still only few studies or reports discussing both, with those studies that do touch the subject staying at a high level. iMinds Living Labs has gained a lot of experience in combined living lab and business model innovation projects and, rather than being competing approaches, our results have shown that these two research methodologies can be complementary, where the combined approach turns out to be more powerful than each individual approach used alone. The goal of this article is to promote the inclusion of business model research in a model of "a living lab as a service" (and vice versa) by explaining the benefits and by introducing a practical framework to implement such combined research tracks based on the experience at iMinds Living Labs over the past few years. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 19-27 %8 12/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/949 %N 12 %1 iMinds Olivier Rits graduated as an Engineer in Applied Physics from Ghent University in Belgium. Olivier joined Alcatel-Lucent as a business developer where he worked on the go2market strategy for innovative solutions, both on networking and applications. He joined iMinds in 2013, focusing on the intersection between technology, business, and innovation. Olivier leads the business model practice at the iMinds Living Labs, where he is responsible for the methodologies used and providing business support to startups, SMEs, and larger organizations. %2 iMinds Dimitri Schuurman holds a PhD (2015) and Master's degree in Communication Sciences (2003) from Ghent University in Belgium. He joined the research group iMinds – MICT – Ghent University in 2005 and started working at iMinds Living Labs in 2009. Together with his iMinds colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at startups and SMEs, in which he has managed over 50 innovation projects. As a senior researcher, Dimitri is currently responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of living lab projects. He also coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers from iMinds – MICT – Ghent University. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. In early 2015, he finished his PhD entitled Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation. %3 iMinds Pieter Ballon is the Director of iMinds Living Labs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and a Professor at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was senior consultant and team leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T The Grey Areas Between Open and Closed in Innovation Networks %A Seppo Leminen %A Taija Turunen %A Mika Westerlund %K closedness %K innovation %K innovation network %K Living lab %K Open innovation %K openness %X This study argues that there are different degrees of openness and closedness in innovation activity, and it highlights the need for more research on the "grey areas" between totally open and totally closed innovation, particularly in innovation networks where multiple stakeholders collaborate for innovation. Here, we focus on four key aspects of innovation networks, as characterized by their degrees of openness or closedness: governance, motivation, interaction, and innovation practices. The categorization is based on a review of theory and an empirical analysis of three distinct innovation networks, two of which represent the open living lab model, and one of which exemplifies the traditional closed innovation model. Our results can help managers improve efficiency in innovation networks by better understanding the grey areas between open and closed in innovation. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 6-18 %8 12/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/948 %N 12 %1 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Seppo Leminen holds positions as Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Adjunct Professor in the School of Business at Aalto University in Finland. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and management in the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, value co-creation and capture with users, relationships, services and business models in marketing, particularly in Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Technology and Engineering and Management, Management Decision, the International Journal of Technology Management, the International Journal of Technology Marketing, the International Journal of Product Development, and the Technology Innovation Management Review, among many others. %2 Aalto University Taija Turunen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Management Studies at Aalto University's School of Business in Finland. Taija holds a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from Aalto University's School of Science. During her academic career, Taija has managed several research projects in the area of service operations management and service innovation. Before joining academia, Taija worked as a management consultant in the field of industrial service operations. %3 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/948 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Introduction to the Special Issue on Creativity in Innovation %A Patrick Cohendet %A Laurent Simon %K creativity %K ideas %K ideation %K innovation %K management %X Managing creativity for innovation is a key challenge in today’s economy; therefore, the management of ideas will play in increasing role in driving the growth and resilience of organizations. Rather than simple inspired insights, ideas have to be addressed as complex socio-cognitive processes, to be organized and managed. To benefit from the full value of new ideas, management must constantly balance the formal and the informal, the logic of creation and the logic of production, and must learn to couple idea-generation processes and innovation processes through renewed knowledge management practices. In this introduction to the Technology Innovation Management Review's special issue on Creativity in Innovation, the guest editors highlight the need to manage: i) ideation processes to foster creativity, ii) the tension that exists between the logic of creation and production; and iii) disruptive innovation to transform a traditional industry. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 5-13 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/909 %N 7 %1 HEC Montréal Patrick Cohendet is a Professor in the Department of International Business at the HEC Montréal business school in Montreal, Canada, where he is also the Co-Director of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub. His research interests include the economics of innovation, knowledge management, and the economics of knowledge and creativity. He is the author of numerous articles and books including La Gestion des connaissances: firmes et communautés de savoir (2006) and The Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities (2004). He was principal investigator of numerous research projects at BETA, a research lab at the University of Strasbourg, France, studying the economic and social impact of new technologies. He has conducted a series of economic studies on innovation for different firms and organizations, notably for the European Commission, the OECD, the Council of Europe, and the European Space Agency. %2 HEC Montréal Laurent Simon is an Associate Professor in the Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the HEC Montréal business school in Montreal, Canada, where he is also the Co-Director of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub. His current research focuses on characterizing the management of techno-creative projects and the study of creative environments and practices, the management of creative projects, creative communities, "creative cities", and the determinants of creativity in innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/909 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Lessons in Creativity from the Innovative Design of the Swatch %A Gilles Garel %K concept %K creativity %K design %K engineering %K innovation %K knowledge %K Swatch %X No space is off-limits to innovation, even those occupied for many years by leading players and proven solutions. The case of the innovative Swatch watch, re-examined in this article with new information and insights, demonstrates that, without knowledge, design is not possible; but, with only knowledge, all we can do is reproduce. Innovation also requires creativity, the introduction of new concepts. Knowledge needs to be associated with unbridled, surprising, and hitherto unknown creativity, as described by the concept-knowledge theory of design. In this article, a new analysis of the well-known but misunderstood case of the Swatch yield lessons about the importance of creativity and knowledge in developing innovative products. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 34-40 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/912 %N 7 %1 Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers Gilles Garel is a Full Chair Professor of Innovation Management at the Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM) in Paris, France. He is also Professor at l'École Polytechnique in Palaiseau, France. At the Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Sciences de l'Action (LIRSA) at CNAM Paris, Gilles conducts research in the field of innovation and design management in close collaboration with innovative firms and organizations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/912 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Luxury and Creativity: Exploration, Exploitation, or Preservation? %A Joanne Roberts %A John Armitage %K craftsmanship %K creativity %K innovation %K knowledge %K luxury %X This article considers the role of creativity in the production and delivery of luxury. The concept of creativity is closely aligned to the idea of luxury goods as rare and highly crafted, often unique, objects produced through artistic endeavour. Moreover, some luxuries, such as expensive cars and private jets, require leading-edge design and technologically advanced inputs. Although creativity is essential for the development of new luxury goods and services, this article highlights that some luxuries are timeless and eschew the changes associated with radical creative transformations. Following a brief discussion of the nature of luxury and creativity, a number of examples are employed to illustrate the different roles of creativity in the development and delivery of different types of luxury. The relationship between luxury and creativity is shown to be varied and complex. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 41-49 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/913 %N 7 %1 University of Southampton Joanne Roberts is Professor in Arts and Cultural Management and Director of the Winchester Luxury Research Group at Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, United Kingdom. Her research interests include knowledge, innovation, creativity, and luxury. Joanne has published articles in a wide range of international journals, including the Journal of Management Studies, Journal of Business Ethics, and Research Policy. Additionally, she has authored and edited a number of books. Her latest sole-authored book is A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Knowledge Management (Sage Publications, 2015). %2 University of Southampton John Armitage is Professor of Media Arts and Co-Director of the Winchester Luxury Research Group at Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, United Kingdom. He is currently co-editing Critical Luxury Studies: Art, Design, Media with Joanne Roberts for Edinburgh University Press, and for Bloomsbury he is editing The Luxury Reader/ with Joanne Roberts and Jonathan Faiers and writing Luxury and Visual Culture. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/913 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems %A Markku Markkula %A Hank Kune %K innovation %K innovation ecosystems %K quadruple helix %K role of universities %K smart cities %K smart regions %K smart specialisation %K smart specialization %K societal innovation %K triple helix %X What makes a "smart region" smarter? We argue that it is the active orchestration of the regional ecosystem around concepts such as knowledge co-creation and exploitation, opportunity exploration, and capacity building. Simply adding to the proliferation of software developers in the area, stimulating the activities of business clusters around information technology, and providing digitally enabled services for citizens is not enough to make a region smarter. Smartness is enhanced by a well-orchestrated regional innovation ecosystem with a strong "smart specialization strategy" that leverages the new societal roles played by universities. In this article, we describe the European Commission’s program for research and innovation strategies for smart specialization (RIS3) and show how the Helsinki Region in Finland is using smart specialization, ecosystem orchestration, and the active role of universities to enhance regional innovation and the "smartness" of the region. These activities are discussed in the context of policy documents and strategy papers from regional, national, and European authorities, which illustrates some differences between papers and practice. This is work in progress, and based on early results, we draw initial conclusions about how putting policy into practice can make smart regions smarter. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 7-15 %8 10/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/932 %N 10 %1 European Union Committee of the Regions Markku Markkula is the President of the European Union Committee of the Regions (CoR), where he has been a member since 2010 and Rapporteur on several opinions related to topics such as Europe 2020, digitalization, single markets, as well as research and innovation. His experience includes memberships of several High Level Expert Groups, and he is a member of the EU Smart Specialisation Mirror Group. Markku works within Aalto University as the Advisor to Aalto Presidents, focusing on European Union strategy affairs. His previous work experience includes Directorship of the Lifelong Learning Institute Dipoli and the Secretary General of the International Association for Continuing Engineering Education IACEE. He is a former member of the Finnish Parliament (1995–2003). As an MP, his international role included the Presidency of EPTA Council (European Parliamentary Technology Assessment Network). In the Helsinki Region, he is the Board member of the Regional Council and the chair of the Steering Board, which makes decisions on the use of Structural Funds. He is a longstanding Espoo City Council member, as well as the chair of the City Planning Board. %2 Educore BV Hank Kune is Director of Educore BV, Founding Partner and member of the governing board of the Future Center Alliance, and active member of the New Club of Paris, a global network organization working as agenda developer for knowledge societies, where his focus is on entrepreneurial initiatives and societal innovation coaching. Hank works with diverse corporate and government organizations in projects about societal innovation and renewal, with a special emphasis on hands-on problem solving in complex social, societal, and organizational situations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/932 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Q&A. In the Innovation Game, Why Do So Many Companies Stay on the Sidelines? %A Katri Valkokari %K co-creation %K co-innovation %K collaboration %K innovation %K lead users %K Open innovation %K open source %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 35-39 %8 11/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/944 %N 11 %1 VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) Katri Valkokari works as a Principal Scientist at VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland) in the Business Ecosystems, Value Chains and Foresight research area. Over the past 15 years, she has carried out several development projects concerning different networked business arrangements (ecosystems, networks, partnerships, and firms). In 2009, Katri completed her doctoral thesis on business network development. She has published several international and national articles in the research areas of business network management, collaboration, organizational knowledge, and innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/944 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Reflecting on 100 Issues of the TIM Review %A Chris McPhee %K business %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K journal %K management %K Open Source Business Resource %K OSBR %K technology %K technology innovation management review %K TIM Review %X First launched in 2007, the Technology Innovation Management Review has now reached the milestone of 100 issues. This article looks back over these first 100 issues, the themes they covered, trends in authorship and readership, and future opportunities and challenges for the journal. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 5-11 %8 11/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/940 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/940 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Setting the Stage for Collaborative Creative Leadership at Cirque du Soleil %A Laurent Simon %K Cirque du Soleil %K collaboration %K creativity %K innovation %K leadership %X Debates about the nature of leadership for creativity have been ongoing since the 1950s. But, despite the central role leadership plays in the management of creative processes, few contributions highlight the actual practice of leadership for collaborative creative ventures. This interview with the Director of Acrobatics and Coaching at Cirque du Soleil addresses the reflexive experience of a creative leader faced with the challenges of integrating multiple expertises around complex, technological, human, and poly-sensorial creative performances. In this context, leadership for collaborative creativity appears as a constant and dynamic balancing act between people, ideas, deliverables, and the position and personality of the leader. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 59-65 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/915 %N 7 %1 HEC Montréal Laurent Simon is an Associate Professor in the Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the HEC Montréal business school in Montreal, Canada, where he is also the Co-Director of Mosaic, the Creativity & Innovation Hub. His current research focuses on characterizing the management of techno-creative projects and the study of creative environments and practices, the management of creative projects, creative communities, "creative cities", and the determinants of creativity in innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/915 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Sustainable Innovation: A Competitive Advantage for Innovation Ecosystems %A Kaisa Oksanen %A Antti Hautamäki %K innovation %K innovation ecosystem %K sustainability %K sustainable innovation %K well-being %X In this article, we elaborate the emerging concept of sustainable innovation and analyze the relevance of innovation as a means to solve wicked problems and enhancing sustainable well-being. We also examine the changing conditions for innovation creation: building global knowledge hubs and local innovation ecosystems. As a result, the drivers of innovation and opportunities to utilize the untapped innovation potential of people outside traditional innovation contexts are expanded and diversified. Ultimately, the success of sustainable innovation constitutes its impact on the well-being of people and vice versa: sustainable well-being is an important source of innovation and growth. The article adds to the conceptual development of sustainable innovation and its motivation, which lies in combining competitiveness, the well-being of people, and inclusive solutions. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 24-30 %8 10/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/934 %N 10 %1 Prime Minister’s Office, Finland Kaisa Oksanen, PhD, is a Senior Specialist at the Prime Minister’s Office, Finland. Her key expertise is related to foresight, socio-technical change, and innovation ecosystems. Previously, she worked at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, working with foresight and bio-economy transition. Her background is in social and political sciences, and she has done research on systemic innovation, futures studies, science and innovation policy, service innovation, and sustainable well-being. She has also worked as a research coordinator and innovation researcher in the Agora Center at the University of Jyväskylä and in Finland’s Futures Research Centre at the University of Turku. %2 University of Jyväskylä Antti Hautamäki, PhD, now a Professor Emeritus, was a Research Professor of Service Innovation and the Director of Agora Center at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. He is also an Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at the University of Helsinki. Antti has published and edited about thirty books and published two hundred articles about philosophy, cognitive science, and innovation. Currently, he works in his firm: Consulting Sustainable Innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/934 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Toward a New Understanding of Creative Dynamics: From One-Size-Fits-All Models to Multiple and Dynamic Forms of Creativity %A Stephen Cummings %A Chris Bilton %A dt ogilvie %K action-embedded creativity %K creative dynamics %K creativities %K creativity %K creativitying %K innovation %K management %X This article proposes an alternative to a managerial "best practice" approach to creativity based on the notion of creativity as a singular concept. Our alternative draws on three fundamental ideas that are emerging in different pockets of the creativity literature in a way that can be readily conceptualized and applied in practice. The first idea is that creativity is really about "creativities", or a cluster of different and discrete qualities that can be combined to suit the context in which they operate. The second is that creativity is not static: it is about "creativitying", or the action and the practice of combining these creativities, which evolve over time. The third is that being creative in organizations is not an individual act: rather, it is the multiple activities of groups as they go about creativitying. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 14-24 %8 07/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/910 %N 7 %1 Victoria University of Wellington Stephen Cummings is Professor of Strategy and ICMCI Academic Fellow at Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. He has published on strategy, creativity, and management history in a range of journals including the Academy of Management Learning and Education Journal, Academy of Management Perspectives, Human Relations, Long Range Planning, and Organization Studies. He has also written, co-written and edited a number of books promoting creative approaches to strategy development. These include Recreating Strategy (2002), Images of Strategy (2003), Creative Strategy (2010), The Handbook of Management and Creativity (2014), and Strategy Builder: How to Create and Communicate More Effective Strategies (2015). %2 University of Warwick Chris Bilton is Reader in the Centre for Cultural Policy Studies at the University of Warwick, United Kingdom, where he specializes in management of creativity and creativity of management. He is the author, editor, and co-author of several books on creative management and creative strategy and teaches modules on creative business and marketing. Chris has a background in theatre and in community arts, which he gained before entering the world of academia. His research interests include: leadership, strategy, and structure in creative organizations; cultural policy and the creative industries; and structure of the creative economy. He is currently working on a book about marketing in the creative industries, for publication in 2016. %3 Saunders College of Business/Rochester Institute of Technology dt ogilvie is Distinguished Professor of Urban Entrepreneurship and former Dean of Saunders College of Business at Rochester Institute of Technology, in New York, United States, where she founded the Center for Urban Entrepreneurship (CUE). She is formerly Professor of Business Strategy & Urban Entrepreneurship at Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick (RBS), where she founded The Center for Urban Entrepreneurship & Economic Development (CUEED) and the Scholarship Training and Enrichment Program (STEP). She has published in top journals and five of her research papers have been recognized with research awards. Her research interests include strategic decision making and the use of creativity to enhance business and battlefield decision making and applying complexity theory to strategy and creativity; executive leadership strategies of multicultural women executives; women in the executive suite; strategic thinking in the 21st century; cognition and strategic decision making; entrepreneurship and economic development of urban cities; and assessing environmental dimensions. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/910 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Viability Radar: A Practical Tool for Assessing the Viability of Transformative Service Innovations in a Healthcare Context %A Marikka Heikkilä %A Jouni Saarni %A Valtteri Kaartemo %A Aki Koponen %K business model %K ecosystem %K healthcare %K innovation %K institutionalization %K technology %K transformative service %K viability %K viability assessment %K viability radar %X This article develops and showcases the viability radar, which is designed to assess the innovation potential of transformative service ideas. Based on service research and innovation literature, we highlight the importance of novel simplifying technology, supporting value networks, cost-effective business models, and regulatory environments that enable the renewal of prevailing market practices. We operationalize the radar with a set of questions and assess the innovation potential of three pilot cases of new transformative healthcare services. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 17-30 %8 05/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/895 %N 5 %1 University of Turku Marikka Heikkilä is a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Turku, Finland. She has an interest in information systems, business models and business model innovation, and collaboration and coordination in business networks, especially with regard to services. Currently, she works for a Horizon2020 project (ENVISION) aiming at activating small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Europe to re-think and transform their business models with the help of an easy-to-use, open-access web platform. Marikka holds an MSc and a Licentiate of Science in Economics and Information Systems from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. She received her PhD from the Faculty of Information Technology at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. %2 University of Turku Jouni Saarni is a Development Manager in the Center for Collaborative Research at Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland. He plans and executes joint research projects in collaboration with different interest groups. Saarni has background in industry analyses, innovation studies, and regulation evaluations. His research interests relate to industry dynamics, market competition, and technological change. %3 University of Turku Valtteri Kaartemo (D.Sc.) is University Lecturer of Global Innovation Management at Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland. Apart from teaching, he is actively involved in various research projects around healthcare innovations and renewing business practices. His major interests can be found in the intersection of international entrepreneurship, service, network, and process research. He has presented his research findings in various conferences and journals worldwide, including the International Journal of Business Excellence, Idäntutkimus, and Форсайт. %4 University of Turku Aki Koponen is the Director and Founder of the Centre for Collaborative Research at Turku School of Economic, University of Turku, Finland. During the last 10 years, he has led over 50 interdisciplinary research, development, and consulting projects. Topics of the research include economic analysis of market competitiveness, effects of new legislation and regulation on competitiveness, competition in service industries, and market-based solutions for healthcare services. In addition to traditional competition policy issues, he has been in charge of several projects focused on innovation activity, industry dynamics, and strategic renewal, as well as regional development. He is also an active speaker and a regular commentator in regional and national media. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/895 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Ambidextrous Strategies and Innovation Priorities: Adequately Priming the Pump for Continual Innovation %A Nehemiah Scott %K ambidexterity %K exploitation %K exploration %K innovation %K strategy %X The dynamic and unpredictable nature of the market has caused many organizations within rapidly changing industries to fail. These failures are, in part, due to a lack of continual and balanced innovation that firms should aim to achieve. That is, although firms may succeed at either refining existing competencies for incremental innovations or exploring new opportunities for radical innovations, many firms have experienced great difficulty in simultaneously pursuing and realizing success in both areas. This innovation imbalance arises when firms stick to traditional strategic notions of competition in fast-moving industries; these firms have not realized that the ability to compete in current and new markets begins with the strategies and priorities that are responsible for the very nature of innovation capabilities. The purpose of this study is to offer a reconceptualization of notions related to organizational strategy that are responsible for driving innovation capabilities. Specifically, this study develops a continual innovation framework that illustrates the impact ambidextrous strategies and priorities have on the firm’s ambidextrous innovation capability. It offers a modified concept of ambidexterity (i.e., exploration, exploitation, coordination) to reconceptualize business, marketing, and information systems strategies as ambidextrous strategy constructs. The article also discusses the relationships between constructs and the implications of this reconceptualization for researchers and managers. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 44-51 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/812 %N 7 %1 University of Toledo Nehemiah Scott is a PhD student in the Manufacturing & Technology Management program in the College of Business and Innovation at the University of Toledo, USA. He holds a BS in Computer Science and Engineering Technology and an MBA specializing in Information Systems from the University of Toledo. He also has corporate experience in the field of information systems working as a database programmer, and he has research and consulting experience in the area of process improvement. Nehemiah’s main research interests include innovation and technology management, and supply chain management. His past research focused on innovation in bottom-of-pyramid societies and the supply chain. His current research focuses on ambidexterity for firm innovation and adaptation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/812 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Collaborative Idea Management: A Driver of Continuous Innovation %A Jesper Bank %A Adnan Raza %K collaboration %K collaborative idea management %K crowdsourcing %K culture %K innovation %K leadership %K Open innovation %K strategy %X Despite the critical importance of innovation to most companies' ongoing success, many organizations fail to develop sustainable innovation management processes. The article explores the application of collaborative idea management to drive continuous innovation in large organizations based on our experience at Waabii, an innovation software and consulting service provider. First, we identify the key roadblocks faced by organizations in managing their innovation processes. Next, we describe the innovation model created at Waabii to help implement a sustainable innovation process, and we present a case study of an innovation management software solution, Exago Idea Market, which was implemented to create a collaborative and sustainable innovation environment in a large global telecommunications company. Finally, we offer recommendations for implementing this model of collaborative idea management. This article is particularly relevant to managers in larger organizations and practitioners of organizational change seeking to identify inhibitors of growth and business innovation and how to combat the roadblocks and create a sustainable innovation environment. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 11-16 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/764 %N 2 %1 Waabii Limited Jesper Bank is CEO and Co-Founder of Waabii Limited, where he is responsible for the company’s strategic direction and partnership development in North America. He works with leaders in public and private sector organizations around the world to help increase collaboration, engage employees in idea generation, and convert great ideas into value. For over a decade, Jesper has helped companies achieve profitable growth through business process improvement, and he currently provides counsel in the areas of strategy clarification, innovation management, and business-process redesign. He also provides idea management software and consulting services that enable firms to identify and prioritize the winning ideas within their organizations. Jesper holds a TRIUM Global Executive MBA from New York University Stern School of Business, London School of Economics and Political Science, and HEC School of Management in Paris, and he has substantive international experience having lived and worked in both North America and Europe. %2 Waabii Limited Adnan Raza is an Innovation Consultant for Waabii Limited, where he provides business support advice and consultancy for Waabii’s idea management solutions. He works with innovation teams in global organizations to improve their business and product innovation processes through novel insights and analysis. He has worked for more than four years in helping global organizations manage innovation through competitive market analysis, as well as the management and protection of intellectual property portfolios. He holds a BASc in Electrical Engineering from the University of Windsor, Canada, and an MBA from Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/764 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Emerging Technologies (March 2014) %A Chris McPhee %A David Hudson %K 3D printing %K big data analytics %K BYOD %K crowdsourcing %K emerging technology %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K IT consumerization %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-6 %8 03/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/769 %N 3 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Carleton University David Hudson is a lecturer in information technology and innovation in the MBA program at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He is a Director of the Venus Cybersecurity Corporation and the Lead To Win entrepreneurship program, and he is the Chair of the Advisory Board for the Province of Ontario Centres of Excellence Information, Communication, and Digital Media Sector. David also consults with F500 firms on innovation management. David's doctoral research at Carleton focused on IT consumerization and how employees create value for themselves and their firms when they "BYOD". Previously, he was the Vice President for advanced research and development at a large technology firm and has received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/769 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship (December 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K 3D printing %K business models %K commercialization %K disruption %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K innovation capacity %K innovation culture %K patents %K social entrepreneurship %K social innovation %K spinoffs %K university technology transfer %K value propositions %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-5 %8 12/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/852 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/852 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India (August 2014) %A Chris McPhee %A Kalyan Kumar Guin %K education %K entrepreneurship %K government support %K India %K innovation %K knowledge systems %K policy %K service innovation %K stakeholders %K startups %K uncertainty %K university %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/816 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/816 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Insights (July 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K ambidexterity %K business ecosystems %K business models %K entrepreneurship %K improvisation %K innovation %K Internet of Things %K knowledge-intensive business services %K platforms %K public good %K publicly funded research %K standards %K strategy %K value co-creation %K value design %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/806 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/806 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Insights (September 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K born global %K crowdsourcing %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K internationalization %K patent citations %K patent evaluation %K social networks %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 09/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/825 %N 9 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/825 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Opportunities and Capabilities (June 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K capabilities %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K IT capabilities %K IT function %K mobile services %K opportunities %K organizational legitimacy %K patent citations %K patent value %K professional services %K service innovation %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/798 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/798 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Seeking Solutions (February 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K collaboration %K employee entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K local open innovation %K Open innovation %K Seeking Solutions %K technology adoption %K value creation %K virtual proximity %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/762 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/762 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Enhancing Innovation through Virtual Proximity %A Tom Coughlan %K clusters %K communication %K distance %K innovation %K tools %K virtual proximity %X Historically, innovation strategists have focused on leveraging local resources and the development of local clusters, which have relied heavily on personal contact. It was assumed that serendipity would occur through casual contact and that this contact would result in rapid sharing of ideas. Many studies have supported this concept; however, the pace of innovation has changed and the most successful organizations promote not only physical proximity but also virtual proximity to resources. Virtual proximity refers to the level of emotional closeness between individuals, as developed through the use of information and communications technologies. This article argues that organizations can and should look to develop local virtual relationships supported by physical proximity: the mix of both virtual proximity and physical proximity can increase an organization's innovation capability. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 17-22 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/765 %N 2 %1 Mercy College Tom Coughlan, DBA, is the Associate Dean of the School of Business at Mercy College in Dobbs Ferry, New York. He is also is an adjunct faculty in the graduate programs of the University of Phoenix, the Manhattan Institute of Management, the University of Bridgeport, and the Weller International Business School in Paris. His fields of practice include management, marketing, and e-business with a particular emphasis on the development of virtual proximity to increase levels of applied innovation within and across organizations. In addition to his academic activities, Dr. Coughlan has over 30 years of field experience as an entrepreneur, consultant, and marketing/management professional. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/765 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Generative Innovation Practices, Customer Creativity, and the Adoption of New Technology Products %A Stoyan Tanev %A Marianne Harbo Frederiksen %K co-creation %K customer creativity %K customer value %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K technology adoption %X We offer a critical reflection on one of the key reasons for the startlingly low success rate of innovation initiatives worldwide – the fact that the interactive environment surrounding the customer is a critical part of the adoption process; it can and should be designed in a way that enables customer creativity, and thus adoption. In this article, we embrace a definition of innovation as “the adoption of a new practice by a community” where the innovator is the one who does not only sense and move into new opportunities but also mobilizes all the necessary resources needed by customers to adopt a new practice. The emphasis on adoption merges together innovation and entrepreneurship by shifting the focus from the inventor and the designer, through the entrepreneur, to the ultimate recipient of the innovative outcomes. Looking at customers as co-creators is critically important for technological product adoption; missing the chance to enable their creativity is equivalent to missing the opportunity of seeing them for who they really are. The result is a distorted vision that is ultimately rooted in the misconception of the dynamics of customer value. We particularly emphasize two points: i) the increasing degree of complexity of everyday technological products requires a higher degree of creativity by customers to adopt; and ii) customer creativity is not only a function of user-technology interaction, it is a function of the various actors in the interactive environment surrounding the customer such as other customers, other technologies, local distributors, customer/technical support providers, and competitors. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 5-10 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/763 %N 2 %1 University of Southern Denmark Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation and member of the Centre for Integrative Innovation Management at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, as well as Adjunct Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he was previously a faculty member in the Technology Innovation Management Program. He has a MSc and a PhD in Physics jointly from the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France and the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, a PhD in Theology from the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, an MEng in Technology Management from Carleton University, Canada, and an MA from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada. He has multidisciplinary research interests with a focus on the fields of technology innovation management, born global technology startup business model development and value co-creation. Dr. Tanev is Senior IEEE member and member of the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %2 University of Southern Denmark Marianne Harbo Frederiksen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation and a member of the Centre for Integrative Innovation Management at the University of Southern Denmark. Currently, she is also a PhD student focusing on creative processes and outcomes in connection with new product development and adoption and therefore the linkages between creativity and innovation. She has an MSc in Architecture from the Aarhus School of Architecture, Denmark, with a specialization within industrial design and product development. She has been co-owner of a design company and has worked in and together with several industries as a designer and R&D Manager as well as an adviser in public-private research projects focusing on user experience, experience designing, and other aspects of product development. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/763 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T The Government of India's Role in Promoting Innovation through Policy Initiatives for Entrepreneurship Development %A Ravindra Abhyankar %K economic growth %K entrepreneurship %K government %K India %K innovation %K innovation ecosystem %K policy %X In spite of having a large publicly funded science and technology infrastructure and a sizeable education base, India has not been able to realize its innovative potential due to a fragmented innovation ecosystem. The government of India has taken many initiatives towards strengthening the innovation ecosystem, the most important of which are: i) the establishment of the National Innovation Council, whose mandate is to coordinate various innovation-related activities, and ii) the new Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013, which is intended to promote entrepreneurship and science-led solutions for sustainable and inclusive growth. With a focus on this new policy initiative, this article describes the current innovation ecosystem and the challenges it faces, and it discusses the efforts made by the government towards the promotion of innovation for entrepreneurship development and sustainable growth. With the implementation of this new policy the early indications are that India is poised to take a big leap towards innovation-led growth. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 11-17 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/818 %N 8 %1 Ravindra Abhyankar is an Electrical Engineer who has worked in the Government of India in various capacities. After working for 17 years in the Ministry of Defense (1974–1990) in the field of quality assurance, technical development, and indigenization of various fighter aircraft and other aeronautical systems, he joined the Ministry of Science and Technology in the Department of Scientific and Industrial research (DSIR). In this ministry, he handled various responsibilities such as administering fiscal incentives for R&D and supporting innovation at the individual and industrial levels for over 20 years (1990–2011). He was the nodal officer in the Government of India for the Asian and Pacific Center for Transfer of Technology (APCTT), which is a United Nations initiative dedicated to capacity building of Asia-Pacific countries to nurture and promote national innovation systems and also to create enabling environments for the development and transfer of technology and R&D management. He has also functioned as an Adviser to the Science and Technology Minister of Mozambique (2012–2014) in the creation of a publicly funded R&D system for the benefit of Mozambican industry. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/818 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Innovation in Services: A Literature Review %A Rabeh Morrar %K assimilation approach %K demarcation approach %K economic performance %K innovation %K service innovation %K synthesis approach %X The article reviews the literature relevant to innovation in services, which has flourished since the 1990s. We discuss the definition of service and to what extent the characteristics of service output have influenced the conceptualization of innovation in services. Then, based on the literature review, we develop a conceptual framework for innovation in service sector, which classifies innovation in service sector into three main approaches: i) assimilation, where innovation in the service sector is assimilated from innovation in manufacturing sector; ii) demarcation, which differentiates innovation in service sector from the traditional conceptualization of innovation in manufacturing sector; and iii) synthesis, which aggregates both assimilation and demarcation approaches within a common conceptual framework. We discuss the relationship between innovation in services and economic performance using productivity and employment as two indicators of performance. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 6-14 %8 04/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/780 %N 4 %1 An-Najah National University Rabeh Morrar is an Assistant Professor of Innovation Economics at An-Najah National University in Nablus, Palestine. Rabeh's doctoral dissertation from Lille 1 University in France focused on public-private innovation networks in the service sector, and his current research is focused on innovation in the service sector, R&D management, and technology management. Rabeh is also CEO of BEST, a small business in Palestine that provides innovation solutions and training. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/780 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Innovation Opportunities: An Overview of Standards and Platforms in the Video Game Industry %A Mikael Laakso %A Linus Nyman %K arcade games %K computer games %K console games %K innovation %K mobile games %K platforms %K standards %K video game industry %X The video game industry offers insights into the significance of standards and platforms. Furthermore, it shows examples of how new entrants can offer innovative services, while reducing their own risk, through bridging the boundaries between standards. Through an exploration of both past and present, this article aims to serve as a primer for understanding, firstly, the technological standards and platforms of the video game industry, and secondly, the recent innovations within the video game industry that have enabled products to be made available across platforms. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 15-21 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/808 %N 7 %1 Hanken School of Economics Mikael Laakso is a postdoctoral researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. He has published research on open access in scientific publishing and standardization of construction IT. Mikael has a Doctoral and Master’s degree in Information Systems Science from the Hanken School of Economics. %2 Hanken School of Economics Linus Nyman is a doctoral researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, where he has recently submitted his PhD on code forking in open source software. Linus has a Master’s degree in Economics from the Hanken School of Economics. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/808 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Integrating Design for All in Living Labs %A Madeleine Gray %A Mikaël Mangyoku %A Artur Serra %A Laia Sánchez %A Francesc Aragall %K 3H %K co-creation %K design %K design for all %K health %K HUMBLES %K ICT %K innovation %K living labs %K LUPI %K methodologies %K service prototyping %K services %K social care %K urban design %K user-centred approaches %X The European Union has identified innovation as a key driver behind business competitiveness and responsive governance. However, innovation in and of itself may not be sufficient to help businesses bring new products to market and to help governments shape public services that meet the real needs of citizens. The Integrating Design for All in Living Labs (IDeALL) project sought to identify and test methodologies for designing with users in real-life settings. The results of the experiments showed how different methodologies can be applied in different contexts, helping to provide solutions to societal issues and to create products and services that genuinely meet user requirements. In this article, we describe the methodologies used in the IDeALL project and provide examples of the project's experiments and case studies across four main areas: i) services; ii) health and social care; iii) information and communication technology; and iv) urban design. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 50-59 %8 05/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/793 %N 5 %1 Design for All Foundation Madeleine Gray is the former Communication Manager at the Design for All Foundation. She has worked in the area of universal design for several years, having previously worked as Head of Knowledge Development at the Centre for Accessible Environments where she was editor of the inclusive-design journal Access by Design. Based in Barcelona, the Foundation works to compile and disseminate information in the area of design for all, as well as to recognise examples of best practice through its annual awards scheme and Flag of Towns and Cities for All. %2 IDeALL Mikaël Mangyoku is the Living Lab Project Manager for the Campus Manufacture Plaine Achille near the Cité du design and the European Project Manager for IDeALL. He has an Innovation Project Management and Industrial Design Master's degree from Strate College in Sèvres, France. He is both an engineer and a designer, and his research compares and analyses user-centred methodologies. %3 i2cat Foundation Artur Serra has been Deputy Director of the i2cat Foundation in Catalonia, Spain, since its creation in 2003. In 2006, he started from i2cat the project Anella Cultural (Cultural Ring), which connects the cultural community from five cities in Barcelona and Catalonia to a future Internet media infrastructure. He is a founding member of the European Network of Living Labs, and he organizes public-private-citizens partnerships fostering open innovation projects in Spain, such as Citilab.eu. %4 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Laia Sánchez is responsible for the Social Media Lab at Citilab and is Assistant Professor of Comunication Sciences Faculty in the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. %# Design for All Foundation Francesc Aragall is President of the Design for All Foundation in Barcelona, Spain, and Director of ProAsolutions, a consultancy company for urban and infrastructures design and strategic planning. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/793 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Mobile Convergence and Entrepreneurial Opportunities for Innovative Products and Services %A Jeff Moretz %A Chirag Surti %K Canada %K competition %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K mobile convergence %K mobile services %K wireless pricing %X Our research on 2012 and 2013 Canadian wireless service pricing indicates that data was underpriced relative to traditional voice and text messaging services. Such a situation, while potentially disadvantaging consumers of traditional mobile services, created a market that favoured competitors pursuing innovative uses of mobile data. Although more competitive pressures in the telecommunications market would provide broader benefits to Canadian consumers and facilitate greater innovation in related services, a favorable pricing differential vis-à-vis data transmission provides useful incentives. Even with recent changes to the pricing of mobile services in Canada, we should expect continued development of services that substitute data for voice and text messaging, particularly for international communications, as well as more innovative uses of mobile data. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 14-21 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/800 %N 6 %1 University of Ontario Institute of Technology Jeff Moretz is Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) in Oshawa, Canada. He obtained his PhD from the University of Texas at Austin, USA, and has an MBA and two undergraduate degrees from Michigan State University, USA. He is a recovering consultant, having worked for McKinsey & Company in Chicago after his MBA studies. Prior to joining the UOIT, he worked at University College Cork in Ireland, researching open source software communities and open innovation. His research interests focus on the impact of information, openness, and information technologies on innovation, business models, and strategies. %2 University of Ontario Institute of Technology Chirag Surti is an Assistant Professor of Logistics and Supply Chain Management at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) in Oshawa, Canada. He earned a PhD degree from McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, and a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York in Buffalo, USA. His primary research interest is in the area supply chain management and understanding and analyzing the role process innovation can play in boosting productivity. He is a recipient of NSERC Discovery and SSHRC Partnership grants. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/800 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Radical Versus Incremental Innovation: The Importance of Key Competences in Service Firms %A Marit Engen %A Inger Elisabeth Holen %K community innovation survey %K competences %K innovation %K innovation novelty %K services %X Today, innovation often takes place using open practices and relies on many sources for knowledge and information. The purpose of this article is to study how different knowledge-based antecedents influence the ability of service organizations to innovate. Using data about the Norwegian service sector from the 2010 Community Innovation Survey, we examined how three types of competence, namely R&D activities, employee-based activities, and customer-related activities, influence the propensity of firms to introduce radical or incremental innovations. The results show that R&D-based competence is important for service firms when pursuing radical innovations, whereas employee-based activities such as idea collaboration are only found to influence incremental innovations. The use of customer information was found to be an important driver for both radical and incremental innovations. The findings points to managerial challenges in creating and balancing the types of competence needed, depending on type of innovation targeted by an organization. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 15-25 %8 04/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/781 %N 4 %1 Lillehammer University College Marit Engen is an Assistant Professor at Lillehammer University College, Norway, where she is also a PhD student at The Centre for Innovation in Services. Her research project focuses on the management of employee-driven service innovation with a particular focus on idea creation in frontline employees and how ideas from the front end are absorbed into the innovation processes in service organizations. She holds an MSc in Marketing from Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Norway, with a specialization in knowledge management. She has worked as an advisor in the tourism sector for several years and has broad experience from projects in both the private and public sectors. %2 Lillehammer University College Inger Elisabeth Holen is a PhD student in the field of public and private service innovation at the Centre of Innovation in Services at Lillehammer University College, Norway. Her research has a special focus on linkages between innovation activity and business performance in service firms, but also on how public policy can stimulate innovation. She holds an MSc in Business and Economics from the BI Norwegian Business School in Oslo, Norway. She is also a co-owner of a milk-producing farm and has experience from agriculture and business consulting, and she has worked with a variety of entrepreneurs as well as established companies. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/781 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T TIM Lecture Series – Adventures in Innovation: Inside the Rise and Fall of Nortel %A John F. Tyson %K Bell-Northern Research %K BNR %K company culture %K industrial design %K innovation %K Nortel %K Northern Telecom %K user-centred design %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 39-40 %8 03/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/775 %N 3 %1 John F. Tyson is an industrial designer, inventor, angel investor and accomplished senior executive who spent over 35 years with Bell-Northern Research (BNR) and Nortel Networks. During this time he focused on product design, R&D, marketing, and advanced technology. His principles on user-centered design, innovation, and design-based thinking have been detailed in numerous publications and his work has been featured in museums and galleries including the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the National Art Gallery of Canada, the Canadian Museum of Science and Technology, the Canadian Museum of Civilization, and the Toronto Design Exchange (DX). His work has also been featured on two Canadian postage stamps. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/775 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T TIM Lecture Series – Insights on Innovation %A Ibrahim Gedeon %K customer focus %K ecosystems %K innovation %K service provision %K telecommunications %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 40-41 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/803 %N 6 %1 TELUS Ibrahim Gedeon is CTO of TELUS, where he is responsible for technology strategy, service and network architecture, service delivery, and operational support systems for the company’s wire line and wireless divisions, as well as service and network convergence, enterprise applications, and network infrastructure strategies and evolution. Ibrahim began his career in telecommunications engineering and research in 1990 when he joined Bell Northern Research. After moving to Nortel in 1994, he was named Vice President and Director of Data Network Engineering in 1996; Vice President of Internet Brand Management in 1999, and Senior Vice President of Wireless Engineering in 2000. Ibrahim has held numerous leadership roles in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and has also received numerous professional awards and various forms of industry recognition, including being named three times to the Global Telecoms Business magazine’s “GTB Power 100,” a list of the 100 most powerful and influential people in the telecoms industry. Ibrahim also serves on the board of a number of industry associations, including the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions and Industry Canada’s Communications Research Centre. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering from the American University of Beirut and a Master's degree in Electronics Engineering from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. In 2010, he received an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from the University of British Columbia. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/803 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T TIM Lecture Series – The Laboratory for Analytic Sciences: Developing the Art and Science of Analysis %A J. David Harris %K analysis %K analytics %K big data %K collaboration %K cybersecurity %K framework %K innovation %K instrumentation %K monitoring %K prediction %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 52-54 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/813 %N 7 %1 Laboratory for Analytic Sciences J. David Harris is the inaugural Director of the Laboratory for Analytic Sciences in Raleigh, North Carolina, where the aim is to develop a science of analysis and analytic methodology. During nearly 25 years service with the U. S. Department of Defense, David has worked in a variety of technical and leadership positions in areas of research and development, technology transfer, and operations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/813 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Using Trademarks to Measure Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services %A Matthias Gotsch %A Christiane Hipp %K innovation %K innovation indicator %K KIBS %K knowledge-intensive business services %K trademarks %X We present an empirical approach to measuring service innovation on the company level through the analysis of trademarks. Prior empirical investigations in several industries have shown that a trademark may be used as an innovation indicator. This article explores the use and relevance of trademarks by conducting a survey in the knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) industries with 278 participating companies. Our survey results explain the use of trademarks as a way to protect innovation and intellectual property for KIBS. In sum, we show that trademarks can be described as adequate and useful indicators to measure new service innovations in the KIBS industries. Additionally, we show that trademarks have the potential to overcome weaknesses of traditional measurement concepts towards KIBS innovation and might make special surveys redundant in the future. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 18-30 %8 05/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/790 %N 5 %1 Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI Matthias Gotsch is a senior researcher in the Competence Center for Industrial and Service Innovations at the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI in Karlsruhe, Germany. He holds a PhD from Brandenburg Technical University of Cottbus for his research on innovation measurement in the knowledge-intensive services industry and a German university diploma in Industrial Engineering with the focus on industrial business, technology, and innovation management from the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg. He has expertise in service innovations, industrial services, and designing innovative service-based business models and has contributed several papers and articles to the field of service science. %2 Technical University Cottbus Christiane Hipp is Dean and Professor for Organisation, Human Resource Management and General Management at the Technical University Cottbus, Germany. She received her diploma in Industrial Engineering in 1994 and her PhD in Economics in 1999. From 1995 until 1999. Christiane was a Research Associate at the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research. She received her postdoctoral lecture qualification in 2005. Her areas of interest include demographical change, service innovation, innovation strategies, intellectual property, and innovation processes. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/790 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? %A Soile Juujärvi %A Kaija Pesso %K innovation %K knowledge production %K networks %K regional development %K urban living labs %X There is a growing trend to involve citizens in city development to make urban areas more suitable to their needs and prevent social problems. City centres and neighbourhoods have increasingly been serving as regional living labs, which are ideal platforms to explore the needs of users as residents and citizens. This article examines the characteristics and success factors of urban living labs based on a case study of Suurpelto, Finland. Urban living lab activity is characterized by a practice-based innovation process with diffuse and heterogeneous knowledge production that aims to address urban problems of varying complexity. User involvement is critical for co-creating value, but equally important is collaboration between other living lab actors: enablers, providers, and utilizers. Enabler-driven labs can be successful in creating common goals but they need providers, such as development organizations, to boost development. Proactive networking, experimentation as a bottom-up process, using student innovators as resources, as well as commitment and longevity in development work are success factors for urban living labs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 22-27 %8 11/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/742 %N 11 %1 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Soile Juujärvi is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Adjunct Professor at the University of Helsinki in Finland. Her research interests include moral and ethical development and innovation processes, especially networking, in living labs. From 2010 to 2012, she worked as a researcher in the Koulii (Innovation & Integration in Education) project, which was funded by the European Social Fund. She holds a Doctor of Social Science degree from the University of Helsinki. %2 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Kaija Pesso is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences in Finland. Her research interests include ethics and health promotion and innovation processes in living labs. From 2010 to 2012, she worked as a researcher in the Koulii (Innovation & Integration in Education) project, which was funded by the European Social Fund. She holds a Doctor of Health Sciences degree from the University of Tampere, Finland. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/742 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Corporate Lifecycles: Modelling the Dynamics of Innovation and Its Support Infrastructure %A Tamas Koplyay %A Lisa Chillingworth %A Brian Mitchell %K innovation %K Innovation management %K leadership %K market lifecycle %K model %K organizational culture %K staffing %X Corporate leadership and corporate culture have to be aligned to market realities to ensure the long-term success of a firm. As companies form, grow, and mature, the management of the enterprises also have to evolve through the business lifecycle. What is successful in the introduction stage may not be successful for a mature company. Firms are required to change their focus from product development, to market development, to process development, and finally to market and financial leadership. To be successful means that not only the types of employees hired have to evolve to support the culture required, but the leadership styles and management focus also have to change and adapt to the new realities that firms encounter in their market. The dynamic model presented in this article shows the broad strategic imperatives that must be met by firms, and it is presented through a graphical illustration of how successful firms manage their evolution and how firms can fail through mis-allocation of corporate efforts to non-mission critical initiatives. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 22-29 %8 10/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/733 %N 10 %1 Université du Québec en Outaouais Tamas Koplyay is Professor of High-Technology Strategic Management at the Université du Québec en Outaouais in Gatineau, Canada. He received Master's degrees in Systems Engineering, Applied Mathematics, and Information Theory from the State University of New York, United States; he received his MBA from the University of Ottawa, Canada; and he received his PhD in Systems Science from Michigan State University, United States. He has been a visiting researcher at the Harvard Law School in Public Finance. Currently, he is also the Director of Research for the Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance as part of his university commitments to the high-technology community. %2 Szent István University Lisa Chillingworth a PhD candidate in Management and Business Administration at Szent István University in Budapest, Hungary. She obtained her Bachelor of Arts degree from York University in Toronto, Canada. She is a Project Management Professional (PMP) and LEED Accredited Professional (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and holds her Masters degree in Project Management from the Université du Québec, Canada, for which she received the 2012 Governor General’s Gold Medal for academic excellence. Ms. Chillingworth has 20 years of experience in project management and is currently the Director of Program Management and Advisory Services, North America, for an international real estate and capital facilities project management firm. Previously, Ms. Chillingworth spent a number of years as a project and management consultant, specializing in business transformation, operations, and strategic planning. She is also the Director of International Corporate Relations for the Global Academic Network, and their annual Global Management Conference, which work to bridge academia and the business community. She is also an Executive in Residence and Associate Director of Research for the Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance (CATA). %3 Szent István University Brian Mitchell is a PhD candidate in Management and Business Administration at Szent István University in Budapest, Hungary. He holds a Master’s degree in Project Management from the Université du Quebec, Canada, is a Project Management Professional (PMP), and LEED Accredited Professional (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) in the building design and construction industry. Mr. Mitchell has over 25 years of diverse experience in the delivery and management of capital projects and related work. As the National Practice Manager for a leading Canadian project management company, Mr. Mitchell was responsible for corporate research, project management best practice methodologies, and knowledge transfer across Canada. He was also a reviewer of the Project Management Institute's Construction Extension to the PMBoK Guide, Second Edition. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/733 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Editorial: Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship (April 2013) %A Chris McPhee %A Jean-Pierre Segers %K business ecosystems %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %K incubation %K innovation %K Open innovation %K partnership %K R&D %K regional innovation system %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 3-5 %8 04/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/672 %N 4 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 PXL University College Jean-Pierre Segers is Dean of the Business School at PXL University College in Hasselt, Belgium, and he is the Chairman and co-founder of Creative Inc.. He holds a Master's degree in Applied Economics and Public Affairs and is a former researcher in the Small Business Research Institute at the University of Brussels. His main research interests are small businesses and entrepreneurship; innovation and technology management; national and regional systems of innovation; and public-private partnerships. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/672 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Editorial: Technology Evolution (May 2013) %A Chris McPhee %A Michael Weiss %K business ecosystems %K industrial instrumentation and control %K innovation %K Innovation management %K mashups %K R&D %K technological change %K technology evolution %K web applications %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 3-4 %8 05/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/681 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Carleton University Michael Weiss holds a faculty appointment in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and is a member of the Technology Innovation Management program. His research interests include open source, ecosystems, mashups, patterns, and social network analysis. Michael has published on the evolution of open source business, mashups, platforms, and technology entrepreneurship. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/681 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T The Habitation Lab: Using a Design Approach to Foster Innovation for Sustainable Living %A Paula Femenías %A Pernilla Hagbert %K experimentation %K Habitation Lab %K housing development %K innovation %K living labs %K residing %K sustainable %X This article describes a first step towards a strategy for using living labs as a means to foster innovation and develop new concepts of sustainable living from an architectural point of view. The overall aim is to enable truly sustainable living through radically reduced energy and resource use thus addressing both environmental and social aspects of sustainability. Earlier research has shown that contemporary housing developments, including those with a sustainable profile, do not profoundly question modern lifestyles and consumption, which is a necessity to overcome limitations of a technological focus on environmental efficiency in construction. Thus, we see an opportunity for the discipline of architecture to engage in current investments in living lab facilities in order to push innovation in the field of sustainable housing. We introduce the concept of a "Habitation Lab", which will provide an arena for radical and high-risk design experimentation between users, building-sector actors, and academia, and we describe a case study of a planned Habitation Lab within a living lab facility where traditional solutions for daily living and habitation are questioned and new architectural innovations are explored and evaluated. The idea of using experimental activities in the field of housing is not new, and we argue that new investments should build on earlier experiences to avoid perpetuating misconceptions and repeating past failures. Furthermore, to ensure the dissemination and uptake of results, the design of the Habitation Lab should consider the innovation and learning trajectories of the building sector. We propose a transdisciplinary setting to provide a neutral arena for value creation and to increase the distribution of experiences. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 15-21 %8 11/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/741 %N 11 %1 Chalmers University of Technology Paula Femenías is an architect and Assistant Professor at the Department of Architecture at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. Paula works in several ongoing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research projects focusing on innovation, development, and learning for more sustainable building. Her work includes developing the perspective of clients and owners and researching the specific challenges for redevelopment of the existing built environment from a multi-value and multi-interest perspective. %2 Chalmers University of Technology Pernilla Hagbert is an architect and doctoral student within the Homes for Tomorrow research environment at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. With previous experience in planning and design, including design/build processes for constructing affordable housing, Pernilla's work addresses all scales of the development of more sustainable living environments. Her PhD research specifically examines the concept of home in light of and with regards to a global resource perspective, with the purpose of providing a framework for re-conceptualization of the sustainable home. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/741 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T How Service Innovation Boosts Bottom Lines %A Claude Legrand %A Rob LaJoie %K complex problems %K innovation %K innovation gap %K innovative intelligence %K service innovation %X In the national quest for ground-breaking R&D discoveries and inventions, service innovation is frequently ignored at considerable cost to an organization’s bottom line and a nation’s productivity. For the fact is that innovation applied systematically to all activities outside of R&D can make the difference between uninspiring results and substantial growth in every sector. Many countries, in particular in Europe, have recognized the importance of service innovation and are devoting considerable resources to research, the capture of best practices, and the measurement of progress and success. Given the physiognomy of the modern economy, it does not make sense for leaders in the Canadian public sector to devote all available innovation investment dollars to science and technology R&D. This article explores why service innovation is not yet a priority on the innovation agenda in Canada and why we should correct the dangerous misconception that there is just one “innovation gap” that needs to be addressed. It provides practical recommendations that public and private sector leaders can use to take advantage of this under-valued, high-potential innovation opportunity and calls for the creation of a national service innovation resource to support enterprises of all sizes as a means to improve Canadian productivity. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 20-25 %8 09/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/724 %N 9 %1 Staples Innovation Claude Legrand is Managing Partner of Staples Innovation, a consulting and learning company based in Toronto, Canada. Prior to this, Claude was Founder and President of Ideaction Inc. For over 25 years, Claude has worked with more than 100 organizations providing strategic counsel, planning, implementation, measurement, and learning programs on innovation. His research interests include the practical application of innovation in organizations and he frequently speaks on all aspects of non-R&D innovation. Claude was the founding Program Director for the Centre of Excellence in Innovation Management at the Schulich Executive Education Centre, part of the Schulich Business School. He is the co-author of Innovative Intelligence – The Art and Practice of Leading Sustainable Innovation in Your Organization. %2 Staples Innovation Rob LaJoie is Managing Partner and leader of Staples Innovation’s consulting and implementation practices. For more than 20 years, he has used the innovation models developed by Ideaction to solve complex problems in the service sector. He is a former Operating Executive of BMO Bank of Montreal with accountabilities in Retail & Commercial Banking and Wealth Management. Prior to joining Staples Innovation, he was the Head of the North American financial services practice for ZS Associates, a global consulting firm specializing in sales and marketing strategy and operations. Rob holds undergraduate degrees in Science and Management Economics, both from the University of Guelph, Canada, an MBA from the Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, and Executive Program certificates from the J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in Illinois, United States. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/724 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Q&A. How Do You Program Innovative Thinking into Company Culture? %A Tim Ragan %K business strategy %K company culture %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 44-47 %8 10/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/736 %N 10 %1 C-View Strategies Tim Ragan is the founder/owner of C-View Strategies, a business-design consultancy, and he is the owner of Career Coaching International , where he helps people discover their talents and interests, and accelerate their career objectives. He has over 25 years of experience in numerous functional, management, and executive capacities on three continents with major communications players including Mitel, Nortel, Newbridge Networks, and Alcatel. Tim has a BSc in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and an MBA from the University of Ottawa, Canada, where he teaches “Business & Society”, a course that examines the ethical and moral implications of modern business and its interaction with government and civil society. He also regularly teaches graduate-level courses on business-process transformation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/736 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Q&A. What Are the Components of Canada's Innovation Ecosystem and How Well Is it Performing? %A David B. Watters %K academia %K commercialization %K innovation %K innovation ecosystem %K performance %K policy %K private sector %K public sector %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 38-41 %8 09/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/727 %N 9 %1 Global Advantage Consulting Group David B. Watters is President and CEO of the Global Advantage Consulting Group in Ottawa, Canada, which helps public and private sector organizations to develop growth strategies, to develop new collaboration networks and business models, to design new support services for industry, to enter new commercial markets, and to design measurement systems to monitor performance. His firm also designs and builds “ecosystem maps” to visualize client investments in programs and projects in areas of new technology development, innovation/commercialization expansion, energy/climate change, and trade. David holds an Economics degree from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, as well as a Law degree in corporate, commercial, and tax law from Queen’s Law School. As an adjunct Professor at the University of Ottawa's School of Management, he taught International Negotiation to MBA students for seven years. His 30-year career in the Government of Canada included responsibilities as an Assistant Deputy Minister in a variety of economic ministries including Industry Canada, the Treasury Board, and Finance Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/727 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Strategic Innovation for Business Performance: The Art and Science of Transformation %A Harold Schroeder %K art and science of transformation %K innovation %K organizational change %K strategy %K transformation %X Despite the well-documented association between innovation and business performance, many organizations struggle in their attempts to become successful innovators. This article discusses a recommended “art and science of transformation” approach to help companies improve their innovation performance through effective organizational change. The approach is focused on four key factors: culture, collaboration, strategy, and systems. Examples are drawn from a review of previous research to demonstrate successful innovation practice using similar approaches, and examples of less successful practice are included to highlight ways in which an "art and science" approach can help overcome the difficulties often faced. The article concludes with some practical, step-by-step guidance based on the art and science of transformation framework. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 6-12 %8 09/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/722 %N 9 %1 Schroeder & Schroeder Inc. Harold Schroeder is President of Schroeder & Schroeder Inc., a Toronto-based firm of senior program managers and project managers, management consultants, and corporate managers. By focusing on both the art and science of transformation, the firm assists organizations who are planning and implementing major transformation initiatives and who have had, or currently are experiencing, sub-optimal business results through their strategic or operational transformation projects. Having worked many years in politically challenging and complex environments with demanding timelines and deliverables, Mr. Schroeder is recognized by clients for his superior relationship-management, problem-solving, communication, and negotiation skills. He has led various management consulting practices in large consulting firms and has acted as a consultant and project manager on over 150 consulting engagements for clients throughout North America and Europe. Most recently, Mr. Schroeder has been involved in significant projects in the areas of innovation and entrepreneurship, including projects for both private sector clients and government ministries. He has also published and presented on the topic of innovation and entrepreneurship. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/722 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T TIM Lecture Series – Enhancing Competitive Position Through Innovation Beyond R&D %A Sorin Cohn %K Canada %K commercialization %K competition %K culture %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K innovation %K managing innovation %K metrics %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 34-38 %8 05/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/686 %N 5 %1 BD Cohnsulting Inc. Sorin Cohn has 35 years of international business and technology experience, having been involved in most facets of innovation development: from idea to research and lab prototype, from technology to product, and then to market success on the global stage. He has developed new technologies, created R&D laboratories, started new product lines, and initiated and managed new business units. Sorin has several essential patents in web services, wireless, and digital signal processing, as well as over 70 publications and presentations. He has also been Adjunct Professor at the University of Ottawa. He is a Killam Scholar, and he holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering, an MSc in Physics, and an MEng in Engineering Physics. Sorin is President of BD Cohnsulting Inc. As well, he acts as Leader of Innovation Metrics at The Conference Board of Canada and as Chief Program Officer of i-CANADA. He is also Member of the Board of Startup Canada as well as the Board of the Centre for Energy Efficiency. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/686 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T TIM Lecture Series – Technology Adoption by Design: Insights for Entrepreneurs %A Stoyan Tanev %K activity theory %K actor-network theory %K co-creation %K customer creativity %K innovation %K invention %K technology adoption %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 39-41 %8 12/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/752 %N 12 %1 University of Southern Denmark Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation and member of the Center for Integrative Innovation Management at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense, Denmark, as well as Adjunct Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he was previously a faculty member in the Technology Innovation Management Program. He has a MSc and a PhD in Physics (jointly by the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France and the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, 1996), a PhD in Theology (University of Sofia, Bulgaria, 2012), an MEng in Technology Innovation Management (Carleton University, Canada, 2005) and a MA (University of Sherbrooke, Canada, 2009). He has multidisciplinary research interests with a focus on the fields of technology innovation management and value co-creation. Dr. Tanev is member of the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/752 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Time to Innovate: Reflections and Recommendations on Time Management for Innovation Managers %A Robert J. Crawhall %K commercialization %K innovation %K product development %K technology %K time management %X Effective time management is a critical success factor for most projects; however, it is particularly challenging for projects involving substantial innovation. For most projects, time (i.e., the schedule) becomes a management "red flag" that signals when something goes wrong or gets out of control. The challenge for projects involving significant innovation is that one or more critical activities may be of an unknown duration or involve factors outside the normal design process and require "red flagging" from the outset. Managers of innovation projects have to distinguish between those activities or work packets that are a part of “business as usual” and those that involve innovation. They must identify and quantify the schedule risks and develop strategies to mitigate them. For example, one strategy to manage time-related risk is to decouple the innovation value as perceived by the customer (innovation output) from the technology innovation that is needed to deliver the product value in a cost-effective manner (innovation input). This strategy should take into account the likely consequences of longer-than-anticipated innovation time. Two common risks associated with poor time management for innovation are running out of financial runway to reach sustainable revenue and missing a critical market window. In this article, the author reflects on almost 30 years of experience in the Canadian innovation system across several industry sectors and provides some practical recommendations on time management for innovation managers. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 13-19 %8 09/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/723 %N 9 %1 Innoxec Innovation Executive Services Robert Crawhall is Principal Consultant at Innoxec Innovation Executive Services. He works with senior managers of companies and organizations on the development and implementation of innovation strategy. He is Board member with the ArboraNano Business-Led Network of Centres of Excellence, NanoOntario, and the Canadian Association of Security and Intelligence Studies. He is formerly COO of Precarn Inc. a federal pre-commercialization fund for intelligent systems companies, CEO of NanoQuébec, Executive Director of the Ontario Research Network in Electronic Commerce, CEO of the National Capital Institute of Telecommunications. He held three Director roles at Nortel in Strategic Planning, Advanced Research Networks, and Disruptive Technologies as well as four management roles in technology development with BNR and Northern Telecom Electronics. He started his career with General Electric (Canada) in manufacturing engineering and with Sulzer (Canada) in project management for nuclear energy systems. He holds degrees in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering from McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and a PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is a registered professional engineer in the province of Ontario, a member of the IEEE, and a certified project management professional (PMP). %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/723 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Business Model Discovery by Technology Entrepreneurs %A Steven Muegge %K business models %K commercialization %K innovation %K technology entrepreneurship %K value capture %K value creation %X Value creation and value capture are central to technology entrepreneurship. The ways in which a particular firm creates and captures value are the foundation of that firm's business model, which is an explanation of how the business delivers value to a set of customers at attractive profits. Despite the deep conceptual link between business models and technology entrepreneurship, little is known about the processes by which technology entrepreneurs produce successful business models. This article makes three contributions to partially address this knowledge gap. First, it argues that business model discovery by technology entrepreneurs can be, and often should be, disciplined by both intention and structure. Second, it provides a tool for disciplined business model discovery that includes an actionable process and a worksheet for describing a business model in a form that is both concise and explicit. Third, it shares preliminary results and lessons learned from six technology entrepreneurs applying a disciplined process to strengthen or reinvent the business models of their own nascent technology businesses. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %V 2 %P 5-16 %8 04/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/545 %N 4 %1 Carleton University Steven Muegge is an Assistant Professor at the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he teaches within the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research interests include open and distributed innovation, technology entrepreneurship, product development, and commercialization of technological innovation. The ideas presented in this article were an outcome of work with talented graduate students in the TIM program, mentoring first-time entrepreneurs in the Lead to Win, Ottawa Young Entrepreneurs (OYE), and Carleton Entrepreneurs programs, and his own research program on commercializing innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/545 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Creativity: Linking Theory and Practice for Entrepreneurs %A Tom Duxbury %K commercialization %K creativity %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %X In this article, creativity research is brought into focus for those involved in the practice of entrepreneurship. The author provides a background on creativity research, how it is defined, and systems models that attempt to explain it. The author distinguishes between creative and innovative activities, and provides advice to entrepreneurs to help realize the creative potential of their organizations. The author reinforces the view that entrepreneurs create new value by investing in ideas, and specific recommendations are made for creating supportive structures, building teams of creative individuals, and successfully championing ideas to acquire the resources they need to produce innovations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 10-15 %8 08/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/594 %N 8 %1 Sprott School of Business Tom Duxbury is Entrepreneur in Residence at Wesley Clover Technologies, a private equity incubator. He is an advisor to many startups, having co-founded several technology ventures and been awarded a variety of patents. Tom received his engineering degree from the University of Waterloo and an MBA from Queen's University. He is currently completing his PhD in Management at the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, where he teaches courses in entrepreneurship and innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/594 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (August 2012) %A Chris McPhee %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K technology entrepreneurship %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-4 %8 08/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/592 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/592 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Insights (November 2012) %A Chris McPhee %K competitive advantage %K global entrepreneurship %K green innovation %K innovation %K process adaptability %K process alignment %K process ambidexterity %K simulation %K startups %K supply chains %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-3 %8 11/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/623 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/623 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Living Labs %A Chris McPhee %A Mika Westerlund %A Seppo Leminen %K co-creation %K innovation %K living labs %K Open innovation %K user innovation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-5 %8 09/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/601 %N 9 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, D. Sc. (Econ.) is an Assistant Professor at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics. His doctoral research focused on software firms’ business models and his current research interests include open innovation, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %3 Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Aalto University Seppo Leminen, D. Sc. (Econ.), Lic. Tech., holds positions as Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Adjunct Professor in the Aalto University School of Business in Finland. Seppo holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a licentiate degree in Information Technology at the Helsinki University of Technology. His research and consultation interests include value co-creation and capture with users as well as relationships, services, and business models in marketing. He runs various living lab and business model projects relating to ICT. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/601 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks %A Seppo Leminen %A Mika Westerlund %A Anna-Greta Nyström %K co-creation %K innovation %K living labs %K networks %K Open innovation %X Living labs bring experimentation out of companies’ R&D departments to real-life environments with the participation and co-creation of users, partners, and other parties. This study discusses living labs as four different types of networks characterized by open innovation: utilizer-driven, enabler-driven, provider-driven, and user-driven. The typology is based on interviews with the participants of 26 living labs in Finland, Sweden, Spain, and South Africa. Companies can benefit from knowing the characteristics of each type of living lab; this knowledge will help them to identify which actor drives the innovation, to anticipate likely outcomes, and to decide what kind of role they should play while "living labbing". Living labs are networks that can help them create innovations that have a superior match with user needs and can be upscaled promptly to the global market. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 6-11 %8 09/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/602 %N 9 %1 Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Aalto University Seppo Leminen, D. Sc. (Econ.), Lic. Tech., holds positions as Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Adjunct Professor in the Aalto University School of Business in Finland. Seppo holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a licentiate degree in Information Technology at the Helsinki University of Technology. His research and consultation interests include value co-creation and capture with users as well as relationships, services, and business models in marketing. He runs various living lab and business model projects relating to ICT. %2 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, D. Sc. (Econ.) is an Assistant Professor at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics. His doctoral research focused on software firms’ business models and his current research interests include open innovation, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %3 Åbo Akademi University Anna-Greta Nyström, D. Sc. (Econ.) is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Business and Economics at Åbo Akademi University in Turku, Finland. Anna-Greta holds a doctoral degree in International Marketing from the School of Business and Economics at Åbo Akademi University. Her doctoral research focused on industry change in the Finnish telecommunications sector, with a special focus on technological convergence. Anna-Greta’s current research interests include business-to-business branding, consumer behaviour in high-tech industries, and changing media-consumption patterns. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Living Labs for Cross-Border Systemic Innovation %A Hans Schaffers %A Petra Turkama %K collaboration %K innovation %K living labs %K networks %K systemic %X Innovation is increasingly taking place in cross-border collaborative networks, which are shaped by the characteristics of systemic innovation, the strategies and objectives of main actors, and the dynamics of the innovation process. Participation in such networks is of high importance for small firms, but requires long-term investments and a diverse range of collaboration and innovation capabilities. This article explores how living labs, understood as innovation projects based on open and user-centric innovation methodologies, can form collaboration networks to support small firms and other actors to engage in cross-border collaboration and to accelerate the development and acceptance of innovations. Based on the lessons learned from a major living lab project, APOLLON, we conclude that adopting the living labs networking approach requires thorough understanding of each party’s objectives and drivers, the alignment of operational processes, establishment of open and collaborative culture, as well as competences, methods, and tools for supporting cooperation and community building. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 25-30 %8 09/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/605 %N 9 %1 Aalto University School of Business Hans Schaffers, PhD, is Visiting Professor at the Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Aalto University School of Business in Helsinki, Finland. He is also an innovation consultant in the Netherlands. His main research interests include open innovation, collaborative networks, living labs, and urban development. He has initiated and led various projects in the area of living labs innovation, collaborative working, and smart cities. He has been the living labs coordinator of the Collaboration@Rural integrated project and methodology leader of the APOLLON project discussed in this paper. %2 Aalto University School of Business Petra Turkama, PhD, is Director of the Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Aalto University School of Business in Helsinki, Finland. Her main research interests are collaborative innovation networks and innovation systems. She has worked on several living labs projects in the past, including APOLLON, and currently contributes to related EU projects such as SILVER on pre-commercial procurement, and CONCORD, a project coordinating the Future Internet PPP programme. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/605 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective %A Blair Winsor %K consultancy %K innovation %K practice-based approach %K time %X This article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambivalent. To provide some clarity, this innovation management dilemma was examined in a fast-growing, medium-sized communication and IT consultancy (“First”), which claimed to be “highly innovative”. Detailed data on five projects was collected over an 18-month period using practice-based methods. Each project team was followed in real time via observation and interviews. The data was then analyzed by dividing project work into three phases: i) negotiating the project particulars with the client; ii) conducting project work; and iii) project evaluation. This detailed analysis revealed how time pressures eliminated innovation in First’s client-based project work and suggested three implications for the management of innovation. Firstly, managers should try to avoid imposing excessive time pressures on their project teams. Secondly, they should ensure that there is space between projects to enable reflection. Thirdly, managers should ensure that project debriefs occur and that they cover potential innovations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 5-9 %8 08/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/593 %N 8 %1 Edinburgh Napier University Blair Winsor is a full-time lecturer in Edinburgh Napier University’s business school in the United Kingdom and currently teaches in the innovation management and entrepreneurship areas. He received his PhD from the University of Warwick's Business School where he studied innovation in consultancies. Blair also has an MBA from SDA Bocconi in Italy and a law degree from the University of Ottawa in Canada. He has had business and consultancy experience in both the United Kingdom and North America. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/593 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies %A Esteve Almirall %A Melissa Lee %A Jonathan Wareham %K innovation %K living labs %K living labs methodologies %K Open innovation %K user-driven design %X A growing interest in living labs as a mechanism for innovation has drawn significant attention to both the different flavours of this methodology and to the organizations that put it into practice. However, little has been done to assess its impact and to compare its contribution to other innovation methodologies. This article aims to cover that gap by summarizing the most common European living labs approaches and positioning them in the landscape of user-contributed innovation methodology. The merits and appropriateness of living labs in these settings are also assessed. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 12-18 %8 09/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/603 %N 9 %1 ESADE Business School and Pompeu Fabra University Esteve Almirall is an Associate Professor in the ESADE Business School and Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona, Spain. His research focuses on innovation and innovation management, and he has more than 30 publications in this field. His background is a mix of Management Science (PhD) and Computer Science (MSc, MRes). Esteve is also highly involved in European Projects and EU organizations being a Council Member of the ENoLL (European Network of Living Labs) and coordinating/participating in EU projects on innovation and smart cities. %2 ESADE Business School Melissa Lee is a PhD candidate at the ESADE Business School in Barcelona, Spain. Her research interests include open innovation, business ecosystems, and innovation in the public sector. %3 ESADE Business School Jonathan Wareham is a Professor of Information Systems in the ESADE Business School in Barcelona, Spain. Dr. Wareham's research has been published, or is forthcoming, in over 80 refereed journals and proceedings. He currently serves as Vice-Dean of Research at ESADE and is Director of the ESADE Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management. In addition, he sits on the advisory boards or editorial boards for a number of academic institutions, journals, NGOs, and social entreprises. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/603 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Open Invention Network: A Defensive Patent Pool for Open Source Projects and Businesses %A Deborah Nicholson %K innovation %K linux %K patent %X This article explores how patents impact innovation within free/libre open source software (F/LOSS) businesses and projects. The number of software patent suits brought each year is increasing and is diverting millions of dollars in funds from developers to lawyers. With patent suits on the rise, the US Supreme Court has left the F/LOSS community in a position where it must either wait years for legislation or address the issue of patent suits itself. However, defending the Linux kernel and related technologies is a different challenge than the one that faces proprietary software businesses. This article describes Open Invention Network, an initiative that is designed to meet the particular challenges facing the F/LOSS community and businesses by providing a defensive patent pool. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 12-17 %8 01/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/511 %N 1 %1 Open Invention Network Deborah Nicholson works at the intersection of technology and social justice. She has been a free speech advocate, economic justice organizer, and civil liberties defender. After working in Massachusetts politics for fifteen years, she became involved in the free software movement. She is the Community Outreach Director at Open Invention Network and the Community Manager at Media Goblin. She also serves on the board at Open Hatch, a non-profit dedicated to providing tools and education for potential new free software contributors. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts where she is slowly pursuing a graduate degree in Information Technology. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/511 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Organizational Ambidexterity: How Small Technology Firms Balance Innovation and Support %A John Schreuders %A Alem Legesse %K ambidextrous organization %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K support %X Many technology entrepreneurs start their companies by focusing on an innovation that creates a market offer to attract their first customers. When the entrepreneur’s firm makes its first sale, the dynamics of the organization change and the entrepreneur faces a new challenge: how can the firm concurrently develop new products and support existing customers? This problem is of great concern to entrepreneurs who own small technology firms and is the subject of this article. In this article, we first address the innovate-versus-support dilemma that small technology firms face early in their lifecycles. Next, we describe the paradigm of the ambidextrous organization. We conclude with a discussion of five mechanisms small firms can use to achieve balance in their quest to concurrently satisfy the need to innovate while fulfilling the demands of existing clients and products. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 17-21 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/522 %N 2 %1 Carleton University John Schreuders is a senior software systems engineer at Mitel Networks in Kanata, Ontario. John is a licensed professional engineer with Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO). After graduating from the Royal Military College in Kingston, John started his engineering career as a combat systems engineer in the Canadian Navy. After that, he went on to work for defence contractors and later for the International Space Station project. Recently John returned from working in New York as a software systems engineer for Wall Street. He is currently pursuing his Master’s degree in Technology Innovation Management at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %2 Carleton University Alem Legesse is pursuing his M.Eng studies in Carleton University’s Technology Innovation Management program in Ottawa, Canada. He is the founder of Syncrodata Inc., a software company that provides software development services for Android, Blackberry, and iOS devices. He holds an MSc degree offered jointly by computer science, engineering, and mathematics at Carleton University. His research interests are mobile developments, telecommunications, open source, and business models. He previously worked as a software designer for RIM, Alcatel-Lucent, and Nortel, and as a flight security analyst for Transport Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/522 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Q&A. What Is the Secret of Red Hat's Success? %A Ruth Suehle %K collaboration %K community %K innovation %K open source %K Red Hat %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 25-28 %8 01/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/513 %N 1 %1 Red Hat Ruth Suehle is a writer and editor in Brand Communications + Design at Red Hat. Previously an editor for Red Hat Magazine, Ruth helps to lead discussions about the open source way in the Life channel of opensource.com. She holds a BA in Journalism and Public Relations from the University of South Carolina-Columbia and has over 10 years' experience in content development roles, primarily in the technology sector. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/513 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Simulation of Supply-Chain Networks: A Source of Innovation and Competitive Advantage for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises %A Giacomo Liotta %K competitive advantage %K innovation %K simulation %K small and medium-sized enterprises %K SME %K supply-chain network %X On a daily basis, enterprises of all sizes cope with the turbulence and volatility of market demands, cost variability, and severe pressure from globally distributed competitors. Managing uncertainty about future demand requirements and volumes in supply-chain networks has become a priority. One of the ways to deal with uncertainty is the utilization of simulation techniques and tools, which provide greater predictability of decision-making outcomes. For example, simulation has been widely applied in decision-making processes related to global logistics and production networks at the strategic, tactical, and operational levels, where it is used to predict the impact of decisions before their implementation in complex and uncertain environments. Large enterprises are inclined to use simulation tools whereas small and medium-sized enterprises seem to underestimate its advantages. The objective of this article is to emphasize the relevance of simulation for the design and management of supply-chain networks from the perspective of small and medium-sized firms. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 13-20 %8 11/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/625 %N 11 %1 University of Southern Denmark Giacomo Liotta is Assistant Professor in the Institute of Technology and Innovation at the University of Southern Denmark. His research interests concern sustainability and innovation in supply-chain networks, including the simulation of networked logistics-production systems as well as product-lifecycle management. He received a PhD in Economics and Management Engineering at the University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy; he also holds MBA, MSc, and BSc degrees in Management and Industrial Engineering from this university. His current teaching activities focus on the design of global supply-chain networks and environmental issues related to their design and implementation. Dr. Liotta is author of more than 20 papers published in international journals, books, and conference proceedings. He has been involved in national and European co-funded research and development projects. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/625 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Editorial: Recent Research (November 2011) %A Chris McPhee %K business ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K open source %K policy %K research %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 3-3 %8 11/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/494 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/494 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Innovation Policy Development and the Emergence of New Innovation Paradigms %A Stoyan Tanev %A Mette Præst Knudsen %A Tanja Bisgaard %A Merethe Stjerne Thomsen %K innovation %K Open innovation %K policy %K user-driven innovation %K value co-creation %X The objective of the present article is to discuss innovation policy issues related to three emerging innovation paradigms: user-driven innovation, open innovation, and value co-creation. It provides a summary of insights based on innovation policy practices and challenges in Denmark. The choice of Danish innovation policy practices is not accidental. In 2008 Denmark implemented 40 different national innovation programs by allocating about 400 million euros. Since the three emerging paradigms have become globally relevant, the discussion of Danish policy development challenges and practices is expected to be insightful for innovation experts from other developed countries that are currently dealing with the adoption of these paradigms. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 14-19 %8 11/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/496 %N 2 %1 University of Southern Denmark Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Institute of Technology and Innovation and member of the Integrative Innovation Management (I2M) Research Unit at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, as well as Adjunct Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he was previously a faculty member in the Technology Innovation Management Program at Carleton University. He has a MSc and PhD in Physics (jointly by the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, and the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France), a MEng in Technology Management (Carleton University, Canada), and a MA (University of Sherbrooke, Canada). His main research interests are in the fields of technology innovation management and value co-creation in technology-driven businesses. Dr. Tanev is also on the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %2 University of Southern Denmark Mette Præst Knudsen is a Professor in Innovation Management at the Department of Marketing & Management (Faculty of Social Sciences), University of Southern Denmark. She is the research manager of the Integrative Innovation Management research unit. She holds a PhD from Aalborg University (Denmark) on technological competencies of high- tech companies. Furthermore, she holds a Master of Economics from Odense University (Denmark). %3 Novitas Innovation Tanja Bisgaard is the founder of Novitas Innovation, a company that facilitates complex innovation processes and is working with clients such as Copenhagen University Hospital, Agro Food Park, and Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster. Previously, she was Manager of Policy Analysis at FORA, the Danish Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs, where she identified and analyzed new forms of innovation in companies. Within the areas of user-driven innovation and corporate social innovation, Tanja has worked on several projects documenting the successful results of companies’ innovation processes. She holds a MSc in Management from the London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, and a BSc in Business Economics from the University of Surrey, UK. %4 University of Southern Denmark Merethe Stjerne Thomsen a PhD student in the Institute of Technology and Innovation in the Faculty of Engineering in the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/496 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Reasons for Patent Protection and Cost-effective Patent Filing Options for SMEs %A Natalie Raffoul %A Art Brion %K innovation %K intellectual property %K patent cost %K patent filing %K patent protection %X Many innovative small and medium enterprises (SMEs) do not seek patent protection for their innovations, either because they are skeptical about the perceived benefits or wary of the perceived costs. However, by failing to protect their intellectual property with patents, they leave themselves exposed to attack by other patent holders. This article explores arguments for patent protection as well as filing options that can protract the patenting process while simultaneously reducing patenting costs. By choosing their patent application filings wisely, SMEs can keep their patenting options open for as long as possible while delaying costs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 29-33 %8 12/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/505 %N 3 %1 CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL Natalie Raffoul is a founding partner of CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL. As a registered patent agent and lawyer with a background in electrical engineering, she has extensive experience in drafting patent applications for technologies including: electronics, wireless and optical communications and networking, telecommunications switching, optical components and manufacturing processes, optical fibre manufacturing processes, satellite components, fuel cell technologies, security devices and software processes for supply chain management. Natalie is also experienced in filing and prosecuting Canadian, U.S., and PCT international patent applications. She provides advice to her clients, in English and in French, on worldwide patent filing strategies and portfolio management. She is also a frequent speaker on intellectual property matters. %2 CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL Art Brion is a computer engineer, lawyer, and a U.S. and Canadian patent agent. Since 1998, he has assisted clients ranging from multinational corporations to high-tech startup companies to lone inventors. Prior to founding CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL, Art practiced with two IP boutique firms in Ottawa. His practice centers on not just the drafting and prosecution of patent applications worldwide but also on providing advice regarding portfolio management and worldwide patent filing strategies. He also provides advice on intellectual property mining and licensing strategies. Art’s fields of specialization include software/Internet-based technologies, wireless technologies, communications and computer and networking and related systems, optics/electro-optic communication systems, cryptography/encryption based technologies, semiconductors and business method systems. A former Editor-in-Chief of the UNB Law Journal, he enjoys the thrust and parry of patent prosecution as it mirrors one of his main preoccupations: fencing. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/505 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Software Patents: Current Challenges and Future Solutions %A Monica Goyal %K innovation %K patent system %K software patents %X Software patents for years have been used in the software industry to suppress innovation, kill competition, and generate undeserved royalties. This article considers whether software patents maintain the right “bargain between the inventor and the public” where, in exchange for disclosure of the invention to the public, the inventor receives a limited monopoly and the exclusive right to exploit the invention. This article argues that they do not and then explores possible solutions to address the problems identified. Those solutions include streamlining the patent process, making it more difficult to patent software innovations, making it easier to invalidate software patents, and shortening the patent protection from 20 to 10 years. The article closes with a call to action for people to work collectively to effect change in the industry. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 18-22 %8 12/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/503 %N 3 %1 My Legal Briefcase Monica Goyal is a Toronto-based lawyer and a softwarenology entrepreneur who founded My Legal Briefcase, an online legal service firm focused on small claims court cases. After graduating from her undergraduate degree from the University of Waterloo, where she was a Dean's List Scholar, Monica attended Stanford University, where she earned her Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering. Monica also holds a law degree from the University of Toronto. Monica's volunteer work with organizations such as Griffin Centre, Adventure Place, Downtown Legal Services, and Pro Bono Law Canada has given her insight into the accessibility and affordability of legal needs for the marginalized. She developed My Legal Briefcase to empower individuals going to Small Claims Court. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/503