@article {1017,
	title = {Developing Tacit Knowledge of Complex Systems: The Value of Early Empirical Inquiry in Healthcare Design},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {28-38},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Infection prevention and control has been the subject of much study in medical and epidemiological research and a variety of best practice guidelines have been developed to support healthcare workers and related stakeholders. Yet, despite the availability of information, managing healthcare-associated infections remains a challenge because the relevant explicit knowledge is not being adequately developed and mobilized as tacit knowledge for use "on the front lines". Some researchers have called for a human factors perspective to help address challenges in designing for infection prevention and  control, but relatively few studies have been conducted to date. Researchers also suggest that empirical inquiry is needed to better inform the design process, and particularly the design of complex systems where attention to detailed processes and interactions can support the success of an intervention. A human factors approach can help designers develop a deeper understanding of work processes, technology considerations, as well as physiological, psychological, cultural, and organizational factors. The need is particularly pressing in low-resource healthcare environments where funds, time, and human resources may be scarce and strategic design decisions based on evidence are needed to support meaningful and effective changes. With this in mind, a human factors study was conducted in an existing neonatal intensive care unit to identify the influence of product and environment design on infection prevention and control and to inform recommendations for improvement. In this case study, we illustrate how the application of an empirical, methodical approach can help design professionals and stakeholders develop tacit knowledge of complex systems {\textendash} knowledge that can be used to better inform design priorities, the design process, decision making, and the allocation of resources to help maximize improvements.},
	keywords = {design research, ergonomics, healthcare design, human factors, infection prevention and control, knowledge mobilization, neonatal intensive care unit},
	issn = { 1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1017},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1017},
	author = {Chantal Trudel and Sue Cobb and Kathryn Momtahan and Janet Brintnell and Ann Mitchell}
}
@article {1013,
	title = {Editorial: Knowledge Mobilization (September 2016)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {design, healthcare, knowledge mobilization, knowledge translation, planning, research},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1013},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1013},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1016,
	title = {Implementing Knowledge Translation Strategies in Funded Research in Canada and Australia: A Case Study},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {16-27},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {There is an emerging literature describing the use of knowledge translation strategies to increase the relevance and usability of research, yet there are few real-world examples of how this works in practice. This case study reports on the steps taken to embed knowledge translation strategies in the Movember Foundation{\textquoteright}s Men{\textquoteright}s Mental Health Grant Rounds in 2013{\textendash}14, which were implemented in Australia and Canada, and on the support provided to the applicants in developing their knowledge translation plans. It identifies the challenges faced by the Men{\textquoteright}s Mental Health Program Team and how these were resolved. The strategies explored include articulating knowledge translation requirements, ensuring a common understanding of knowledge translation, assessing knowledge translation plans, methods of engaging end users, and building capacity with applicants. An iterative approach to facilitating knowledge translation planning within project development was rolled out in Australia just prior to Canada so that lessons learned were immediately available to refine the second roll out. Implementation included the use of external knowledge translation expertise, the development of knowledge translation plans, and the need for internal infrastructure to support monitoring and reporting. Differences in the Australian and Canadian contexts may point to differential exposure to the concepts and practices of knowledge translation. This case study details an example of designing and implementing an integrated knowledge translation strategy that moves beyond traditional dissemination models. Lessons learned point to the importance of a long lead-up time, the use of knowledge translation expertise for capacity building, the need for flexible implementation, and the need for efficiencies in supporting applicants.},
	keywords = {funded research, implementation, knowledge mobilization, knowledge translation, organizational learning},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1016},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1016},
	author = {Gabriel Moore and Therese Fitzpatrick and Ivy Lim-Carter and Abby Haynes and Anna Flego and Barbara Snelgrove}
}
@article {1018,
	title = {Mobilizing Knowledge: The Evidence Gap for Assistive Devices},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {39-45},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Knowledge mobilization can be hindered in healthcare technology settings where the pace of change outpaces the ability to perform high-quality research methodologies that provide timely knowledge to enable informed prescription and technology application to the end user. Although well-controlled research with appropriate sample sizes is needed, this approach must be balanced with other evidence sources to address the knowledge immediacy requirements. Using carbon-fibre ankle{\textendash}foot orthoses (i.e., lower-limb braces that improve stability, alignment, and foot-to-ground placement) as a case study, various sources of assistive device evidence were explored for their contribution to the continuum of knowledge in this area. A basic level of knowledge exists, but the quality is insufficient to inform the physical rehabilitation community on selecting from the almost 70 different devices on the market and the expected clinical outcomes for a target population. A combination of enhanced single-participant reports should be considered as an important part of the knowledge continuum and essential for knowledge immediacy. This approach must also be expanded to national and multinational database initiatives that provide a better base from which to extract knowledge on assistive device performance and mobilize this knowledge to provide optimal care for people with physical disabilities.},
	keywords = {assistive devices, knowledge mobilization, orthosis},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1018},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1018},
	author = {Edward D. Lemaire}
}
@article {1014,
	title = {Perspectives on Knowledge Mobilization: An Introduction to the Special Issue},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {4-8},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this introduction to the Technology Innovation Management Review{\textquoteright}s special issue on Knowledge Mobilization, Guest Editors Kimberly Matheson and Cathy Malcolm Edwards share their different perspectives as an academic and a knowledge broker on the process of knowledge mobilization. Despite their distinctive points of entry into the knowledge mobilization field, they share a common perspective on the value of researchers and knowledge users learning from each other, working together to co-create solutions, and the importance of contributing back into the basic research and training of the next generation. They also provide the context of the authors{\textquoteright} contributions to this special issue, noting that the articles are rooted in the authors{\textquoteright} experiences in the health domain, but that they help to understand some of the challenges and rewards of integrating knowledge mobilization into research approaches more generally. },
	keywords = {health, interdisciplinary, knowledge mobilization, partnerships},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1014},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1014},
	author = {Kimberly Matheson and Cathy Malcolm Edwards}
}
@article {1020,
	title = {Research on Fire: Lessons Learned in Knowledge Mobilization},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {53-58},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article, I outline knowledge mobilization lessons learned while working on politically {\textquotedblleft}hot button{\textquotedblright} issues in public policy research related to fire services. These lessons were shaped by the research funding context. Researchers are increasingly required to develop research relationships with government, industry, and community partners to ensure research is relevant to those who can best use it, to embed knowledge mobilization in research processes, to ensure that knowledge has an impact in the world beyond the academy, and to provide research funding. Perhaps not surprisingly, when my findings created challenges for research partners, controversies erupted, potentially imperiling my research program, career, and potential research impact. Drawing from my knowledge-mobilization experiences as well as those of other researchers, I offer some insights gained from mobilizing knowledge on a {\textquotedblleft}hot topic{\textquotedblright} in public policy.},
	keywords = {catalytic validity, knowledge mobilization, public policy, public services, research values},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1020},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1020},
	author = {Susan Braedley}
}
@article {1019,
	title = {Transferable Practices for Knowledge Mobilization: Lessons from a Community-Engaged Health Research Study},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	pages = {46-52},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Community-engaged health research can have both immediate and lasting impacts, yet is often plagued with various unknowns and unanticipated delays {\textendash} this can be especially true in hospital settings with older adults. In this informal case study based on the authors{\textquoteright} collective experiences of an unraveling of the research process, the challenges and issues faced in assessing the health benefits of the {\textquotedblleft}Music \& Memory{\textquotedblright} iPod program in a complex continuing care hospital wing are discussed. Specifically, the lessons learned through the processes of acquiring ethical approval to work with a particularly vulnerable population, of effectively measuring the benefits of the program, and of the day-to-day logistical issues are recounted, with suggestions for overcoming these challenges through transferable practices for working with vulnerable or older adults and mobilizing the knowledge gained.},
	keywords = {challenges, community engagement, complex care, health, knowledge mobilization, music, older adults},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1019},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1019},
	author = {Renate Ysseldyk and Angela Paric and Tracy Luciani}
}
