@article {1472,
	title = {Technology Project Summaries as a Predictor of Crowdfunding Success},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {12/2021},
	pages = {33-44},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {33},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Crowdfunding has emerged in recent years as an important alternative means for technology entrepreneurs to raise funds for their products and business ideas. While the success rate of crowdfunding projects is somewhat low, scholarly understanding of what distinguishes projects that reach their fundraising goals from those that fail remains incomplete. Further, studies on crowdfunding success often examine a number of variables that make predicting success a challenge for entrepreneurs wiling to use crowdfunding. This study uses topic modelling on a data set of over 21,000 technology projects from Kickstarter to investigate if short-text project summaries can reveal predictors of fundraising success on crowdfunding platforms. The results indicate that compared to those that fail in fundraising, project summaries of successfully funded technology projects put forward more trendy topics, use wording that reflects novelty, and focus on solving a social problem. Our results contribute to theory and practice by suggesting the importance of summarizing project content for crowdfunding success.},
	keywords = {backers, crowdfunding, failure, funding, fundraising, Kickstarter, prediction, project, success, topic modelling},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1472},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1472},
	author = {Mika Westerlund and Ishdeep Singh and Mervi Rajahonka and Seppo Leminen}
}
@article {1354,
	title = {Citizen Perceptions of Government{\textquoteright}s Resistance to Shared Parking},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {05/2020},
	pages = {28-40},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {28},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Sharing economy services is one of the fastest growing segments in today\&rsquo;s economy, especially in urban centres. However, some cities have taken a negative stance and sought to prohibit sharing economy services, which has raised tensions between citizens and the local government. This paper adopts a case study approach to investigate what the main topics are in citizen perceptions of their government{\textquoteright}s resistance to shared parking in Ottawa, the capital city of Canada, where shared parking is considered illegal. In so doing, the study applies topic modelling on readers{\textquoteright} comments following news about local residents being threatened with legal action by the city for providing shared parking services to government employees suffering from insufficient office parking resources. Based on six identified topics, the study establishes a conceptual framework that contributes to the literature on sharing economies by illustrating how citizens perceive their government{\textquoteright}s resistance toward sharing economies. The paper considers whether sharing economy services could be an innovation that would benefit societies, and how understanding citizen perceptions through online comments can help a government to solve policy issues and create win-win resolutions.},
	keywords = {government, innovation resistance, parking, Sharing economy services, topic modelling},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1354},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1354},
	author = {Mika Westerlund}
}
@article {1166,
	title = {Editorial: Innovation Management (July 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {07/2018},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {corporate incubators, entrepreneurial ecosystems, innovation capacity, innovation ecosystems, Innovation management, ISPIM, KPIs, living labs, middle managers, topic modelling},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1166},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1166},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1170,
	title = {A Topic Modelling Analysis of Living Labs Research},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {07/2018},
	pages = {40-51},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This study applies topic modelling analysis on a corpus of 86 publications in the Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review) to understand how the phenomenon of living labs has been approached in the recent innovation management literature. Although the analysis is performed on a corpus collected from only one journal, the TIM Review has published the largest number of special issues on living labs to date, thus it reflects the advancement of the area in the scholarly literature. According to the analysis, research approaches to living labs can be categorized under seven broad topics: 1) Design, 2) Ecosystem, 3) City, 4) University, 5) Innovation, 6) User, and 7) Living lab. Moreover, each topic includes a set of characteristic subtopics. A trend analysis suggests that the emphasis of research on living labs is moving away from a conceptual focus on what living labs are and who is involved in their ecosystems to practical applications of how to design and manage living labs, their processes, and participants, especially users, as key stakeholders and in novel application areas such as the urban city context.},
	keywords = {big data, data mining, innovation, Living lab, living laboratory, research trends, text analytics, topic modeling, topic modelling},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1170},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1170},
	author = {Mika Westerlund and Seppo Leminen and Mervi Rajahonka}
}
@article {1184,
	title = {Transnational Entrepreneurship: Distinctive Features and a New Definition},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {09/2018},
	pages = {28-38},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Definitions of transnational entrepreneurship are too general making it difficult to understand what distinguishes transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship. In addition, these definitions identify the {\textquotedblleft}immigrant{\textquotedblright}, {\textquotedblleft}ethnic{\textquotedblright}, or {\textquotedblleft}migrant{\textquotedblright} entrepreneur as the focal actor rather than the company. This makes it difficult to align transnational entrepreneurship with the theory of the firm and provide practical insights to practitioners. This article examines 11 definitions of transnational entrepreneurship, discovers the groups of words that best represent the information in a corpus comprised of 44 journal articles, identifies the key features that distinguish transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship, and advances a new definition of transnational entrepreneurship. The results indicate that transnational entrepreneurship has two key distinctive features: cross-border investment logic and institutional distance {\textendash} the difference in institutional context between countries. Accordingly, transnational entrepreneurship may be usefully defined as {\textquotedblleft}a cross-border investment to acquire, combine, and recombine specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets to create and capture value for the company under conditions of institutional distance and uncertainty{\textquotedblright}. This proposed definition builds on the features that make transnational entrepreneurship distinctive, is consistent with the theory of the firm, and carries implications for how to grow companies at an early stage.},
	keywords = {cross-border, definition, entrepreneurship, features, topic modelling, transnational},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1184},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1184},
	author = {Eduardo Bailetti}
}
@article {1086,
	title = {Editorial: 10th Anniversary Issue (July 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {07/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {ecosystems, entrepreneurship, inclusive innovation, India, knowledge commercialization, living labs, OSBR, TIM Review, topic modelling, universities, urban},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1086},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1086},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1087,
	title = {Reflecting on 10 Years of the TIM Review},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {07/2017},
	pages = {5-20},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In July 2007, the first issue of this journal was published under the banner of the Open Source Business Resource. Re-launched with a broader scope in 2011 as the Technology Innovation Management Review, the journal now celebrates its 10th anniversary. In this article, we review the 10-year history of the journal to examine what themes have been covered, who has contributed, and how much the articles have been read and cited. During those 10 years, the journal has published 120 monthly issues, including more than 800 publications by more than 800 international authors from industry, academia, the public sector, and beyond. As discovered with topic modelling, the journal has covered seven themes: open source business, technology entrepreneurship, growing a business, research approaches, social innovation, living labs, and cybersecurity. Overall, the website has attracted over 1 million readers from around the world {\textendash} 31\% from Asia, 30\% from the Americas, 26\% from Europe, 8\% from Africa, and 5\% from Oceania {\textendash} with over 25,000 readers now accessing the site each month. },
	keywords = {business, entrepreneurship, innovation, journal, management, open source, OSBR, research, scientometric analyses, technology, TIM Review, topic, topic modelling},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1087},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1087},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Teemu Santonen and Ahmed Shah and Ali Nazari}
}
