@article {1474,
	title = {Antecedents, Decisions, and Outcomes of a Sharing Economy: A Systematic Literature Review},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {12/2021},
	pages = {59-71},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {59},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article provides a comprehensive framework-based review of literature on "Sharing Economy" (SE) using an ADO (antecedents, decisions, and outcomes) framework. Based on extensive coverage of studies published over a period of 12 years between 2008 and 2020, we reviewed extant research on this phenomenon from both, more developed and emerging countries. Using PRISMA methodology inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 93 articles for the review. The motivation to undertake this research was to understand emerging consumer behavior that intends to collaborate for consumption with the help of technological innovation. We identified major theoretical frameworks developed for investigating SEs and collaborative consumption behavior. The findings of the paper reveal possible antecedents, decisions, and outcomes of SEs. Many areas in the SE domain remain underexplored, despite recent significant advancements, and for this the paper provides directions for future research.},
	keywords = {access-based economy, antecedents and motivators, collaborative consumption, decisions, determinants, gig economy, outcomes, sharing economy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1474},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1474},
	author = {Shweta Shirolkar and Kanchan Patil}
}
@article {1353,
	title = {More for Less? Sharing Economy as a Driver of Public Welfare Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {05/2020},
	pages = {19-27},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {19},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article investigates sharing economy as a path to welfare innovation. It is based on a case where a digital platform is activated in order to support sharing among citizens with lung disease, and thereby increase health and well-being. The case exemplifies how sharing economy currently is taken up by public actors in the attempt to prolong the goals of the public sector beyond itself. This implies drawing everyday sharing practices into a new middle between formal organization and private relations. In a critical response to literature on sharing economy that tends to reduce "sharing" to "transaction", the article draws attention to how sharing entangles with hopes, fears, and affectual engagements of everyday life, and to how it interacts with technology in unforeseen ways and beyond anticipated outcomes. Based on the analysis, the article concludes that there may be good reasons for public welfare authorities to engage in facilitating sharing among citizens. This is not because it is likely to provide "more for less" in relation to predetermined goals, but rather because it can open up other kinds of welfare outcomes that cannot be produced by public organizations themselves.},
	keywords = {innovation, public sector, sharing economy, technology, welfare state},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1353},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1353},
	author = {Eva Pallesen and Marie Aakj{\ae}r}
}
@article {1352,
	title = {Trust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the Government{\textquoteright}s Role?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {05/2020},
	pages = {5-17},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {5},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {To obtain access to goods or services between people or stakeholders, some collaboration between actors is a necessary component. Sharing and a sharing economy is closely related to trust. Within the context of {\textquoteright}the{\textquoteright} sharing economy, especially digital trust is assumed to play a crucial role. Access to information is a crucial digital cue which can lead to trust yet, sharing economies are subject to asymmetry of information, wherein certain actors have limited access to market information on the consumption behaviour of users, the pricing of a product and, the reliability of peers. The lack of confidential market information between actors is thus limiting the potential for collaboration, as it reduces trust between them. Governments are amongst the (usually more trustworthy) candidates to undertake critical roles in enhancing the sharing of sensitive data. This paper aims to identify the role of government in facilitating and enabling data sharing between various actors in sharing economies. In this paper, we analyse the adequacy of a government{\textquoteright}s potential role in enabling transparency, trust and security, while operating within a sharing economy scenario, based on two case studies. Additionally, the role of technology is briefly defined for digital platforms and for blockchain-based opportunities for sharing economies. The use cases for the paper concern a digital platform for industrial symbioses, and peer-to-peer electricity trading based on blockchain technology.},
	keywords = {blockchain, government, network, P2P, peer-to-peer, sharing economy, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1352},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1352},
	author = {Ruben D{\textquoteright}Hauwers and Jacobus van der Bank and Mehdi Montakhabi}
}
@article {1214,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (February 2019)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {02/2019},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {digital innovation, digital transformation, innovation, innovation ecosystems, management, sharing economy, technology},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1214},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1214},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1215,
	title = {How to Create Value(s) in the Sharing Economy: Business Models, Scalability, and Sustainability},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {02/2019},
	pages = {5-24},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {By organizing peer-to-peer exchanges and promoting access over ownership, the sharing economy is transforming a great variety of sectors. Enjoying fast growth, the sharing economy is an umbrella term encompassing heterogeneous initiatives that create different types of economic, environmental, or social value. This heterogeneity triggers tensions and intense disputes about the perimeter of the field. Do Airbnb and Uber belong to the sharing economy? How do we consider practices such as gifting, renting, and swapping that existed before the sharing economy boom? To sort out this complexity, we have adopted a pragmatic and grounded approach examining 27 initiatives that claim to be part of, or are perceived as emblematic of the sharing economy. We develop a typology of sharing economy business models revealing four configurations: shared infrastructure providers, commoners, mission-driven platforms, and matchmakers. Each configuration exhibits specific value-creation logics, scalability issues, sustainability impacts, and potential controversies. Our results provide guidance for sharing entrepreneurs, for established businesses that want to embrace the principles of the sharing economy, and for public actors wishing to regulate or support the field.},
	keywords = {business model, scalability, sharing economy, sustainability, value creation, value distribution},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1215},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1215},
	author = {Aur{\'e}lien Acquier and Valentina Carbone and David Mass{\'e}}
}
@article {1094,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (August 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {08/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {academic spin-offs, business model development, car sharing, incubation, leadership, Machiavelli, management, organizational culture, research institutes, researchers, sharing economy, social media, technology transfer},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1094},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1097,
	title = {The Sharing Economy and the Future of Personal Mobility: New Models Based on Car Sharing},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {08/2017},
	pages = {27-31},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The sharing economy is an emerging phenomenon that shapes the cultural, economic, and social landscape of our modern world. With variations of the concept of the sharing economy emerging in so many fields, the area of shared mobility {\textendash} the shared use of a motor vehicle, bicycle, or other mode that enables travellers to gain short-term access to transportation modes on an on-demand basis {\textendash} has developed as the forerunner of the transformation to be expected in other areas. This article examines how the sphere of personal mobility has been affected by the growth of sharing economy. It contributes to the growing body of shared mobility literature by uncovering innovative mobility-based models that represent solutions on the intersection of shared mobility, physical infrastructure, and integrated-mobility schemes.},
	keywords = {integrated solution, mobility modes, shared mobility, sharing economy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1097},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1097},
	author = {Olga Novikova}
}
