@article {1352,
	title = {Trust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the Government{\textquoteright}s Role?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {05/2020},
	pages = {5-17},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {5},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {To obtain access to goods or services between people or stakeholders, some collaboration between actors is a necessary component. Sharing and a sharing economy is closely related to trust. Within the context of {\textquoteright}the{\textquoteright} sharing economy, especially digital trust is assumed to play a crucial role. Access to information is a crucial digital cue which can lead to trust yet, sharing economies are subject to asymmetry of information, wherein certain actors have limited access to market information on the consumption behaviour of users, the pricing of a product and, the reliability of peers. The lack of confidential market information between actors is thus limiting the potential for collaboration, as it reduces trust between them. Governments are amongst the (usually more trustworthy) candidates to undertake critical roles in enhancing the sharing of sensitive data. This paper aims to identify the role of government in facilitating and enabling data sharing between various actors in sharing economies. In this paper, we analyse the adequacy of a government{\textquoteright}s potential role in enabling transparency, trust and security, while operating within a sharing economy scenario, based on two case studies. Additionally, the role of technology is briefly defined for digital platforms and for blockchain-based opportunities for sharing economies. The use cases for the paper concern a digital platform for industrial symbioses, and peer-to-peer electricity trading based on blockchain technology.},
	keywords = {blockchain, government, network, P2P, peer-to-peer, sharing economy, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1352},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1352},
	author = {Ruben D{\textquoteright}Hauwers and Jacobus van der Bank and Mehdi Montakhabi}
}
@article {1181,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (September 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {09/2018},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {commercialization, emerging economies, entrepreneurial marketing, export, globalization, lean, partnerships, transnational entrepreneurship, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1181},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1181},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1182,
	title = {How to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an R\&D Partnership},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {09/2018},
	pages = {4-15},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article offers an actionable framework for dealing with trust violations in R\&D partnerships: it explains how to turn around a conflicted R\&D partnership, repair trust, and learn from the experience. As innovation becomes more open, firms increasingly find themselves involved in R\&D collaborations with suppliers, customers or even competitors. Trust plays a fundamental role in such partnerships to work. Yet, trust cannot be taken for granted. In fact, trust in R\&D partnerships is often violated {\textendash} and without executive intervention, trust violations can soon turn even the most promising partnership into a value-destroying predicament. Although much has been written about trust formation in R\&D partnerships, this article focuses instead on what to do when trust has been broken. The analysis is based on a review of academic research and is illustrated with real-life examples of trust repair processes. },
	keywords = {conflict, Open innovation, R\&D partnerships, trust, trust repair},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1182},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1182},
	author = {Anna Brattstr{\"o}m}
}
@article {1108,
	title = {Editorial: Blockchain (October 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {10/2017},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {authentication, Bitcoin, blockchain, cryptography, digital identity, economics, healthcare, internal audit, services, smart contracts, transactions, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1108},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1108},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Anton Ljutic}
}
@article {1111,
	title = {Hitching Healthcare to the Chain: An Introduction to Blockchain Technology in the Healthcare Sector},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {10/2017},
	pages = {22-34},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Health services must balance patient care with information privacy, access, and completeness. The massive scale of the healthcare industry also amplifies the importance of cost control. The promise of blockchain technology in health services, combined with application layers built atop it, is to be a mechanism that provides utmost privacy while ensuring that appropriate users can easily add to and access a permanent record of information. Blockchains, also called distributed ledgers, enable a combination of cost reduction and increased accessibility to information by connecting stakeholders directly without requirements for third-party brokers, potentially giving better results at lower costs. New ventures are looking to apply blockchain technology to solve real-world problems, including efforts to track public health, centralize research data, monitor and fulfill prescriptions, lower administrative overheads, and organize patient data from an increasing number of inputs. Here, concrete examples of the application of blockchain technology in the health sector are described, touching on near-term promise and challenges.},
	keywords = {blockchain, distributed ledger, health, patient-centred care, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1111},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1111},
	author = {Mark A. Engelhardt}
}
@article {1110,
	title = {Smart Contract Relations in e-Commerce: Legal Implications of Exchanges Conducted on the Blockchain},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {10/2017},
	pages = {14-21},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Much of the discussion around blockchain-based smart contracts has focused on whether or not they operate in the same way as legal contracts. However, it is argued that most contracts are social rather than legal in nature and are entered into because the parties trust each other to perform the agreed exchange. Little has been written to address how the blockchain{\textquoteright}s trust protocol can enable the kind of social contracting that characterized the way exchanges were conducted before the Internet. This article aims to fill that gap by exploring blockchain-based smart contracts primarily as non-contractual social exchanges.},
	keywords = {blockchain, law, legal, online transactions, reputation, smart contracts, trust},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1110},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1110},
	author = {Philippa Ryan}
}
@article {1084,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} Building Trust in an IoT-Enabled World},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {06/2017},
	pages = {50-54},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {cybersecurity, Internet of Things, IOT, ransomware, trust, WannaCry, wireless},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1084},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1084},
	author = {Jeremy Watson and John Marshall and Mike Young and Peter Smetny and David Mann}
}
@article {567,
	title = {Building Trust in High-Performing Teams},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06/2012},
	pages = {38-41},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Facilitation of growth is more about good, trustworthy contacts than capital. Trust is a driving force for business creation, and to create a global business you need to build a team that is capable of meeting the challenge. Trust is a key factor in team building and a needed enabler for cooperation. In general, trust building is a slow process, but it can be accelerated with open interaction and good communication skills. The fast-growing and ever-changing nature of global business sets demands for cooperation and team building, especially for startup companies. Trust building needs personal knowledge and regular face-to-face interaction, but it also requires empathy, respect, and genuine listening. Trust increases communication, and rich and open communication is essential for the building of high-performing teams. Other building materials are a shared vision, clear roles and responsibilities, willingness for cooperation, and supporting and encouraging leadership. 

This study focuses on trust in high-performing teams. It asks whether it is possible to manage trust and which tools and operation models should be used to speed up the building of trust. In this article, preliminary results from the authors{\textquoteright} research are presented to highlight the importance of sharing critical information and having a high level of communication through constant interaction. },
	keywords = {high-performance teams, high-performing teams, social capital, team, team building, trust, wellbeing},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/567},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/567},
	author = {Mila Hakanen and Aki Soudunsaari}
}
