@article {1363,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (June 2020)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {06/2020},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {3},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {Bitcoin, blockchain, crowdfunding, crypto assets, cryptocurrencies, developing countries., distributed ledger technology, Employeedriven innovation, entrepreneurial finance, entrepreneurship, Ethereum, Financial industry, FinTech, ICOs, IEO, innovation, intellectual property rights, internationalization, IT industry, job autonomy, mining industry, moral hazard, need for autonomy, new company, Porter{\textquoteright}s Five Forces framework, regulation, scaling company value, scaling-up, self-leadership, signaling, SME, STO, sustainability, technological environment, technology, technology readiness, token offering, token sales, tokenization, value proposition, value proposition alignment, venture capital},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1363},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1363},
	author = {Stoyan Tanev and Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {1364,
	title = {A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {06/2020},
	pages = {5-13},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {5},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI) that comprise novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, use of these leads to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI and its positive effect is felt through easy accessibility of the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to the understanding of the effect of strong IPR regimes on the different stages of the innovation process.},
	keywords = {entrepreneurship, innovation, intellectual property rights, technology},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1364},
	author = {Saurav Pathak and Etayankara Muralidharan}
}
@article {500,
	title = {Editorial: Intellectual Property Rights (December 2011)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2011},
	month = {12/2011},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {intellectual property, intellectual property rights, IP, IPR, patents},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/500},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/500},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Peter Carbone}
}
@article {504,
	title = {Intellectual Property Rights: Unlocking the Value of this New Asset Class},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2011},
	month = {12/2011},
	pages = {23-28},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Discussing the value of intellectual property (IP) has become a common theme in today{\textquoteright}s mainstream press and is now central to the business strategy of a growing number of technology companies, both large and small, domestically and internationally. This focus on IP and intellectual property rights (IPR) is a trend that has developed over the last several years as a result of a convergence of factors including the growth of the patent monetization industry, ongoing reforms to U.S. patent law, the emergence of China and other countries in the Far East as technology-production hubs, and the advocacy of the {\textquotedblleft}knowledge-centric{\textquotedblright} economy. In this article, we look at the monetization of patents and the emergence of a vibrant industry based on IPR as a new and highly prized asset class.},
	keywords = {asset class, intellectual property, intellectual property rights, patents},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/504},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/504},
	author = {Daniel J. Henry}
}
