@article {1162,
	title = {Additive Manufacturing and Business Models: Current Knowledge and Missing Perspectives},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {06/2018},
	pages = {15-33},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Additive manufacturing, that is 3D printing technology, may change the way companies operate their businesses. This article adopts a business model perspective to create an understanding of what we know about these changes. It summarizes current knowledge on additive manufacturing within management and business research, and it discusses future research directions in relation to business models for additive manufacturing. Using the scientific database Web of Science, 116 journal articles were identified. The literature review reveals that most research concerns manufacturing optimization. A more holistic view of the changes that additive manufacturing may bring about for firms is needed, as is more research on changed value propositions, and customer/sales-related issues. The article contributes to previous research by systematically summarizing additive manufacturing research in the business and management literature, and by highlighting areas for further investigation related to the business models of individual firms.},
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, business model, literature review},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1162},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1162},
	author = {Christina {\"O}berg and Tawfiq Shams and Nader Asnafi}
}
@article {1160,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (June 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {06/2018},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, Amazon, boundary spanning, business models, civic innovation, culture, entrepreneurship, innovation integrators, knowledge transfer, living labs, sociotechnical systems, startup, university{\textendash}industry collaboration},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1160},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1160},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {942,
	title = {3D Printing and Its Disruptive Impacts on Supply Chains of the Future},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {20-25},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {3D printing technology has emerged as one of the most disruptive innovations to impact the global supply chain and logistics industry. The technology is impacting our personal and professional lives, with some claiming that the technology will revolutionize and replace existing manufacturing technologies, while others argue that the technology merely enhances some aspects of the production process. Whether evolutionary or revolutionary, 3D printing technology is recognized as a striking trend that will significantly impact supply chains. Although the expansion of 3D printing in the private consumer market is an interesting development in its own right, the biggest potential for disruption lies in industrial applications and how 3D printing will influence supply chains of the future. In this article, we examine the areas of the supply chain most likely to be disrupted by 3D printing technology and we identify the key questions that must be answered in a roadmap for future research and practice. While we seek answers to these questions, we suggest that managers should develop a flexible change management strategy to mitigate the effects of disruption to their future supply chains and take advantage of the resulting opportunities. Those that do nothing will be left wanting, because the influence of 3D printing technology on supply chains is expected to grow. },
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, disruptive innovation, logistics, supply chain},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/942},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/942},
	author = {Sebastian Mohr and Omera Khan}
}
@article {939,
	title = {Editorial: 100th Issue (November 2015)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, born-global firms, collaborative innovation, cybersafety, cybersecurity, cyberspace, future research, innovation, lean global startups, lean startups, management, Open innovation, social innovation, supply chains, technology, technology innovation management review, TIM Review},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/939},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/939},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {772,
	title = {3D Printing: A Revolutionary Advance  for the Field of Urology?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {03/2014},
	pages = {19-24},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Over the past decade, 3D printing has garnered considerable attention due to its broad applications, its ease of customization, and its increasing affordability. What began as the straightforward replication of simple objects has now progressed into a sophisticated industry for the fabrication of detailed products, which stands to threaten conventional forms of manufacturing and change the face of consumerism. More recently, the technology has found a footing within the medical field with the promise of applying 3D printing for the process of organ generation. With the reality of an aging population, the need for replacement organs globally will increase proportionately, while the number of donors remains static. In the field of urology specifically, the need for organ transplants is ever increasing as the number of patients in renal failure continues to rise. This article reviews the development of biological 3D printing, or biofabrication, within the field of urology and examines both the pros and the cons of this emerging technology. The cost implications of this technology for healthcare facilities are considered, as well as the entrepreneurial opportunities that arise from the emergence and evolution of 3D printing.},
	keywords = {3D printing, biofabrication, biological 3D printing, bioprinting, entrepreneurship, nephrology, organ transplants, renal failure},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/772},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/772},
	author = {Rebecca Neu}
}
@article {769,
	title = {Editorial: Emerging Technologies (March 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {03/2014},
	pages = {3-6},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, big data analytics, BYOD, crowdsourcing, emerging technology, entrepreneurship, innovation, IT consumerization},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/769},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/769},
	author = {Chris McPhee and David Hudson}
}
@article {852,
	title = {Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship (December 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, business models, commercialization, disruption, entrepreneurship, innovation, innovation capacity, innovation culture, patents, social entrepreneurship, social innovation, spinoffs, university technology transfer, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/852},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/852},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
