@article {1428,
	title = {The Interplay of Digital Transformation and Collaborative Innovation on Supply Chain Ambidexterity},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {03/2021},
	pages = {45-56},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {45},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This study aims at investigating the impact of digital transformation on the efficiency and adaptability of a supply chain (SC). It also identifies the role of collaborative innovation as a catalyst in these relationships. Survey data from Japanese manufacturing companies was examined using hierarchical multiple regression analysis to test the study{\textquoteright}s hypotheses. According to the results, collaborative innovation with SC members, that is, suppliers and customers, strengthens the impact of digital transformation on adaptability, but not on efficiency. In contrast, collaborative innovation with market participants, such as competitors and partners, reinforces the positive relationship between digital transformation and efficiency, with no evidence supporting its effect on the innovation-adaptability relationship. These findings encourage firms to widen the scope of their collaborative innovation activities to include different types of partners. For firms with limited abilities to conduct such complex collaboration projects, the findings can assist managers in making well-informed decisions to include partners that accommodate prioritized organizational goals.},
	keywords = {collaboration, digital transformation, innovation, resource-based view., supply chain ambidexterity, supply chain management},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1428},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1428},
	author = {Sara Abdalla and Koichi Nakagawa}
}
@article {1270,
	title = {Editorial: Celebrating Innovation in Florence (October 2019)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {10/2019},
	pages = {3-4},
	chapter = {3},
	keywords = {behavioural economics, behavioural science, bibliometric analysis, business models, Buyer-Supplier Relationships, choice architecture, collaboration, consumer-to-business, Content creator-based business models, content creators, creativity management, digital platforms, digital technologies, digital transformation, Digital user involvement, digitalization, digitization, disruption, e-commerce, human-centered data economy, IIoT, Industry 4.0, innovation, innovation policy, intellectual commerce, Living lab, mission-led science, multisided platforms, personal data, research impact, social commerce, Supplier Integration, taxonomy, user-generated content},
	author = {Stoyan Tanev and Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {1232,
	title = {Increasing the Impact of Industry{\textendash}Academia Collaboration through Co-Production},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {04/2019},
	pages = {37-47},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Increased competition and globalization motivate us to join forces to enhance the impact of the research conducted. Collaboration between organizations with different views can, however, be difficult to manage and needs awareness and skills to meet different expectations. This article will consider both a mutual industrial and academic perspective into the development of action research and, in six research project cases, empirically explore how the impact can be enhanced by considering certain key factors in the research process. How the phases of problem formulation, methodology, and results are managed is critical for the success of a collaboration and, thereby, its impact. Counter-productive forces that could dilute the progress over time need to be considered given that combining practical relevance and scientific rigour comes with challenges.},
	keywords = {action research, co-production, collaboration, impact, industry{\textendash}academia collaboration, key factors, relevance, rigour},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1232},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1232},
	author = {Anna Sann{\"o} and Anna Ericson {\"O}berg and Erik Flores-Garcia and Mats Jackson}
}
@article {1271,
	title = {Kick-Start for Connectivity: How to Implement Digital Platforms Successfully in Industry 4.0},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {10/2019},
	pages = {5-15},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {5},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Based on digitalization and interconnectedness, Industry 4.0 causes a structural change in the value creation processes, and thus reinforces the transformation of business processes and business models. One way for companies to cope with this development and its associated challenges is to apply digital platforms in the value creation process. As the potential of digital platforms for industrial value creation can only be leveraged to its full extent with adequate implementation, this paper addresses the research question: How are digital platforms best implemented in Industry 4.0 contexts; Using a qualitative case study design, based on 32 semi-structured expert interviews, the study identifies different triggers and initiators, challenges, and respective countermeasures, as thematic core elements of implementation, and requirements for platforms. The research insights contribute to existing literature on Industry 4.0 and digital platforms. In addition, the paper discusses practical implications for industrial companies.},
	keywords = {Buyer-Supplier Relationships, collaboration, digital platforms, Digital Technologies., IIoT, Industry 4.0, Supplier Integration},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1271},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1271},
	author = {Marie-Christin Schmidt and Johannes W. Veile and Julian M. M{\"u}ller and Kai-Ingo Voigt}
}
@article {1195,
	title = {Collaboration Strategies in Innovation Ecosystems: An Empirical Study of the German Microelectronics and Photonics Industries},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {11/2018},
	pages = {4-12},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Effective collaboration between companies and research organizations is key to successful innovation systems. Against the background of digitalization, a shift from traditional innovation systems towards innovation ecosystems can be observed. In this article, we investigate how companies operating in innovation ecosystems address the challenge of collaboration in dynamic innovation ecosystems. We focus on microelectronics and photonics in Germany as examples of knowledge- and research-intensive industries and analyze the strategies of companies to collaborate with research organizations. We explore whether and to what extent companies develop different and new strategies for collaborating with research institutions within innovation ecosystems, on the basis of which we identify two ideal types of strategies. Whereas ideal type A is aiming towards obtaining specific knowledge in order to further develop a particular technology or product (i.e., towards incremental innovation), ideal type B seeks to harness the new and full potential of innovation ecosystems (i.e., aiming at rather radical innovation). Finally, our findings contribute to a better understanding of innovation ecosystems and give managerial implications for collaborating in such systems. },
	keywords = {business ecosystem, collaboration, development and innovation, innovation ecosystem, innovation ecosystem strategies, knowledge ecosystem, microelectronics, photonics, research},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1195},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1195},
	author = {Fabian Schroth and Johann Jakob H{\"a}u{\ss}ermann}
}
@article {1194,
	title = {Editorial: Innovation Strategy and Practice (November 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {11/2018},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {best practice, collaboration, creativity, cybersecurity, framework, information security, innovation, innovation ecosystems, maturity model, method, model, practice, research, research institutions, strategy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1194},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1194},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1144,
	title = {From Closed to Open Innovation in Emerging Economies: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in Brazil},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03/2018},
	pages = {26-37},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article, we examine how firms in an emerging economy perform research and development (R\&D) activities in regards to the concept of open innovation. Most literature on open innovation shows multinational knowledge-intensive firms with well-established R\&D processes mainly in developed countries. Searching for management contributions for firms in emerging economies, we qualitatively analyzed two chemical firms in Southern Brazil that have different profiles and are representative samples of typical firms in the region. Our results show that firms did not fully exploit the potential benefits brought by open innovation, even when complete opening was not the main goal. The firms were similar concerning interactions with partners and stages where relationships occur. The generation of ideas was an open activity performed both by firms and by clients, and interactions with universities were getting stronger. On the other hand, intellectual property has not been used as means of profiting from innovation activities. Our main finding refers to the internal mediation of relationships with partners. R\&D teams rarely contact external organizations directly; instead, they leave such interactions to other departments within their firms. Relationships with clients are mediated through technical and commercial departments, and interactions with suppliers are intermediated by the supply staff.},
	keywords = {collaboration, emerging economy, intermediary, Open innovation, R\&D},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1144},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1144},
	author = {Elisa Thomas}
}
@article {1175,
	title = {From Importing Innovations to Co-Producing Them: Transdisciplinary Approaches to the Development of Online Land Management Tools},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {08/2018},
	pages = {16-26},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {While traditional approaches to innovation diffusion often assume that innovations come from outside a local system, transdisciplinary co-production offers an alternative paradigm in which local stakeholders are engaged as co-producers of innovations. The use of digital online tools for agriculture, conservation, and citizen science is an area of expanding opportunities, but landholders are often dependent on tools developed outside their local communities. This article looks at the potential for transdisciplinary co-production to be used as a framework for more participatory development of digital online land management tools, with a case study from the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. This research has implications beyond rural land management to other industries and contexts where reflexive and integrative strategies are needed to overcome barriers to stakeholder participation and engagement with new technologies.},
	keywords = {adaptive, co-production, collaboration, decision-support, innovation, land management, tools, transdisciplinary},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1175},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1175},
	author = {Alex Baumber and Graciela Metternicht and Peter Ampt and Rebecca Cross and Emily Berry}
}
@article {1126,
	title = {Collaborative Capability in Coworking Spaces: Convenience Sharing or Community Building?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {12/2017},
	pages = {32-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This study explores the development of collaborative capability in coworking spaces. It is based on the perception of collaboration among 31 coworking founders, community managers, and coworkers of those spaces. In-depth interviews around the meaning of collaboration and its challenges were conducted in 14 coworking spaces located in six Asian countries. A set of factors was identified and a model was proposed based on a set of four dimensions: enabling knowledge sharing, enhancing a creative field, enhancing an individual action for the collective, and supporting a collective action to an effective execution. The {\textquotedblleft}Convenience Sharing{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}Community Building{\textquotedblright} coworking types based on Capdevila (2014) suggest different conditions under which collaborative capability develops. Convenience Sharing coworking spaces tend to foster collaborative capability through knowledge sharing and effective execution, whereas Community Building coworking spaces tend to foster collaborative capability by enhancing a creative field and individual action for the collective. Overall, this study contributes to a theoretical model for coworking spaces to help coworking founders and community managers make strategic decisions. The findings suggest that collaborative capability in coworking spaces depends on the interlacing of a set of factors along four dimensions that relate in varying degrees of intensity to a two-fold coworking space typology.},
	keywords = {collaboration, collaborative knowledge work, collaborative workspaces, coworking, innovativeness},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1126},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1126},
	author = {Marcelo F. Castilho and Carlos O. Quandt}
}
@article {1122,
	title = {Editorial: Collaboration (December 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {12/2017},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, collaborative capability, cooperation, coworking, education, entrepreneurial commitment, entrepreneurship, industry, interdisciplinarity, SMEs, startups, university},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1122},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1122},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1059,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (March 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {03/2017},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, exploitation, exploration, hybrid entrepreneurship, innovation ecosystems, insourcing, organizational ambidexterity, outsourcing, part-time entrepreneurship, R\&D, roles, suppliers},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1059},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1059},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1115,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (November 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {11/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {academic publishing, business models, cities, collaboration, entrepreneurship, fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0, Internet of Things, IOT, living labs, open access, open data, Open innovation, social innovation, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1115},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1061,
	title = {Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {03/2017},
	pages = {12-24},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article explores how firms can orchestrate innovation ecosystems to enhance collaboration for innovation among different actors. Most previous research on ecosystems has focused on firm-level strategies to operate in an ecosystem rather than the composition or orchestration of an ecosystem as a whole. However, finding the balance between the self-interests of involved actors is critical in order to create collaborative settings that induce different parties to jointly develop and put their best efforts into a joint endeavour. Thus, we undertook a qualitative study with 35 case companies from the metal and engineering industries, each of whom was interested in developing their position in ecosystems and improving their relational business practices. The findings suggest that there is an essential ecosystem competence that is needed by all actors in an ecosystem, regardless of their position, and that is the ability to manage dynamic strategic interactions related to innovation. This competence enables them to ensure the future vitality of the ecosystem and their own business. These results highlight the need for managers to profile their own company{\textquoteright}s role in an ecosystem in relation to the type of ecosystems, while simultaneously evaluating the ecosystem{\textquoteright}s ability and potential to survive.},
	keywords = {actors, collaboration, ecosystems, innovation, orchestration, positioning, roles, strategy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1061},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1061},
	author = {Katri Valkokari and Marko Sepp{\"a}nen and Maria M{\"a}ntyl{\"a} and Simo Jylh{\"a}-Ollila}
}
@article {1041,
	title = {Collaborative Innovation with External Actors: An Empirical Study on Open Innovation Platforms in Smart Cities},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {12/2016},
	pages = {49-60},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Despite the rapid increase of public{\textendash}private{\textendash}people partnership (PPPP) programs at the global scale, the scientific knowledge of collaborative innovation in cities is scarce. All smart city initiatives emphasize collaborative innovation for better services and products to address the needs and problems of modern cities. Indeed, there is an evident need for both scientific and practical knowledge in this area. Based on an extensive empirical study of open innovation platforms in smart cities, this article seeks to address this knowledge gap by increasing the knowledge of opportunities and challenges of collaborative innovation between a city and external actors, including companies, third sector organizations, research institutions, and citizens. The opportunities relate to novel services, products, and solutions, as well as economic gains, regional development, and systemic and process improvements. The challenges relate to city governments and external actors.},
	keywords = {collaboration, collaborative innovation, innovation intermediaries, innovation platform, PPPP, public innovation, public{\textendash}private{\textendash}people partnership, smart city, urban development},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1041},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1041},
	author = {Jukka Ojasalo and Heini Kauppinen}
}
@article {956,
	title = {The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {01/2016},
	pages = {7-16},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Open innovation scholars as well as practitioners are still struggling with the practical implementation of open innovation principles in different contexts. In this article, we explore the value of a living lab approach for open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Using a case study approach, we compared 27 SME projects conducted by iMinds Living Labs from 2011 to 2015. The results suggest that a real-life intervention and a multi-method approach {\textendash} both of which are methodological characteristics of living lab projects {\textendash} increase the chance of generating actionable user contributions for the innovation under development. Moreover, the results also suggest that a living lab project yields maximal value when evolving from concept towards prototype. Besides these exploratory findings, this article also demonstrates that living lab projects are a perfect "playground" to test and validate assumptions from the open innovation literature.},
	keywords = {collaboration, distributed innovation, entrepreneur, Innovation management, living labs, Open innovation, SME, startup, user innovation, user involvement},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/956},
	author = {Dimitri Schuurman and Lieven De Marez and Pieter Ballon}
}
@article {987,
	title = {Open Innovation in Indian Organizations: Types of Collaboration},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {05/2016},
	pages = {15-23},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In order to succeed, it is important for any organization to leverage the power of the known and unknown networks around it. The organization must collaborate with others, and to do so requires it to open up its boundaries  inside-out, outside-in, or both. However, the type of collaboration required to work with other parties and the respective output is different across different organizations on account of need, R\&D intensity, capability, and risk-taking ability, as well as the nature of the business and industry. The major problem that comes in the way of open innovation in Indian organizations is their risk taking ability; the more an organization collaborates, the more risk it is taking by sharing internal information with the other parties. Through a sample of 31 manufacturing-based firms in India belonging to 12 different industries, the article explores the types of collaborations that they have with various related or unrelated organizations as they engage in open innovation. The article compares the collaborations each industry has entered into to identify the industries that are more open to take risks by collaborating with other parties in multiple ways. },
	keywords = {collaboration, forms, India, manufacturing, Open innovation, risk, types},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/987},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/987},
	author = {Shiv S. Tripathi}
}
@article {982,
	title = {TIM Seminar {\textendash} Transforming a Desert City into an International Cybersecurity Hub and Ecosystem},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {04/2016},
	pages = {43-45},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {Canada, collaboration, cooperation, cybersecurity, CyberSpark, Israel},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/982},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/982},
	author = {Roni Zehavi}
}
@article {931,
	title = {Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (October 2015)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {10/2015},
	pages = {3-6},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, ecosystems, innovation ecosystem, living laboratories, living labs, Open innovation, regional innovation, smart cities, smart regions, smart specialisation, smart specialization, sustainability, urban capabilities},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/931},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/931},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Taina Tukiainen and Seppo Leminen and Mika Westerlund}
}
@article {949,
	title = {Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	pages = {19-27},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Business model and living lab research both have similar objectives {\textendash} to maximize the probability of successful market introduction of innovative solutions {\textendash} be it through different means. Yet, there are still only few studies or reports discussing both, with those studies that do touch the subject staying at a high level. iMinds Living Labs has gained a lot of experience in combined living lab and business model innovation projects and, rather than being competing approaches, our results have shown that these two research methodologies can be complementary, where the combined approach turns out to be more powerful than each individual approach used alone. The goal of this article is to promote the inclusion of business model research in a model of "a living lab as a service" (and vice versa) by explaining the benefits and by introducing a practical framework to implement such combined research tracks based on the experience at iMinds Living Labs over the past few years.},
	keywords = {business model, collaboration, innovation, living labs, user research, value network, value proposition},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/949},
	author = {Olivier Rits and Dimitri Schuurman and Pieter Ballon}
}
@article {944,
	title = {Q\&A. In the Innovation Game, Why Do So Many Companies Stay on the Sidelines?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {35-39},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {co-creation, co-innovation, collaboration, innovation, lead users, Open innovation, open source},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/944},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/944},
	author = {Katri Valkokari}
}
@article {915,
	title = {Setting the Stage for Collaborative Creative Leadership at Cirque du Soleil},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {07/2015},
	pages = {59-65},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Debates about the nature of leadership for creativity have been ongoing since the 1950s. But, despite the central role leadership plays in the management of creative processes, few contributions highlight the actual practice of leadership for collaborative creative ventures. This interview with the Director of Acrobatics and Coaching at Cirque du Soleil addresses the reflexive experience of a creative leader faced with the challenges of integrating multiple expertises around complex, technological, human, and poly-sensorial creative performances. In this context, leadership for collaborative creativity appears as a constant and dynamic balancing act between people, ideas, deliverables, and the position and personality of the leader.},
	keywords = {Cirque du Soleil, collaboration, creativity, innovation, leadership},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/915},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/915},
	author = {Laurent Simon}
}
@article {906,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} Three Collaborations Enabling Cybersecurity},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {06/2015},
	pages = {45-48},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {book launch, collaboration, cybersecurity, entrepreneurship, NSA, research},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/906},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/906},
	author = {Deborah Frincke and Dan Craigen and Ned Nadima and Arthur Low and Michael Thomas}
}
@article {764,
	title = {Collaborative Idea Management: A Driver of Continuous Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {02/2014},
	pages = {11-16},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Despite the critical importance of innovation to most companies{\textquoteright} ongoing success, many organizations fail to develop sustainable innovation management processes. The article explores the application of collaborative idea management to drive continuous innovation in large organizations based on our experience at Waabii, an innovation software and consulting service provider. First, we identify the key roadblocks faced by organizations in managing their innovation processes. Next, we describe the innovation model created at Waabii to help implement a sustainable innovation process, and we present a case study of an innovation management software solution, Exago Idea Market, which was implemented to create a collaborative and sustainable innovation environment in a large global telecommunications company. Finally, we offer recommendations for implementing this model of collaborative idea management. This article is particularly relevant to managers in larger organizations and practitioners of organizational change seeking to identify inhibitors of growth and business innovation and how to combat the roadblocks and create a sustainable innovation environment.},
	keywords = {collaboration, collaborative idea management, crowdsourcing, culture, innovation, leadership, Open innovation, strategy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/764},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/764},
	author = {Jesper Bank and Adnan Raza}
}
@article {755,
	title = {Editorial: Open Source Business (January 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {01/2014},
	pages = {3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {business models, collaboration, ecosystems, licensing, open data, open source business, open source software, patterns},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/755},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/755},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {762,
	title = {Editorial: Seeking Solutions (February 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {02/2014},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, employee entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurship, innovation, local open innovation, Open innovation, Seeking Solutions, technology adoption, value creation, virtual proximity},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/762},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/762},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {788,
	title = {Editorial: Service and Innovation (May 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {05/2014},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, innovation indicators, innovation practices, intellectual property, knowledge-intensive business services, living labs, online gaming, service business development, service design, service innovation, service-dominant logic, trademarks, value chains, value creation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/788},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/788},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Risto Rajala and Marja Toivonen and Mika Westerlund}
}
@article {758,
	title = {Overcoming Barriers to Collaboration in an Open Source Ecosystem},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {01/2014},
	pages = {18-27},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Leveraging open source practices provides value to businesses when entrepreneurs and managers understand how to collaborate effectively in an open source ecosystem. However, the complex mix of different actors and varying barriers to effective collaboration in the ecosystem pose a substantial challenge. How can a business create and capture value if it depends on effective collaboration among these different groups? In this article, we review the published research on open source collaboration and reveal insights that will be beneficial to entrepreneurs and managers. We organize the published research into four streams based upon the following actor groups: i) governance actors, ii) competitors, iii) complementors, and iv) the core community. Then, through induction and synthesis, we identify barriers to collaboration, first by ecosystem and then by actor group. Finally, we offer six recommendations for identifying and overcoming barriers to collaboration in an open source ecosystem.},
	keywords = {business ecosystem, collaboration, collaboration barriers, communities, competitors, complementors, core community, governance, open source},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/758},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/758},
	author = {Derek Smith and Asrar Alshaikh and Rawan Bojan and Anish Kak and Mohammad Mehdi Gharaei Manesh}
}
@article {813,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} The Laboratory for Analytic Sciences: Developing the Art and Science of Analysis},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {07/2014},
	pages = {52-54},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {analysis, analytics, big data, collaboration, cybersecurity, framework, innovation, instrumentation, monitoring, prediction, strategy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/813},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/813},
	author = {J. David Harris}
}
@article {663,
	title = {Editorial: Local Open Innovation (March 2013)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {03/2013},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, economic development, local open innovation, Open innovation, problem solving},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/663},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/663},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Christophe Deutsch}
}
@article {749,
	title = {How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {12/2013},
	pages = {16-22},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Living lab environments are often promoted as a way to engage private companies, citizens, researchers, and public organizations in mutually beneficial learning. Based on an in-depth case study of a four-year living lab collaboration in gerontechnology, we agree that successful living lab development hinges on learning between the parties, yet its emergence cannot be presumed or taken for granted. Diverse competences and interests of participating actors often make technology development projects complicated and volatile. The study describes two specific challenges faced in a living lab project: i) power issues between the actors and ii) end-user reluctance to participate in the development of new technology. Despite the hardships, we suggest that the living lab environment worked as a catalyst for learning between users and developers. Nevertheless, realizing the benefits of this learning may be more challenging than is usually expected. Learning for interaction is needed before effective learning in interaction is possible.},
	keywords = {collaboration, conflicts, gerontechnology, health care, learning, living labs},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/749},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/749},
	author = {Louna Hakkarainen and Sampsa Hyysalo}
}
@article {667,
	title = {Quebec Seeks Solutions: An Economic Development Agency{\textquoteright}s Role in Local Open Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {03/2013},
	pages = {27-32},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article offers an economic-development perspective on a new method for local companies to find innovative solutions to their most challenging business problems: local open innovation. Quebec International, the economic development agency for the Quebec City area, contributed to the development of the Seeking Solutions approach to local open innovation, which included the hosting of problem-solving conferences with local research centres, economic development actors, and companies. Looking back on our experiences and outcomes since 2010, this article shows how the development and introduction of this new approach to local open innovation has changed the rules of the game in the region.},
	keywords = {collaboration, economic development, local open innovation, Open innovation, private research and development, Quebec Seeks Solutions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/667},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/667},
	author = {Alexandra Berger Masson}
}
@article {664,
	title = {The Seeking Solutions Approach: Solving Challenging Business Problems with Local Open Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {03/2013},
	pages = {6-13},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {How can small and medium-sized enterprises try open innovation and increase their level of collaboration with local partners? This article describes a possible solution: the Seeking Solutions approach. The Seeking Solutions process consists of four steps: a call for problems, problem selection, problem broadcast, and a collaborative event. This approach has been successfully used for the Quebec Seeks Solutions events in 2010 and 2012 with concrete results and real impacts. By mixing open innovation and collaboration, the Seeking Solutions approach has introduced a new concept: local open innovation. },
	keywords = {broadcast of search, collaboration, crowdsourcing, local open innovation, Open innovation, Seeking Solutions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/664},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/664},
	author = {Christophe Deutsch}
}
@article {605,
	title = {Living Labs for Cross-Border Systemic Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {09/2012},
	pages = {25-30},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Innovation is increasingly taking place in cross-border collaborative networks, which are shaped by the characteristics of systemic innovation, the strategies and objectives of main actors, and the dynamics of the innovation process. Participation in such networks is of high importance for small firms, but requires long-term investments and a diverse range of collaboration and innovation capabilities. This article explores how living labs, understood as innovation projects based on open and user-centric innovation methodologies, can form collaboration networks to support small firms and other actors to engage in cross-border collaboration and to accelerate the development and acceptance of innovations. Based on the lessons learned from a major living lab project, APOLLON, we conclude that adopting the living labs networking approach requires thorough understanding of each party{\textquoteright}s objectives and drivers, the alignment of operational processes, establishment of open and collaborative culture, as well as competences, methods, and tools for supporting cooperation and community building. },
	keywords = {collaboration, innovation, living labs, networks, systemic},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/605},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/605},
	author = {Hans Schaffers and Petra Turkama}
}
@article {514,
	title = {Q\&A. What Are the Long-Term Effects of Open Source?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {01/2012},
	pages = {29-30},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {code quality, collaboration, growth, open source, open standards},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/514},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/514},
	author = {Carlo Daffara}
}
@article {513,
	title = {Q\&A. What Is the Secret of Red Hat{\textquoteright}s Success?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {01/2012},
	pages = {25-28},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {collaboration, community, innovation, open source, Red Hat},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/513},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/513},
	author = {Ruth Suehle}
}
