@article {1462,
	title = {Human Factors in Living Lab Research},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {12/2021},
	pages = {21-29},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {21},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Human factors research is still in its infancy in healthcare and other fields. Yet it has the potential to allow organisations and living labs to assess and improve innovation quality, while closely involving potential end users. "Human factors" involve a scientific focus on the interaction between individuals and systems with the goal of improving safety, performance, and user acceptability. Studies simulating challenging real-life circumstances in selected samples and using a multi-method approach can provide important insights for organisations and governments and allow for better and safer services for the end user. By combining existing theory and case examples, the current paper aims to situate human factors research and to help researchers determine when and how this methodology could be applied.},
	keywords = {human factors, Living lab, methodology, safety, usability},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1462},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1462},
	author = {Nele A.J. De Witte and Leen Broeckx and Sascha Vermeylen and Vicky Van Der Auwera and Tom Van Daele}
}
@article {953,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} When Are Software Systems Safe Enough?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	pages = {56-58},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {risk, safety, safety-critical systems, security, software systems, standards, testing},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/953},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/953},
	author = {Chris Hobbs}
}
@article {843,
	title = {Editorial: Cybersecurity (November 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {11/2014},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {crimeware, cyber-attacks, cybersecurity, globalization, malware, safety, science of cybersecurity, scientific contributions, startups},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/843},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/843},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Tony Bailetti}
}
@article {834,
	title = {The Online World of the Future: Safe, Productive, and Creative},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {10/2014},
	pages = {5-12},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {A safer online world is required to attain higher levels of productivity and creativity. We offer a view of a future state of the online world that places safety, productivity, and creativity above all else. The online world envisaged for 2030 is safe (i.e., users communicate with accuracy and enduring confidence), productive (i.e., users make timely decisions that have an ongoing global effect), and creative (i.e., users can connect seemingly unrelated information online). The proposed view differs from other views of the future online world that are anchored around technology solutions, confrontation, deception, and personal or commercial gain. The following seven conditions characterize the proposed view of the online world: i) global-scale autonomous learning systems; ii) humans co-working with machines; iii) human factors that are authentic and transferrable; iv) global scale whole-brain communities; v) foundational knowledge that is authentic and transferrable; vi) timely productive communication; and vii) continuous technological adaptation. These conditions are expected to enable new social-behavioural, socio-technical, and organizational interaction models. },
	keywords = {bisociation, cybersecurity, excludability, future vision, Industrial Internet, Internet, Internet of Everything, Internet of Things, online, productivity, rivalry, safety, security},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/834},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/834},
	author = {Tony Bailetti and Renaud Levesque and D{\textquoteright}Arcy Walsh}
}
@article {849,
	title = {Safety in the Online World of the Future},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {11/2014},
	pages = {41-48},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article, we address what it means to be safe in the online world of the future by advocating the perspective whereby improving safety will improve resilience in cyberspace. We adopt a specific approach towards transdisciplinarity; present a weakly transdisciplinary model of the safety context and an initial position about what existing disciplines are most relevant; and link prospect theory to risk-based decision making as one example that could lead to a new paradigm for safety. By treating safety as a transdisciplinary challenge, there is an opportunity to enable the participants of the online world to become more productive and creative than ever before. The beneficiary of this increased productivity and creativity will ultimately be the public. The perspective of this article is of interest to senior decision makers, policy makers, managers, educators, strategists, futurists, scientists, technologists, and others interested in shaping the online world of the future.},
	keywords = {cybersecurity, prospect theory, risk-based decision making, safety, security, weak transdisciplinary},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/849},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/849},
	author = {Nadeem Douba and Bj{\"o}rn R{\"u}tten and David Scheidl and Paul Soble and D{\textquoteright}Arcy Walsh}
}
