@article {1203, title = {Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {8}, year = {2018}, month = {12/2018}, pages = {26-39}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, abstract = {This article explores how to conduct a cost-effective stakeholder analysis to investigate opportunities and interest in establishing a living lab for an autonomous ferry connection. Using an action research approach, we share our experiences with the process and results, and we reflect openly on the strengths and weaknesses of both the stakeholder methodology generally as well as our own implementation specifically. According to the cyclic nature of action research and experiential learning, the research was conducted in two iterations, with the second iteration drawing upon input from the first. We compare and discuss these two approaches in terms of costs and benefits from a practitioner{\textquoteright}s perspective. The article provides a contribution to stakeholder analysis methodology for complex, multi-stakeholder innovation initiatives, such as living labs.}, keywords = {action research, autonomous vessels, living labs, management, maritime, Open innovation, quadruple helix, stakeholder analysis}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1203}, url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1203}, author = {Marius Imset and Per Haavardtun and Marius Stian Tannum} } @article {889, title = {Challenges in Maritime Cyber-Resilience}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {5}, year = {2015}, month = {04/2015}, pages = {35-39}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, abstract = {The maritime industry has been shown to be under increasing levels of cyber-attack, with future attacks having the potential to severely disrupt critical infrastructure. The industry lacks a standardized approach to cybersecurity, a national approach will be counterproductive, and a global mandatory standard, while needed, will take a long time to implement. In the shorter term, this article recommends that the industry coalesce around a set of voluntary guidelines in order to reduce the risk profile and increase resilience. To provide context for these recommendations, this article examines the specific characteristics of the maritime industry in relation to cybersecurity. Examples of existing vulnerabilities and reported cyber-attacks demonstrate that the threat is current and real. }, keywords = {container, cyber-resilience, cyber-risk, CyberKeel, cybersecurity, maritime, terminal, vessel}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/889}, url = {http://timreview.ca/article/889}, author = {Lars Jensen} }