00766nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260004200199300000800241490000600249653001800255653002600273653001800299653002100317653002500338653001700363653002000380100001800400700002300418700001700441700001700458856003700475       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries (February 2018)0 aEditorial Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries February 2  aOttawabTalent First Networkc02/2018  a3-60 v810abiotechnology10aconvergent innovation10afood security10ainclusive growth10ainclusive innovation10amaker spaces10aOpen innovation1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aSchillo, R. Sandra1 aEarl, Louise1 aKinder, Jeff  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/113402125nas a2200193   4500008004100000022001400041245006600055210006500121260004200186300000900228490000600237520155300243653002201796653002501818653001301843653001901856100001901875856003701894       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aFrugal or Fair? The Unfulfilled Promises of Frugal Innovation0 aFrugal or Fair The Unfulfilled Promises of Frugal Innovation  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2018  a6-130 v83 aFrugal innovation has become a popular buzzword among management and business scholars. However, despite its popularity, I argue that the frugal innovation literature, in its present form, is problematic for at least two reasons. First, the frugal innovation literature assumes that scarcity is a normal condition of the “Global South”. In this article, I show that this assumption neglects the fact that scarcity can be socially constructed to deny certain social sectors the access to resources essential for their flourishing. Second, despite all the good intentions underpinning the idea of “alleviating poverty”, frugal innovation studies rarely challenge, or even discuss, the causes of destitution and social exclusion. Innovation, as well as technology, is overwhelmingly framed in an agnostic and neutral way that sidelines the socio-economic complexity of the exclusion mechanisms that cause poverty and underdevelopment. By ignoring this, the frugal innovation literature risks limiting the understanding of the problems it seeks to solve and, most importantly, it risks limiting its impact. Most frugal innovation literature, in other words, seems to elude the fact that, rather than being a mere lack of resources or technology, poverty is a matter of social justice. In order to be empowering, technology has to be value-based, normative framed, socially controlled, and democratically debated. In this article, I propose that we should use these principles to develop a new wave of frugal innovation literature and practice. 10afrugal innovation10ainclusive innovation10ascarcity10asocial justice1 aPansera, Mario  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/114801419nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245007900055210006900134260004200203300001000245490000600255520066500261653002100926653001500947653001800962653001700980653002500997653001501022653000801037653001501045653002001060100002001080700001601100856003701116       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aInclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces: The Role of Systems and Networks0 aInclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces The Role of Systems and  aOttawabTalent First Networkc02/2018  a27-370 v83 aIn this article, we examine the development of biohacker spaces and their impact on innovation systems through the lens of inclusive innovation. Examining issues associated with people, activities, outcomes, and governance, we observe that biohacker spaces offer an alternative approach to biotechnological research outside the orthodox walls of academia, industry, and government. We explain that harnessing the full innovative potential of these spaces depends on flexible legal and regulatory systems, including appropriate biosafety regulations and intellectual property policies and practices, and organic, community-based social and financial networking.10abiohacker spaces10abiohacking10abiotechnology10acrowdfunding10ainclusive innovation10ainnovation10alaw10aregulation10asocial networks1 ade Beer, Jeremy1 aJain, Vipal  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/113700719nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245005000055210004700105260004200152300000800194490000600202653001500208653002100223653002500244653001000269653003200279653001600311653000900327653001500336653002000351653001700371653001000388100001800398856003700416       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: 10th Anniversary Issue (July 2017)0 aEditorial 10th Anniversary Issue July 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2017  a3-40 v710aecosystems10aentrepreneurship10ainclusive innovation10aIndia10aknowledge commercialization10aliving labs10aOSBR10aTIM Review10atopic modelling10auniversities10aurban1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/108602494nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245007700055210006900132260004200201300001000243490000600253520183500259653002402094653001402118653002502132653001502157653002102172100002302193700002302216856003702239       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aInclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How0 aInclusive Innovation in Developed Countries The Who What Why and  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2017  a34-460 v73 aAlthough widely appreciated as an important driver of economic growth, innovation has also been established as a contributor to increasing economic and social inequalities. Such negative consequences are particularly obvious in the context of developing countries and extreme poverty, where innovation’s contributions to inequalities are considered an issue of social and economic exclusion. In response, the concept of inclusive innovation has been developed to provide frameworks and action guidelines to measure and reduce the inequality-increasing effects of innovation. In developing countries, attention has only recently turned to the role of innovation in increasing inequalities, for example in the context of the degradation of employment in the transition from production to service industries. Although the focus of this early work is primarily on economic growth, innovation in developed countries also contributes to social exclusion, both of groups traditionally subject to social exclusion and new groups marginalized through arising innovations. This article summarizes the origins of the concept of inclusive innovation and proposes a four-dimensional framework for inclusive innovation in developed countries. Specifically, innovation needs to be inclusive in terms of people, activities, outcomes, and governance: i) individuals and groups participating in the innovation process at all levels; ii) the types of innovation activities considered; iii) the consideration of all positive and negative outcomes of innovation (including economic, social, and environmental); and iv) the governance of innovation systems. This framework is intended to guide policy development for inclusive innovation, as well as to encourage academics to investigate all dimensions of inclusive innovation in developed countries.10adeveloped countries10aframework10ainclusive innovation10ainequality10asocial exclusion1 aSchillo, R. Sandra1 aRobinson, Ryan, M.  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/1089