01193nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245017600055210006900231260004200300300001300342490000700355520039400362653001500756653002700771653003400798653001200832653002500844100002100869700002000890700002300910856003000933       2022                        eng d  a1927-032100aInterview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services. Part II: Governance and Legal Issues, Future Opportunities, Development Needs and Research Pathways0 aInterview Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Ser  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2022  a220102060 v123 aThis interview on “Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services” between 9th Gear Technologies, Inc., CPQi and the TIM Review took place on April 22nd and 29th, 2022. The interviewees were Maryanne Morrow, CEO, Founder, and Chairman of 9th Gear, and Matthew Midson, CEO, North America, CPQi. The interview was conducted by Gregory Sandstrom, Managing Editor, TIM Review.10ablockchain10adigital transformation10adistributed ledger technology10aFinTech10aReal Time Settlement1 aMorrow, Maryanne1 aMidson, Matthew1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/148301194nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245017700055210006900232260004200301300001300343490000700356520039400363653001500757653002700772653003400799653001200833653002500845100002100870700002000891700002300911856003000934       2022                        eng d  a1927-032100aInterview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services. Part I: Transformation and Adoption of DLTs, Technology and Innovation, Markets and Money Management0 aInterview Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Ser  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2022  a220102050 v123 aThis interview on “Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services” between 9th Gear Technologies, Inc., CPQi and the TIM Review took place on April 22nd and 29th, 2022. The interviewees were Maryanne Morrow, CEO, Founder, and Chairman of 9th Gear, and Matthew Midson, CEO, North America, CPQi. The interview was conducted by Gregory Sandstrom, Managing Editor, TIM Review.10ablockchain10adigital transformation10adistributed ledger technology10aFinTech10aReal Time Settlement1 aMorrow, Maryanne1 aMidson, Matthew1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/148200553nas a2200169   4500008004100000022001400041245005900055210005800114260004200172300000600214490000600220653001500226653004300241653002700284653003400311856003800345       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aCall for Papers: Blockchain and Digital Transformation0 aCall for Papers Blockchain and Digital Transformation  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2021  a-0 v-10ablockchain10adecentralized autonomous organizations10adigital transformation10adistributed ledger technology  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/145000620nas a2200193   4500008004100000022001400041245008100055210006900136260004200205300000800247490000700255653002800262653001500290653001800305653002000323653003400343653001900377856003000396       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aCall for Papers: Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Digital Economies0 aCall for Papers Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Digita  aOttawabTalent First Networkc02/2021  a1-10 v1110aartificial intelligence10ablockchain10acybersecurity10adigital economy10adistributed ledger technology10asmartification  utimreview.ca/article/142202253nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245014100055210006900196260004200265300001000307490000700317520124900324653002801573653001501601653002001616653002101636653003401657653002501691653002301716653002301739653002501762653002301787653002101810653001901831653002001850653001601870100002301886856003001909       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aDistributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines: How to “smartify” the economy with blockchain-based digital extension services?0 aDistributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines How to smart  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2021  a42-570 v113 aThis paper examines the broad impact of digitalization on economic development. More specifically, it addresses the computer science-derived notion of "social machines", along with the invention of distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) (or blockchain), as potential signposts on the pathway to "smart(er) digital economies". The paper investigates blockchain-based ecosystems as examples of social machines that assist in economic "smartification" and development. It looks at distributed ledger-based communities (DLCs) that provide examples of functioning social machines for a variety of business and personal network communications purposes. It then analyses the scaleup of DLT-based social machines by comparison with "extension services", largely in education and agriculture, which are currently undergoing processes of digitalization. Overall, this conceptual study examines the general horizons and potential impact of blockchain and social machines on the provision of online products and services, across a range of sectors and industries. The paper offers interpretative assistance to managers, entrepreneurs, technology experts, and academics with lingering questions about blockchain in and for business and economic development.10aartificial intelligence10ablockchain10adigital economy10adigital platform10adistributed ledger technology10aeconomic development10aextension services10aextension thinking10ainnovation diffusion10aInternet of Things10aledger community10asmartification10asocial machines10aweb science1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/144901969nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245014000055210006900195260004200264300000900306490000700315520112200322653001501444653003401459653002001493653001601513653002201529653002801551653001701579100002101596700001601617700001901633700002101652856003001673       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aAn Exploration of Blockchain-based Traceability in Food Supply Chains: On the Benefits of Distributed Digital Records from Farm to Fork0 aExploration of Blockchainbased Traceability in Food Supply Chain  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2021  a6-180 v113 aThere are growing internal and external pressures for traceability in food supply chains due to food scandals. Traceability refers to tracking food from the consumer back to the farm and vice versa for quality control and management. However, many traceability solutions have failed to meet the needs of supply chain stakeholders. Blockchain is a novel distributed database technology that could solve some issues of traditional traceability systems, such as cost of adoption and vulnerabilities to hacking and data tampering. This study aims to gain insights on the benefits of applying blockchain technology for traceability in food supply chains through literature review and an investigation of five companies that are experimenting with blockchain-based food traceability. Our findings suggest that, upon implementation and contribution by all supply chain participants, blockchain-based traceability can provide cost-savings, reduced response time to food scandals and food-borne illness outbreaks, improved security and accuracy, better compliance with government regulations, and thus increase consumer trust.10ablockchain10adistributed ledger technology10afood innovation10aFood safety10afood supply chain10asupply chain management10atraceability1 aWesterlund, Mika1 aNene, Soham1 aLeminen, Seppo1 aRajahonka, Mervi  utimreview.ca/article/144602223nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245010800055210006900163260004200232300001000274490000700284520150400291653001501795653001901810653003401829653001701863653002201880100001601902700002701918700001801945856003001963       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aLearning from Early Adopters of Blockchain Technology: A Systematic Review of Supply Chain Case Studies0 aLearning from Early Adopters of Blockchain Technology A Systemat  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2021  a19-310 v113 aBlockchain technology is widely seen as a promising technology for global supply chains, though early adoption of the technology is both costly and risky. Along with many other discouraging factors, large investments required to enter or develop a blockchain raise barriers to entry. Concerns about potential benefits, on the other hand, have led to companies questioning whether it is worth it. Consequently, many players in the global arena are still preferring to wait by observing current practices before making investments, while trying to figure out what the technology might bring them. Hence, the main purpose of this paper is to research various implementations of blockchain technology in supply chains, in order to learn from its early adopters. For this purpose, we chose case studies as the research method, which we used in a systematic way. We focused on multiple relevant case studies from previous research concerning the use of blockchain technology in supply chain practices. Through a systematic analysis of case studies, the study paper aims at bringing forward different views, approaches and results about blockchain adoption, as a way to show the pros and cons of adopting the technology under certain circumstances. The previous research was obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. This paper contributes to the literature by showcasing the use of blockchain in supply chains via multiple cases to learn from early blockchain adopters in supply chain practices.
10ablockchain10adigitalization10adistributed ledger technology10asupply chain10asystematic review1 aDede, Sevda1 aKöseoğlu, Mesut, Can1 aYercan, Funda  utimreview.ca/article/144701301nas a2200469   4500008004100000022001400041245004000055210003700095260004200132300000800174490000700182653002700189653001500216653001900231653003000250653001800280653002100298653000900319653002100328653002100349653003400370653001300404653002000417653002400437653002300461653001400484653001300498653001500511653001000526653002100536653002100557653001900578653002000597653002400617653001300641653005100654653004100705653001400746100001800760700002300778856003000801       2020                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (December 2020)0 aEditorial Insights December 2020  aOttawabTalent First Networkc12/2020  a3-30 v1010a5G technology; Bitcoin10ablockchain10abusiness model10abusiness model innovation10acrypto assets10acryptocurrencies10aDiem10aDiem Association10adigital currency10adistributed ledger technology10aFacebook10afiat currencies10afinancial inclusion10aFinancial industry10afront-end10aideation10ainnovation10aLibra10alocal currencies10aManagement Model10anot-for-profit10aresearch center10astrategic foresight10astrategy10atechnology firms; project portfolio management10atokenization; product innovativeness10avisioning1 aTanev, Stoyan1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/141001726nas a2200649   4500008004100000022001400041245003600055210003300091260004200124300000800166490000700174653001200181653001500193653001700208653001800225653002100243653002600264653003400290653003000324653002800354653002100382653001300403653002300416653001200439653000900451653000800460653001500468653003300483653002500516653001600541653001700557653002000574653001700594653002200611653001600633653003500649653001500684653002600699653001500725653002000740653001400760653000800774653000800782653001900790653003000809653001500839653002500854653001900879653001600898653001700914653002200931653003200953653002000985100001801005700002301023856003001046       2020                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (June 2020)0 aEditorial Insights June 2020  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2020  a3-40 v1010aBitcoin10ablockchain10acrowdfunding10acrypto assets10acryptocurrencies10adeveloping countries.10adistributed ledger technology10aEmployeedriven innovation10aentrepreneurial finance10aentrepreneurship10aEthereum10aFinancial industry10aFinTech10aICOs10aIEO10ainnovation10aintellectual property rights10ainternationalization10aIT industry10ajob autonomy10amining industry10amoral hazard10aneed for autonomy10anew company10aPorter's Five Forces framework10aregulation10ascaling company value10ascaling-up10aself-leadership10asignaling10aSME10aSTO10asustainability10atechnological environment10atechnology10atechnology readiness10atoken offering10atoken sales10atokenization10avalue proposition10avalue proposition alignment10aventure capital1 aTanev, Stoyan1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/136302299nas a2200337   4500008004100000022001400041245010300055210006900158260004200227300001000269490000700279520132100286653001201607653001501619653001801634653002101652653000901673653002101682653002101703653003401724653001301758653002001771653002401791653002301815653001001838653002101848653001701869100002001886700002501906856003001931       2020                        eng d  a1927-032100aFacebook’s Digital Currency Venture “Diem”:  the new Frontier ... or a Galaxy far, far away?0 aFacebook s Digital Currency Venture Diem the new Frontier or a G  aOttawabTalent First Networkc12/2020  a19-300 v103 aThis article focuses on Facebook's new digital currency, initially called "Libra" and renamed in December 2020 "Diem", that has been designed and proposed by the Diem Association (formerly the Libra Association). It briefly reflects on the historical meaning of money and currency, as well as "local currencies" viewed as precursors to the new "digital currencies" or "cryptocurrencies". The paper presents a general overview of the Diem project, particularly from the perspective of financial theory and practise. It looks specifically into Diem's business model and analyzes the project's planned and potential revenue streams, according to official documents published by the Diem Association. The research identifies potential obstacles and hurdles this digital currency would (since it has not happened yet) face on launch day and assesses whether the project is feasible in its current form. In the authors' view, although some early concerns were addressed in the Diem White Paper 2.0, the Diem project is only questionably ready for commercial launch in its current state. Speaking directly to the financial aspects of the Diem Association's project, the current regulatory hurdles and institutional pressures seem difficult to bypass without making some additional noticeable and meaningful changes to Diem.10aBitcoin10ablockchain10acrypto assets10acryptocurrencies10aDiem10aDiem Association10adigital currency10adistributed ledger technology10aFacebook10afiat currencies10afinancial inclusion10aFinancial industry10aLibra10alocal currencies10atokenization1 aRrustemi, Jahja1 aTuchschmid, Nils, S.  utimreview.ca/article/140702550nas a2200385   4500008004100000022001400041245012500055210006900180260004200249300001000291490000700301520145900308653001201767653001501779653001701794653001801811653002101829653003401850653002801884653001301912653002301925653001201948653000901960653000801969653001801977653001401995653000802009653001902017653001602036653001702052653002002069100002002089700002502109856003002134       2020                        eng d  a1927-032100aFundraising Campaigns in a Digital Economy: Lessons from a Swiss Synthetic Diamond Venture's Initial Coin Offering (ICO)0 aFundraising Campaigns in a Digital Economy Lessons from a Swiss   aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2020  a53-630 v103 aAs economies digitalize and many local businesses gradually internationalize, crowdfunding platforms have offered a new way for ventures to raise capital. Relying on distributed ledger technology (DLT, blockchain), the method of "tokenization" now seems to be the next way for digital economics to be actualised in practise. Digitalizing some of the production and selling processes through crypto-tokenization technology has brought with it new perspectives and opportunities. Any thorough consideration of the logic of "distributed systems" applied to economics is bound to see that it potentially brings considerable disruptions and significant changes in how companies get access to funding. Cryptocurrencies, and subsequently "tokens" initially issued from "initial coin offerings" (ICOs) have answered an obvious need for efficient, borderless, and secure flows of capital. This article first summarizes what early academic research tells us about ICOs based on DLTs and their factors of success. We then use the case of LakeDiamond, a Swiss venture in the business of growing and polishing synthetic diamonds, to present and contextualize the process of holding an ICO, which ultimately did not succeed. In the final section, we present two fund raising models that have recently gained traction and popularity, namely "security token offerings" (STOs) and "initial exchange offerings" (IEOs), and highlight their main advantages compared to ICOs.10aBitcoin10ablockchain10acrowdfunding10acrypto assets10acryptocurrencies10adistributed ledger technology10aentrepreneurial finance10aEthereum10aFinancial industry10aFinTech10aICOs10aIEO10amoral hazard.10asignaling10aSTO10atoken offering10atoken sales10atokenization10aventure capital1 aRrustemi, Jahja1 aTuchschmid, Nils, S.  utimreview.ca/article/1368