{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab360

{\fonttbl
{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial}
{\f1\froman\fcharset0 Times New Roman}
{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Verdana}
{\f3\froman\fcharset2 Symbol}
}

{\colortbl;
\red0\green0\blue0;
}

{\info
{\author Biblio 7.x}{\operator }{\title Biblio RTF Export}}

\f1\fs24
\paperw11907\paperh16839
\pgncont\pgndec\pgnstarts1\pgnrestart
Brioschi, M., Bonardi, M., Fabrizio, N., Fuggetta, A., Verga, E. Sergio, & Zuccal\'e0, M. 2021. Enabling and Promoting Sustainability through Digital API Ecosystems: An example of successful implementation in the smart city domain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(1): 4-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1412\par \par Payne, A., Frow, P., & Tanev, S. 2021. Interview: Discussing Value Proposition Research in the Context of New Companies Committed to Scaling Early and Rapidly. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(4): 6-12. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1432\par \par Hansen, A. Vorre, Fuglsang, L., Liefooghe, C., Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., Haug, I. Mergel & N., et al. 2021. Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 47-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464\par \par Lappalainen, I., & Federley, M. 2021. The Role of Digital Platforms in Resident-Centric Housing Concepts. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(11-12): 45-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1473\par \par Ferasso, M., & Bergamaschi, E. Andrey. 2020. Kondratieff?s Economic Waves and Future Scenarios Planning: an approach for organizations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(2): 51-61. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1327\par \par Castro, R. Nuno, & Ferreira, J. Jos\'e9 Pint. 2020. Project Portfolio Management in the Front-End of Innovation of Research Centers: a Literature Review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(12): 46-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1409\par \par Soutter, L., Ferguson, K., & Neubert, M. 2019. Digital Payments: Impact Factors and Mass Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(7): 41-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1254\par \par Falk, K., & Muller, G. 2019. Embedded Master?s Students Conduct Highly Relevant Research Using Industry as Their Laboratory. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(5): 54-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1241\par \par Lee, Y. Yin, & Falahat, M. 2019. The Impact of Digitalization and Resources on Gaining Competitive Advantage in International Markets: Mediating Role of Marketing, Innovation and Learning Capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11): 26-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1281\par \par Sann\'f6, A., \'d6berg, A. Ericson, Flores-Garcia, E., & Jackson, M. 2019. Increasing the Impact of Industry?Academia Collaboration through Co-Production. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(4): 37-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1232\par \par Hartmann, M., Laubengaier, D., & Foerstl, K. 2019. Live and Let Die: On the Management of Creativity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 16-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1272\par \par Mileros, M. D., Lakemond, N., & Forchheimer, R. 2019. Towards a Taxonomy of E-Commerce: Characterizing Content Creator-based Business Models. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 62-74. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1276\par \par Riedy, C., Fam, D., Ross, K., & Mitchell, C. 2018. Transdisciplinarity at the Crossroads: Nurturing Individual and Collective Learning. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(8): 41-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1177\par \par Femen\'edas, P., & Thuvander, L. 2018. Transdisciplinary Research in the Built Environment: A Question of Time. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(8): 27-40. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1176\par \par Fiset, J., & Dostaler, I. 2017. Opening the Black Box of Ambidexterity: Three Product Development Stories. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(3): 4-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1060\par \par Moore, G., Fitzpatrick, T., Lim-Carter, I., Haynes, A., Flego, A., & Snelgrove, B. 2016. Implementing Knowledge Translation Strategies in Funded Research in Canada and Australia: A Case Study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9): 16-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1016\par \par Forde, A. N., & Fox, M. S. 2016. A Proposed Approach for Idea Selection in Front End of Innovation Activities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1011\par \par Buhr, K., Federley, M., & Karlsson, A. 2016. Urban Living Labs for Sustainability in Suburbs in Need of Modernization and Social Uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 27-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/958\par \par Cocca, S., Franke, A. - M., & Schell, S. 2015. Agile New Service Development in an Interdisciplinary Context. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(2): 33-45. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/872\par \par Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. - K. 2015. Contextuality and Co-Creation Matter: A Qualitative Case Study Comparison of Living Lab Concepts in Urban Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/952\par \par Watanabe, K., Fukuda, K., & Nishimura, T. 2015. A Technology-Assisted Design Methodology for  Employee-Driven Innovation in Services. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(2): 6-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/869\par \par Frincke, D., Craigen, D., Nadima, N., Low, A., & Thomas, M. 2015. TIM Lecture Series ? Three Collaborations Enabling Cybersecurity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(6): 45-48. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/906\par \par Tanev, S., & Frederiksen, M. Harbo. 2014. Generative Innovation Practices, Customer Creativity, and the Adoption of New Technology Products. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(2): 5-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/763\par \par Femen\'edas, P., & Hagbert, P. 2013. The Habitation Lab: Using a Design Approach to Foster Innovation for Sustainable Living. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 15-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/741\par \par Fan, X., & Gong, G. 2013. Security Challenges in Smart-Grid Metering and Control Systems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(7): 42-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/702\par \par Freedman, G. 2012. TIM Lecture Series ? Intellectual Property Paradigms for Global Business. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(12): 43-45. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/638\par \par Fitzpatrick, C. 2010. Improving Product-Market Fit by Engaging an Open Source Community. Open Source Business Resource, (July 2010). http://timreview.ca/article/365\par \par Feuer, A. 2010. Mifos: Ending Poverty with Software. Open Source Business Resource, (December 2010). http://timreview.ca/article/402\par \par Finkelstein, H. 2010. Q&A. Which is the better path to take, as a push or a pull startup?. Open Source Business Resource, (February 2010). http://timreview.ca/article/327\par \par French, D. J. 2010. Why Intellectual Property Will Not Save the Canadian Economy. Open Source Business Resource, (November 2010). http://timreview.ca/article/396\par \par Ferreira, E., & Tanev, S. 2009. How Companies Make Money Through Involvement in Open Source Hardware Projects. Open Source Business Resource, (February 2009). http://timreview.ca/article/228\par \par Friesen, N. 2009. Open Source Resources in Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Open Source Business Resource, (July 2009). http://timreview.ca/article/271\par \par Ferreira, E. 2008. Open Hardware Business Models. Open Source Business Resource, (April 2008). http://timreview.ca/article/136\par \par Few, R. 2007. Keystone Organization for Ontario's Open Source Ecosystem. Open Source Business Resource, (August 2007). http://timreview.ca/article/85\par \par }