%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Opening the Black Box of Ambidexterity: Three Product Development Stories %A John Fiset %A Isabelle Dostaler %K adaptability %K alignment %K ambidextrous behaviour %K contextual ambidexterity %K exploitation %K exploration %K new product development %X Organizational ambidexterity, which can be roughly defined as the ability for organizations to combine old and new ways of doing things to meet organizational objectives, has drawn considerable attention in the management literature in recent years. Authors distinguish clearly between structural ambidexterity, which implies that ambidextrous organizations are firms in which groups of people concentrate on traditional business or ways of doing things while others explore new avenues, and contextual ambidexterity, which characterizes companies where any individual can be ambidextrous. Our research is positioned in the contextual ambidexterity perspective. In this article, we apply the typology of four ambidextrous behaviours developed by Birkinshaw and Gibson (2004) to increase our understanding of the process whereby organizational actors are able to build on existing capabilities or business processes while developing new ones. Our results indicate that at least three of the ambidextrous behaviours proposed by Birkinshaw and Gibson (2004) (initiator, broker, and multitasker) are helpful to understand how new product development team members rely on proven approaches while simultaneously introducing new ones to successfully overcome daily challenges. Practitioners should be encouraged to become familiar with the concept of ambidexterity, to recognize when and how the successful combination of old and new ways of doing happens, and to promote these occurrences. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 4-11 %8 03/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1060 %N 3 %1 Memorial University of Newfoundland John Fiset is an Assistant Professor of Management in the Faculty of Business Administration at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. John’s, Canada. He received his doctoral degree from the John Molson School of Business at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada, where he examined how leaders influence intragroup workplace dynamics. His current research interests include examining the process by which leaders are able to elicit high performance among followers as well as studying various forms of interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. %2 Concordia University Isabelle Dostaler is a Professor in the Department of Management of the John Molson School of Business at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. She holds a PhD in Management Studies from the University of Cambridge in England. She has conducted research into business strategy and performance, regional development and air transport, and supplier–buyer relationships in several industrial sectors. She is also interested in the field of management education and her recent research has focused on teaching methods and on the gap between business practice and business research. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1060