%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries (February 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A R. Sandra Schillo %A Louise Earl %A Jeff Kinder %K biotechnology %K convergent innovation %K food security %K inclusive growth %K inclusive innovation %K maker spaces %K Open innovation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-6 %8 02/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1134 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 University of Ottawa R. Sandra Schillo is an Assistant Professor in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Canada, and an affiliate of the Institute for Science, Society and Policy at the University of Ottawa. Prof. Schillo’s research investigates systems aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship in her academic work and places emphasis on contributions to practice. Prof. Schillo holds a PhD in management from the University of Kiel, Germany, and a Master’s (Diplom) in engineering management from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. %3 Statistics Canada Louise Earl is a Section Chief in the Investment, Science and Technology Division at Statistics Canada has been active in the measurement and analysis of science, technology and innovation since 2000. Louise holds a Master of Arts from Queen’s University, Kingston and a Bachelor of Arts degree with first class honours from the University of New Brunswick. Louise is a vice chair of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators. She is actively involved in the soon to be concluded revision of the OECD’s Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. She contributed to the Frascati Manual 2015, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Development revision. She is the co-editor of National Innovation, Indicators and Policy (2006, Edward Elgar) and is the author of chapters in Measuring Knowledge Management in the Business Sector: First Steps (2003, OECD). Her analytical works at Statistics Canada on topics such as impacts of science, technology and innovation; organization and technological change in the public and private sectors; indicators of growth firms; knowledge management practices; household e-commerce; and wage gaps have been published in the Canadian Economic Observer, Perspectives on Labour and Income, Services Indicators, Health Reports, Focus on Culture, and various working papers series. %4 Institute on Governance Jeff Kinder, Director of Innovation at the Institute on Governance has almost 30 years of experience in government science, technology and innovation policy in the US and Canada. His US experience includes the National Science Foundation, the National Academies and the Naval Research Laboratory. In Canada, Jeff has worked at Industry Canada, Natural Resources Canada and the Council of Science and Technology Advisors. In 2014, he supported the External Advisory Group on Federal S&T (the Knox Panel). Most recently, he led the Federal Science and Technology Secretariat supporting the Minister of Science, the Deputy Minister Champion for Federal S&T and related initiatives. He is now on interchange with the Institute on Governance where he leads the ASPIRE Innovation Collaboratory. At the University of Ottawa, Jeff is a Fellow of the Institute for Science, Society and Policy and an adjunct professor at the Telfer School of Management. He is author and co-editor with Paul Dufour of A Lantern on the Bow: A History of the Science Council of Canada (forthcoming from Invenire), author of Government Science 2020: Re-thinking Public Science in a Networked Age and co-author with Bruce Doern of Strategic Science in the Public Interest: Canada’s Government Laboratories and Science-Based Agencies (U. Toronto Press, 2007). He holds a PhD in public policy, a Master’s in science, technology, and public policy, and a BS in physics. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1134 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How %A R. Sandra Schillo %A Ryan M. Robinson %K developed countries %K framework %K inclusive innovation %K inequality %K social exclusion %X Although widely appreciated as an important driver of economic growth, innovation has also been established as a contributor to increasing economic and social inequalities. Such negative consequences are particularly obvious in the context of developing countries and extreme poverty, where innovation’s contributions to inequalities are considered an issue of social and economic exclusion. In response, the concept of inclusive innovation has been developed to provide frameworks and action guidelines to measure and reduce the inequality-increasing effects of innovation. In developing countries, attention has only recently turned to the role of innovation in increasing inequalities, for example in the context of the degradation of employment in the transition from production to service industries. Although the focus of this early work is primarily on economic growth, innovation in developed countries also contributes to social exclusion, both of groups traditionally subject to social exclusion and new groups marginalized through arising innovations. This article summarizes the origins of the concept of inclusive innovation and proposes a four-dimensional framework for inclusive innovation in developed countries. Specifically, innovation needs to be inclusive in terms of people, activities, outcomes, and governance: i) individuals and groups participating in the innovation process at all levels; ii) the types of innovation activities considered; iii) the consideration of all positive and negative outcomes of innovation (including economic, social, and environmental); and iv) the governance of innovation systems. This framework is intended to guide policy development for inclusive innovation, as well as to encourage academics to investigate all dimensions of inclusive innovation in developed countries. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 34-46 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1089 %N 7 %1 University of Ottawa R. Sandra Schillo is an Assistant Professor in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Canada, and an affiliate of the Institute for Science, Society and Policy at the University of Ottawa. Prof. Schillo’s research explores aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship that have policy and societal relevance. She has a strong background in technology transfer through her PhD (University of Kiel, Germany) and Master’s level research (University of Karlsruhe, Germany). She also has practical experience in innovation management within the Canadian federal government and consulting on innovation and entrepreneurship policy issues. %2 University of Ottawa Ryan M. Robinson is a Third Year Undergraduate student attending the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Business Management in Ottawa, Canada. He was born and raised in Oshawa, Canada: a city with its history carved out by advances in technological innovation. Today, Ryan balances living in these two very different locales, both of which are writing the story of diversity and inclusion in Canada. Being continuously surrounded by innovative landscapes, Ryan plans continue to study the evolution of innovation in Canada following the completion of his degree in Finance. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1089 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Commercialization and Public Good: Conflict, Complement, or Critical Component? %A R. Sandra Schillo %K commercialization %K intellectual property %K public good %K publicly funded science %K science in society %K societal benefits %K technology transfer %K university research %X The controversy regarding the role of science in society – and how science can best achieve its role – may well date as far back as the beginnings of science itself. The specific arguments and the possible mechanisms for science to impact society, however, have changed over time. This article picks up the conversation with regards to the specific role of publicly funded science, presuming, similar to Brecht in this article's opening quotation, that publicly funded science has the goal of making positive contributions to society. To achieve this goal, today’s scientists and research managers face a myriad options of publication venues, protection mechanism, and collaborations with external partners including licensing and other options for commercialization. Oftentimes, the goal of achieving positive contributions to society is perceived as being in fundamental conflict with the restrictions many commercialization arrangements place on the use of knowledge. This article argues that, although commercialization may at times conflict with the goal of achieving positive contributions to society, it can also be complementary to pursuits towards societal contributions, or even a critical component in achieving the desired positive contributions to society. More specifically, it suggests that the use of the term “science for the public good” as description of the goal to achieve positive societal contributions might create confusion with the economic term “public good”. Thus, it seeks to reframe the discussion of how science can contribute to society in an era of increased openness and interaction. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 27-35 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/810 %N 7 %1 University of Ottawa R. Sandra Schillo is an Assistant Professor at the Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa, Canada. Sandra completed her doctoral studies at the Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, University of Kiel, Germany and obtained her Masters' degree in Engineering Management from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. Her professional work experience includes employment and consulting assignments with many of Canada’s federal science-based departments and agencies and other organizations active in innovation and entrepreneurship in Canada. Sandra teaches innovation and entrepreneurship at the undergraduate and master’s levels. Her research agenda focuses on the impact of research and innovation, and explores the application of new methodologies to capturing measures of innovation and entrepreneurship and their outcomes. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/810 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Entrepreneurial Orientation and Company Performance: Can the Academic Literature Guide Managers? %A R. Sandra Schillo %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %X This article comments on the management implications of the various approaches to measuring entrepreneurial orientation (EO), and it discusses the implications of a range of empirical findings for management decisions. On the whole, the argument is that academic research needs to increase its understanding of the differences in empirical results between different studies. To date, the research mostly spells a small number of useful warnings, for example that the positive impact of EO may level off or turn negative beyond a certain point and that it may not have the anticipated positive effect in all circumstances. However, the academic research has yet to identify these circumstances to a level of specificity that could provide useful guidance to managers. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 20-25 %8 11/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/497 %N 2 %1 Innovation Impact Inc. Sandra Schillo is a researcher and consultant in the area of innovation and entrepreneurship. She is the Founding Editor of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, a publication founded to make academic literature on innovation and entrepreneurship accessible to policy professionals and researchers. She also is the President of Innovation Impact Inc., a company specializing in custom research and consulting services in the areas of innovation, science and technology policy, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Schillo is also on the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Dr. Schillo obtained her Doctorate from the Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, University of Kiel, Germany, and received her Masters' degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. She has extensive experience working with government departments and agencies on innovation and entrepreneurship. Dr. Schillo draws on both her practical and academic experience to ensure the relevance and quality of her work. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/497