%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Technology Commercialization and Entrepreneurship (January 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Ferran Giones %A Dev K. Dutta %K commercialization %K digitalization %K e-leadership %K entrepreneurship %K framework %K innovation %K internationalization %K legitimacy %K management %K SMEs %K startups %K technology %K technology intensity %K ventures %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-8 %8 01/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1207 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 University of Southern Denmark Ferran Giones is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. He received his PhD from La Salle – Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain. His research field is technology entrepreneurship, where he explores how and when technological progress transforms into entrepreneurial activity, and how this entrepreneurial activity results in sustainable organizations and innovative ecosystems. %3 University of New Hampshire Dev K. Dutta is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship in the Management Department at the University of New Hampshire in the United States. His research and teaching focus on the intersection of entrepreneurship and innovation, especially the way these concepts apply at the firm and ecosystem levels. Dev has over 25 research publications in his field in peer-reviewed journals as well as books, book chapters, and research monographs. He also holds national certifications as an academic coach and facilitator in technology entrepreneurship, innovator mindset, lean launch pad, and design thinking (MIT and Stanford D-School). Before joining academia, Dev worked for 15 years as a corporate strategy consultant for several large Indian IT multinationals. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1207 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Innovation Strategy and Practice (November 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K best practice %K collaboration %K creativity %K cybersecurity %K framework %K information security %K innovation %K innovation ecosystems %K maturity model %K method %K model %K practice %K research %K research institutions %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-3 %8 11/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1194 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1194 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A Seppo Leminen %A Dimitri Schuurman %A Mika Westerlund %A Eelko Huizingh %K analysis %K constructs %K cultural space %K definition %K ENoLL %K framework %K innovation %K ISPIM %K lean startup %K library %K living labs %K methodology %K stakeholder %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-6 %8 12/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1200 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Pellervo Economic Research, Aalto University, and Carleton University Seppo Leminen is a Research Director at Pellervo Economic Research in Finland, and he serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and as an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics in Finland and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. He is serving as an associate editor in the BRQ Business Research Quarterly, on the editorial board of the Journal of Small Business Management, as a member of the Review Board for the Technology Innovation Management Review, and on the Scientific Panel of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Prior to his appointment at Aalto University, he worked in the ICT and pulp and paper industries. %3 imec.livinglabs Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead of the Business Model and User Research Team at imec.livinglabs. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University in Belgium. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. He is also active in the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) and in the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) as a living labs specialist. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. %4 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %# University of Groningen Eelko Huizingh is an Associate Professor of Innovation Management and Director of the Innovation Centre of Expertise Vinci at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. He is founder of Huizingh Academic Development, offering workshops academic research and academic writing to increase the publishing performance of academics. He is also the Director of Scientific Affairs for the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). His academic research focuses on the intersection of innovation and entrepreneurship, marketing, and information technology. He has authored over 350 articles, has edited more than 30 special issues of journals, and has published several textbooks. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T A Cybersecurity Risk Assessment Framework that Integrates Value-Sensitive Design %A Aida Alvarenga %A George Tanev %K cybersecurity %K framework %K medical devices %K risk assessment %K value propositions %K value-sensitive design %X Medical devices today are more effective and connected than ever before, saving more patient lives and making healthcare practitioner’s jobs more efficient. But with this interconnectedness comes inherent concerns over increased cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Medical device cybersecurity has become an increasing concern for all relevant stakeholders including: patients, regulators, manufacturers, and healthcare practitioners. Although cybersecurity in medical devices has been covered in the literature, there is a gap in how to address cybersecurity concerns and assess risks in a way that brings value to all relevant stakeholders. In order to maximize the value created from cybersecurity risk mitigations, we review literature on the state of cybersecurity in the medical device industry, on cybersecurity risk management frameworks in the context of medical devices, and on how cybersecurity can be used as a value proposition. We then synthesize the key contributions of the literature into a framework that integrates cybersecurity value considerations for all relevant stakeholders into the risk mitigation process. This framework is subsequently applied to the hypothetical case of an insulin pump. Using this example case, we illustrate how medical device manufacturers can use the framework as a standardized method that can be applicable to medical devices at large. Our ultimate goal is to make cybersecurity risk mitigation an exploitable asset for manufacturers rather than a regulatory obligation. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 32-43 %8 04/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1069 %N 4 %1 Carleton University Aida Alvarenga Castillo is a Master’s student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Aida undertook her undergraduate studies at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, with a focus on Economics, Business Management, and Political Science. She has experience in the financial industry for well-established banks, in a business development role for a technology startup, and as an entrepreneur in launching her own family food business. Within the field of technology innovation, Aida’s main interests are in financial technologies (FinTech) and innovation within the financial industry. %2 Carleton University George Tanev is a Master’s student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. George holds a Master’s of Science degree in Medicine and Technology from the Technical University of Denmark and a Bachelor of Engineering in Biomedical and Electrical Engineering from Carleton University. George has experience in the medical device industry and the air navigation services industry. His interests are in technology entrepreneurship, cybersecurity, medical device product development, signal processing, and data modelling. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1069 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How %A R. Sandra Schillo %A Ryan M. Robinson %K developed countries %K framework %K inclusive innovation %K inequality %K social exclusion %X Although widely appreciated as an important driver of economic growth, innovation has also been established as a contributor to increasing economic and social inequalities. Such negative consequences are particularly obvious in the context of developing countries and extreme poverty, where innovation’s contributions to inequalities are considered an issue of social and economic exclusion. In response, the concept of inclusive innovation has been developed to provide frameworks and action guidelines to measure and reduce the inequality-increasing effects of innovation. In developing countries, attention has only recently turned to the role of innovation in increasing inequalities, for example in the context of the degradation of employment in the transition from production to service industries. Although the focus of this early work is primarily on economic growth, innovation in developed countries also contributes to social exclusion, both of groups traditionally subject to social exclusion and new groups marginalized through arising innovations. This article summarizes the origins of the concept of inclusive innovation and proposes a four-dimensional framework for inclusive innovation in developed countries. Specifically, innovation needs to be inclusive in terms of people, activities, outcomes, and governance: i) individuals and groups participating in the innovation process at all levels; ii) the types of innovation activities considered; iii) the consideration of all positive and negative outcomes of innovation (including economic, social, and environmental); and iv) the governance of innovation systems. This framework is intended to guide policy development for inclusive innovation, as well as to encourage academics to investigate all dimensions of inclusive innovation in developed countries. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 34-46 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1089 %N 7 %1 University of Ottawa R. Sandra Schillo is an Assistant Professor in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Canada, and an affiliate of the Institute for Science, Society and Policy at the University of Ottawa. Prof. Schillo’s research explores aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship that have policy and societal relevance. She has a strong background in technology transfer through her PhD (University of Kiel, Germany) and Master’s level research (University of Karlsruhe, Germany). She also has practical experience in innovation management within the Canadian federal government and consulting on innovation and entrepreneurship policy issues. %2 University of Ottawa Ryan M. Robinson is a Third Year Undergraduate student attending the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Business Management in Ottawa, Canada. He was born and raised in Oshawa, Canada: a city with its history carved out by advances in technological innovation. Today, Ryan balances living in these two very different locales, both of which are writing the story of diversity and inclusion in Canada. Being continuously surrounded by innovative landscapes, Ryan plans continue to study the evolution of innovation in Canada following the completion of his degree in Finance. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1089 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Models for Providers of Critical Infrastructure %A Walter Miron %A Kevin Muita %K adoption %K bersecurity %K capability maturity models %K compliance %K critical infrastructure %K framework %K municipalities %K protection %K regulation %K standards %X Critical infrastructure such as power generation and distribution systems, telecommunications networks, pipelines and pipeline control networks, transportation control networks, financial networks, and government information and communications technology (ICT) have increasingly become the target of cyber-attacks. The impact and cost of these threats, as well as regulatory pressure to mitigate them, have created an impetus to secure these critical infrastructures. Managers have many controls and models at their disposal to help them secure infrastructure technology, including cybersecurity capability maturity models to enable measurement and communication of cybersecurity readiness to top management teams, regulators, and customers, thereby facilitating regulatory compliance, corporate responsibility, and improved brand quality. However, information and awareness is lacking about which models are most appropriate for a given situation and how they should be deployed. This article examines relevant cybersecurity capability maturity models to identify the standards and controls available to providers of critical infrastructure in an effort to improve their level of security preparedness. These capability models are described and categorized by their relevance to different infrastructure domains, and then recommendations are provided on employing capability maturity models to measure and communicate readiness. This article will be relevant to regulators, critical infrastructure providers, and researchers. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 33-39 %8 10/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/837 %N 10 %1 Carleton University Walter Miron is a Director of Technology Strategy at TELUS Communications, where he is responsible for the evolution of their packet and optical networks. He has over 20 years of experience in enterprise and service provider networking conducting technology selection and service development projects. Walter is a member of the research program committee of the SAVI project, the Heavy Reading Global Ethernet Executive Council, and the ATOPs SDN/nFV Working Group. He is also Chair of the Venus Cybersecurity Corporation and a board member of the Centre of Excellence for Next Generation Networking (CENGN) in Ottawa, Canada. Walter is currently a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %2 Carleton University Kevin Muita is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He has a Bachelor's degree in Technology from Africa Nazarene University in Nairobi, Kenya. He has co-founded two technology startups: a network consultancy company and a systems installation and maintenance company. He has experience in logistics and supply chain management, having managed a Coca-Cola distribution network in Kenya, overseeing a successful 300% increase in sales volume, operations, and service delivery. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/837 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T TIM Lecture Series – The Laboratory for Analytic Sciences: Developing the Art and Science of Analysis %A J. David Harris %K analysis %K analytics %K big data %K collaboration %K cybersecurity %K framework %K innovation %K instrumentation %K monitoring %K prediction %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 52-54 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/813 %N 7 %1 Laboratory for Analytic Sciences J. David Harris is the inaugural Director of the Laboratory for Analytic Sciences in Raleigh, North Carolina, where the aim is to develop a science of analysis and analytic methodology. During nearly 25 years service with the U. S. Department of Defense, David has worked in a variety of technical and leadership positions in areas of research and development, technology transfer, and operations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/813