<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Renée van den Heuvel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susy Braun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manon de Bruin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ramon Daniëls</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Closer Look at Living Labs and Higher Education using a Scoping Review</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">approaches</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">definitions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">higher education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">key elements</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scoping review</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1463</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">As society changes rapidly, there is a need to educate professionals who contribute to innovation and complex adaptations in organizations. As part of this education, companies, governmental bodies and other stakeholders have sought collaboration on complex issues in &quot;living labs&quot;. Living labs are recognized as educational environments to prepare students in higher education for future roles. The aim of this article is to explore the nature and extent of the scientific literature about living labs in which actors in higher education actively participate. In total, 21 articles were included in this scoping review. Research into this topic appears to be relatively new. Definitions of living labs are mostly in line with the definition used by the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL), with its large variation of lab locations. Few results about organization and governance were identified. Different lessons learned regarding processes, interaction and requirements for successful living labs were found. The design of learning is mostly described by learning activities. Learning outcomes are described in generic and specific competences and assessments in living labs are rarely described. The authors recommend more detailed studies into aspects of the successful participation of higher education to gain knowledge about enhancing learning outcomes, and the effects of educational activities within living lab environments.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9/10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Renée van den Heuvel, PhD is a post-doctoral researcher at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences Reseach Centre for Assistive Technology in Care. In 2018, she finished her PhD about robots that support play in children with severe physical disabilities. During this project she became interested in sustainable collaboration with health care practise, research, and education, for example, in living labs. Next to her research activities about living labs, Renée is a lecturer in the occupational therapy department and lecturer-practitioner at the Multidisciplinary Care and Innovation Centre Zuyd-Adelante at the Adelante rehabilitation centre. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Susy Braun, PhD (Health, Medicine and Life Sciences) is a professor of Applied Science. Her research focusses on the development, evaluation, and implementation of personalized intervention programs, along with the potential role of technology. Co-creation, working with multiple stakeholders and involving client representatives play an essential role in her research. Dr. Braun is head of the Research Center of Nutrition, Lifestyle and Exercise at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Manon de Bruin is head of department of the academy for occupational therapy at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences. She is chairman of the head of departments of the Health and Welfare domain of Zuyd University, project leader of the Multidisciplinary Care and Innovation Centre Zuyd-Adelante, project leader of the Innovation team for technology and E-Health working on curriculum in the Health and Welfare domain of Zuyd University, and program manager EIZT, Expertise Centre for Innovative Care and Technology.

</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences 
Ramon Daniels, PhD, is a professor at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences and head of the Research Centre for Assistive Technology in Care. His research focusses on the design, evaluation, and implementation of interventions with assistive technology in long term care. Further, he is appointed at Maastricht University and at an elderly care institution, Sevagram, respectively doing research on innovation readiness of care organizations and supporting the organization to become innovation ready.
</style></custom4><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrick Brecht</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Hendriks</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anja Stroebele</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carsten H. Hahn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ingmar Wolff</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Discovery and Validation of Business Models:  How B2B Startups can use Business Experiments</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B2B Startup</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business Experiment Design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business Experiments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Customer Development Process</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Four-Step Iterative Cycle</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Growth Hacking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lean startup</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1426</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-31</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Startups searching for a business model face uncertainty. This research aims to demonstrates how B2B startups can use business experiments to discover and validate their business model's desirability quickly and cost-effectively. The research study follows a design science approach by focusing on two main steps: build and evaluate. We first created a B2B-Startup Experimentation Framework based on well-known earlier frameworks. After that, we applied the framework to the case of the German startup heliopas.ai. The framework consists of four steps (1) implementation of a measurement system, (2) hypothesis development and prioritization, (3) discovery, and (4) validation. Within its application, we conducted business experiments, including online and offline advertisements, as well as interviews. This research contributes in several ways to the understanding of how B2B-startups can use business experiments to discover and validate their business models: First, the designed B2B-Startup Experimentation Framework can serve as a guideline for company founders. Second, the results were used to improve the existing business model of the German B2B startup heliopas.ai. Finally, applying the framework allowed us to formulate design principles for creating business experiments. The design principles used in the study can be further tested in future studies.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Patrick Brecht, M.Sc., works as a research associate at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences after completing his study in industrial engineering with a focus on sales. In addition to his passion for sales, he has a growing fascination for science and entrepreneurship. In his role as project manager at the xLab, Experimental Lab for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, he supports startups in the area of business model innovation. His focus lies in validating startup potential within the field of smart business experiments and platform business models.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Daniel Hendriks, B.Sc., studied business administration and industrial engineering, focusing on service-oriented business model development at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences. He works as a research associate at xLab of the University of Applied Sciences as an expert on B2B startup experimentation and Lean Startup. Besides his work, he is perusing a master’s degree at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in business administration and industrial engineering.  </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Anja Ströbele, B.Sc., is a research associate of the xLab at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences. Her main research interests are in the fields of innovation, platform business models, and experimentation. During her studies, she developed a passion for research and an interest in innovation and entrepreneurship from analyzing the factors that turn a user innovator into a social entrepreneur with the help of theories of planned behavior. Her current master’s degree focus is on marketing-finance that not only provides an understanding of the interface of these two disciplines, but also gives insights into design process models to create financial innovations. She currently works analyzing service management failures by applying probabilistic Bayesian modeling on collections of text documents.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Prof. Dr. Carsten Hahn works as a director of research and innovation at SAP and additionally holds a professorship for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the University of Applied Sciences Karlsruhe. After studying business informatics at the University of Mannheim and doing his doctorate in Marketing at the University of Mainz, he began his career as an assistant to the executive board of SAP. Carsten serves as a visiting lecturer at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In his academic work, he founded the xLab, which deals with entrepreneurship and innovation concepts in research, teaching, and practical application. </style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">heliopas.ai
Ingmar Wolff, M.Sc., is always passionate about innovation and entrepreneurship, has founded two startups, and financed his studies with a sales business. He completed his studies in industrial engineering with a focus on entrepreneurship and computer science at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Afterwards, he consulted for startups on product-market fit and technology at the SAP startup incubator “innoWerft”. After working at KIT as a research associate in the domain of automated machine learning, he founded his current company heliopas.ai GmbH, which provides AI-powered irrigation advice to farmers.</style></custom5><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christian Keen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Aligning Multiple Stakeholder Value Propositions (April 2021)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1431</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-5</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the past Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université Laval
Christian Keen, PhD is an Assistant Professor at the Département de Management, Université Laval, Canada. Christian has an extensive research and working experience in emerging and developed economies. His professional experience includes being a member of several the Board of Directors of private companies and NGOs. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship and strategic management. His research areas of interest include international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial capital and rapidly growing firms. Christian is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Entrepreneurship Small Business and TIM Review. He has presented his research in several international conferences such as AIB, AOM, EIBA, and has also published papers in those areas.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wenting Zou</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saara A. Brax</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risto Rajala</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Effects of Competence-Based, Expressive and Collaborative Service Performance on the B2B Service Relationship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B2B services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Relationship performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Repurchase intentions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Service performance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Service purchasing</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1439</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-31</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Service performance is considered an essential determinant of successful business relationships. It affects the customer’s repurchase intentions and, therefore, the continuity of the relationship between the service provider and the customer. Yet, due to the complexity of  B2B relationships, service performance is a multi-faceted issue. It includes at least three crucial aspects: competence-based, expressive, and collaborative performance. The present paper investigates the effects of these dimensions on the buyer-supplier relationship and analyzes their mediated impact on customer repurchasing intentions. In so doing, we establish a structural equation model and test multiple hypotheses with a sample of 141 purchasing professionals from 23 countries. The findings indicate that expressive and collaborative service performance are more significant determinants of successful business relationships and influence business relationship continuity more than competence-based service performance. Also, relationship performance was found to fully mediate the links between expressive and collaborative service performance with customer repurchase intentions. The study underscores that service providers can ensure business continuity with their customers by investing in expressive and collaborative service performance.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Wenting Zou, MSc (Tech), is a doctoral candidate at Aalto University, Finland. Her research focuses on managing the complexity of B2B services, paying a special attention to the influences of service contract management, contracting process, and service complexity on service providers’ performance. Her work builds on an interdisciplinary background and combines multiple theoretical perspectives and methods of analysis. She is affiliated with Aalto University School of Science, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LUT University
Saara A. Brax, DSc (Tech), is a postdoctoral researcher at the School of Business and Management in LUT University, Finland. Her research covers service operations management and industrial management, focusing on servitization, industrial product-service systems, and service supply chains in the B2B context. Her recent works have focused on digitalization, data analytics and sustainability in supply chains.

</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University and Carleton University
Risto Rajala, DSc (Econ), is Associate Professor of Service Engineering and Management at Aalto University, Finland, and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University, Canada. His research focuses on the management challenges of technology firms’ service operations, including the management of complex service systems and the system-level changes linked with the transformation of technology industries toward service-based value creation. He currently serves as the Head of the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management of Aalto University.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maurizio Brioschi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Bonardi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nadia Fabrizio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alfonso Fuggetta</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emiliano Sergio Verga</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maurilio Zuccalà</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enabling and Promoting Sustainability through Digital API Ecosystems: An example of successful implementation in the smart city domain</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FAIR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interoperability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1412</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4-10</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Recent studies have recognized that digital ecosystems can enhance the transformation of enterprises and the sustainability of cooperation networks by enabling a regulated and governed exchange of data between different stakeholders according to common rules. Thanks to digital ecosystems, data can be effectively distributed and leveraged to build innovative services in various contexts, such as smart cities or corporate solutions. In this paper we apply the Cefriel Digital Ecosystem Toolkit approach, which was first adopted to foster digital interoperability during the 2015 World Exposition in Milan, Italy. The goal of this lightweight approach is to combine technologies for building API-based solutions with governance processes and common participation guidelines. Moreover, we argue that this approach fosters data sustainability responding to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) principles for data management and stewardship. Since 2015, this approach has been applied in several projects and featured by the European Commission's JRC and the USA's NIST. The Cefriel Digital Ecosystem Toolkit approach now supports the creation of many-to-many digital relationships between stakeholders operating in various domains, allowing the discovery and reuse of digital assets owned by companies and organizations of any type and size, as well as supporting the development of added value services for citizens and other end-users.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Michele Bonardi has been working in Cefriel since 2008. From 2010 to 2015, he was  manager of the Technical Management Board of the E015 Digital Ecosystem. He is now the Head of Digital Ecosystems Practice in Cefriel. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Maurizio Brioschi is a Business Developer, Director and Foresight Manager in Cefriel. Since April 1997, he has worked in distributed architectures and the strategic development of complex IT systems, ranging from e-government solutions to industrial infrastructure. He was the project manager of ICT planning for Expo 2015, helping to foresee and shape digital innovation scenarios through digital ecosystems.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Nadia Fabrizio is a Senior Manager at Cefriel, where she has worked since 2004. In recent years, she has been working as the principal investigator for H2020 and EIT projects in the field of distributed ledger technologies.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Alfonso Fuggetta is a Full Professor at Politecnico di Milano and Scientific Director of Cefriel. He has been a member of several committees in the Italian Government. He has also collaborated with AIPA, CNIPA, the Department of Innovation, and the Ministries of Health, Labour, and Education and University.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Emiliano Sergio Verga has been working at Cefriel as a Digital Ecosystem Manager since 2013. His main role is the Scientific Coordination of the Lombardy Region’s E015 Digital Ecosystem.</style></custom5><custom6><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cefriel
Maurilio Zuccalà has been principal investigator in research projects (FP6, FP7, H2020, EIT) since 2004 in the field of API economy, smart cities, digital platforms, and service ecosystems. He has authored texts in peer reviewed journals, books, and conferences and is a technical leader for the urban data platform of the H2020 “Sharing Cities” lighthouse project in Milan.</style></custom6><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nele A.J. De Witte</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leen Broeckx</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sascha Vermeylen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vicky Van Der Auwera</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tom Van Daele</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Factors in Living Lab Research</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">human factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">methodology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">safety</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">usability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1462</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21-29</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human factors research is still in its infancy in healthcare and other fields. Yet it has the potential to allow organisations and living labs to assess and improve innovation quality, while closely involving potential end users. &quot;Human factors&quot; involve a scientific focus on the interaction between individuals and systems with the goal of improving safety, performance, and user acceptability. Studies simulating challenging real-life circumstances in selected samples and using a multi-method approach can provide important insights for organisations and governments and allow for better and safer services for the end user. By combining existing theory and case examples, the current paper aims to situate human factors research and to help researchers determine when and how this methodology could be applied.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9/10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LiCalab Living and Care Lab
Nele A.J. De Witte is the scientific coordinator of LiCalab Living and Care Lab, where she is committed to the scientific valorization of living lab methodologies and supports the design of high-quality user research. She is also a senior researcher at the Expertise Unit Psychology, Technology &amp; Society of Thomas More University of Applied Sciences (Belgium), with specialization in e-mental health and attitudes towards technology in mental healthcare. She holds a PhD in Psychology and has 10 years of research experience, mostly in the field of practice-oriented research.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LiCalab Living and Care Lab
Leen Broeckx is a researcher at Thomas More University of Applied Sciences (Belgium) where she started working in 2013 as a panel manager for LiCalab Living and Care Lab. Within the team, Leen is responsible for the community of end users. She supports projects with recruitment, facilitation, and reporting. She is an expert in co-creation methodologies. She holds a master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LiCalab Living and Care Lab
Sascha Vermeylen is a researcher at Thomas More University of Applied Sciences (Belgium). In 2018, she kicked off her career as a junior panel manager at LiCalab Living and Care Lab. Sascha manages the end user panel, alongside Leen Broeckx, and maintains the segmented database that consists of ca 1,500 elderly persons, and more than 600 caregivers and care organizations. She supports projects with recruitment of end-users and facilitates testing and reporting to companies. She holds a master’s degree in social economic sciences from the University of Antwerp and has completed Academic Teacher Training. </style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LiCalab Living and Care Lab
Vicky Van Der Auwera is a researcher at Thomas More University of Applied Sciences (Belgium), which she helped to start in 2012, in close collaboration with the City of Turnhout. She is currently responsible for the operational management of LiCalab. In that capacity she leads both EU-projects as well as private assignments. Vicky holds a master’s degree in Engineering Sciences from Brussels University Belgium, where she graduated as a civil mechanical-electrical engineer. Prior to her current position, she worked for 14 years in a private sector area of mechanical engineering as Research Manager.
</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomas More University of Applied Sciences 
Tom Van Daele is head of the Expertise Unit Psychology, Technology &amp; Society at Thomas More University of Applied Sciences (Belgium), and convenor of the Project Group on eHealth of the European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. As a clinical psychologist (PhD), he focuses primarily on translating insights and tools from theory to practice-oriented applications and services. His primary field of research is e-mental health, the use of technology in mental healthcare. This practice-oriented focus is also supplemented with more basic research, through his positions at both KU Leuven and Queen’s University Belfast.</style></custom5><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Petra Berg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rumy Narayan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arto Rajala</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ideologies in Energy Transition: Community Discourses on Renewables</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ideological Discourses</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Municipal Energy Transition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Renewable Energy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sense making</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sustainability Transitions</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1458</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">79-91</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper examines discourses in five Finnish municipalities' energy transition processes to identify and explain different ideological discourses among its members. The study fills a gap in research extending the idea of sense making to capture the ideologies that hide in discourses during socio-technical transitions. We identify three types of ideological discourses labelled as Clan, Solarpunk and Native. The implications of the ideologies embedded in municipal, multi-partner networks that participate in energy transition affect who will be heard in a local context. This impacts future choices directly related to sustainability outcomes. We propose that discourses in these multi-partner networks, conceptualized from the perspective of municipal energy systems, help us to uncover underlying ideologies that imperil change. And yet at the same time, these revelations offer opportunities for sustainability-oriented innovation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7/8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Vaasa
Petra Berg is a Post Doc Researcher at the School of Marketing and Communication as well as the VEBIC platform, University of Vaasa, Finland. She holds a D.Sc. (Econ.) in Marketing. Dr. Berg has been participating as a project researcher, as well as coordinating proposal writing for national and EU (H2020) projects in sustainability, food and energy related areas. For the moment, she is teaching sustainability transitions and responsible business, while participating in the Biogas Utilization Opportunities in Ostrobothnia Region project. Her research interests are in the fields of Macromarketing, energy behavior and transition management, with sustainability transitions and social-cyber-physical energy systems as her main focus.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Vaasa
Rumy Narayan studies transitions to sustainable energy systems. Her research interests fall within a framework of innovation possibilities that could potentially address pressing global challenges of our time, while stimulating societal and economic prosperity. This entails activating innovations across sectors, actors, and disciplines, while enabling experimentation, a complex process that needs appropriate tools for coordinating and managing diverse networks. Within this context, blockchain has gained in relevance for her research as an institutional and social technology for managing and coordinating disparate networks of actors.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Vaasa
Arto Rajala (M), D.Sc. (Econ.), is a Professor of Marketing at the School of Marketing &amp; Communication in University of Vaasa. He is the leader of the school’s marketing research group. He also holds the Title of Docent (Entrepreneurial Marketing) at the Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland. Rajala’s research interest and special expertise are related to business-to-business marketing, business networks, and renewable energy marketing. He has published several articles on business networks and their management, SME growth and innovativeness, and marketing capabilities. Rajala has more than 20 years’ experience of teaching and program coordination at the University of Vaasa and Aalto University (Finland). Currently, Rajala is leading and involved in several international and national interdisciplinary projects related to energy, for example, Erasmus+ (Furn360 and EntRNEW), H2020 (IRIS Smart City, OpenInnoTrain, and RIPEET), and Business Finland (FLEXIMAR and SolarX). In these projects, renewable energy, citizen engagement as well as energy communities and prosumers are core topics.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">79</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ermela Bashuri</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategies for a Small to Medium-sized Enterprise to Engage in an Existing Ecosystem</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complementarities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">engagement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value creation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1453</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-19</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Recent advances in ecosystem theory prescribe that companies need to develop offers that are modular and form unique or supermodular complementarities with other offers. However, both academic and managerial knowledge of the strategies that especially small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) can use to engage in existing ecosystems for value creation remains scattered and predominantly vague. This article thus aims to explore applicable ecosystem engagement strategies from the perspective of SMEs, as discussed in previous scholarly literature. In so doing, the article puts forward and elaborates three distinct strategies that SMEs can apply to become part of value-creating ecosystems. In this way, the findings contribute to the literature on ecosystems.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7/8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TIM Program, Carleton University
Ermela Bashuri is a MEng graduate of Carleton University’s TIM program. She also holds a MSc degree in European Economic Studies from the University of Tirana in Albania. Ermela is an experienced finance officer who has worked in the government, telecommunications, IT, and banking sectors. During her studies at Carleton University, Ermela held the position of Research Assistant and is currently working as a Business Analyst for Lixar IT (Lixar- BDO) in Ottawa, Canada. Her research interests include innovation ecosystems, e-commerce, and cross border trade.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TIM Program, Carleton University
Dr. Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business and the Faculty of Engineering and Design (carleton.ca). Dr. Bailetti is the past Director of Carleton’s Technology Management Innovation (TIM) program (timprogram.ca). He is the founder of the Scale Early, Rapidly and Securely community (globalgers.org) and the TIM Review (timreview.ca). He is the Chair of the Board of the Nigeria-Canada Trade and Investment Group (nctig.org). He is the lead for the AI for Local Value and Cross-border for Local Value, two global programs designed to scale the value of companies early and rapidly. His areas of expertise include: i) Technology entrepreneurship; ii) Scaling companies early, rapidly, and securely; and iii) Cross-border ecommerce.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stefano Blezer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nurhan Abujidi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urban Living Labs and Transformative Changes: A qualitative study of the triadic relationship between financing, stakeholder roles, and the outcomes of Urban Living Labs in terms of impact creation in the city of Groningen, the Netherlands</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Impact Creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Transformative Changes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trust Building</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">urban living labs</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1466</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73-87</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urban Living Labs (ULLs) have become a popular instrument for finding solutions to urban challenges faced by cities. While ULLs have achieved a certain level of normalisation in cities, a general lack of understanding remains regarding the character and purpose of the ULL phenomenon still leaves many challenges open to be overcome. One challenge involves the potential impact of ULLs in contributing to meaningful transformative changes. By combining a literature review with a comparative case study of three ULLs in the city of Groningen, the Netherlands, this study confirms and adds to current theoretical positions taken about how to overcome the challenge in terms of holding a shared ideology and reviewing the concepts of agency and power. It also shows that opportunity comes along with trust-building among stakeholders in ULLs, as a way to enhance their potential in practise. Consequently, this study calls for further research regarding underexplored theories and models of ULLs, power dynamics in ULLs, and into their self-sustaining character, both in terms of social adoption and ownership, as well as financial sustainability.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9/10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Stefano Blezer is a lecturer and researcher in Spatial Planning at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences in the Built Environment Academy and Smart Urban Redesign research centre. He holds a BSc. in Spatial Planning at the eponymous institute (2017) and a MSc. in Socio-Spatial Planning from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands (2020). His BSc. is about Urban Living Labs and its applicability in the context of Limburg, and his MSc. thesis is about Urban Living Labs and their potential to shape systemic changes in doing urban development. His expertise and interest mainly revolve around the relationship between the physical built environment and human behaviour, as well as related themes such as spatial justice, spatial inequalities, or co-creation governance and collaboration modes. Blezer also advocates an established role for spatial planning in achieving the UN SDGs.

</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Nurhan Abujidi is Associate Professor at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, where she is the Head of the Smart Urban Redesign research centre. She leads urban renewal projects in multiple neighbourhoods and cities in Limburg, including Maastricht, Heerlen, and Kerkrade. Abujidi holds a doctor’s degree in Architecture, Urban Design and Regional Planning from KU Leuven (Belgium). At this university, she also completed a post-graduate master’s degree in Architecture of Human Settlement. Abujidi was a teacher in international, post-graduate programmes at the Belgian universities KU Leuven and Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB). At VUB, she was the academic coordinator of the Erasmus Mundus UII-module Urban Studies. As a vice-dean and senior researcher at the School of Architecture of San Jorge University (Zaragoza), Abujidi led multiple research projects on urban development. Her expertise includes urban renewal, public space revitalisation, and tactical urbanism.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Roshana Prabaharan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martin Bliemel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Value Proposition Misalignment and the Failure to Become a Born-Global Company</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Born-global</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">failure</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalisation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">premature scaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value propositions</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1435</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38-51</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This inductive study explores factors by which some new and innovative firms try yet fail to achieve born-global status. Born-global studies have a survivorship bias, with errors of omission that paint a favourable picture of how innovative and well-funded new ventures internationalise. In this paper, we counter such biases by focussing on innovative ventures that expressed intentions to become born global but failed to do so. Our findings reveal that these new ventures fail in two ways. Either they underestimate the need to tailor a portfolio of value propositions and over-extend their efforts across too many markets, a pattern called &quot;baby born-global&quot;. Or they over-commit to one market at a time, thus limiting their capacity to develop value propositions in similar markets, a pattern called &quot;micro multinational&quot;.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alvarez &amp; Marshal Valuation Services
Roshana Prabaharan is currently an Associate with the Alvarez &amp; Marsal Valuation Services practice in London. Prior to joining A&amp;M, Roshana spent several years within the Valuation, Modelling and Economics team at EY in Sydney, where she most recently served as Senior Consultant. Roshana supported her broader team to provide valuations across the Oceania region for a range of purposes (including commercial and strategic, financial reporting and tax purposes) and across a wide variety of sectors. Roshana earned a Bachelor of Commerce (First Class Honours) degree from the University of New South Wales, with majors in Finance and International Business. 
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Associate Professor Martin Bliemel is the Director of Research for TD School at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). TD stands for ‘transdisciplinarity’ which embraces a multitude of academic disciplines and professional practices to tackle complex societal problems. Martin is also the Course Director for the Diploma in Innovation, a unique degree that adds to any undergraduate degree across UTS. Martin holds a BSc (Mechanical Engineering) and MBA from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and a PhD in Business from Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. Martin’s research interests include entrepreneurial networks, accelerators, education, research commercialization, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and the entrepreneurial university. In particular, his work played a key role in the design of the AUD $23m Incubator Support Programme by the federal Department of Industry (DIIS), and the evaluation of the AUD $150m Southern Cross Renewable Energy Fund by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) who are now acting on his recommendations. These days, his main focus is on entrepreneurial ecosystems and working with the public and private sector to stimulate entrepreneurial activity and cultivate innovation precincts. Martin’s research has received multiple awards and been published in several prestigious journals including Nature Nanotechnology, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Entrepreneurship &amp; Regional Development, Technovation, Education+Training, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior &amp; Research, and the Entrepreneurship Research Journal.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christian Keen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Call for Papers: Aligning multiple stakeholder value propositions: the challenge of new companies  committed to scale early and rapidly</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1349</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80-82</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rico Baldegger</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maurizio Caon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kreshnik Sadiku</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Correlation between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Implementation of AI in Human Resources Management</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">artificial intelligence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial orientation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Resource Management</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1348</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72-79</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper develops the concept of adopting artificial intelligence (AI) in human resources management (HRM) through a research questionnaire and reports the results of a study designed to investigate the perception of adopting and introducing AI in HRM processes. In addition, it investigates the correlation between entrepreneurship orientation (EO) and AI in HRM processes. A survey was conducted with a sample of 310 firm members in the HR Section Romande, as well as a literature review on the adoption of new technologies. The results indicate a perceived positive value of introducing AI in HRM and a correlation between the level of a company's EO and the introduction of AI in HRM. This means that the more a company is entrepreneurially oriented, the more it tends to implement or include already implemented AI projects and tools in HRM processes. The perceived value of AI in HRM was evaluated by comparing answers to research questions involving the introduction of AI in HRM tools, and expectations of widely implementing AI in the next five years. The main barrier of adopting AI in HRM appeared to be a lack of skills and training. In addition, potential features of implementing AI in HRM were identified as potential steps toward introducing AI as a new technology. Questions regarding the evaluation of EO were based on a research Colvin Slevin (1989). It is important for SMEs to invest in information technology to set the basis for further development. Owing to intensified competitive pressures and the necessity of entering global markets, SMEs are incrementally employing Information Technology (IT) to create substantial benefits. Most prior research has focused more on IT adoption in large organizations, yet when regarding the limited resources of SMEs, the IT adoption process is considerably different. (Ghobakhloo, Sabouri, Hong and Zulkifli, 2011).</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg
Prof. Rico Baldegger is Director and Professor of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), Switzerland. He has studied at the Universities of St. Gallen and Fribourg, Switzerland. His research activities concentrate on innovative start-ups, the entrepreneurial behavior of individuals and organizations, as well as the phenomenon of rapid-growth companies. He has published several books and articles and, since the beginning of the 1990s, he has been the manager of a business for company development. Moreover, he is a business angel and serial entrepreneur, as is demonstrated by the many companies he has created.
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg
Maurizio Caon is currently Associate Professor and Leader of the Digital Business Center at the School of Management Fribourg, member of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO). He is also lecturer at the College of Engineering Fribourg, director of design and innovation at the HumanTech Institute and member of Centre Compétences Numériques (also part of HES-SO). He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science issued by the University of Bedfordshire, UK, and a Master’s degree in Telecommunications and Computer Engineering issued by the University of Perugia, Italy. His research interests include human-computer interaction, human factors in digital technologies and digital transformation.
</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg
Kreshnik Sadiku graduated in the MSc in Business Administration major Entrepreneurship in HES-SO. He published a book “Path toward Entrepreneurship” on 2012 and works currently as Regional Manager in a company that provides financial services.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Supriya Singh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punit Saurabh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nityesh Bhatt</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Demystifiying the Meaning of Transnational Entrepreneurship: Indian transnational entrepreneurs in comparative perspective</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">diaspora</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">immigrant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">migration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transnational</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1403</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">47-59</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Migration of people from one geographical location to another, within or outside a country, has a major role to play in the socio-economic development across the globe. &quot;Migrants&quot; and &quot;immigrants&quot; that showcase entrepreneurial traits and are valued in both home and host countries. Transnational entrepreneurs are often studied in various cross-national entrepreneurial research streams, like international entrepreneurship, immigrant entrepreneurship, thus causing ambiguity in the existing definitions. This paper contributes a specific definition of &quot;transnational entrepreneurship&quot;, based on secondary research, which takes into account different mobility types. It emphasizes the importance of this construct for developing transnational entrepreneurial typologies. The authors propose a &quot;framework of transnational entrepreneurship&quot; in the paper.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nirma University
Supriya Singh is a Doctoral Scholar from the Institute of Management, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India. The broad research topic she currently works on is entrepreneurship, innovation and the role of transnational migrants.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nirma University
Dr. Punit Saurabh is presently serving Nirma University with the Institute of Management and specializes in entrepreneurship, innovation, family business, venture ecosystems, International relations, and geostrategic studies. He holds a doctorate in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur, and frequently contributes articles to key journals and newspapers. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nirma University
Dr. Nityesh Bhatt is a Professor and Chair of Information Management Area at the Institute of Management, Nirma University, India. He has more than 20 years of experience in academia. His research areas include e-Governance, E-Commerce, ERP, and IT strategy.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">47</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annaële Hervé</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christophe Schmitt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rico Baldegger</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Digitalization, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Internationalization of Micro-, Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digitalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entrepreneurial Orientaton</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">international entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MSMEs</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1343</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nowadays, we are living in a digitally connected global economy that is completely transforming trade in foreign markets and exposing firms, particularly micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), to major changes and new opportunities. As the use of digital technologies is creating more fluidity and nonlinearity across time and space in entrepreneurial processes, our research adopted a conceptual process to investigate how the digital transformation of MSMEs will support decision-makers in international businesses. Based on a quantitative research design, we demonstrate that the more a company digitalizes its functions, the more it favours entrepreneurial behavior to lead successful strategic decisions in foreign markets. Our results are discussed in detail and we propose several ways to benefit from opportunities arising from the use of digital technologies.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université de Lorraine 
Annaële Hervé is a PhD candidate at the Université de Lorraine. Her thesis addresses the research streams of digitalization and internationalization of MSMEs. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Management as well as a Master degree in Entrepreneurship. She is also working part time at the research department of the School of Management Fribourg in Switzerland. Her main research interests are digital transformation of firms, digital business model as well as international entrepreneurship. 
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université de Lorraine
Prof. Christophe Schmitt is a Professor in Entrepreneurship at the Université de Lorraine (IAE de Metz and CEREFIGE), he holds the research Chair “Entreprendre”, and he is responsible for PeeL (the Lorraine Student Entrepreneurship Pole). He is also an Associate Professor at the Louvain School of Management in Belgium and at the School of Management Fribourg in Switzerland. His articles and books mostly concern the notion of value design and knowledge building for action as well as the development of entrepreneurial practices.

</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg
Prof. Rico Baldegger is Director and Professor of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), Switzerland. He has studied at the Universities of St. Gallen and Fribourg, Switzerland. His research activities concentrate on innovative start-ups, the entrepreneurial behavior of individuals and organizations, as well as the phenomenon of rapid-growth companies. He has published several books and articles and, since the beginning of the 1990s, he has been the manager of a business for company development. Moreover, he is a business angel and serial entrepreneur, as is demonstrated by the many companies he has created.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christophe Schmitt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rico Baldegger</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Digitalization and Internationalization (April 2020)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business network hubs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">businessmodel</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">coaching</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digitalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digitalmarketing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial orientation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">export practices</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">facilitators</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">impacts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">international entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">liability of foreignness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MSMEs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network view</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SMEs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">support institutions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">training</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1342</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université  de Lorraine
Prof. Christophe Schmitt is a Professor in Entrepreneurship at the Université de Lorraine (IAE de Metz and CEREFIGE), he holds the research Chair “Entreprendre”, and he is responsible for PeeL (the Lorraine Student Entrepreneurship Pole). He is also an Associate Professor at the Louvain School of Management in Belgium and at the School of Management Fribourg in Switzerland. His articles and books mostly concern the notion of value design and knowledge building for action as well as the development of entrepreneurial practices.

</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg
Prof. Rico Baldegger is Director and Professor of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), Switzerland. He has studied at the Universities of St. Gallen and Fribourg, Switzerland. His research activities concentrate on innovative start-ups, the entrepreneurial behavior of individuals and organizations, as well as the phenomenon of rapid-growth companies. He has published several books and articles and, since the beginning of the 1990s, he has been the manager of a business for company development. Moreover, he is a business angel and serial entrepreneur, as is demonstrated by the many companies he has created.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pınar Büyükbalcı</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esin Ertemsir</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zayneb Boukari</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Embracing Product Innovativeness in Technology Firms: The Impact of Management Model Principles</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Management Model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Product innovativeness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology firms</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1408</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-45</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Extending the debate on how to enable and manage innovation requires a discussion of the potential beneficial impact of management models and corresponding principles. In this paper, we draw on literature involving product innovativeness and management models to propose that product innovativeness is facilitated and influenced by practices and principles traceable in different management models. We test our hypotheses with data from a sample of high technology firms. Findings suggest that management models and principles have varying impacts on product innovativeness. Specifically, we found the principles of obliquity, emergence, and intrinsic motivation as significant enablers of product innovativeness, along with extrinsic motivation. Also, each management model differently impacted and fostered product innovativeness.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yildiz Technical University
Pınar Büyükbalcı is an Associate Professor at Yildiz Technical University – Department of Business Administration, Istanbul. Her research spans entrepreneurship (international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship ecosystems, subsidiary level entrepreneurship), innovation strategies and multinational network structure. She is also the co-author of five books, including case studies on management and entrepreneurship.
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yildiz Technical University
Esin Ertemsir is an Assistant Professor at Yildiz Technical University - Department of Business Administration, Istanbul. She previously held a position as a visiting doctoral student at the British University in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Her research interests include innovation, creativity, and human resource management, as well as interdisciplinary studies such as innovative approaches to management education.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Istanbul Commerce University
Zayneb Boukari is a Ph.D. student at Istanbul Commerce University. She obtained an undergraduate degree in Business Administration and a master’s degree in Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Yıldız Technical University. Her current research interests include entrepreneurship, innovation, business models, and exporting. She is supported by a Tübitak 2215 program scholarship. </style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Craigen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Examining the Relationship Between Cybersecurity and Scaling Value for New Companies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling company value</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling initiatives</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">topic model stability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02-2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1329</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">62-70</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We explore the cybersecurity-scaling relationship in the context of scaling new company value rapidly. The relationship between the management of what a new company does to protect against the malicious or unauthorized use of electronic data, and the management of what a new company does to scale company value rapidly is important, but not well understood. We use a topic modelling technique to identify the eight topics that best describe a corpus comprised of 137 assertions about what new companies do to scale company value rapidly, manually examine the stability of the topics extracted from the dataset, and describe the relationship between 17 assertions about how to manage cybersecurity in new companies, and the six topics found to be stable. The six stable topics are labelled Fundraise, Enable, Position, Communicate, Innovate, and Complement. We find that of the 17 cybersecurity assertions, seven are related to Position, two to Innovate, one to Fundraise and, one to Complement. Six cybersecurity assertions were not found to be strongly related to any of the eight topics. This paper contributes to our understanding of cybersecurity in the context of a new company that scales its value rapidly, an application of topic modelling to perform small-scale data analysis, and a manual approach to examine the stability of the topics extracted by the topic modelling technique. We expect this paper to be relevant to new companies’ top management teams, members of the networks upon which new companies depend for to scale company value, accelerators and incubators, as well as academics teaching or carrying out research in entrepreneurship.   </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the past Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mr. Craigen is the community and project manager with the Technology Innovation Management Program, Carleton University. Formerly, he was the  Director of Carleton University’s Global Cybersecurity Resource (GCR) (https://www.cugcr.ca) and was the founding president of Global EPIC (https://www.globalepic.org). Mr. Craigen was a senior science advisor with the Government of Canada for 12-years and President of ORA Canada, a company that focused on high assurance technologies and distributed its technology to sites in 65-countries. Mr. Craigen was the Chair of two NATO research task groups (“Dual use of high assurance technologies” and “Validation, verification and certification of embedded systems.”) Mr. Craigen obtained a B. Sc (Honours Math) and an M. Sc from Carleton University. </style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">62</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Examining the Relationship Between Value Propositions and Scaling Value for New Companies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling company value</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling objectives</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">topic modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">topic stability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1324</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-13</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">To scale company value rapidly, a new company needs to develop value propositions for diverse parties, customers, investors, partners, suppliers, employees, and other resource owners, as well as align these value propositions with its scaling objectives. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationships between value propositions for a diverse set of parties, and efforts from a new company to scale company value rapidly. We review the value proposition literature and then examine the relationships between 19 assertions about value propositions, as well as six stable topics that best describe the SERS corpus, which is comprised of 137 assertions about scaling companies early, rapidly, and securely. Conducting a topic model of eight topics led to six stable topics: Fundraise, Enable, Position, Communicate, Innovate, and Complement. We find that of the 19 assertions about value propositions, four are connected to Complement, four to Innovate, one to Position, one to Fundraise, and one to Communicate. A total of eight assertions about value propositions are not connected to any of the six stable topics. This paper contributes to our understanding of how a new company scales company value rapidly, adding an application of topic modelling to perform small-scale data analysis. The findings are expected to be relevant to entrepreneurs and new companies worldwide.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal </style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the past Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).
Dr. Stoyan Tanev has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annaële Hervé</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christophe Schmitt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rico Baldegger</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Internationalization and Digitalization: Applying digital technologies to the internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital technologies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digitalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">international business</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SMEs.</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1373</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29-41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Digitalization is playing an increasingly important role in the growth of firms and is leading to structural and strategic transformations. The use of digital technologies presents new opportunities for SMEs to expand and succeed in foreign markets. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the impact of digital technologies on the internationalization process of SMEs has been acknowledged in the literature. It offers an in-depth analysis of five of the most highly relevant recent scientific research papers. The findings are synthetized through key points that highlight how SMEs acting in foreign markets could benefit from digital technologies. This paper complements previous research on the international trade transition initiated by digital technologies and provides a new perspective on contemporary research regarding the internationalization of firms. It concludes by identifying implications for research by scholars seeking to further study the digital aspects of traditional theoretical models of internationalization.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université de Lorraine
Annaële Hervé is a PhD candidate at the Université de Lorraine. Her thesis addresses the research streams of digitalization and internationalization of MSMEs. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Management as well as a Master degree in Entrepreneurship. She is also working part time at the research department of the School of Management Fribourg in Switzerland. Her main research interests are digital transformation of firms, digital business model as well as international entrepreneurship. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université de Lorraine
Prof. Christophe Schmitt is a Professor in Entrepreneurship at the Université de Lorraine (IAE de Metz and CEREFIGE), he holds the research Chair “Entreprendre”, and he is responsible for PeeL (the Lorraine Student Entrepreneurship Pole). He is also an Associate Professor at the Louvain School of Management in Belgium and at the School of Management Fribourg in Switzerland. His articles and books mostly concern the notion of value design and knowledge building for action as well as the development of entrepreneurial practices.
</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">School of Management Fribourg 
Prof. Rico Baldegger is Director and Professor of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), Switzerland. He has studied at the Universities of St. Gallen and Fribourg, Switzerland. His research activities concentrate on innovative start-ups, the entrepreneurial behavior of individuals and organizations, as well as the phenomenon of rapid-growth companies. He has published several books and articles and, since the beginning of the 1990s, he has been the manager of a business for company development. Moreover, he is a business angel and serial entrepreneur, as is demonstrated by the many companies he has created.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marcos Ferasso</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eloisio Andrey Bergamaschi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kondratieff’s Economic Waves and Future Scenarios Planning: an approach for organizations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economic waves</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">foresight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Future studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kondratieff.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategic Planning</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1327</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51-61</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This manuscript aims to present connections between scenario building techniques and Kondratieff's long economic waves, as a way of identifying patterns in medium and long-term planning for companies' future scenarios. This essay considers two different conceptual contributions to improve forecasting on organizations taking as a departure point Kondratieff's economic waves and Schwartz's future scenario planning. Analyzing these two theoretical contributions, we concluded that the information obtained through the path of Kondratieff's waves can delineate future scenarios as a way to anticipate challenges, opportunities, and threats for organizations' contingency planning. As a contribution for practitioners, considering these two approaches together enables greater performance for strategic planning of future scenarios that can be applied by organizations across a range of industries.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unochapeco University
M. Ferasso earned his Bachelor Diploma in Management from University of the West of Santa Catarina (Brazil) in 2002, his Specialization Diploma in Business Management from UNOESC (Brazil) in 2005, his Specialization Diploma in Local Development from International Labour Organization/United Nations (Italy) in 2006, earned his M.Sc. in Management from UFRGS (Brazil) in 2009, with an exchange period as visiting researcher at Euromed-Marseille Ecole de Management (France), and earned his Ph.D. in Management from Federal University of Parana (Brazil) in 2018, with an exchange period as visiting researcher at Forsyth Technical Community College (USA). He concluded his first Postdoctorate at Meridional Faculty – IMED (Brazil) and the second at KEDGE Business School – Marseilles (France). He is currently Assistant Professor at Unochapeco University (Brazil).</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SESI Innovation Institute
E. A. Bergamaschi earned his Bachelor Diploma in Business Management and Information Systems from Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) in 2002, his M.Sc. in Management from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) in 2008, and his Specialization Diploma in Computer Science from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) in 2010. Currently, he is Manager at SESI Innovation Institute (Brazil).
</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Supriyo Das</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amit Kundu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arabinda Bhattacharya</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Adaptation and Survival of SMEs: A Longitudinal Study of Developing Countries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">developing countries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological environment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology readiness</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1369</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">64-72</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the current era of internationalizing business activities and globalizating markets, technology has become an essential tool for enhancing market competitiveness. With globalization, a country's economic and business scenarios can change drastically. Many companies have seized on opportunities to pursue, and sometimes achieve economies of scale. Especially in some countries, however, the technological revolution creates significant challenges for small business entrepreneurs. Technological development plays a pivotal role in making small and medium enterprises (SMEs) competitive, as well as leading to sustainable growth. Under such circumstances, it is relevant to consider a country's technological environment for ways that can lead SMEs towards sustainable development. In the present study, we explore the impact of volatility in technological environments on the sustainability of SMEs in developing countries with emerging economies. We use the Global Competitive Index Report for the period 2012-2016, in which six parameters were applied to define the technological environment of developing nations. Two factors, namely, institutional capabilities and external capabilities emerged as significant factors according to factor analysis. We also studied the impact of emerging factors in new technological environments on the sustainability of SMEs in the specific time period using a regression analysis. The results indicate that both institutional capabilities and external capabilities become significant when time is taken as a selection variable. The highly significance of the time variable indicates the dynamism of today's technological environments. As well, institutional capabilities were found to have a strong impact on a business' sustainability, in comparison with external capabilities and the high level of technological volatility.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Calcutta
Supriyo Das is Assistant Professor for Marketing at Asutosh College, India. He obtained his BTech from the University of Calcutta, Kolkata, then a Masters in Business Management from the University of Calcutta, and is now pursuing a PhD from the same university. He is UGC Net qualified, with eight years of banking experience, including special exposure in rural banking and marketing. His primary research interests are in entrepreneurship development, financial innovation and social inclusion, where he publishes in journals, such as Journal of Global Entrepreneurship and in the edited volumes of the EDII’s conference proceedings.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Calcutta
Amit Kundu is presently Professor and Dean in the School of Management, at Techno India Group. He obtained his BTech from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, MBA from the Indian Institute of Engineering, Science and Technology (IIEST), Shibpur, and PhD from the Department of Business Management, University of Calcutta. He was previously a Business Development Executive of Consulting Engineering Services Private Limited (India) in New Delhi. He has extensive industrial and consulting experience in the areas of marketing strategy, project planning, and implementation. He has presented research papers at multiple conferences and events, both in India and abroad, with publications in peer reviewed journals. He received an outstanding research award at the Global Conference on Business and Finance from the Institute for Business and Finance Research in Las Vegas, USA.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Calcutta
Arabinda Bhattacharya is a former Associate Professor of the Department of Business Management, University of Calcutta, where he taught for 40 years. He completed his MStat from the Indian Statistical Institute in 1974. He obtained a MPhil in Economics from the Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He also did an FDP in Management from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. His research interests are in the area of organisational behaviour and market research. He has published  research in national and international journals and has supervised numerous research scholars in their doctoral work. 
</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">64</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ronald Beckett</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Dalrymple</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Triadic Actor View of Value Co-creation in Business Incubation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-working</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incubators</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">investors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge-sharing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">service ecosystems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">service entities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">service-dominant logic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stakeholders</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">triadic relationships.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value co-creation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1378</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this paper we view an incubator as a service entity that may take different forms. We contribute to the literature by exploring the utility of the service-dominant logic (SDL) paradigm (Vargo &amp;amp; Lusch, 2016) to better understand incubation operations. Value co-creation is a central axiom of SDL, as is engagement with a supporting service ecosystem. Whilst some studies have considered dyadic incubator-client value creation arrangements, we extend this to include interaction with other service ecosystem stakeholders that we characterise as investors. This way a triadic interaction model is presented. We consider four different cases of a service entity supporting start-up development from this actor-oriented perspective. Adopting a client company perspective, we draw a parallel between various kinds of incubation services and department stores, where clients may access what they need when they need it from a variety of offerings, and obtain the assistance they require.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swinburne University of Technology
Ron Beckett is an industry practitioner with more than 30 years of experience in the implementation of creative change and innovation management in Aerospace and Manufacturing. He frequently works at the academia–industry interface, with a focus on Learning to Compete. Ron is an Adjunct Professor at Swinburne University, and he has held similar appointments at several other universities. He has authored or co-authored more than 100 conference papers, journal articles, and book chapters related to the pursuit of best practice in extracting value from innovative ideas, knowledge management, and effective collaboration implementation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swinburne University of Technology
John Dalrymple holds a BA (Hons) from the University of Stirling and a PhD from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland where he worked with the Scottish Enterprise Foundation to improve the performance of small and medium-sized companies. He was Founding Director of the Centre for Management Quality Research at RMIT University. John, the staff, and students of the Centre were regular recipients of “Best Paper” awards at international conferences. His publications have attracted more than 1100 citations to date. John was the Editor of the Quality Assurance in Education journal from 2003 until 2019. He has supervised over 20 PhD candidates to successful completion. In October 2018, John was presented with the J. M. Juran Award by the Australian Organisation for Quality.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bastiaan Baccarne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tom Evens</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lieven De Marez</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Understanding Civic Crowdfunding as a Mechanism for Leveraging Civic Engagement and Urban Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Civic crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Civic engagement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Civic entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Civic identity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Digital citizenship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Participation inequalities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peer-to-peer economy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social cohesion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urban innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1356</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51-66</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article studies the emergence of government-initiated civic crowdfunding platforms. Such platforms can be considered as governmental responses for bottom-up peer-to-peer support mechanisms related to urban innovation, which also allows top-down governance and governmental support systems for civic entrepreneurship. To better understand the implications of these innovative ICT-enabled interaction interfaces for collective urban innovation, this study investigates participation inequalities from the perspective of campaign instigators, using in-depth interviews (N=28), and from the perspective of the citizen-funder, using a survey (N=265). The analysis shows that urban crowdfunding practices mainly contribute to higher-level development of collective identities with increased neighborhood capacities. Although participation in such ICT-enabled interaction interfaces could reinforce digital inequalities and existing power balances, this research shows a more nuanced perspective, in which online and offline practices intertwine. Furthermore, while civic crowdfunding campaigns are driven by a traditional 'participation elite', the deliberation process on development projects involves new publics that are not typically engaged in civic activities. Hence, civic crowdfunding formulates a new mode of civic engagement in which institutional involvement acts as a trust broker between civic funders and civic entrepreneurs, as well as adding legitimacy to innovation processes in the public sphere.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghent University
Dr. Bastiaan Baccarne is a senior researcher at imec-mict-Ghent University, Belgium. His academic interests converge on the crossroads between urban challenges, (urban) living labs, civic technology and smart cities. His work focusses on the potential and development of new interfaces in the urban environment to solve wicked urban issues. In September 2019, Bastiaan finished his PhD on innovative ICT-enabled interaction interfaces in the urban environment, titled: &quot;collaborative and participatory challenges in urban innovation&quot;. This includes research on online civic engagement, digital citizenship, urban commons, innovation ecosystems and urban social informatics.
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghent University
Professor Tom Evens is Assistant Professor at the Department of Communication Sciences at Ghent University, Belgium. He holds Masters Degrees in Communication Sciences (2005) and Business Administration (2006) from Ghent University. Tom teaches in Media Economics (Ba1), Innovation and Tech Policy (Ma) and Business Models in Media and Technology (Ma). He is fellow holder of the chair ‘Media in a Society in Transition’.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghent University
Professor Lieven De Marez holds degrees in in communication sciences (1999) and marketing (2000), and a PhD on the ‘Diffusion of ICT-innovations: more accurate user insight for better introduction strategies’. He heads the interdisciplinary research group imec-mict-Ghent University, Belgium, a group of approx. 50 researchers teaming up around a mission to empower users in a digitizing society. His personal research focus is on methodological innovation to feel the digital pulse of users in a digitizing society.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karl Breunig</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tale Skjølsvik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Understanding the Strategy-Innovation Link in an Era of Disruptions</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conceptual research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">disruption</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizational capabilities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy-innovation link.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">structured literature review</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1376</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4-13</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Whereas innovation and strategy traditionally are treated as two separate fields of expertise and research, this conceptual paper aims to identify how strategy theory can be linked to recent developments within the innovation field. Innovation research seeks to explain the process of creating new products and services. Strategy research, in turn, intends to explain how businesses create lasting competitive advantages. In recent years, research in strategy has shifted towards explaining how organizational capabilities and environmental turbulence are related, increasingly recognizing that it is difficult to retain sustainable competitive advantages, unless market dynamics and business renewal are addressed. To establish a systematic integration and analysis, we present the results of an extensive literature review of 1,268 research articles published between 2007-2017 to address the question: &lt;em&gt;To what degree, and how, have strategy and innovation been linked in leading management journals?&lt;/em&gt; Our analysis reveals that research addressing both strategy and innovation is limited, but highly cited. Moreover, we identify 5 main themes, which in turn reflected 12 subsidiary themes addressed in extant research. These themes combine to give important insights about the research that been done and what is likely to be needed going forward.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo Metropolitan University
Karl Joachim Breunig is a Full Professor of Strategic Management at the Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University – OsloMet, where he is heading the research group on Digital Innovation and Strategic Competence in Organizations (DISCO). He received his Ph.D. from BI Norwegian Business School, and holds a MSc from London School of Economics. Prof. Breunig’s research concentrates on the interception of strategy and innovation theory, and involves topics such as service- and business model innovation as well as
digitalization in knowledge intensive firms.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo Metropolitan University
Tale Skjølsvik is a Full Professor of Technology Management, and the Vice-Dean of Research at the Faculty of Technology, Art &amp; Design at OsloMet. She holds a Ph.D. in Strategic Management from BI Norwegian Business School and has experience as a management consultant from Bain &amp; Company and Gemini Consulting. Tale develops and runs executive education within strategic management and digital transformation, consults organizations and does ostensive public speaking. Her research interests concentrate on the strategic management, innovation, digitalization and procurement of knowledge intensive services and firms.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christian Keen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">What Makes Value Propositions Distinct and Valuable to New Companies Committed to Scale Rapidly?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new company</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling company value</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling-up</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition alignment</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1365</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">One of the most valuable resources a company owns is the &quot;portfolio of value propositions&quot; to its diverse external stakeholders, such as customers, investors, and resource owners. In this article, we fill a gap in the value proposition literature by identifying features that make the value propositions of new companies different from other resources, along with factors that make them valuable. A value proposition is conceived as being what enables and improves business transactions between a new company and external stakeholders. We reason that two features in particular make value propositions of new companies distinct: (1) business transactions between a new company and one or more external stakeholders, and (2) investments to create and improve a new company's value propositions that enable business transactions. We provide a definition of &quot;value proposition&quot; and postulate that a value proposition will benefit a new company when it: (1) strengthens the new company's capabilities to scale; (2) increases demand for the new company's products and services; and (3) increases the number, diversity, and rapidity of external investments in the new company's value proposition portfolio.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the past Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University

Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.

Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). 

Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université Laval
Christian Keen, PhD is an Assistant Professor at the Département de Management, Université Laval, Canada. Christian has an extensive research and working experience in emerging and developed economies. His professional experience includes being a member of several the Board of Directors of private companies and NGOs. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship and strategic management. His research areas of interest include international entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial capital and rapidly growing firms. Christian is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Entrepreneurship Small Business and TIM Review. He has presented his research in several international conferences such as AIB, AOM, EIBA, and has also published papers in those areas.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Navneet Bhalla</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The 3S Process: A Framework for Teaching AI Strategy in Business Education</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3S Process</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">artificial intelligence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business Education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">design thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harvard Case Method</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1290</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36-42</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A gap has emerged in teaching artificial intelligence (AI) in business education, where a style of curriculum based on strategy is missing. This article presents a new framework, the 3S Process, as a method for teaching leaders how to strategically adopt AI within their organizations. At a high-level, the 3S Process consists of three stages (Story, Strategy, and Solution), which are described in detail in the article. Stage 1: Story in the process is inspired by the Harvard Case Method to provide context for a problem. Stage 2: Strategy uses Design Thinking to produce candidate solutions. The substage of Empathy in Design Thinking plays a crucial role to reduce bias in designing AI. Virtualization technology is a tool for students to experience hands-on learning in prototype development. Stage 3: Solution is where students advocate for their conceptual AI solution in the context of the case study. AI is a type of complex system; therefore, students should consider feedback loops and the potential for unintended biases to enter a deployed solution. The presentation of the 3S Process in this article is conceptual. Further empirical studies, including evaluations of the 3S Process in classroom settings, will be considered in the future.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University College London &amp; Cetana AI
Navneet Bhalla, PhD, is a Senior Honorary Research Associate at University College London, in the Department of Computer Science, and a member of Intelligent Systems Group. He is also the founder of Cetana AI Inc., a consultancy specializing in artificial intelligence. Prior to starting the consultancy, Navneet was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University (in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology), at Cornell University (in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering), and at the Universität Paderborn (in the Department of Computer Science). His research interests include self-assembling systems, machine learning, soft robotics, mechanical design, composite materials, and innovation management. </style></custom1><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrea Holand</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silje Svadberg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karl Joachim Breunig</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beyond the Hype: A Bibliometric Analysis Deconstructing Research on Digitalization</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1274</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">48</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The accelerating emergent field of research addressing digitalization and related topics is complex, unstructured and hyped. Consequently, both research and practice lack a rigorous foundation of prior published research to underpin and direct future exploration into the opportunities and challenges provided by these exciting new digital technologies. This study employed a bibliometric analysis to explore extant published research within the digitalization field. We identified key articles that have enabled us to distinguish between interrelated digitalization concepts. Subsequently, we propose a taxonomy with characteristics for different levels of digitalization. The taxonomy contributes dimensions that create different commercial and organizational opportunities and challenges at various levels. The taxonomy offers a vantage point for subsequent empirical and conceptual research to extend insights on related digitalization themes, and especially those related to innovation and strategy decisions on scalability, automation, channel selection and connectivity.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Columbus&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andrea Holand is a business consultant at the Norway office in the IT-consulting firm Columbus. Ms. Holand graduated with a MSc in Business Administration from Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet in 2019. The article &amp;ldquo;Beyond the Hype: A Bibliometric Analysis Deconstructing Research on Digitalization&amp;rdquo; is based on research for her masters dissertation conducted in collaboration with the research group on Digital Innovation and Strategic Competence in Organizations (DISCO), at Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet. Prior to enrolling into the graduate program at Oslo Business School Ms. Holand graduated with a BA in Business Administration in 2017 from the University of South-Eastern Norway with a specialization in innovation and entrepreneurship management.&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:16px;&quot;&gt;PA Consulting&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:16px;&quot;&gt;Silje Svadberg is an analyst at PA Consulting in Norway. Ms Svadberg graduated with a MSc graduate in Business Administration at Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet in 2019. The article &amp;ldquo;Beyond the Hype: A Bibliometric Analysis Deconstructing Research on Digitalization&amp;rdquo; is based on research for her masters dissertation conducted in collaboration with the research group on Digital Innovation and Strategic Competence in Organizations (DISCO), at Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet. Prior to enrolling into the graduate program at Oslo Business School Ms. Svadberg graduated with a BA in Business Administration from Oslo Business School in 2017. In her bachelor thesis, she focused on digitalization of the financial sector. Ms. Svadberg has worked as an IT consultant for a Nordic Microsoft partner, responsible for financial applications, in parallel with full time enrolment and progress in the graduate program at Oslo Business School.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:16px;&quot;&gt;Oslo Metropolitan University&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:16px;&quot;&gt;Karl Joachim Breunig is a Full Professor of Strategic Management at the Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet, where he is heading the research group on Digital Innovation and Strategic Competence in Organizations (DISCO), at Oslo Metropolitan University &amp;ndash; OsloMet. He received his Ph.D. from BI Norwegian Business School, and holds a MSc from London School of Economics. Prof. Breunig&amp;rsquo;s research concentrates on the interception of strategy- and innovation theory, and involves topics such as service- and business model innovation as well as digitalization in knowledge intensive firms.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ronald C. Beckett</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Dalrymple</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business Model Architecture by Design</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">activity theory</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">architecture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business networks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dynamic capabilities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ISO/IEC 42010</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multiple viewpoints</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">relationship matrix</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zachman framework</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1252</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we view business models as complex deal-making activity systems organized to create, deliver, and capture value. Unlike some other viewpoints, we emphasize both system components and their interconnection. Business activities are carried out by a network of actors drawing on a network of resources, and individual firms seek to configure these intersecting networks to enhance their competitive positioning. The business model literature refers to the significance of antecedent activities in providing context – opportunities the firm decides to pursue, the strategy adopted, and requisite capabilities. Drawing on this literature, we propose an approach to framing business model context. Drawing on the information systems literature, we identify a toolkit facilitating activity system architecture design. We suggest how this both draws out the underlying complexity of a business model and shows how a multiplicity of views makes sense.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swinburne University of Technology
Ron Beckett is an industry practitioner with more than 30 years of experience in the implementation of creative change and innovation management in Aerospace and Manufacturing. He frequently works at the academia–industry interface, with a focus on Learning to Compete. Ron is an Adjunct Professor at Swinburne University, and he has held similar appointments at several other universities. He has authored or co-authored more than 100 conference papers, journal articles, and book chapters related to the pursuit of best practice in extracting value from innovative ideas, knowledge management, and effective collaboration implementation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swinburne University of Technology
John Dalrymple holds a BA (Hons) from the University of Stirling and a PhD from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland where he worked with the Scottish Enterprise Foundation to improve the performance of small and medium-sized companies. He was Founding Director of the Centre for Management Quality Research at RMIT University. John, the staff, and students of the Centre were regular recipients of “Best Paper” awards at international conferences. His publications have attracted more than 1100 citations to date. John was the Editor of the &lt;em&gt;Quality Assurance in Education&lt;/em&gt; journal from 2003 until 2019. He has supervised over 20 PhD candidates to successful completion. In October 2018, John was presented with the J. M. Juran Award by the Australian Organisation for Quality. 
</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maksim Belitski</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bain Liversage</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">E-Leadership in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Developing World</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">commercialization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">developing country</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">e-leadership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">small- and medium-sized enterprises</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SMEs</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1212</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">64-74</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in the economies of many developing countries. A critical challenge faced by SME leaders, as digitization continues, is how to adopt digital technologies to create value and enable faster product commercialization. There is a paucity of empirical research examining how e-leadership in SMEs drives technology and new product commercialization processes in the developing world. In this study, we have broadened the notion of what constitutes e-leadership, from the perspective of how advanced information technologies affect the leadership dynamic and the appropriation of advanced information technologies. Although there have been several studies on leading technologies in developed countries, we focus on developing an e-leadership framework for SMEs in developing economies. Using this framework and five selection criteria, we conducted 11 interviews with a sample of successful SMEs selected from a pool of 2,240 firms in the city of Johannesburg, South Africa. We conclude by highlighting the five key findings of this study, which explain how SMEs can develop effective e-leadership to foster commercialization and improve firm performance.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Reading
Maksim Belitski is an Associate Professor in the Henley Business School at the University of Reading, United Kingdom. He holds a PhD in Applied Economics from the University of Leicester, UK, and a PhD in Economics from the University of Milan, Italy. He is a Trusted Researcher of the Secure Data Service, UK Data Archive and Virtual Micro-data Lab, Office of National Statistics, UK. His research interests lie in the area of entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional economics, with a focus on entrepreneurship as a spillover of knowledge and creativity. He is an editor of the &lt;em&gt;Small Business Economics Journal.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smartcom
Bain Liversage is the CEO at Smartcom in Johannesburg, South Africa. His research focuses on businesses and the people in business, in particular, what makes people make choices, grow, and fail. Bain has over 10 years of experience as an executive manager and CEO in the ICT sector as well as in strategy, finance, operations, human resources, and networking. He manages a variety of sales teams and individuals, including a broad range of executive decision-making activities related to technology adoption. He gained his MBA from Henley Business School in Johannesburg, South Africa.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taina Tukiainen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thommie Burström</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martin Lindell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Strategies of Technology Startups Within and Between Business Ecosystems</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">boundaries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business ecosystems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1247</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25-41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology startups build strategies in order to survive within the framework of business ecosystems. However, the knowledge required to make such strategies effective is scarce. This article poses the question: “How do small technology startups strategize within and between business ecosystems?” Based on an explorative qualitative study, this article defines and presents a dynamic strategic framework of three strategies employed by technology startups. Some startups choose to act within one defined business ecosystem, most startups use a multi-ecosystem strategy to act between and draw benefits from many business ecosystems, and the rest act as ecosystem creators that challenge the logics of existing ecosystems.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Taina Tukiainen is Professor of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Aalto University in Finland. She is also a Cabinet Member of the First Vice President of the EU Committee of the Regions. She has worked for over 10 years at Nokia Corporation and over 15 years globally in universities. Her research interests are entrepreneurship, innovation, strategy, and technology management. Her doctoral dissertation is titled &lt;em&gt;The Unexpected Benefits of Internal Corporate Ventures: An Empirical Examination of the Consequences of Investment in Corporate Ventures &lt;/em&gt;(2004), and her latest related books are &lt;em&gt;The Finnish Startups in Globally Evolving Ecosystems: Value for Finland&lt;/em&gt; (2014) and &lt;em&gt;The Regional Innovation Ecosystems &lt;/em&gt;(2016). She has published in &lt;em&gt;Organization Science&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;MIT Sloan Management Review&lt;/em&gt; and has a wide international network.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanken School of Economics
Thommie Burström is Rettig Capital Assistant Professor of Management and Organisation at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. His academic interests are in projects, entrepreneurship, business ecosystems, and platform management. Thommie has published papers in, for example, the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanken School of Economics
Martin Lindell is Professor Emeritus in Entrepreneurship and Management at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. His research interests are in entrepreneurship, creativity, innovation, strategy, and leadership. He has published in many international journals including, among others, &lt;em&gt;Leadership Quarterly, Scandinavian Journal of Management, International Strategic Management and Organization, Journal of Small Business Management,&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;European Management Journal.&lt;/em&gt; He has a wide international network and has been an active member in several international research projects.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Brattström</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Working with Startups? These are the Three Things You Ought to Know about Startup Teams</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new venture teams</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teamwork</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1279</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-14</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">While much has been written about how startups work to develop their product, this paper focuses instead on how to manage the startup team. Based on a systematic review of current research, I present actionable insights about startup team characteristics; who they are, how they work, and how they stay together. I explain how these characteristics imply both opportunities and threats for the viability of the team and discuss how startup teams can be managed to increase the likelihood of their survival and growth. Given that the majority of startup failures are attributed to the team, not to the product, these insights are valuable both to aspiring entrepreneurs and to their external stakeholders.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;div&gt;Lund University&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anna Brattström works at Lund University, Sweden. Her research focuses on how people come together and work together in contexts such as innovative start-ups or inter-organizational R&amp;amp;D alliances. Her work has been published in journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Studies, Research Policy, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Journal of Product Innovation Management.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</style></custom1><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martin Bliemel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Transdisciplinary Innovation (August 2018)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interdisciplinary</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multidisciplinary</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">practice</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transdisciplinarity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transdisciplinary</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1173</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Martin Bliemel is the Director of the Diploma in Innovation at the new Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). Martin holds a BSc (Mechanical Engineering) and MBA from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and a PhD in Business from Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. His research interests include entrepreneurial networks, accelerators, education, research commercialization, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and the entrepreneurial university. His research has been published in several prestigious journals including &lt;em&gt;Nature Nanotechnology, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Education+Training,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior &amp; Research,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Entrepreneurship Research Journal,&lt;/em&gt; where one of his articles on entrepreneurship education is the journal’s most downloaded article. Martin is a recipient of the nationally competitive Office of Learning and Teaching Citation.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer is a Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Her research interests span the fields of human-centred design, systemic design, and public and social sector innovation. As a lecturer, she is responsible for coordinating part of the transdisciplinary degree Bachelor of Creative Intelligence and Innovation. Mieke holds a Master of Science degree in Industrial Design Engineering from Delft University of Technology and a PhD on the topic of user-centred design from the University of Twente, both in the Netherlands. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alex Baumber</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graciela Metternicht</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter Ampt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rebecca Cross</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emily Berry</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">From Importing Innovations to Co-Producing Them: Transdisciplinary Approaches to the Development of Online Land Management Tools</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">adaptive</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-production</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">decision-support</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">land management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tools</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transdisciplinary</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1175</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-26</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">While traditional approaches to innovation diffusion often assume that innovations come from outside a local system, transdisciplinary co-production offers an alternative paradigm in which local stakeholders are engaged as co-producers of innovations. The use of digital online tools for agriculture, conservation, and citizen science is an area of expanding opportunities, but landholders are often dependent on tools developed outside their local communities. This article looks at the potential for transdisciplinary co-production to be used as a framework for more participatory development of digital online land management tools, with a case study from the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. This research has implications beyond rural land management to other industries and contexts where reflexive and integrative strategies are needed to overcome barriers to stakeholder participation and engagement with new technologies.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Alex Baumber is a Scholarly Teaching Fellow in the Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at the University of Technology Sydney, Australia. He has undertaken collaborative research on a range of rural sustainability issues, including revegetation, bioenergy, agroforestry, wildlife management, and carbon accounting. Research grants include projects on Landholder Collaboration (NSW Environmental Trust), Low Carbon Tourism (CRC for Low-Carbon Living 2013–2015), Optimising Revegetation Management for Regent Honeyeater Recovery (NSW Environmental Trust 2013–2016), the Central Tablelands Agroforestry Bioenergy Project (RIRDC and DAFF 2010–12), and the Barrier Ranges Sustainable Wildlife Enterprise Trial (RIRDC 2006–2009).</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of New South Wales
Graciela Metternicht is a Professor in the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. She has expertise and experience in land degradation assessment and monitoring, ecosystem-based approaches to land use planning, and sustainable development. Her prior and current work includes working with UN Environment, the UNCCD, and as a reviewer of major reports of the Convention of Biological Diversity and of the State of the Environment Australia Report 2016. Metternicht has experience in leading multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral projects in environmental assessment and management, including the Collaborative Planning Support Tools for Optimising Farming Systems (funded by the Australian Research Council).</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Sydney
Peter Ampt is a Lecturer in Natural Resource Management and Extension at the University of Sydney, Australia. He has expertise in participatory research, which seeks to integrate production and conservation, including as a lead investigator for the project Landholder Collaboration for Landscape-scale Conservation (NSW Environmental Trust 2016–18). His roles include manager of the Future of Australia’s Threatened Ecosystems (FATE) program and steering committee member for the Communities in Landscapes (CiL) project, which aimed at improving the management of Box Gum grassy woodlands under the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country program. Ampt’s track record includes participatory research projects such as the Central Tablelands Agroforestry Bioenergy Project (RIRDC and DAFF 2010–12) and the Barrier Ranges Sustainable Wildlife Enterprise Trial (RIRDC 2006–2009).</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Sydney
Rebecca Cross is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Sydney, Australia. She has led the development of participatory social research methodology for the Landholder Collaboration project (NSW Environmental Trust) and has worked on several projects including Communities in Landscapes (CiL) (funded by Caring for Our Country, 2010–2012) and Mining and Biodiversity Offsetting in Agricultural Landscapes in Mudgee, NSW and the Burdekin, QLD (UNSW, 2014).</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of New South Wales
Emily Berry provided support for social research and coordination of the project Landholder Collaboration for Landscape-scale Conservation (NSW Environmental Trust 2016–18). She holds a Master of Philosophy degree in Environmental Management from the University of New South Wales and has also undertaken research into landholder perceptions of land degradation in the Far West NSW, private land conservation in NSW, and cultural land management in the NSW Central Tablelands.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Brattström</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an R&amp;D Partnership</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conflict</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R&amp;D partnerships</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trust</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trust repair</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1182</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4-15</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article offers an actionable framework for dealing with trust violations in R&amp;D partnerships: it explains how to turn around a conflicted R&amp;D partnership, repair trust, and learn from the experience. As innovation becomes more open, firms increasingly find themselves involved in R&amp;D collaborations with suppliers, customers or even competitors. Trust plays a fundamental role in such partnerships to work. Yet, trust cannot be taken for granted. In fact, trust in R&amp;D partnerships is often violated – and without executive intervention, trust violations can soon turn even the most promising partnership into a value-destroying predicament. Although much has been written about trust formation in R&amp;D partnerships, this article focuses instead on what to do when trust has been broken. The analysis is based on a review of academic research and is illustrated with real-life examples of trust repair processes. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lund University
Anna Brattström is an Assistant Professor in the School of Economics and Management at Lund University, Sweden, where she researches innovation and collaboration. Her work on trust in R&amp;D partnerships has been published in journals such as &lt;em&gt;Organization Studies&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Product Innovation Management.&lt;/em&gt; In 2015, she was shortlisted for the ISPIM Innovation Management Dissertation Award for her in-depth studies of trust dynamics in R&amp;D partnerships. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pekka Buttler</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">communities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creativity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">practice</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research method</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teamwork</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1197</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22-31</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Explaining innovation – even merely spotting it actually happening – is difficult. In this article, I introduce an industry-friendly approach that will enable practitioners and researchers alike to observe, interpret, and understand the different types of creativities – the raw materials necessary for innovation – that happen in creative communities. The Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities (PMSCC) is based on theories developed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. However, unlike mainstream practice-oriented methods, the PMSCC does not necessitate the use of theory-heavy conceptualizations; instead, it focuses on the everyday, creative micro-interactions in communities. As I describe in this article, the PMSCC offers practitioners and researchers an effective way to gain new insights into an otherwise relatively opaque process. Besides outlining the method, I also present results from a research project utilizing the PMSCC, showing how the method can produce worthwhile findings, foster new insights, and help practitioners hone their creative processes.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanken School of Economics
Pekka Buttler, M.Sc. (Econ), is a doctoral student at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, where he is researching conceptual design in IT projects. His other academic interests range from leading knowledge work to software business management. Besides research, Pekka involves himself in teaching and consulting by utilizing his more than 15 years of experience within the IT industry.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rituparna Basu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sarada Chatterjee</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. What Barriers Do Women Face in Becoming High-Tech Entrepreneurs in Rural India?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">barriers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">challenges</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">India</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rural</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">women</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1132</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-36</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Management Institute, Kolkata
Rituparna Basu is an Assistant Professor in Marketing, Retail and Entrepreneurship at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. Dr. Basu won the Global ISB-Ivey Case Competition 2017 and received the prestigious AIMS-IRMA Outstanding Young Woman Management Teacher Award 2016. She earned her Doctor of Philosophy in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2013. She holds a BSc in Economics from St. Xaviers’ College in Kolkata, and she is a gold medallist MBA. She is particularly known for her practice-led research and is also regarded as a high-impact corporate trainer. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Management Institute, Kolkata
Sarada Chatterjee is a Teaching Assistant at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. She holds a BCom (Hons) from the University of Calcutta, India, and an MCom from University of Burdwan, India. She received the Active Young Researcher Award in 2017 from the AR Research Publication and Conference World. Previously, she was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Administration at Bhawanipur Education Society College in Calcutta and a Lecturer in the Department of Business Administration at the Scottish Church College, also in Calcutta.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kelly Bronson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agriculture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">automation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">big data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">machine intelligence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">power</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">responsible innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">smart agriculture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological values</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1135</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7-14</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article draws on the literature of responsible innovation to suggest concrete processes for including rights holders in the “smart” agricultural revolution. It first draws upon historical agricultural research in Canada to highlight how productivist values drove seed innovations with particular consequences for the distribution of power in the food system. Next, the article uses document analysis to suggest that a similar value framework is motivating public investment in smart farming innovations. The article is of interest to smart farming’s decision makers (from farmers to governance actors) and a broader audience – anyone interested in engendering equity through innovation-led societal transitions.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Kelly Bronson is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Social Sciences and the Institute for Science, Society, and Policy at the University of Ottawa, Canada. She is a social scientist studying science–society tensions that erupt around controversial technologies and their governance – from GMOs to big data. Her research aims to bring community values into conversation with technical knowledge in the production of evidence-based decision-making. She has published her work in regional &lt;em&gt;(Journal of New Brunswick Studies),&lt;/em&gt; national &lt;em&gt;(Canadian Journal of Communication),&lt;/em&gt; and international journals &lt;em&gt;(Journal of Responsible Innovation, Big Data and Society).&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Gentner</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Birgit Stelzer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bujar Ramosaj</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leo Brecht</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategic Foresight of Future B2B Customer Opportunities through Machine Learning</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B2B industries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer base analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer foresight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer knowledge</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer profile</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data mining</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">machine learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategic foresight</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1189</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Within the strategic foresight literature, customer foresight still shows a low capability level. In practice, especially in business-to-business (B2B) industries, analyzing an entire customer base in terms of future customer potential is often done manually. Therefore, we present a single case study based on a quantitative customer-foresight project conducted by a manufacturing company. Along with a common data mining process, we highlight the application of machine learning algorithms on an entire customer database that consists of customer and product-related data. The overall benefit of our research is threefold. The major result is a prioritization of 2,300 worldwide customers according to their predicted technical affinity and suitability for a new machine control sensor. Thus, the company gains market knowledge, which addresses management functions such as product management. Furthermore, we describe the necessary requirements and steps for practitioners who realize a customer-foresight project. Finally, we provide a detailed catalogue of measures suitable for sales in order to approach the identified high-potential customers according to their individual needs and behaviour. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Daniel Gentner is a Junior Research Fellow at the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany. His research focuses on product management in B2B industries and especially on customer analytics methods and applications. Additionally, he works at iTOP.Partners GmbH as consultant and trainer for B2B product management, for example in the Center of Excellence in Global Product Management (CE ProMM). There, he supports the experience and knowledge transfer to practitioners on processes, techniques, roles, responsibilities, and tasks of product management in globally acting German and Swiss B2B companies. Daniel studied Business Administration at Ulm University and the University of Connecticut and holds a Master of Science degree from Ulm University. During his studies, he worked as a Student Research Assistant at Ulm University and as a student trainee in different companies (B2B and B2C). </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Birgit Stelzer is a Senior Research Fellow of the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany, where she is also Head of the Department of Didactics. She has a diploma and a PhD in Management Science. She also works as a consultant and trainer for B2B companies on foresight topics, agile project management, and organizational transformation. Her research focuses mainly on foresight issues and business model innovation. She also lectures at several institutions in Europe, including the University of Antwerp and Steinbeis University Berlin.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Bujar Ramosaj is a PhD Candidate at the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany, where he holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration with a focus on Technology Management. His research focuses on the financial evaluation of emerging technologies and the assessment of their potential to gain greater value in technology-related M&amp;A activities. In addition, he works for ITOP.Partners GmbH as a technology management consultant, where he identifies, analyzes, and evaluates technologies and technology strategies.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Liechtenstein
Leo Brecht is a Full Professor of Entrepreneurship and Technology at the University of Liechtenstein, where he researches in innovation, technology, and product management, mainly based on analytics. He joined the University of Liechtenstein in October 2018; previously, he was a Professor at Ulm University, Germany. Leo is the author of several books and the founder of two start-up companies.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jasmin Winter</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Justine Boudreau</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Supporting Self-Determined Indigenous Innovations: Rethinking the Digital Divide in Canada</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indigenous</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">makerspaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1138</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38-48</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article seeks to revisit dominant narratives of digital technological development in Indigenous communities in Canada. By prioritizing Indigenous voices and drawing from concepts of self-determination and sovereignty, this analysis reorients discourse surrounding the “digital divide” towards a strength-based approach that positions Indigenous peoples as innovators and creators, not just consumers, of digital technologies. This article begins with a discussion of how dominant media has used technology and technological imagery to misrepresent Indigenous cultures and perpetuate colonial biases, and emphasizes the importance of making space for Indigenous future imagery. Following this is a discussion of digital storytelling and virtual landscapes, showcasing a small sample of Indigenous initiatives online, in video game and app development, and in augmented and virtual reality. Finally, this article considers the potential of “makerspaces” as a framework for future action to bridge theory and practice. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">First Nations Technology Council
Jasmin Winter is a recent graduate of the Master’s in Development Practice program at the University of Winnipeg, which stands on Treaty 1 territory. Originally from Vancouver, on the unceded lands of Coast Salish peoples, Jasmin was raised by a European father and a Chinese mother. This article contains material from a Major Research Paper that was graciously supervised by Dr. Julie Nagam. Jasmin completed a field placement with the Initiative for Indigenous Futures in the summer of 2017, and was a research assistant for the Transactive Memory Keepers project. She is currently working for the First Nations Technology Council in British Columbia. She is incredibly grateful to have had these opportunities to support Indigenous-determined innovations. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Justine Boudreau completed her undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ottawa, Canada, and is now working on a Master’s degree in Electronic Business Technologies. During the last three years, she has spent her time playing with new technology and diversifying her knowledge. She spent almost two years working with the Maker Mobile delivering workshops and integrating new curriculum for robotics and women in science and engineering. She then moved on to work for the uOttawa Richard L'Abbé Makerspace while teaching and running the first and second year engineering design courses run through the Makerlab. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abdolrasoul Habibipour</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annabel Georges</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Ståhlbröst</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">drop-out</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">field test</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">taxonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user engagement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user motivation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1155</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-21</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The concept of a “living lab” is a relatively new research area and phenomenon that facilitates user engagement in open innovation activities. Studies on living labs show that the users’ motivation to participate in a field test is higher at the beginning of the project than during the rest of the test, and that participants have a tendency to drop out before completing the assigned tasks. However, the literature still lacks theories describing the phenomenon of drop-out within the area of field tests in general and living lab field tests in particular. As the first step in constructing a theoretical discourse, the aims of this study are to present an empirically derived taxonomy for the various factors that influence drop-out behaviour; to provide a definition of “drop-out” in living lab field tests; and to understand the extent to which each of the identified items influence participant drop-out behaviour. To achieve these aims, we first extracted factors influencing drop-out behaviour in the field test from our previous studies on the topic, and then we validated the extracted results across 14 semi-structured interviews with experts in living lab field tests. Our findings show that identified reasons for dropping out can be grouped into three themes: innovation-related, process-related, and participant-related. Each theme consists of three categories with a total of 44 items. In this study, we also propose a unified definition of “drop-out” in living lab field tests.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Abdolrasoul Habibipour is a PhD student in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden and is a User Engagement Expert at Botnia Living Lab, Sweden. His research focuses on user engagement in living lab research, with a particular emphasis on users’ motivations and needs. Abdolrasoul has previously worked in information technology (IT) projects for more than 13 years as a project leader and project manager as well as software designer and developer. He is currently involved in international innovation and research projects such as UNaLab project, U4IoT project, as well as Privacy Flag project, all of which are financed by the European Commission.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Annabel Georges is a User Specialist at imec.livinglabs in Belgium. Annabel holds a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University, with a specialization in New Media and Society. Since 2013, she has worked at imec.livinglabs, where she has conducted research for more than 15 innovation projects. Her main interests are contextual research, field tests, and working on improvements on current living lab practices.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Anna Ståhlbröst is a Professor of Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, and Managing Director of Botnia Living Lab in Sweden. Her research is focused on the phenomena of living labs and open, user-driven innovation processes, with special interest in end-user needs and motivations. Anna’s research is related to different application areas such as smart cities, domestic IT use, and online privacy. She has participated in several international and national innovation and research projects, and she is currently involved in the UNaLab project, U4IoT project, as well as Privacy Flag project, all of which are financed by the European Commission.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead of the Business Model and User Research Team at imec.livinglabs. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University in Belgium. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. He is also active in the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) and in the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) as a living labs specialist. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. </style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn is Vice Chancellor and Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Birgitta’s research interests concern design-oriented research focused on participatory design in distributed and open environments; human-centric and appreciative methodologies for design and learning; value-based information systems development; the increasing overlap between stakeholder participation and labour sourcing; and its consequences for value creation and value capture. She has published several articles within these areas, and she has participated in a large number of national and international research projects.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shiv S Tripathi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mita Brahma</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: An Exploration of Entrepreneurial Models Prevalent in India</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emerging markets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">India</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">typology</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1131</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24-32</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Are the features and processes of entrepreneurship – such as wealth creation, risk taking, vision, identification of a niche market, launching new products, and so on – common across the world? Many would assume they would be. However, firms that are entrepreneurial in nature and belong to emerging markets may or may not follow the established models of developed economies. In this study, we sought to explore various types of entrepreneurial models that are prevalent in an emerging market. For this purpose, we collected primary and secondary data to identify characteristics of technology-based entrepreneurial firms in India. Based on the two dimensions of degree of demand/supply and expected loss/risk, we identify four models of entrepreneurship – incremental, proactive, radical, and reactive – and illustrate each model with examples from Indian companies. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Management Development Institute, Gurgaon
Shiv S Tripathi is an Assistant Professor in the area of Strategic Management at the Management Development Institute in Gurgaon, India. He holds a PhD degree from the Vinod Gupta School of Management at the Indian Institute of Technology in Kharagpur. He has published papers in the area of product and service innovations, growth strategies, and innovations in large organizations. He has co-authored a book titled &lt;em&gt;International Business&lt;/em&gt; along with a number of case studies. He is a member of the Strategic Management Society, the International Society for Professional Innovation Management, the Academy of Management, and the Academy of International Business. His current research interests include corporate entrepreneurship, open innovation, ambidexterity, and innovation in large organizations.  </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Management Development Institute, Gurgaon
Mita Brahma is a Fellow Program Scholar in the area of Strategic Management at the Management Development Institute in Gurgaon, India. She holds MS and MBA degrees from the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi, India. Her research interests include corporate entrepreneurship, innovation, and strategic human resources management. She has over thirty years of experience in the banking, software, and education sectors. She currently leads a niche-consulting firm that helps organizations improve their performance through increased operational efficiency and strategic and human resource initiatives.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eduardo Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Transnational Entrepreneurship: Distinctive Features and a New Definition</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cross-border</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">definition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">features</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">topic modelling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transnational</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1184</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-38</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Definitions of transnational entrepreneurship are too general making it difficult to understand what distinguishes transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship. In addition, these definitions identify the “immigrant”, “ethnic”, or “migrant” entrepreneur as the focal actor rather than the company. This makes it difficult to align transnational entrepreneurship with the theory of the firm and provide practical insights to practitioners. This article examines 11 definitions of transnational entrepreneurship, discovers the groups of words that best represent the information in a corpus comprised of 44 journal articles, identifies the key features that distinguish transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship, and advances a new definition of transnational entrepreneurship. The results indicate that transnational entrepreneurship has two key distinctive features: cross-border investment logic and institutional distance – the difference in institutional context between countries. Accordingly, transnational entrepreneurship may be usefully defined as “a cross-border investment to acquire, combine, and recombine specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets to create and capture value for the company under conditions of institutional distance and uncertainty”. This proposed definition builds on the features that make transnational entrepreneurship distinctive, is consistent with the theory of the firm, and carries implications for how to grow companies at an early stage.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Eduardo Bailetti is a graduate student undertaking a master’s degree in Entrepreneurship from the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a BA in Economics, at Carleton University and has experience in industry as a manager and a venture founder. His research interests focus on combining and applying theory and practice to grow new ventures early, rapidly, and securely.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rens Brankaert</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elke den Ouden</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Design-Driven Living Lab: A New Approach to Exploring Solutions to Complex Societal Challenges</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">societal challenges</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology probe</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1049</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">44-51</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of a design-driven living lab as an innovative approach to addressing societal challenges. This living lab incorporates design qualities such as exploration, open-ended results, and disruption. This approach was applied in three case studies within the context of dementia, each of which explored the impact of Qwiek.up – a media system that creates an ambient experience in a room through projection and sound. A cluster analysis of the results in the three case studies showed that the system has considerable potential for people with dementia, and possibly also for other groups. In addition, the design-driven approach led to new applications in care, improved functionality, and a broader design space. Our findings show that design-driven living labs can widen the scope of innovation and improve the value proposition of an innovative solution. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eindhoven University of Technology
Rens Brankaert is an Assistant Professor working on design for “Active &amp; Healthy Ageing” within the Business Process Design group in the Department of Industrial Design at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) in the Netherlands. He received his PhD early in 2016 for work related to design for people with dementia involving the application of living labs. In this work, he aimed to build a bridge between a design-based approach and current healthcare practices.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eindhoven University of Technology
Elke den Ouden is based at the Innovation, Technology and Entrepreneurship Management Group in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) in the Netherlands. As a TU/e Fellow and Strategic Director of TU/e LightHouse, she forges links between research and industry. Her long history at Philips, including in the role of group leader, has provided her with the network and expertise needed to do perform her current role. Elke operates as the TU/e living lab expert and regularly publishes on this topic. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ferran Giones</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexander Brem</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">definitions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology Innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1076</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">44-51</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology entrepreneurship is an established concept in academia. However, recent developments in the context of digital entrepreneurship call for revision and advancement. The multiple possible combinations of technology and entrepreneurship have resulted in a diversity of phenomena with significantly different characteristics and socio-economic impact. This article is focused on the identification and description of technology entrepreneurship in times of digitization. Based on current examples, we identify and describe characterizations of technology entrepreneurship, digital technology entrepreneurship, and digital entrepreneurship. With this new delineation of terms, we would like to foster discussion between researchers, entrepreneurs, and policy makers on the impact of digitization on entrepreneurship, and set a future research agenda.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Ferran Giones is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. He received his PhD from La Salle – Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain. His research field is technology entrepreneurship, where he explores how and when technological progress transforms into entrepreneurial activity, and how this entrepreneurial activity results in sustainable organizations and innovative ecosystems.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Alexander Brem holds the Chair of Technology Management at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) which is located at the Nuremberg Campus of Technology in Germany. Before joining FAU, Alexander was Professor of Technology and Innovation Management and Head of SDU Innovation and Design Engineering at the Mads Clausen Institute at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. His primary research interest is technology and innovation management with a special focus on interdisciplinary links to psychology, marketing, and entrepreneurship.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seppo Leminen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mika Westerlund</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business-to-business</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emotions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">needsfinding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">operations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflection</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1052</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Seppo Leminen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Finland and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management in the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in &lt;em&gt;Industrial Marketing Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Business &amp; Industrial Marketing, Management Decision, &lt;/em&gt;the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Marketing, &lt;/em&gt;the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Product Development,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review,&lt;/em&gt; among many others.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Pieter Ballon is the Academic Lead of imec.livinglabs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and Director of the research group imec-SMIT at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seppo Leminen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mika Westerlund</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agile methods</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conceptualizations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation tool</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1044</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Pieter Ballon is the Academic Lead of imec.livinglabs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and Director of the research group imec-SMIT at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Seppo Leminen holds positions as Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and Adjunct Professor in the School of Business at Aalto University in Finland. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and management in the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, value co-creation and capture with users, relationships, services and business models in marketing, particularly in Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in &lt;em&gt;Industrial Marketing Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Technology and Engineering and Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Business &amp; Industrial Marketing, Management Decision,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Marketing,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Product Development,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review,&lt;/em&gt; among many others.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Päivi Jaring</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Asta Bäck</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Researchers Use Social Media to Promote their Research and Network with Industry</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brand building</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">marketing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">networking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">promotion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">researcher</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social media</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1098</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">32-39</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social media is now an essential information and interaction channel. Companies advertise and sell their products and services through social media, but this channel has not been so commonly applied to the task of selling knowledge and research work. This article studies the use of social media by researchers to promote their research and network with product developers in industry, and it presents a model of the use of social media by researchers. The data for this research was obtained by interviewing individual researchers of a research organization and surveying product developers from industry. The findings show that social media is seen as a good source of new information and contacts, and it is suitable for promoting awareness of research services and results. The results show that the speed and intensity of social media present challenges for researchers, but by being active in posting content and participating in discussions, researchers can derive benefits and enhance their personal reputations.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Päivi Jaring is a Senior Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd in the area of Business Ecosystem Development. She has Master’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Vaasa (1995) and Master’s degree and PhD in Information Processing Science from the University of Oulu (2001, 2004). Her research interest and topic of many scientific articles are use of ICT (especially mobile technologies and social media) for improving society and creating business. Her research has been published in the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Mobile Communications,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Innovation Management,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of E-Business Research,&lt;/em&gt; among others.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Asta Bäck is a Principal Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd in the research area of Big Data Industrial Applications. She received her MSc (Tech.) degree from Helsinki University of Technology in Finland. Her research interests include utilization of social media to support various business processes such as innovation and marketing, and tools and methods for analyzing social media data. Her research has been published in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Innovation Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Journal of Print and Media Technology Research,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Future Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing,&lt;/em&gt; among others.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruben D’Hauwers</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aron-Levi Herregodts</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annabel Georges</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lynn Coorevits</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olivier Rits</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Overcoming Barriers to Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B2B</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">experimentation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">testing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1054</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20-26</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business-to-business (B2B) living lab projects have been mentioned in different areas of academic research, but the innovation management literature requires deeper analysis of their potential opportunities and challenges. Real-life experimentation is a key requirement for living labs as it enables deeper insights in the potential success of innovations. However, the literature has not provided insights on how living lab projects can implement real-life experimentation in B2B innovation projects and does not describe appropriate conditions for experimentation in these settings. In this study, we identified three main barriers preventing real-life experimentation in B2B living lab projects: the technological complexity, the need for integration, and the difficulty in identifying testers. The barriers are discussed in detailed and potential solutions are provided to help overcome these barriers and stimulate the adoption of real-life experimentation in B2B innovation projects.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – SMIT – VUB
Ruben D’Hauwers is a Researcher at imec-SMIT-VUB in Belgium. He holds a master’s degrees in Business Engineering (2011) and Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2013). He has also worked in the field of business development in two different organizations. He joined imec in 2014 and focuses on business-to-business research, business modelling, and on capturing and validating the assumptions throughout the innovation process.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Aron-Levi Herregodts is a User Expert at imec.livinglabs and an affiliated researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds master’s degrees in Communication Sciences (2013) and Complementary Business Economics (2014). As a user expert, his role is to translate user behaviour, needs, and wants into tangible recommendations to provide structure to the innovation process of both SMEs and large organizations. His main research interests include open innovation, user innovation, organizational learning, intermediary activities, and user-centric design and methodologies. He is also preparing a PhD on the configuration of intermediary user-oriented activities with innovation-relevant actors for distinct types of entrepreneurs and innovations.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Annabel Georges is a Junior Researcher in the research group at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. She holds a master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University, with a specialization in New Media and Society. Her main interests are domestication theory, field tests, and improvements to living lab practices.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Lynn Coorevits is a Senior User Researcher for imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium, where she focuses on tools and techniques for open and user innovation, such as sensors and design thinking. Her current research focuses on the adoption and attrition of wearables as well as optimization of context integration in living lab projects. She works on several SME living lab projects ranging from the financial to social industry. She holds master’s degrees in Psychology and in Marketing Analysis from Ghent University and has 9 years of experience in innovation research and consultancy.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom5><custom6><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SMIT
Olivier Rits holds a master’s degree in Applied Physics (Engineering) from the Ghent University in Belgium. Previously, Olivier worked as a business developer for Alcatel-Lucent, where he was involved with many different technologies. Within SMIT, Olivier is leading the business modelling practice in the context of SME living lab innovation projects. With a team of researchers, he is organizing business model workshops and stakeholder interviews to apply business model methodologies to link the user feedback and insights to the business model aspects of the SME’s strategy. Olivier is also involved in business modelling efforts in research projects dealing with ICT in general, with a specific interest in M2M and IoT and mobile telecommunications.</style></custom6><custom7><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Pieter Ballon is the Academic Lead of imec.livinglabs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and Director of the research group imec-SMIT at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. From 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union’s 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and an MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.</style></custom7></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Franziska Brodack</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Sinell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Promoting Entrepreneurial Commitment: The Benefits of Interdisciplinarity</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">academic spin-offs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial commitment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interdisciplinarity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">team composition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teamwork</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology transfer</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1123</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-13</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article is the first to examine the relationship between interdisciplinarity and entrepreneurial commitment in academic spin-offs. Building on literature on interdisciplinarity, academic entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial intention, we analyzed the development of nine interdisciplinary spin-off teams comprising expertise from science, industry, and design. Our findings suggest that interdisciplinary teams engage with their ideas, maintain productive interaction, and successfully implement these ideas. Subjects in this study thoroughly developed their project proposals and implementation strategies by examining them from multiple angles. They believed not only in the value of these projects, but in their own ability to see them through. They found one another’s contributions highly inspirational and experienced a strong sense of responsibility and motivation. Communication within the teams was well managed, and tasks were clearly defined and distributed. Based on our findings, we put forward a number of propositions about the positive effects of interdisciplinarity on entrepreneurial commitment and conclude with implications for future research and practice.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fraunhofer Center for Responsible Research and Innovation
Franziska Brodack is Research Fellow at the Fraunhofer Center for Responsible Research and Innovation in Berlin, Germany. Her current projects focus on academic spin-off creation and the utilization of inter- and transdisciplinary teams for technology and knowledge transfer. Franziska holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the Brandenburg University of Technology in Germany.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fraunhofer Center for Responsible Research and Innovation
Anna Sinell is a PhD Candidate at the Technical University of Berlin, Germany, and a Research Fellow at the Fraunhofer Center for Responsible Research and Innovation. Her research focus is the transfer of knowledge and technology between different actors in innovation ecosystems. She is currently finishing her PhD thesis on strategies to foster academic entrepreneurship at research institutions.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sari Mäenpää</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anu Helena Suominen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rainer Breite</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Boundary Objects as Part of Knowledge Integration for Networked Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">boundary object</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation network</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cross-learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge integration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">networked innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1025</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25-36</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Networked innovation in co-creation networks is not possible without collaborative practices. Especially in complex projects, contextual knowledge is often spread among different stakeholders. To harness this dispersed knowledge for networked innovation, working knowledge management and collaborative practices are needed. This article addresses this need for better understanding and approaches to facilitate knowledge integration for networked innovation. We consider knowledge integration as the ability to put knowledge into action, and networked innovation as the co-created goal-driven output of selected partners. Our study focuses on describing and reporting a cross-learning type of expert knowledge-integration process with boundary objects, concrete or abstract “bridges” for overcoming possible knowledge boundaries, in a co-creation network. This article adds knowledge on networked innovation through knowledge integration with boundary objects. The reported process will help managers to systematically approach problems requiring expert knowledge that does not exist within their own organization and to better integrate knowledge required for innovation within their project networks.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tampere University of Technology
Sari Mäenpää, DrTech, works as a Post-Doctoral Researcher and Project Manager in the area of Industrial and Information Management at the Tampere University of Technology, Finland. She holds a LicSc degree in Logistics, an MSc degree in Industrial Engineering, and a BSc degree in Construction Engineering. Her doctoral thesis focused on managing network relations in project business context. Sari has been working for years in the field of research and education and is especially interested in knowledge integration, relationship quality, and digitalization among manufacturing networks and business ecosystems. Prior to her academic career, she worked several years within the construction industry.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tampere University of Technology
Anu Helena Suominen, MScTech, is currently a doctoral student in the area of Industrial and Information Management at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. Her doctoral thesis focuses on inter-organizational network legitimation. Anu has several years of practical working experience in exports in the metal and telecommunications industries. She has also managed both networking and training projects in industry. Her research interests focus on inter-organizational networks and their governance, and innovation, especially from the perspective of knowledge management.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tampere University of Technology
Rainer Breite, DrTech, is a Lecturer and Researcher in the area of Industrial and Information Management at Tampere University of Technology, Finland. He has worked in several engineering companies, and his main industrial experience derives from water turbines. Rainer’s research interest is focused on knowledge sharing in supply chains and networks.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Melanie Barwick</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building Scientist Capacity in Knowledge Translation: Development of the Knowledge Translation Planning Template</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">capacity building</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">competencies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge translation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">template</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tools</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1015</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9-15</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The last fifteen years have seen a fundamental shift in the importance of knowledge translation in health research and clinical care. Health research funders have incorporated knowledge translation into their missions, strategic directions, and funding opportunities, encouraging knowledge translation and implementation science and requiring knowledge translation practice from researchers working across the health research pillars – basic, clinical, health services, and population health. Healthcare and research organizations have changed their landscape as well, hiring knowledge translation practitioners to bridge research and practice for a range of knowledge users. Universities are shifting criteria for academic promotion to incorporate knowledge translation. Growing attention to knowledge translation in research, practice, and scholarship has created a need for researchers and practitioners to develop knowledge translation skills and competencies related to their research, scholarship, and organizational activities. The Knowledge Translation Planning Template was developed to support knowledge translation planning for scientists in health and other sectors. This article provides an overview of the rationale for its development, introduces the tool components, and describes preliminary indicators of impact. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SickKids
Melanie Barwick (PhD, CPsych) is a Senior Scientist in the Child Evaluative Sciences Program of the Research Institute, and Head of the Child and Youth Mental Health Research Unit (CYMHRU) in the Department of Psychiatry at SickKids in Toronto, Canada. She is also affiliated with the SickKids’ Learning Institute where she conducts professional development in knowledge translation, and with the Centre for Global Child Health as a scientist and member of the leadership. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. She chairs the Creative Professional Activity Committee for the Department of Psychiatry, and is a member of the Departmental Promotions Committee. She is an Executive Board member for AMREF Health Africa, the Children and Youth in Challenging Contexts (CCYC) Network Centre of Excellence and for the Global Implementation Initiative (GII), and she is an Associate Editor for the journal &lt;em&gt;Evidence &amp; Policy&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liza Wohlfart</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark Bünger</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Claus Lang-Koetz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frank Wagner</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Corporate and Grassroot Frugal Innovation: A Comparison of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">case studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">corporate frugal innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">frugal innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">grassroots frugal innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/977</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frugal innovations aim at the development of basic solutions that are affordable for price-sensitive customer groups. This article looks at the similarities and differences between two major approaches, corporate and grassroot frugal innovation, and identifies initial ideas on how the two streams can learn from each other. The three pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social) provide one of the guidelines for the comparison. The research is based on an analysis of case studies from various industries, six of which are presented in this article. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fraunhofer IAO
Liza Wohlfart (MA) works as a Scientist and Project Manager at the Competence Center R&amp;D Management of Fraunhofer IAO in Stuttgart, Germany. She has long-term experience with national and international research and consulting projects. Topics of specific expertise include innovation management, business development, frugal innovation, and the human side of R&amp;D. She has been the manager of large international projects, both EU- and industry-funded, where she has been responsible for the development of Community of Interests among Russian SMEs and the establishment of an Innovation Audit Tool for South-Australian SMEs. She is the editor of two books on knowledge management and business development, and she is the author of several scientific publications. She has delivered seminars and intermediary training sessions related to innovation as well as lectures on project management. Her international experience includes several European countries as well as Brazil, Russia, Australia, and Malaysia.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lux Research
Mark Bünger is Vice President of Research at Lux Research. Since joining Lux in 2005, Mark Bünger has seeded, launched, and led many of the company’s intelligence services and consulting work, ranging from bio-based fuels and chemicals to big data in agriculture and healthcare. Mark previously worked at Forrester Research, Accenture, and several successful startups. His business education at Mälardalen Polytechnic (Sweden) and the University of Texas (United States) focused on market research, complemented by studies and lab work in neurology and bioengineering at the University of California (Berkeley and UCSF). He is a standing guest lecturer at UC Berkeley and collaborates widely on studies of innovation with Fraunhofer Institute (Germany), LUMS (Pakistan), Masdar (Abu Dhabi), and the Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering, among others.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pforzheim University
Claus Lang-Koetz is Professor for Sustainable Technology and Innovation Management at Pforzheim University in Pforzheim near Stuttgart, Germany. His research interests are management methods and tools that help companies to deal with innovation ideas and implement them into resource efficient products and solutions – while using new technologies where appropriate. Claus studied Environmental Engineering (Dipl.-Ing.) and Water Resources Engineering and Management (MSc) in Germany and the United States. He worked in applied research at University of Stuttgart and Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering from 2000 until 2009 and obtained a doctorate in Engineering Science (Dr.-Ing.) at the University of Stuttgart in 2006. From 2009 through 2014, he was Head of Innovation Management at Eisenmann SE, a plant engineering and equipment firm supplying, for example, systems for surface finishing technology worldwide. </style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fraunhofer IAO and Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
Frank Wagner is Head of the Competence Centre R&amp;D Management at Fraunhofer IAO and a lecturer in Technology Management at the University of Stuttgart, Germany. Based in Brisbane, Australia, as a Professor at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Frank is working on R&amp;D and innovation projects mostly relating to the Innovation Manufacturing CRC and Assistive Technologies. He has over two decades of experience in implementing numerous innovation and technology management, corporate development, and organizational design projects across various sectors in Australia, Asia, America, and Europe.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chantal Trudel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sue Cobb</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kathryn Momtahan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Janet Brintnell</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ann Mitchell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developing Tacit Knowledge of Complex Systems: The Value of Early Empirical Inquiry in Healthcare Design</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">design research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ergonomics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">healthcare design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">human factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">infection prevention and control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge mobilization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">neonatal intensive care unit</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1017</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-38</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infection prevention and control has been the subject of much study in medical and epidemiological research and a variety of best practice guidelines have been developed to support healthcare workers and related stakeholders. Yet, despite the availability of information, managing healthcare-associated infections remains a challenge because the relevant explicit knowledge is not being adequately developed and mobilized as tacit knowledge for use &quot;on the front lines&quot;. Some researchers have called for a human factors perspective to help address challenges in designing for infection prevention and  control, but relatively few studies have been conducted to date. Researchers also suggest that empirical inquiry is needed to better inform the design process, and particularly the design of complex systems where attention to detailed processes and interactions can support the success of an intervention. A human factors approach can help designers develop a deeper understanding of work processes, technology considerations, as well as physiological, psychological, cultural, and organizational factors. The need is particularly pressing in low-resource healthcare environments where funds, time, and human resources may be scarce and strategic design decisions based on evidence are needed to support meaningful and effective changes. With this in mind, a human factors study was conducted in an existing neonatal intensive care unit to identify the influence of product and environment design on infection prevention and control and to inform recommendations for improvement. In this case study, we illustrate how the application of an empirical, methodical approach can help design professionals and stakeholders develop tacit knowledge of complex systems – knowledge that can be used to better inform design priorities, the design process, decision making, and the allocation of resources to help maximize improvements.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Chantal Trudel is an Assistant Professor at Carleton University’s School of Industrial Design in Ottawa, Canada. Chantal draws on her background in industrial design (B.I.D, Carleton University), human factors and ergonomics (MSc, University of Nottingham) and 10 years professional experience in commercial and healthcare design to support her research. Chantal is interested in human-centred and participatory design methods to improve our understanding and design of peoples’ experiences within complex systems.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Nottingham
Sue Cobb is Associate Professor and Head of the Human Factors Research Group in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Sue has been working in this group for 30 years. Over this period she has worked on many projects involving analysis of user requirements and user feedback or opinion on a variety of issues in contexts including industrial workplaces, educational settings, and community environments. Her specialist interest is in multi-disciplinary research and the use of user-centred and participatory design methods in a variety of contexts including special education and healthcare.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Kathryn Momtahan has 10 years of critical care nursing experience and a PhD in Experimental Psychology, focusing on healthcare human factors. Dr. Momtahan's human factors professional experience includes several years working in the hi-tech sector and fourteen years in a research-lead capacity in a hospital environment. She has published in human factors, healthcare, and engineering journals and holds several adjunct professor appointments in various faculties and programs including engineering, psychology, nursing, business, and human–computer interaction.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Ottawa Hospital
Ann Mitchell is the Director of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care at The Ottawa Hospital. Ann has 28 years of experience in NICU and maternal newborn care in a variety of clinical, regional, and administrative roles. Her current focus is on staff and patient safety, engaging families, and improving the patient experience. </style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Ottawa Hospital
Janet Brintnell is the Corporate Clinical Manager of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Special Care Nursery at The Ottawa Hospital. Her nursing career spans 32 years of which 26 have been focused in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Her experience ranges from a clinical bedside capacity to her current role with an administrative focus while constantly maintaining a critical focus on the delivery of family-centered care and best practices.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luke Hendrickson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stan Bucifal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Antonio Balaguer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Hansell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Employment Dynamics of Australian Entrepreneurship: A Management Perspective</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Australia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creative destruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">employment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">high growth</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">productivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startup</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/995</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article attempts to draw together the literature on high-growth firms and management capability using Australian Government data from the Expanded Analytical Business Longitudinal Database. We tracked cohorts of new micro-sized firms (startups) over five years from birth. Compared with startups that had a low employment growth trajectory, medium- and high-growth micro-startups exhibited higher financial performance, higher innovation activity, and a greater propensity to seek external (debt or equity) finance. From a management perspective, medium- and high-growth startups were also significantly more likely to monitor and assess their performance across a wider range of performance indicators. High-growth micro-startups exhibited significantly higher operational process and organizational/managerial innovation, a higher likelihood of foreign ownership, and a greater demand for equity finance than medium-growth micro-startups. This data is consistent with other evidence that suggests that sustained high growth comes from superior strategic management and may suggest an ongoing role for government policy in building firm management capability in order to foster employment growth. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia)
Luke Hendrickson is Manager of Innovation Research in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he is focused on innovation and measuring the performance of the national innovation system. He is principally responsible for delivering the Government’s annual &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.industry.gov.au/innovationreport&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Australian Innovation System Report&lt;/a&gt;, which is now in its seventh year. Luke’s general work interests are in the areas of productivity and competitiveness and how innovative entrepreneurship drives these outcomes across all sectors of the economy. He also has a particular interest in the economics of complexity, measuring management capability, and business eco-innovation. Luke holds a PhD from the Australian National University in Canberra.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia)
Stan Bucifal is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the field of industry policy, productivity, and innovation. He has experience in industry policy development, cost-benefit analysis applied to carbon emission abatement, and conducting research into intangible capital and the geography of innovation. Stan holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business from the Queensland University of Technology, where he majored in Economics and Finance (QUT), and a Master’s degree in Public Policy, specializing in industry strategy, from the Australian National University in Canberra.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia)
Antonio Balaguer is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the fields of innovation, management, and technological change. Antonio was initially trained as chemist and holds a PhD in Political Economy and Asian Studies from Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, and a postgraduate diploma in Public Policy from the Australian National University in Canberra.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Australian Bureau of Statistics
David Hansell is a Researcher with the Australian Bureau of Statistics, where he has worked since 2008. His main research interests include productivity of exiting and entering firms, and characteristics associated with high-productivity firms. David has an Honours degree in Asian history from the Australian National University in Canberra and a Masters of Economics degree from Macquarie University in Sydney.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mahmoud Gad</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Examining the Modes Malware Suppliers Use to Provide Goods and Services</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agents</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybercrime</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">malware</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multisided platform</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">suppliers</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/965</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Malware suppliers use various modes to provide goods and services to customers. By mode, we mean “the way” the malware supplier chooses to function. These modes increase monetization opportunities and enable many security breaches worldwide. A theoretically sound framework that can be used to examine the various modes that malware suppliers use to produce and sell malware is needed. We apply a general model specified recently by Hagiu and Wright to study five modes that malware suppliers use to deliver goods and services to their customers. The framework presented in this article can be used to predict the mode in which a malware supplier will function; to study which types of malware suppliers, agents, and customers are attracted to each mode; to discover new modes; and to better understand the threat a malware supplier presents.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation
Mahmoud M. Gad is a Research Associate at VENUS Cybersecurity. He holds a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Ottawa in Canada and an MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Maryland in College Park, United States. His research interests include cybercrime markets, machine learning for intrusion detection, analysis of large-scale networks, and cognitive radio networks.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bastiaan Baccarne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sara Logghe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lieven De Marez</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">distributed innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quintuple helix innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social ecology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">socio-ecological entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">urban living labs</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/972</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22-30</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Growing urbanization puts pressure on both social and ecological systems. This pressure raises complex and multi-facetted challenges that can only be tackled by collaborative and distributed innovation development processes. However, theoretical frameworks that assess such collaborations are often very conceptual, with little focus on the actual governance mechanisms that facilitate them. This article studies the urban living lab concept as an inter-organizational design and multi-stakeholder innovation development process to govern the quintuple helix model for innovation by means of an action research based multidimensional case study design, which focuses on the concepts of innovation democracy, mode 3 knowledge production, the innovation ecosystem as a system of societal subsystems, and socio-ecological transition. In this way, we provide a more profound understanding of such innovation processes to tackle socio-ecological challenges by means of public–private interactions driven by eco-entrepreneurship. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds – MICT – Ghent University
Bastiaan Baccarne is a Research and Teaching Assistant at iMinds-MICT, a research group within the communications department of Ghent University, where he works on the topic of user-centric innovation development in the context of (new) media and ICT. Bastiaan is also a PhD student working on citizen empowerment through the co-development of socio-technical innovations in an urban environment. Being part of iMinds Living Labs, Bastiaan works as a user researcher for several SME and startup projects, with an overall academic focus on the possibilities and limitations of user-centric innovation development ecosystems.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds – MICT – Ghent University
Sara Logghe obtained a master’s degree in both History and Communication Sciences with specialization in New Media and Society at Ghent University. Her second master's thesis was &lt;em&gt;Cultural Communication on the Internet: A Study on the Potential of Social Media for Cultural Institutions&lt;/em&gt;. A three-month internship at iMinds Living Labs encouraged her interest in research on living labs, and in May 2013, Sara joint iMinds-MICT as a Junior Researcher. Working on cultural projects within living lab research, Sara developed a specific interest in the changing library scene.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds – MICT – Ghent University
Dimitri Schuurman holds a PhD (2015) and Master's in Communication Sciences (2003) from Ghent University in Belgium. He joined the research group iMinds – MICT – Ghent University in 2005 and started working at iMinds Living Labs in 2009. Together with his iMinds colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at startups and SMEs, in which he has managed over 50 innovation projects. As a senior researcher, Dimitri is currently responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of living lab projects. He also coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers from iMinds – MICT – Ghent University. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. In early 2015, he finished his PhD entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds – MICT – Ghent University
Lieven De Marez is Research Director of the iMinds Media &amp; ICT (MICT) research group and teaches on the topics of innovation research, media, market and ICT, and new communication technologies in the Department of Communication Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium. MICT is one of 16 research groups within iMinds, and Lieven is also part of the management team of iMinds Living Labs’ facilitating infrastructure for living lab research.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lieven De Marez</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">distributed innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startup</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user involvement</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/956</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7-16</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation scholars as well as practitioners are still struggling with the practical implementation of open innovation principles in different contexts. In this article, we explore the value of a living lab approach for open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Using a case study approach, we compared 27 SME projects conducted by iMinds Living Labs from 2011 to 2015. The results suggest that a real-life intervention and a multi-method approach – both of which are methodological characteristics of living lab projects – increase the chance of generating actionable user contributions for the innovation under development. Moreover, the results also suggest that a living lab project yields maximal value when evolving from concept towards prototype. Besides these exploratory findings, this article also demonstrates that living lab projects are a perfect &quot;playground&quot; to test and validate assumptions from the open innovation literature.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds and Ghent University
Dimitri Schuurman holds a PhD (2015) and Master's degree in Communication Sciences (2003) from Ghent University in Belgium. He joined the research group iMinds – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium in 2005 and started working at iMinds Living Labs in 2009. Together with his iMinds colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at startups and SMEs, in which he has managed over 50 innovation projects. As a senior researcher, Dimitri is currently responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of living lab projects. He also coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers from iMinds – MICT – Ghent University. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. In early 2015, he finished his PhD entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation&lt;/em&gt;. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds and Ghent University
Lieven De Marez is Head of the research group for Media &amp; ICT (MICT) and Manager of iMinds Living Labs media activities at Ghent University in Belgium. He has obtained a Master in Communication Sciences (1999) and Marketing (2000) and wrote a PhD titled &lt;em&gt;Diffusion of ICT Innovations: More Accurate User Insight for Better Introduction Strategies&lt;/em&gt;. His main expertise is in the development of &quot;segmentation forecast&quot; tools for prior-to-launch adoption potential forecasts for new media and ICT innovations. He continuously seeks to explore new methodologies and understand emerging media use patterns and the impact of new media and ICT and making media innovation more user-centric. At the department of Communication Studies, he founded and coordinates the Master's program on New Media &amp; Society.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">European Network of Living Labs
Pieter Ballon is the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL). He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. From 2006 to 2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI) that united five integrated projects in the EU 6th Framework Programme. He holds a PhD in Communication Sciences and an MA in Modern History.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rowena Barrett</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation Rhetoric and Reality: An Introduction to the TIM Review's Special Issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Australia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Innovation and Science Agenda</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/992</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-10</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this introduction to the Technology Innovation Management Review's special issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia, Guest Editor Rowena Barrett reflects on the perceptions of &quot;innovation&quot;, both in terms of its evolving concepts and terminology (the rhetoric) and its frontline application (the reality). Prompted by the recent launch and ongoing implementation of Australia Government's National Innovation and Science Agenda's, this special issue focuses on insights into innovation and entrepreneurship from the Australian context.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Queensland University of Technology
Rowena Barrett is Head of the School of Management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. She has played leading roles in organizing, managing, and administering research in universities in Australia and the United Kingdom. Rowena holds a PhD from the University of Melbourne, Australia, on industrial relations in smaller firms, and she has spent many years investigating the ways people in smaller firms are managed and how those firms are organized. She has a sizeable portfolio of research publications including books, book chapters, journal articles, as well practitioner papers and reports. Her research has been funded by university, industry, and government sources in Australia and the United Kingdom. She has extensive experience in teaching in the areas of management, human resource management, and industrial relations, while she has supervised over 10 PhDs to successful completion. She has also held numerous board and council member positions, both within and beyond academia. In 2015, Rowena chaired the ISPIM Innovation Summit &quot;Changing the Innovation Landscape&quot;, which took place at QUT in Brisbane, Australia, from 6–9 December.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mahmoud Gad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ahmed Shah</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Intrusion Learning: An Overview of an Emergent Discipline</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">adversarial learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">clustering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">enterprise</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intrusion detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intrusion learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning algorithms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">machine learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">real-time analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resiliency</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">streaming network data</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/964</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15-20</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The purpose of this article is to provide a definition of intrusion learning, identify its distinctive aspects, and provide recommendations for advancing intrusion learning as a practice domain. The authors define intrusion learning as the collection of online network algorithms that learn from and monitor streaming network data resulting in effective intrusion-detection methods for enabling the security and resiliency of enterprise systems. The network algorithms build on advances in cyber-defensive and cyber-offensive capabilities. Intrusion learning is an emerging domain that draws from machine learning, intrusion detection, and streaming network data. Intrusion learning offers to significantly enhance enterprise security and resiliency through augmented perimeter defense and may mitigate increasing threats facing enterprise perimeter protection. The article will be of interest to researchers, sponsors, and entrepreneurs interested in enhancing enterprise security and resiliency.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation
Mahmoud M. Gad is a Research Associate at VENUS Cybersecurity. He holds a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Ottawa in Canada. Additionally, he holds an MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Maryland in College Park, United States. His research interests include cybercrime markets, machine learning for intrusion detection, analysis of large-scale networks, and cognitive radio networks.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Ahmed Shah holds a BEng in Software Engineering and is pursuing an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Ahmed has experience working in cybersecurity research with the VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation and has experience managing legal deliverables at IBM. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Trifilova</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Bessant</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Allen Alexander</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. How Can You Teach Innovation and Entrepreneurship?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tacit knowledge</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teaching innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">university–industry cooperation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1027</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">45-50</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exeter Business School 
Anna Trifilova is a Research Fellow at Exeter Business School in the United Kingdom. She is also a Professor at both Saint Petersburg State University, Russia, and at National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia. She is a visiting professor at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan. Anna is involved with ISPIM as an International Advisory Board member and a Leader of Teaching &amp; Coaching Innovation Special Interest Group. She is a Co-Founder of the Future ofInnovation.org. For the last three years, she has acted as an Executive Director for Europe, with DICAMP project in Tunisia, coordinating it on behalf of University of Leipzig, Germany. For the next three years, she is coordinating EU Knowledge Alliance TACIT project with the University of Exeter being the Applicant. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exeter Business School 
John Bessant is the Chair in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has visiting appointments at the universities of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Queensland University of Technology, and the National University of Ireland. Originally a chemical engineer, John has been active in the field of research and consultancy in technology and innovation management for over 35 years. He was elected as a Fellow of the British Academy of Management in 2003 and as a Fellow of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management in 2016. He has acted as advisor to various national governments and international bodies including the United Nations, The World Bank, and the OECD. He is the author of 30 books and many articles on the topic and has lectured and consulted widely around the world.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exeter Business School 
Allen Alexander is the Director of the University of Exeter Business School’s Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research and Chair of the University’s Science Park and Innovation Centres operating company in the United Kingdom. He is also a Senior Lecturer and researcher focusing on innovation, entrepreneurship, and specifically the role that knowledge plays in creating a corporate innovation capability. He is currently investigating a range of research and teaching grants, publishing the findings in the top international research journals. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susan Braedley</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research on Fire: Lessons Learned in Knowledge Mobilization</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">catalytic validity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge mobilization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">public policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">public services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research values</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1020</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53-58</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, I outline knowledge mobilization lessons learned while working on politically “hot button” issues in public policy research related to fire services. These lessons were shaped by the research funding context. Researchers are increasingly required to develop research relationships with government, industry, and community partners to ensure research is relevant to those who can best use it, to embed knowledge mobilization in research processes, to ensure that knowledge has an impact in the world beyond the academy, and to provide research funding. Perhaps not surprisingly, when my findings created challenges for research partners, controversies erupted, potentially imperiling my research program, career, and potential research impact. Drawing from my knowledge-mobilization experiences as well as those of other researchers, I offer some insights gained from mobilizing knowledge on a “hot topic” in public policy.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Susan Braedley is an Associate Professor in the School of Social Work at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She is co-editor of &lt;em&gt;Neoliberalism and Everyday Life&lt;/em&gt; (McGill-Queens University Press, 2010) and &lt;em&gt;Troubling Care&lt;/em&gt; (Canadian Press, 2013), and she is the author of many articles on social policy topics. She is a co-investigator on three large-scale comparative studies of long-term care policies and practices (funded by SSHRC and CIHR), as well as principal investigator on the SSHRC funded project “Equity Shifts: Employment Equity in Protective Services”. Her research and teaching focus on social policies and their implications for labour, gender, race, and class, and on research methodologies.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrea Baptiste</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TIM Lecture Series – Startup Life: Lessons Learned in Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lessons</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/981</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">41-42</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benbria Corporation
Andrea Baptiste is the President and CEO of Benbria Corporation. She is a veteran executive with more than 20 years of experience in telecommunications and network/service management. Prior to joining Benbria, Andrea was co-founder and CEO of Atreus Systems, where she successfully led the company’s growth resulting in its acquisition by Sonus Networks in 2008. Prior to co-founding Atreus Systems, Andrea was responsible for business development at Cambrian Systems, a metro DWDM equipment vendor that was acquired by Nortel Networks in 1998. Andrea’s experience in business leadership includes heading up venture capital financing rounds, merger and acquisitions, as well as establishing strategic partnerships with some of the world’s largest hardware and software companies. Andrea’s prior experience includes management positions at CrossKeys Systems, TeleSat Mobile Inc., and Newbridge Networks. Currently, Andrea is a member of the Queen’s Innovation Connector Advisory Board. Baptiste holds a BA Sc (Honours, Applied Science in Electrical Engineering) from Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and has achieved accreditation as a Professional Engineer of Ontario. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kamal Sakhdari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Underground Innovation: How to Encourage Bootlegging Employees to Disclose Their Good Ideas</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bootlegging</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">corporate entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">hidden ideas</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">qualitative research method</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R&amp;D departments</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/970</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-12</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Employees are increasingly considered as the origin of many corporate entrepreneurial ideas. Research on “bootlegging” posits that individuals often resort to hidden activities to elaborate their initial ideas and bring them to fruition. The origins and causes of bootlegging behaviour are well argued in the literature. Yet, less is known about what drives bootleggers to uncover their hidden ideas. This research uses field data from in-depth interviews with innovators in R&amp;D departments in different industries of Iran to identify factors stimulating bootleggers to reveal their underground ideas. We identified five groups of factors at individual, managerial, firm, industrial, and idea levels, explaining the revealing stage of bootlegging behaviour. The findings provide a better understanding of the later phases of bootlegging behaviour and the possible role of context-specific factors such as cultural and religious beliefs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Tehran
Kamal Sakhdari is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD in Business and Entrepreneurship from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, institutional theory, and international business. He is also a member of the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research (ACE) at the QUT Business School. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Tehran
Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi holds a Master's degree in Entrepreneurship from the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, and organizational behaviour. He has been working in the telecommunication industry for several years, and is now conducting a research project on bootlegging behaviour focusing on cultural and institutional factors.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Katarina Buhr</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maija Federley</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anja Karlsson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urban Living Labs for Sustainability in Suburbs in Need of Modernization and Social Uplift</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">city</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">suburb</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">urban</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/958</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-34</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A number of urban living labs have been set up in recent years, with the aim of developing innovation processes within a multi-stakeholder partnership in an urban context. Several urban living labs focus on sustainable development, which is a visible and urgent issue in less valued suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift. We argue that, when applying the living labs approach in the context of sustainable development in suburbs, the primary focus should be society’s collective goals, as expressed through municipalities and users. The aim of this article is to show examples of how urban living labs can be applied in less valued suburbs in order to contribute to sustainability based on societal goals. We build on analyses from the research project SubUrbanLab, where urban living labs were set up in Alby and Peltosaari, two suburban areas in Sweden and Finland, respectively. We draw lessons regarding how to use urban living labs for sustainable development in order to create favourable conditions for ongoing engagement with the municipality and users towards long-term sustainability. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IVL Swedish Environment Research Institute
Katarina Buhr is a Social Scientist at IVL Swedish Environment Research Institute. She holds a PhD in Business Administration (Organization and Management) from Uppsala University in Sweden and has been a post-doctoral researcher at Linköping University in Sweden. She has worked in several research projects related to urban sustainable development and has published widely on policy processes and public engagement in the environmental and sustainability field. In SubUrbanLab, she was particularly involved in the evaluation and scientific writing activities for the urban living labs in Alby, Sweden.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> VTT Technical Research Centre
Maija Federley is a Senior Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. She holds a Master of Science degree in technology from Helsinki University of Technology (currently Aalto University) in Finland. She has worked in several research projects related to co-development of digital services and environmental sustainability communication in stakeholder networks. In SubUrbanLab, she was particularly involved in designing and observing all urban living labs in Peltosaari, Finland, with a special interest in participatory methods and development of urban living lab practices and evaluation. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IVL Swedish Environment Research Institute
Anja Karlsson has worked at IVL Swedish Environment Research Institute since 2011. She holds a BSc in Political Science and Environmental Science from Gothenburg University, Sweden and an MSc from Uppsala University, Sweden. Her studies have focused on stakeholder and public participation in local and national decision making. She has worked in research projects related to sustainable development in urban areas, focusing on social sustainability and the involvement of residents and other stakeholders in urban development. In SubUrbanLab, she was particularly involved in the urban living labs in Alby, Sweden, and the evaluation of the urban living labs.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hugh Boyes</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity and Cyber-Resilient Supply Chains</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyber-resilience</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">risk management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">supply chain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">threat management</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/888</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-34</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">There has been a rapid growth in the use of communications and information technology, whether embedded in products, used to deliver services, or employed to enable integration and automation of increasingly global supply chains. Increased use of information technology introduces a number of cybersecurity risks affecting cyber-resilience of the supply chain, both in terms of the product or service delivered to a customer and supply chain operation. The situation is complicated by factors such as the global sourcing of technology components or software, ownership of the systems in a supply chain, different legal jurisdictions involved, and the extensive use of third parties to deliver critical functionality. This article examines the cyber-resilience issues related to the supply of products, services, and the supply chain infrastructure considering the nature of threats and vulnerabilities and the attributes of cybersecurity. In doing so, it applies a model for cybersecurity that is adapted from the Parkerian hexad to explore the security and trustworthiness facets of supply chain operations that may impact cyber-resilience.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Warwick
Hugh Boyes is a Principal Fellow at WMG at the University of Warwick, United Kingdom, where he focuses on cyber-resilience and the cybersecurity of cyber-physical systems. He is a Chartered Engineer, a Fellow of the IET and holds the CISSP credential issued by (ISC)&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Hugh is also the Cyber Security Lead at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), where he focuses on developing cybersecurity skills initiatives for engineering and technology communities. This work is particularly focused on the design and operation of physical-cyber systems (e.g., industrial control systems, building automation systems). He has written two guidance documents for the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) on cybersecurity in the built environment, and with Alex Luck, is the joint technical author of a BSI publicly available specification (PAS) on security-minded building information modeling, digital built environments, and smart asset management.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Cybersecurity (January 2015)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">automotive manufacturing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">botnet takedowns</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">botnets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">commercialization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical infrastructure</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyber-attacks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">employee training</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">gamification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Internet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">outsourcing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantum key distribution</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/860</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olivier Rits</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value network</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/949</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business model and living lab research both have similar objectives – to maximize the probability of successful market introduction of innovative solutions – be it through different means. Yet, there are still only few studies or reports discussing both, with those studies that do touch the subject staying at a high level. iMinds Living Labs has gained a lot of experience in combined living lab and business model innovation projects and, rather than being competing approaches, our results have shown that these two research methodologies can be complementary, where the combined approach turns out to be more powerful than each individual approach used alone. The goal of this article is to promote the inclusion of business model research in a model of &quot;a living lab as a service&quot; (and vice versa) by explaining the benefits and by introducing a practical framework to implement such combined research tracks based on the experience at iMinds Living Labs over the past few years.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Olivier Rits graduated as an Engineer in Applied Physics from Ghent University in Belgium. Olivier joined Alcatel-Lucent as a business developer where he worked on the go2market strategy for innovative solutions, both on networking and applications. He joined iMinds in 2013, focusing on the intersection between technology, business, and innovation. Olivier leads the business model practice at the iMinds Living Labs, where he is responsible for the methodologies used and providing business support to startups, SMEs, and larger organizations.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Dimitri Schuurman holds a PhD (2015) and Master's degree in Communication Sciences (2003) from Ghent University in Belgium. He joined the research group iMinds – MICT – Ghent University in 2005 and started working at iMinds Living Labs in 2009. Together with his iMinds colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at startups and SMEs, in which he has managed over 50 innovation projects. As a senior researcher, Dimitri is currently responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of living lab projects. He also coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers from iMinds – MICT – Ghent University. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. In early 2015, he finished his PhD entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Pieter Ballon is the Director of iMinds Living Labs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and a Professor at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was senior consultant and team leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Odd Jarl Borch</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marina Z. Solesvik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation on the Open Sea: Examining Competence Transfer and Open Innovation in the Design of Offshore Vessels</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arctic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cooperative design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">core competencies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">offshore operations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">shipbuilding</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/926</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we discuss the role of open innovation in collaborative design processes in mature industries such as the shipping industry. We examine the design of high-tech offshore service vessels in environments characterized by high volatility and complexity. We elaborate on the role that accumulating and sharing core competences plays in speeding up the innovation process and increasing product value. We present a longitudinal case study of a shipping company implementing an open innovation approach that integrates its own core competences in offshore operations with the competences of ship designers and ship builders to develop a new design for challenging environments. In this article, we draw on an open innovation approach and a competence-based view to demonstrate how the firm can &quot;reach out&quot; to gain novel competences related to innovation, which may transform the competitive environment to the firm’s advantage. The article would be useful to innovation scholars and practitioners who work with innovative product development.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Nordland
Odd Jarl Borch is a Professor of Strategy and Business Development at the University of Nordland in Bodø, Norway, and he is a Senior Researcher at Nordland Research Institute, also in Bodø. His research fields include corporate strategy, business development, innovation and entrepreneurship. Odd Jarl has published extensively in national and international journals and has broad teaching experience in addition to his comprehensive academic writings.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stord/Haugesund University College
Marina Z. Solesvik is a Professor of Innovation and Management at the Stord/Haugesund University College in Norway. She also holds part-time positions in Norway as Professor at the University of Tromsø, the University of Nordland, and Bergen University College. She is a board member at several Norwegian firms and organizations, including the National Riksteatret in Oslo. Marina holds a PhD in Management from the Graduate Business School at the University of Nordland and a PhD in Entrepreneurship from the Institute of Agrarian Economy in Kiev, Ukraine. Her research interests include regional innovation, open innovation, maritime business, entrepreneurial intentions, female entrepreneurship, strategic alliances, and Arctic research.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Claude Baron</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philippe Esteban</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rui Xue</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Esteve</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michel Malbert</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Method and Tool to Support the Management of Systems Engineering Projects</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaborative engineering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">decision support</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">engineering processes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">project management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">system design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems engineering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems engineering standards</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/878</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18-28</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Too many industrial projects still fail, mainly due to the managerial techniques used. Indeed, organizational processes are more or less specifically mentioned in systems engineering standards, but in practice, project managers tend to rely more on their own standards, which sometimes set forth practices that do not align with those of the systems engineering domain, hence the reported discrepancies that very often lead to project failure. Thus, we argue that, to improve the companies’ competitiveness when developing new products, cooperation between processes related to system development and project management is key to achieving performance and success. This article presents arguments that tend to support this assertion and introduces an ongoing project to develop both a method and tool that aim to integrate both domains.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS
Claude Baron is a Professor of Computer Sciences at the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA) of the University of Toulouse, France. She teaches systems engineering, system design and modelling, and system reliability for real-time and critical embedded software systems in master's programs. Her current research focuses on systems engineering, collaborative engineering, and project management in engineering projects. She develops her research activities in the LAAS-CNRS laboratory in Toulouse. She is the author or co-author of many international articles and several books, and she has received IEEE and INCOSE awards for her work.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS
Philippe Esteban is Associate Professor at the University of Toulouse, France. He conducts his research on systems engineering at the LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS (French National Center for Sciences and Research). He is an expert in the domain of the design and verification of complex and hybrids systems. His predilection domain of application is embedded systems.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS
Rui Xue is a PhD Candidate at LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS (French National Center for Sciences and Research) in Toulouse, France. She received her ME degree in Computer Software and Theory in the year 2012 from Jilin University, China. Her PhD topic is about systems engineering, project management, system modelling, decision processes, and decision engineering.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS
Daniel Esteve is Emeritus Research Director at LAAS Laboratory of the CNRS (French National Center for Sciences and Research) in Toulouse, France. In 1968, he joined the LAAS-CNRS to participate in the development of microelectronics. In 1974, his research work took a new turn towards the management of different programs. In 1981, he was appointed Director of LAAS and later became Head of the Electronics and Computer Sciences Department at the French Ministry of Research and Technology. He is now Emeritus Research Director, and his investigations mainly concern the development of tools and processes needed in the design of complex systems and microsystems. Dr. Esteve has been awarded the CNRS medal of research (1969 and 1976) and the BLONDEL medal.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Michel Malbert is an entrepreneur and consultant, and he holds a doctorate in Physics from the University of Toulouse. For more than thirty years, he was the CEO and founder of a company involved in applied mathematics. Its main activities were to model and simulate the interaction between elementary particles and matter, and to apply statistical methods to industrial problems. His interests include modelling, simulation, Monte Carlo methods, and others statistical methods.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bernhard R. Katzy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Claudia Bücker</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Organization of Living Labs: Coordinating Activities for Regional Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">activities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ideation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">processes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venturing</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/927</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23-28</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article contributes to the ongoing knowledge from the first decade of operating living labs with a study on the coordination of novel innovation activities in living labs. The article provides an organizational model for living labs to order the activities that eventually will allow the conceptualization of living labs as innovation systems, thus giving user involvement a more central role in innovation process theories. This article shows how innovation networks systematically align their activities to reliably achieve their objectives. Next to this interpretivist theoretical contribution, the article contributes relevant practical insights to technology innovation management practitioners based on in-depth living lab cases that exhibit interesting, relevant, and new activities.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Center for Technology and Innovation Management (CeTIM)
Bernhard Katzy is Professor of Technology and Innovation Management at University BW Munich in Germany and Leiden University in the Netherlands. He is also a Co-Founder of the Center for Technology and Innovation Management (CeTIM). He started his professional career with an apprenticeship as a car mechanic and later earned Master of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering and Business Management. Bernhard holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from RWTH Aachen University of Technology, Germany, and a second PhD (Habilitation) in Technology Management from the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland. His research interests are the entrepreneurial management of fast-growing high-tech firms and the management of strategic change in the transition to the information age.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Center for Technology and Innovation Management (CeTIM)
Claudia Bücker is Co-Founder and Director of the Center for Technology and Innovation Management (CeTIM). In this capacity, she has been involved in numerous entrepreneurial innovation activities combining theory and practice. Claudia is an experienced project manager of publicly funded projects and also has been involved in the coaching of privately funded startups. She is a lecturer in the &quot;ICT in Business&quot; program of Leiden University in the Netherlands. She holds a PhD in Biochemistry from RWTH Aachen University of Technology in Germany.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carina Ihlström Eriksson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Ståhlbröst</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Places and Spaces within Living Labs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">influence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">openness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">place</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">realism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">space</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/951</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">37-47</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we propose the concepts of places and spaces as conceptual tools to facilitate the organization of innovation activities within living labs. We have taken a pragmatic perspective on these concepts regarding how they are integrated in design situations, and how different types of places and spaces can facilitate or hinder innovation. We have found that, by applying openness, realism, and influence in the different spaces of our living lab milieus, they have transformed into many different places depending on the stakeholders involved, the methods chosen, and the facilitation of activities. Hence, by understanding this line of reasoning, living lab managers can make more informed decisions and plans for innovation activities.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn is Pro-Vice Chancellor and Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Birgitta’s research interests concern design-oriented research focused on participatory design in distributed and open environments; human-centric and appreciative methodologies for design and learning; value-based information systems development; the increasing overlap between stakeholder participation and labour sourcing, and its consequences for value creation and value capture. She has published over 60 articles within these areas, and she has participated in a large number of national and international research projects. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halmstad University
Carina Ihlström Eriksson is Associate Professor in Informatics at Halmstad University in Sweden, where she is also the manager of &lt;a href=&quot;http://halmstadlivinglab.se&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Halmstad Living Lab&lt;/a&gt;. Carina’s research interests concerns digital innovation services, user and stakeholder involvement in innovation processes, living labs, value networks, and business models within the application areas of media and health innovation. She has published more than 50 articles within these areas and has managed and participated in numerous research projects.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Anna Ståhlbröst is an Associate Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Her research is focused on the phenomena of living labs and open, user-driven innovation processes, with special interest in end-user needs and motivations. Anna's research is related to different application areas such as energy, domestic-IT use, and smart cities. She has participated in several international and national innovation and research projects, and she is currently involved in the IoT Lab project financed by the European Commission. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stephen Cummings</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris Bilton</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dt ogilvie</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toward a New Understanding of Creative Dynamics: From One-Size-Fits-All Models to Multiple and Dynamic Forms of Creativity</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action-embedded creativity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creative dynamics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creativities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creativity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creativitying</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/910</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14-24</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article proposes an alternative to a managerial &quot;best practice&quot; approach to creativity based on the notion of creativity as a singular concept. Our alternative draws on three fundamental ideas that are emerging in different pockets of the creativity literature in a way that can be readily conceptualized and applied in practice. The first idea is that creativity is really about &quot;creativities&quot;, or a cluster of different and discrete qualities that can be combined to suit the context in which they operate. The second is that creativity is not static: it is about &quot;creativitying&quot;, or the action and the practice of combining these creativities, which evolve over time. The third is that being creative in organizations is not an individual act: rather, it is the multiple activities of groups as they go about creativitying.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Victoria University of Wellington 
Stephen Cummings is Professor of Strategy and ICMCI Academic Fellow at Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. He has published on strategy, creativity, and management history in a range of journals including the &lt;em&gt;Academy of Management Learning and Education Journal, Academy of Management Perspectives, Human Relations, Long Range Planning,&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Organization Studies&lt;/em&gt;. He has also written, co-written and edited a number of books promoting creative approaches to strategy development. These include &lt;em&gt;Recreating Strategy&lt;/em&gt; (2002), &lt;em&gt;Images of Strategy&lt;/em&gt; (2003), &lt;em&gt;Creative Strategy&lt;/em&gt; (2010), &lt;em&gt;The Handbook of Management and Creativity&lt;/em&gt; (2014), and &lt;em&gt;Strategy Builder: How to Create and Communicate More Effective Strategies&lt;/em&gt; (2015).</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Warwick
Chris Bilton is Reader in the Centre for Cultural Policy Studies at the University of Warwick, United Kingdom, where he specializes in management of creativity and creativity of management. He is the author, editor, and co-author of several books on creative management and creative strategy and teaches modules on creative business and marketing. Chris has a background in theatre and in community arts, which he gained before entering the world of academia. His research interests include: leadership, strategy, and structure in creative organizations; cultural policy and the creative industries; and structure of the creative economy. He is currently working on a book about marketing in the creative industries, for publication in 2016.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saunders College of Business/Rochester Institute of Technology 
dt ogilvie is Distinguished Professor of Urban Entrepreneurship and former Dean of Saunders College of Business at Rochester Institute of Technology, in New York, United States, where she founded the Center for Urban Entrepreneurship (CUE). She is formerly Professor of Business Strategy &amp; Urban Entrepreneurship at Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick (RBS), where she founded The Center for Urban Entrepreneurship &amp; Economic Development (CUEED) and the Scholarship Training and Enrichment Program (STEP). She has published in top journals and five of her research papers have been recognized with research awards. Her research interests include strategic decision making and the use of creativity to enhance business and battlefield decision making and applying complexity theory to strategy and creativity; executive leadership strategies of multicultural women executives; women in the executive suite; strategic thinking in the 21st century; cognition and strategic decision making; entrepreneurship and economic development of urban cities; and assessing environmental dimensions.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jesper Bank</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adnan Raza</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Collaborative Idea Management: A Driver of Continuous Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaborative idea management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdsourcing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">culture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">leadership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/764</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11-16</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Despite the critical importance of innovation to most companies' ongoing success, many organizations fail to develop sustainable innovation management processes. The article explores the application of collaborative idea management to drive continuous innovation in large organizations based on our experience at Waabii, an innovation software and consulting service provider. First, we identify the key roadblocks faced by organizations in managing their innovation processes. Next, we describe the innovation model created at Waabii to help implement a sustainable innovation process, and we present a case study of an innovation management software solution, Exago Idea Market, which was implemented to create a collaborative and sustainable innovation environment in a large global telecommunications company. Finally, we offer recommendations for implementing this model of collaborative idea management. This article is particularly relevant to managers in larger organizations and practitioners of organizational change seeking to identify inhibitors of growth and business innovation and how to combat the roadblocks and create a sustainable innovation environment.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Waabii Limited
Jesper Bank is CEO and Co-Founder of Waabii Limited, where he is responsible for the company’s strategic direction and partnership development in North America. He works with leaders in public and private sector organizations around the world to help increase collaboration, engage employees in idea generation, and convert great ideas into value. For over a decade, Jesper has helped companies achieve profitable growth through business process improvement, and he currently provides counsel in the areas of strategy clarification, innovation management, and business-process redesign. He also provides idea management software and consulting services that enable firms to identify and prioritize the winning ideas within their organizations. Jesper holds a TRIUM Global Executive MBA from New York University Stern School of Business, London School of Economics and Political Science, and HEC School of Management in Paris, and he has substantive international experience having lived and worked in both North America and Europe.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Waabii Limited
Adnan Raza is an Innovation Consultant for Waabii Limited, where he provides business support advice and consultancy for Waabii’s idea management solutions. He works with innovation teams in global organizations to improve their business and product innovation processes through novel insights and analysis. He has worked for more than four years in helping global organizations manage innovation through competitive market analysis, as well as the management and protection of intellectual property portfolios. He holds a BASc in Electrical Engineering from the University of Windsor, Canada, and an MBA from Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, Canada.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Zijdemans</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity Startups: The Importance of Early and Rapid Globalization</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">born global</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">globalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/845</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14-21</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Corporations and government agencies worldwide seek to ensure that their networks are safe from cyber-attacks, and startups are being launched to take advantage of this expanded market for cybersecurity products, services, and solutions. The cybersecurity market is inherently global; therefore, cybersecurity startups must globalize to survive. With this article, we fill a gap in the literature by identifying the factors that make a technology startup valuable to specific stakeholders (e.g., investors, customers, employees) and by providing a tool and illustrating a process to describe, design, challenge, and invent the actions that should be performed to globalize a cybersecurity startup early and rapidly for the purpose of increasing its value. The development of the tool builds on recent advances in the resource-based literature, the review of the literature on born-global firms and business model discovery processes, and the experience gained operating the Lead to Win ecosystem. This article will be of interest to entrepreneurs and their venture teams, investors, business development agencies, advisors, and mentors of cybersecurity startups as well as researchers who develop tools and approaches that are relevant to technology entrepreneurs. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program in Ottawa, Canada. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and the early and rapid globalization of technology ventures. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Erik Alexander Zijdemans is a Master’s degree candidate in Product Development and Innovation with a focus on Global Supply Chain Development at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. He holds a BEng in Business Engineering from Hogeschool Utrecht, The Netherlands. Currently, he is conducting his research on the role of business development agencies in the support of early globalization in technology startups at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Cybersecurity (November 2014)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crimeware</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyber-attacks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">globalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">malware</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">safety</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science of cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific contributions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/843</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Cybersecurity (October 2014)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberattacks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberthreats</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/833</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rituparna Basu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entrepreneurship Education in India: A Critical Assessment and a Proposed Framework</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">India</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">marketing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">qualitative research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/817</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-10</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entrepreneurship education is considered as one of the most influential forces that determine the health of the economy. Hence, ignoring controversies on whether entrepreneurship can be taught, the majority of the top business schools in India offer entrepreneurship education with tailored elective courses to inculcate a wide range of skills encompassing a multi-disciplinary approach among mature management students. However, considering the basic synergies of core management subjects such as marketing and entrepreneurship, both of which provide an opportunity to develop unique solutions to satisfy customer needs, the study of entrepreneurial aspects as a prerequisite for management education and research seems indispensable when specifically catering to the growing entrepreneurial intent in developing economies. This approach necessitates a compulsory initiation of entrepreneurship courses early in the curricula of contemporary business schools. In this context, the present article aims to qualitatively review the current entrepreneurship education regime in India to propose an effective ecosystem for integrating and promoting entrepreneurship education as fundamental to mainstream business education in India.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Management Institute Kolkata
Rituparna Basu is Assistant Professor in Marketing, Retail, and Entrepreneurship at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. She earned her PhD in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur. She holds a BSc in Economics from St. Xavier's College, Kolkata, and she received a gold medal for her MBA degree. Dr. Basu has over 10 years of industry-academia experience, and she has worked with some of the best-known media companies as well as a startup niche magazine in national sales and marketing profiles for around five years prior to joining IIT.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sen Bao</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marja Toivonen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Finnish Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in China: Market Entry and Position in the Value Chain</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization of services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">KIBS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge-intensive business services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Western companies in China</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/784</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43-52</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The internationalization of companies offering knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) plays an important role in the general process of globalization. As the largest emerging market, China is attractive for Western KIBS. This article presents a case study on Finnish KIBS in China. Three companies in &quot;clean tech&quot; engineering, eco-cities design, and 3D media solutions describe the challenges and promoting factors in entering the Chinese markets. The study also examines the various ways of positioning the firm in the value chain through the roles of an integrator, a concept developer, and a multi-stage actor. Our findings illustrate the new business opportunities provided by China in advanced service sectors focusing on sustainability issues and creative content. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Sen Bao is PhD candidate in the School of Science at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, where he also holds a Master’s degree in Service Management and Engineering. He also works as Research Scientist in Business Ecosystems Development at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. He has over 4 years’ working experience in service industries, half of it in the ICT sector. Currently, his research interests focus on service business development and internationalization of services. He is carrying out a research project on the service activities of Finnish manufacturers and technological knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) in China. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VTT Technical Research Centre 
Marja Toivonen is Research Professor at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, her specialty being service innovation and service business models. She is also Adjunct Professor at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Marja has written several articles on service-related topics and been an invited speaker in many international conferences focusing on these topics. She is a council member of the European Association for Research on Services (RESER), and she is a member of the European Union's 2013–2014 High-Level Expert Group on Business Services. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Renaud Levesque</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">D’Arcy Walsh</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Online World of the Future: Safe, Productive, and Creative</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bisociation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">excludability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">future vision</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Industrial Internet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Internet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Internet of Everything</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Internet of Things</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">online</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">productivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rivalry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">safety</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">security</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/834</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-12</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A safer online world is required to attain higher levels of productivity and creativity. We offer a view of a future state of the online world that places safety, productivity, and creativity above all else. The online world envisaged for 2030 is safe (i.e., users communicate with accuracy and enduring confidence), productive (i.e., users make timely decisions that have an ongoing global effect), and creative (i.e., users can connect seemingly unrelated information online). The proposed view differs from other views of the future online world that are anchored around technology solutions, confrontation, deception, and personal or commercial gain. The following seven conditions characterize the proposed view of the online world: i) global-scale autonomous learning systems; ii) humans co-working with machines; iii) human factors that are authentic and transferrable; iv) global scale whole-brain communities; v) foundational knowledge that is authentic and transferrable; vi) timely productive communication; and vii) continuous technological adaptation. These conditions are expected to enable new social-behavioural, socio-technical, and organizational interaction models. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Communications Security Establishment
Renaud Levesque is the Director General of Core Systems at the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) in Ottawa, Canada, where he is responsible for R&amp;D and systems development. He has significant experience in the delivery of capability and organizational change in highly technical environments. His career began at CSE in 1986 as a Systems Engineer, responsible for the development and deployment of numerous systems, including the CSE IP corporate network in 1991. In 2000 Renaud went to work in the private sector as Head of Speech Technologies at Locus Dialogue, and later at Infospace Inc., where he became Director of Speech Solutions Engineering. He rejoined CSE in 2003, where he assumed the lead role in the IT R&amp;D section. Subsequently, as a Director General, he focused efforts towards the emergence of CSE's Joint Research Office and The Tutte Institute for Mathematics and Computing. Renaud holds a Bachelor of Engineering from l’École Polytechnique, Université de Montréal, Canada.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Communications Security Establishment
D’Arcy Walsh is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) in Ottawa, Canada. His research interests include software-engineering methods and techniques that support the development and deployment of dynamic systems, including dynamic languages, dynamic configuration, context-aware systems, and autonomic and autonomous systems. He received his BAH from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and he received his BCS, his MCS, and his PhD in Computer Science from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Derek Smith</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Asrar Alshaikh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rawan Bojan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anish Kak</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mohammad Mehdi Gharaei Manesh</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Overcoming Barriers to Collaboration in an Open Source Ecosystem</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration barriers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">communities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">competitors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">complementors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">core community</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">governance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">open source</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/758</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leveraging open source practices provides value to businesses when entrepreneurs and managers understand how to collaborate effectively in an open source ecosystem. However, the complex mix of different actors and varying barriers to effective collaboration in the ecosystem pose a substantial challenge. How can a business create and capture value if it depends on effective collaboration among these different groups? In this article, we review the published research on open source collaboration and reveal insights that will be beneficial to entrepreneurs and managers. We organize the published research into four streams based upon the following actor groups: i) governance actors, ii) competitors, iii) complementors, and iv) the core community. Then, through induction and synthesis, we identify barriers to collaboration, first by ecosystem and then by actor group. Finally, we offer six recommendations for identifying and overcoming barriers to collaboration in an open source ecosystem.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Derek Smith is the founder and principal of Magneto Innovention Management, an intellectual property consulting firm that assists entrepreneurs and small businesses with difficult intellectual property issues. He has over 20 years of experience working as an intellectual property management consultant and patent agent for IBM Canada, Bell Canada and, most recently, Husky Injection Molding Systems where he was Director, Global Intellectual Property. Prior to entering the field of intellectual property, he was an advisory engineer at IBM Canada where he was involved in a variety of leading-edge software development projects. Derek is currently a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He also holds a BEng degree in Systems and Computer Engineering from Carleton University and is a registered patent agent in both Canada and the United States.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Asrar Abdulqader Alshaikh is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She holds a Bachelor of Accounting degree from King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Her work experience includes customer service in a sale for distribution and communication company as well as working for the Alahli Bank (NCB) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Her main area of research interest is collaborative consumption.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Rawan Mohammad Bojan is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She has professional experience in the banking industry and holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Anish Kak is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a BEng degree in Computer Science Engineering, from Birla Institute of Technology in India. Anish has two years of experience in the information technology services sector, which he gained while working for Hewlett-Packard in India. His research interests include the electronic sports ecosystem.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mohammad Mehdi Gharaei Manesh is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds an MBA degree from Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business and also has a degree in Biomedical Engineering from Tehran Polytechnic University in Iran. He has 5 years of working experience in a medical equipment company and his main area of interest relates to crowdsourcing and international business. </style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susmita Ghosh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bhaskar Bhowmick</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalyan Kumar Guin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Perceived Environmental Uncertainty for Startups: A Note on Entrepreneurship Research from an Indian Perspective</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business environment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emerging economies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">India</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">uncertainty</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/820</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-35</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In an entrepreneurship environment, understanding uncertainty is critical to startups because it is directly related to the context of decision making. In an emerging country such as India, uncertainties are more predominant due to the very nature of the emerging country, which is characterized by an underdeveloped institutional setup, a lack of protection for legal and intellectual property rights, underdeveloped factor markets, and high transaction costs. In this article, a systematic review of the existing literature on environment and uncertainty in an entrepreneurial, emerging-economy context identifies a gap of a new scale for perceived environmental uncertainty. Three primary contributions are made by this research. First, a literature review for existing uncertainty scales and their evaluation in the context of emerging countries is provided. Second, the research identifies a gap in the uncertainty measurement literature that is relevant to emerging economies. Finally, this study proposes a future research scope that can bridge the identified gap by exploring the factors of uncertainty in emerging countries. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Susmita Ghosh is a Research Scholar at Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Currently she is pursuing her doctoral degree in Entrepreneurship, with a research focus on uncertainties in decision making for startups. Her other current research interests include entrepreneurial business incubation and uncertainty in product development. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Bhaskar Bhowmick is an as Assistant Professor at Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He completed his PhD from the Indian Institute of Management Ahmadabad with a specialization in Business Policy. He has thirteen years of industry experience in sales and marketing. His research interests include strategy-sustenance-succession, leadership strategy, and uncertainty in product development, innovation, and entrepreneurship.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punit Saurabh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prabha Bhola</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalyan Kumar Guin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reviewing the Knowledge Systems of Innovation and the Associated Roles of Major Stakeholders in the Indian Context</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">government</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">higher-education institutions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stakeholders</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">university</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/821</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36-45</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we review various models of knowledge systems and discusses the relationships between various component stakeholders of innovation, namely higher-education institutions, industry, and government. The article uses India as a case study to examine new challenges and opportunities facing its innovation ecosystem. Within this context, we review existing models of knowledge systems through an innovative representation exemplifying the knowledge landscape and the model positioning. We argue for a reinforcing role of major stakeholders in the proliferation of innovation and entrepreneurship, and the need to promote healthy interactions between them.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Punit Saurabh recently completed his PhD in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship development from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He has hands-on experience in managing government innovation and entrepreneurship funding programs and is also involved with the academic aspects of entrepreneurship. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Prabha Bhola is an Assistant Professor in the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India, where she also received her PhD in Poverty Economics. She has wide range of teaching experience at different institutions.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul E. Renaud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sheppard D. Narkier</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using a Capability Perspective to Sustain IT Improvement</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">capability improvement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">capability maturity model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">change management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">competency capability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">enterprise architecture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT function</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizational culture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizational learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process capability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">shadow IT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology capability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/802</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-39</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A firm’s dependency on the information technology (IT) function is increasingly central to its ability to innovate. The IT function must balance this need for change with sustaining consistent, highly reliable operation of all existing services. A firm’s ability to rapidly change IT is impeded by its legacy portfolio of applications and infrastructure because changes need to be very carefully managed and understood in order to avoid unintended consequences leading to system failure and process breakdown. The change imperative for IT is urgent and often determines how IT is valued by the rest of the firm. 

Improving the IT function’s agility requires improvement in IT capabilities, which can be categorized into three broad classes: technology, process, and competency. This article identifies the critical success factors for creating sustainable change for each of these three capability classes. It draws on the practical experience of the authors and leverages appropriate standards that provide grounding for change within the IT function of the firm, along with the roles and tasks that will be involved in this change agency. The article is of primary benefit for IT executives seeking to sustain an ongoing, systematic transformation of the IT function to enable IT entrepreneurship and agility.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Lanigan Group
Paul Renaud is Chief Executive of The Lanigan Group, which specializes in customer-driven product strategy and business-aligned IT service delivery. He is an advisor to CEOs, CTOs, and CIOs in the technology community and he is a member of industry advisory boards, including Queen’s University’s Innovation Council for the School of Computing and Ubiquity’s Chairman’s Advisory Board prior to its acquisition by Avaya. His previous roles include VP Business Intelligence Development at Cognos, Director of Computing &amp; Networking and the Advanced Computing Research Lab at Bell Northern Research, Director of Nortel’s Public Network Switching Capacity program and Chief Architect at SHL Systemhouse. Mr. Renaud is a co-author of several patents and authored &lt;em&gt;Introduction to Client/Server Systems&lt;/em&gt;, which was published in four languages and widely used as a university textbook. He has a BSc degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from Queens University.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sheppard Narkier is a business-driven, senior information technology executive who generates business value where investment in enabling technology is an integral part of a company’s business strategy. Sheppard’s experience spans roles as a senior executive, enterprise architect, systems engineer, and developer. He has been recognized for building strong, diverse, and motivated teams that have delivered measurable business value in diverse IT environments. He has implemented mission-critical systems, reusable assets, and technology roadmaps in premier financial services institutions such as the American Stock Exchange, S&amp;P, and UBS-IB. Sheppard was a co-founder and Chief Scientist of Adaptivity, which was acquired by EMC. Sheppard is responsible guiding EMC’s application transformation portfolio strategy. Sheppard has a BA in both Mathematics and Anthropology from Oswego State, NY. He is the co-author on several patents, has written thought-leadership blogs for Network World, Adaptivity, and EMC InFocus, and has ghost-written the book &lt;em&gt;Next Generation Datacenters in Financial Services: Driving Extreme Efficiency and Effective Cost Savings&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sonia Bot is an accomplished operational executive who has experienced a wide range of climates in businesses, from unprecedented extreme highs and lows through to various stages of lifecycle development, transformation, and turnaround. She is an entrepreneurial-minded leader and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. Ms. Bot is the Chief Executive of The BOT Consulting Group Inc., where she partners with executives and entrepreneurs of global technology companies in to assist in building, growing, and transforming ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Ms. Bot is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles, and industry executive member of university and business acceleration boards. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion (BlackBerry), Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dan Craigen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Hudson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Renaud Levesque</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stuart McKeen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">D’Arcy Walsh</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developing an Innovation Engine to Make Canada a Global Leader in Cybersecurity</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation engine</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation in commercialization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation in research and development</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/711</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-14</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An engine designed to convert innovation into a country’s global leadership position in a specific product market is examined in this article, using Canada and cybersecurity as an example. Five entities are core to the innovation engine: an ecosystem, a project community, an external community, a platform, and a corporation. The ecosystem is the focus of innovation in firm-specific factors that determine outcomes in global competition; the project community is the focus of innovation in research and development; and the external community is the focus of innovation in resources produced and used by economic actors that operate outside of the focal product market. Strategic intent, governance, resource flows, and organizational agreements bind the five entities together. Operating the innovation engine in Canada is expected to improve the level and quality of prosperity, security, and capacity of Canadians, increase the number of Canadian-based companies that successfully compete globally in cybersecurity product markets, and better protect Canada’s critical infrastructure. Researchers interested in learning how to create, implement, improve, and grow innovation engines will find this article interesting. The article will also be of interest to senior management teams in industry and government, chief information and technology officers, social and policy analysts, academics, and individual citizens who wish to learn how to secure cyberspace. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Communications Security Establishment Canada 
Dan Craigen is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). Previously, he was President of ORA Canada, a company that focused on High Assurance/Formal Methods and distributed its technology to over 60 countries. His research interests include formal methods, the science of cybersecurity, and technology transfer. He was the chair of two NATO research task groups pertaining to validation, verification, and certification of embedded systems and high-assurance technologies. He received his BScH in Math and his MSc in Math from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
David Hudson has recently completed his doctoral studies at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He is a lecturer in information technology innovation in the MBA program at Sprott, a Director of the Lead to Win entrepreneurship program, and Chair of the Ontario Centres of Excellence advisory board for the Information, Communication, and Digital Media sector. David also consults with Fortune 500 firms on innovation management. Previously, he was the Vice President for advanced research and development at a large technology firm and has had an extensive career in technology development and product line management. David received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Canada.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Communications Security Establishment Canada 
Renaud Levesque is the Director General of Core Systems at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), where he is responsible for R&amp;D and systems development. He has significant experience in the delivery of capability and organizational change in highly technical environments. His career began at CSEC in 1986 as a Systems Engineer, responsible for the development and deployment of numerous systems, including the CSEC IP corporate network in 1991. In 2000 Renaud went to work in the private sector as Head of Speech Technologies at Locus Dialogue, and later at Infospace Inc., where he became Director of Speech Solutions Engineering. He rejoined CSEC in 2003, where he assumed the lead role in the IT R&amp;D section. Subsequently, as a Director General, he focused efforts towards the emergence of CSEC's Joint Research Office and The Tutte Institute for Mathematics and Computing. Renaud holds a Bachelor of Engineering from l’École Polytechnique, Université de Montréal, Canada.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
Stuart McKeen works for the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI), where he just finished serving a three-year secondment with the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev). At FedDev, he was both the Agency’s Manager of Innovation and the Manager of Entrepreneurship, Internship, and Youth Programs. He has worked in six different ministries of the Ontario Government over the past 30 years. In 2008, he was awarded the Amethyst Award, the Province of Ontario’s highest employee recognition award for his pioneering work on prospecting and developing large-scale international research consortiums that have brought jobs and investment to Ontario. Stuart holds a BScH degree in Zoology from the University of Western Ontario, Canada and a BA degree in Economics from the University of Toronto, Canada.</style></custom5><custom6><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Communications Security Establishment Canada
D’Arcy Walsh is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). His research interests include software-engineering methods and techniques that support the development and deployment of dynamic systems, including dynamic languages, dynamic configuration, context-aware systems, and autonomic and autonomous systems. He received his BAH from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and he received his BCS, his MCS, and his PhD in Computer Science from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.</style></custom6></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Ecosystem-Based Job-Creation Engine Fuelled by Technology Entrepreneurs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">economic development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incubator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">job creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lead To Win</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/658</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Job creation is at the centre of the rationale provided by governments and publicly funded organizations for investing in services purported to support entrepreneurs to launch and grow technology startups. However, little is known about how to design and build the engines that convert these publicly funded services into jobs in a region. In this article, we argue that the architecture of a job-creation engine fuelled by technology entrepreneurs is important and that it should be made visible to the stakeholders of a regional venture system. The manner in which the components of a job-creation engine are organized and integrated determines the effectiveness and efficiency of the conversion of public funds into jobs. Making visible the architecture of a job-creation engine enables individuals and organizations to: i) better understand the link between the investment made to service technology entrepreneurs and systematic job creation; ii) utilize the regional venture system more effectively; and iii) set the performance benchmark for capability improvement and rapid adjustment to environmental changes. The experience gained from operating Lead To Win since 2009 is used to describe the architecture of a job-creation engine fuelled by technology entrepreneurs that operate in Canada’s Capital Region. Lead To Win is an ecosystem designed to help a technology venture generate sufficient revenue to create six or more knowledge jobs in the region within three years of inception. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (&lt;a href=&quot;http://carleton.ca/tim&quot;&gt;TIM&lt;/a&gt;) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lead To Win Council
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded leader/executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, product management and delivery, business transformation and strategy, and leading organizational change. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed published articles, and industry executive member of the Technology Entrepreneurship &amp; Commercialization Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently partners with executives and entrepreneurs of small-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies to assist in building, growing, and transforming new ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion / BlackBerry, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. In November 2012, Ms. Bot received the honour of &quot;Innovators &amp; Entrepreneurs&quot; by the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Toronto. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Cybersecurity (August 2013)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Canada</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberattacks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberthreats</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">risk assessment</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/710</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Cybersecurity (July 2013)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Canada</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberattacks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberthreats</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/699</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-5</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul E. Renaud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sheppard D. Narkier</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enabling Sustainable Improvement in IT Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">capability maturity assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT capability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT function</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process ambidexterity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process maturity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainable metrics</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/694</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-38</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Firms must embrace processes that enable the information technology (IT) function to become a strategic partner to the business functions it serves. Process ambidexterity is a way for processes to be augmented to improve alignment and adaptability to new markets and technologies. By applying the principles of process ambidexterity, the key elements required for sustainable change within the capabilities that comprise the IT function of the firm are identified. Furthermore, the scope and depth of the dysfunction that is widespread across large firms that depend upon IT are outlined to provide a contextual basis for presenting a solution framework to address sustainable change. This framework for sustainable change is of primary benefit to IT executives seeking to systematically transform the IT function and enable IT entrepreneurship.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Lanigan Group
Paul Renaud is Chief Executive of The Lanigan Group, which specializes in customer-driven product strategy and business-aligned IT service delivery. He is an advisor to CEOs, CTOs, and CIOs in the technology community, and he is a member of industry advisory boards, including Queen’s University’s Innovation Council for the School of Computing and Ubiquity’s Chairman’s Advisory Board prior to its acquisition by Avaya. His previous roles include VP Business Intelligence Development at Cognos, Director of Computing &amp; Networking and the Advanced Computing Research Lab at Bell Northern Research, Director of Nortel’s Public Network Switching Capacity program, and Chief Architect at SHL Systemhouse. Mr. Renaud is a co-author of several patents and authored &lt;em&gt;Introduction to Client/Server Systems&lt;/em&gt;, which was published in four languages and widely used as a university textbook. He has a BSc degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from Queen's University.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sheppard Narkier is a business-driven, senior executive in information technology who generates business value where investment in enabling technology is an integral part of a company’s business strategy. Sheppard’s experience spans roles as a senior executive, enterprise architect, systems engineer, and developer. He has been recognized for building strong, diverse, and motivated teams that have delivered measurable business value in diverse IT environments. He has implemented mission-critical systems, reusable assets, and technology roadmaps in premier financial services institutions such as the American Stock Exchange, S&amp;P, and UBS-IB. Sheppard was co-founder and Chief Scientist of Adaptivity, which was recently acquired by EMC. Sheppard is responsible for designing the rules engines that enable better system-design decisions. Sheppard has a BA in both Mathematics and Anthropology from Oswego State, NY. He is the co-author on several patents, has written thought-leadership blogs for Network World and EMC InFocus, and has ghost-written the book &lt;em&gt;Next Generation Datacenters in Financial Services: Driving Extreme Efficiency and Effective Cost Savings&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded leader/executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, operational excellence, business transformation and strategy, leading organizational change, and evolving entrepreneurial ecosystems. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles, member of the Lead to Win Council, and industry executive member of the Technology Entrepreneurship &amp; Commercialization Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently partners with executives and entrepreneurs of small-to-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies in the information and computing technology sector (namely healthcare, mobility, telecommunications, software, Internet, IT) to assist in building, growing, and transforming global ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes BlackBerry / Research In Motion, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frédérick Brousseau-Gauthier</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yvon Brousseau</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Heritage Economy: Business Model Innovation for Economic Wealth, Social Well-Being, and Environmental Health</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">benefit corporation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business model innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">heritage economy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">impact investment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">natural capitalism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/726</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">32-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Faced with the inherent unsustainability of infinite growth in a world of finite resources, the neoclassical economy is running towards a cliff. In order to avoid a hard landing, enterprises need to broaden their definitions of value and wealth to include parameters that are not currently in the economic lexicon, but are still of paramount importance in our lives. Taken from that angle, heritage can be seen as a perfect replacement for capital, because its multidimensional and complex nature opens up numerous possibilities for the creation of shared economic, social, and environmental value; the designing of value chains; and the direction of technological innovation. This article explores the various ramifications of a paradigm shift from managing capital to managing heritage, and it underlines the need to create a series of pioneering business models for enterprises to adapt and profit from a new, heritage economy.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université du Québec à Montréal
Frédérick Brousseau-Gauthier is a creative writing student at Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM), with a strong interest in the relationships between politics, the economy, and the environment. Between 2006 and 2008, he took part as speaker in several seminars in France and Canada on the topic of information technologies and their role in education. He also worked as columnist and investigative reporter in various student media outlets, covering matters from citizens’ engagement in their democracy to the management of collective property. He is currently writing a novel.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Centre of Excellence in Energy Efficiency
Yvon Brousseau is CEO of the Centre of Excellence in Energy Efficiency (C3E), which has a mandate to develop “commercialization exit strategies” for R&amp;D projects from the private and public sectors across Canada. He holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree in Microbiology from Sherbrooke University, Canada. He has more than 20 years of experience including his current role of CEO of C3E, during 8 years as CEO for an applied mathematical start-up company, and during 12 years as a marketing/finance consultant. He managed and operated business corporate strategies and R&amp;D projects for different business sectors (e.g., biotech, chemistry, optics, and mathematics) with well-educated and seasoned employees from scientific, technical, and financial backgrounds. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lieven De Marez</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge exchange</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">open innovation networks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/743</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-36</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As open innovation systems, living labs consist of various actors with each playing their specific role. Within this article, we will take an open innovation perspective by analyzing the knowledge spill-overs between living lab actors through three in-depth innovation case studies taking place within the LeYLab living lab in Kortrijk, Belgium. The results illustrate how living labs foster the three open innovation processes of exploration, exploitation, and retention. From our analysis, we conclude that living labs are particularly useful for exploration and, to a lesser extent, exploitation. In terms of retention, living labs seem to hold a large potential; however, the success and the nature of the innovation processes depend on the sustainability of living labs, the number of innovation cases, and the alignment of these cases with the living lab infrastructure. Based on these findings, a concrete set of guidelines is proposed for innovating in living labs and for setting up a living lab constellation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Dimitri Schuurman is a Senior Researcher at the iMinds Media &amp; ICT (MICT) research group and is responsible for the methodology of living lab projects facilitated by iMinds iLab.o. His involvement in living labs started in 2010 with the Mediatuin and LeYLab living labs. To date, he has managed over 30 concrete living lab projects that deal with new media and innovative use of ICT. He is currently finishing his PhD on living labs at Ghent University in Belgium. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Lieven De Marez is Research Director of the iMinds Media &amp; ICT (MICT) research group and teaches on the topics of innovation research and new communication technologies in the Department of Communication Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium. MICT is one of 16 research groups within iMinds, and Lieven is also part of the management team of iLab.o, iMinds’ facilitating infrastructure for living lab research. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">iMinds
Pieter Ballon is Director Living Labs at iMinds and Professor at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He also heads iMinds’ Market Innovation &amp; Sector Transition research team, specializing in new business models for the telecommunications and media industries. He leads various national and international projects on open innovation platforms, real-life ICT experiments, and business models for media and ICT services. Since 2009, Pieter is the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs. From 2006 to 2007, he coordinated the joint research on business models for future mobile IP-based systems of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI) in the EU 6th Framework Programme.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexandra Berger Masson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quebec Seeks Solutions: An Economic Development Agency's Role in Local Open Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">economic development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">local open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">private research and development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quebec Seeks Solutions</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/667</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-32</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article offers an economic-development perspective on a new method for local companies to find innovative solutions to their most challenging business problems: local open innovation. Quebec International, the economic development agency for the Quebec City area, contributed to the development of the Seeking Solutions approach to local open innovation, which included the hosting of problem-solving conferences with local research centres, economic development actors, and companies. Looking back on our experiences and outcomes since 2010, this article shows how the development and introduction of this new approach to local open innovation has changed the rules of the game in the region.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quebec International
Alexandra Berger Masson is Director of Corporate Affairs at Quebec International, which includes responsibility for innovation projects. She has worked for Quebec International since 2008 and lived the second Quebec Seeks Solution experience as the Project Manager. In previous economic development roles with Quebec International she, managed projects in applied technology and technology entrepreneurship. She has a PhD in Philosophy and in Cognitive Sciences and has worked on the creation of an expressive language for artificial agents in the artificial intelligence domain. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vickie Cammack</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kerry Byrne</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accelerating a Network Model of Care: Taking a Social Innovation to Scale</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network centric care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network model of care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">personal networks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tyze</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/578</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26-30</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government-funded systems of health and social care are facing enormous fiscal and human-resource challenges. The space for innovation in care is wide open and new disruptive patterns are emerging. These include self-management and personal budgets, participatory and integrated care, supported decision making and a renewed focus on prevention. Taking these disruptive patterns to scale can be accelerated by a technologically enabled shift to a network model of care to co-create the best outcomes for individuals, family caregivers, and health and social care organizations.

The connections, relationships, and activities within an individual’s personal network lay the foundation for care that health and social care systems/policy must simultaneously support and draw on for positive outcomes. Practical tools, adequate information, and tangible resources are required to coordinate and sustain care. 

Tyze Personal Networks is a social venture that uses technology to engage and inform the individual, their personal networks, and their care providers to co-create the best outcomes. In this article, we demonstrate how Tyze contributes to a shift to a network model of care by strengthening our networks and enhancing partnerships between care providers, individuals, and family and friends. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tyze Personal Networks
Vickie Cammack is President and CEO of Tyze Personal Networks. In this role, Vickie focuses her attention and expertise on how best to deliver online, personal support networks to people facing life challenges. Vickie is also a co-founder of Planned Lifetime Advocacy Network (PLAN), a pioneer social enterprise supporting families to secure the future of their family member with a disability. She created PLAN’s Personal Network program, a unique response to the isolation experienced by people with disabilities and mentored the spread of PLAN groups in 40 locations globally. Vickie is the recipient of the Meritorious Service Medal of Canada, the Canadian Psychological Association’s Humanitarian Award, and Simon Fraser University President’s Club Distinguished Community Leadership Award. She co-led a Canadian exploration on sustainability and social innovation and is a Fellow with Social Innovation Generation. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tyze Personal Networks
Kerry Byrne, PhD, is the Director of Research at Tyze Personal Networks. She has over 10 years of healthcare research experience and cares deeply about improving care for families. Through her work, she strives to give a voice to families’ and patients’ experiences with health and social care and improve the mobilization of formal and informal support for family caregivers and persons experiencing life challenges. Her areas of research expertise are in family caregiving, care transitions, home care, and relationship-centered care. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punit Saurabh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bhaskar Bhowmick</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amrita</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dhrubes Biswas</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developmental Impact Analysis of an ICT-Enabled Scalable Healthcare Model in BRICS Economies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business model innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">developmental Impact analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/565</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25-31</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article highlights the need for initiating a healthcare business model in a grassroots, emerging-nation context. This article’s backdrop is a history of chronic anomalies afflicting the healthcare sector in India and similarly placed BRICS nations. In these countries, a significant percentage of populations remain deprived of basic healthcare facilities and emergency services. Community (primary care) services are being offered by public and private stakeholders as a panacea to the problem. Yet, there is an urgent need for specialized (tertiary care) services at all levels. 
As a response to this challenge, an all-inclusive health-exchange system (HES) model, which utilizes information communication technology (ICT) to provide solutions in rural India, has been developed. The uniqueness of the model lies in its innovative hub-and-spoke architecture and its emphasis on affordability, accessibility, and availability to the masses. This article describes a developmental impact analysis (DIA) that was used to assess the impact of this model. The article contributes to the knowledge base of readers by making them aware of the healthcare challenges emerging nations are facing and ways to mitigate those challenges using entrepreneurial solutions.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinod Gupta School of Management
Punit Saurabh is a senior researcher from the Vinod Gupta School of Management at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. His research specialization includes entrepreneurship and innovation technology management. He is also a research partner at Global Venture Lab (GVL). He has played an instrumental role in the successful establishment and functioning of the DSIR-run TePP Outreach Center at IIT-Kharagpur, providing innovation funding support to individual innovators. At the Center, he has overseen the development and commercialization of more than 30 path-breaking innovations and the functioning of several other innovation and entrepreneurship support programs. As a mentor to startup companies, he provides expert advice and active support to several university-based startups.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship
Bhaskar Bhowmick is a faculty member at the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. He is mentoring the dual-degree students in building their career as entrepreneurs. He is also guiding research scholars engaged in studies of business intelligence, business architecture, product development, and social media. His domain of focus is designing an ICT-driven innovation platform in an  emerging-country context. He has written papers, cases, book chapters with peers in academia, and presented papers in international conferences. He is presently focusing on building a model of Education-Entrepreneurship-Enterprise-Environment relating to issues specific to emerging countries.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship
Amrita is a Research Scholar in the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. She also oversees the incubation and entrepreneurship support program functioning under SRIC as a Senior Project Officer. She is actively engaged in the study of business intelligence in healthcare for future generations. Her other important areas of research are social media in healthcare. The setting of her research is focused on emerging nations such as India. She has played an active part in the health project implementation by the Society of Social Entrepreneurs (SSE), acting as an enabler of transformation for societal juncture for solving local problems by local solutions.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship
Dhrubes Biswas is a Professor of Electronics &amp; Electrical Communication Engineering, Head of the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Professor-in-Charge of Incubation and Entrepreneurship, and Managing Director of Science and Technology at the Entrepreneurs’ Park at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. He directs international university collaborations, technology parks, cross-functional business incubation, the Technology Business Incubator for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Govt. of India). He also coordinates the Technopreneur Promotion Program for Innovation grants (Govt. of India) and the Technology Entrepreneurship Development Program for grassroots entrepreneurs (Govt. of India). He has championed advanced research in “beyond Moore’s” electronic and optical devices in Metamorphic HEMT/ HBT, &amp; SiGe devices at his nationally acclaimed “India Innovation Semiconductor Fab” at IIT in compound semiconductors. He is an internationally recognized expert in radio frequency integrated circuits (RFIC) and in technology ventures in wireless electronics, cellular phone systems, and communication-related RFICs.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Born Global (October 2012)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">born global</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">export</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">globalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/613</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent FIrst Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (&lt;a href=&quot;http://carleton.ca/tim&quot;&gt;TIM&lt;/a&gt;) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Technology Entrepreneurship (April 2012)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/544</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review 
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt; and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland.
 
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.
 
</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Technology Entrepreneurship (February 2012)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/519</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt; and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Technology Entrepreneurship (March 2012)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/531</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review 
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt; and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland.
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.
</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Technology Entrepreneurship (May 2012)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">global entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/552</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review 
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt; and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul E. Renaud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enabling Process Alignment for IT Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT function</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process alignment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process ambidexterity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/626</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13-20</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">All firms use information technology (IT). Larger firms have IT organizations whose business function is to supply and manage IT infrastructure and applications to support the firm's business objectives. Regardless of whether the IT function has been outsourced or is resident within a firm, the objectives of the IT organization must be aligned to the strategic needs of the business.

It is often a challenge to balance the demand for IT against the available supply within the firm. Most IT organizations have little capacity to carry out activities that go beyond the incremental ones that are needed to run the immediate needs of the business. A process-ambidexterity framework for IT improves the IT organization's entrepreneurial ability, which in turn, better aligns the IT function with the business functions in the firm.

Process ambidexterity utilizes both process alignment and process adaptability. This article presents a framework for process alignment in IT. This is useful for understanding how the processes in Business Demand Management, a core component of the process-ambidexterity framework for IT, relate to those in IT Governance and IT Supply Chain Management. The framework is presented through three lenses (governance, business, and technology) along with real-world examples from major firms in the USA. Enabling process alignment in the IT function, and process ambidexterity overall, benefits those who govern IT, the executives who lead IT, as well as their peers in the business functions that depend on IT.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Lanigan Group
Paul Renaud is Chief Executive of The Lanigan Group, which specializes in customer-driven product strategy and business-aligned IT service delivery. He is an advisor to CEOs, CTOs, and CIOs in the technology community and he is a member of industry advisory boards, including Queen’s University’s Innovation Council for the School of Computing and Ubiquity’s Chairman’s Advisory Board prior to its acquisition by Avaya. His previous roles include VP Business Intelligence Development at Cognos, Director of Computing &amp; Networking and the Advanced Computing Research Lab at Bell Northern Research, Director of Nortel’s Public Network Switching Capacity program and Chief Architect at SHL Systemhouse. Mr. Renaud authored Introduction to Client/Server Systems, which was published in four languages and widely used as a university textbook. He has a BSc degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from Queens University.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> 
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, product management and delivery, business transformation and strategy, and leading organizational change. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles, and industry executive member of the Technology Innovation Management Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently provides consulting services by partnering with executives and entrepreneurs of small-to-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies to assist in building, growing, and transforming new ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tom Duxbury</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Hudson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Steven Muegge</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michael Weiss</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jonathan Wells</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mika Westerlund</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Overview of Four Issues on Technology Entrepreneurship in the TIM Review</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creative destruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">global entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">journal articles</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">theory</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/557</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-34</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The field of technology entrepreneurship is in its infancy when compared to other fields such as economics and management. Articles on technology entrepreneurship have been published in at least 62 journals, of which only 18 contribute to technology innovation management or entrepreneurship. Less than a handful of these 62 journals are considered to be &quot;good&quot; journals and none can claim a leadership position in technology entrepreneurship. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the 20 journal articles published in the February, March, April, and May 2012 issues of the Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review).</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.

(See end of article for further author biographies.)</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul E. Renaud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Process Adaptability in the IT Supply Chain</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT function</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process adaptability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process ambidexterity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">supply chain</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/627</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The continuous pressure to minimize IT costs challenges the IT function to achieve a balance between its own effectiveness and the productivity of the users in the business functions that it serves (i.e., user effectiveness). In many cases, user effectiveness is sacrificed to ensure IT function effectiveness. Process adaptability improves the IT organization’s entrepreneurial ability by balancing these conflicting productivity and performance objectives.

This article applies a process-ambidexterity framework to examine how process adaptability in IT is affected by the choice of different strategies for IT Demand Management as well as different fulfillment strategies for IT Supply Chain Management. Alternative fulfillment strategies are presented, along with criteria and indicators that impact IT and user effectiveness that have been applied within major firms. 

IT and senior business executives will find this article valuable for helping understand how they can influence the balance between IT and user productivity through their choice of different Demand Management and IT fulfillment strategies. Academic readers will discover that, while process adaptability in IT is an important enabler for implementing dynamic alignment between business and IT function objectives, there may be circumstances where IT process adaptability is not a priority for the business.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Lanigan Group
Paul Renaud is Chief Executive of The Lanigan Group, which specializes in customer-driven product strategy and business-aligned IT service delivery. He is an advisor to CEOs, CTOs, and CIOs in the technology community and he is a member of industry advisory boards, including Queen’s University’s Innovation Council for the School of Computing and Ubiquity’s Chairman’s Advisory Board prior to its acquisition by Avaya. His previous roles include VP Business Intelligence Development at Cognos, Director of Computing &amp; Networking and the Advanced Computing Research Lab at Bell Northern Research, Director of Nortel’s Public Network Switching Capacity program and Chief Architect at SHL Systemhouse. Mr. Renaud authored Introduction to Client/Server Systems, which was published in four languages and widely used as a university textbook. He has a BSc degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from Queens University.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> 
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, product management and delivery, business transformation and strategy, and leading organizational change. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles, and industry executive member of the Technology Innovation Management Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently provides consulting services by partnering with executives and entrepreneurs of small-to-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies to assist in building, growing, and transforming new ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Process Ambidexterity for Entrepreneurial Firms</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">performance improvement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process ambidexterity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/547</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology-based entrepreneurial firms must effectively support both mainstream exploitation and new-stream exploration in order to remain competitive for the long term. The processes that support exploitation and exploration initiatives are different in terms of logistics, payoff horizons, and capabilities. Few firms are able to strike a balance between the two, where mainstream exploitation usually trumps new-stream exploration. The ultimate goal is for the firm to operate effectively in a repeatable, scalable, and systematic manner, rather than relying on good luck and hoping either to come up with the next innovation or for the product to function according to its requirements. 

This article builds on the author’s years of experience in building businesses and transforming medium and large-sized, entrepreneurial technology firms, leading large-scale breakthrough and sustained performance improvements by using and evolving Lean Six Sigma methodologies, and reviews of technology innovation management and entrepreneurship literature. This article provides a process-based perspective to understanding and addressing the issues on balancing mainstream exploitation and new-stream exploration in medium and large-sized entrepreneurial firms and extending it to startups. The resulting capability is known as process ambidexterity and requires disciplined, agile, and lean business management.
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sonia Bot is a business executive who specializes in strategy and business execution for technology innovation and corporate entrepreneurship ventures. She has extensive experience in the high-tech industry, including business transformation and strategy, product management and delivery, and new venture creation within multinational technology companies. Her work experience includes Research In Motion, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul E. Renaud</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Process Ambidexterity for IT Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business demand</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business value chains</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">exploration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT supply</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process ambidexterity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/596</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-22</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">All firms use information technology (IT). Larger firms have information technology organizations whose business function is to supply and manage IT infrastructure and applications to support business needs for IT. While some firms have chosen to outsource the IT function, the majority rely on an internal IT organization that is focused on running the IT infrastructure and optimizing IT operations and applications by exploiting technology improvements over time. Most IT organizations have little capacity to carry out transformational initiatives because they are focused on incremental improvements needed to run the business. As the global economy contracts, growing cost pressure on firms escalates the need for the IT function to behave in a more entrepreneurial manner that accelerates the availability of new technological solutions to enhance productivity and lower cost of doing business. 

This article provides a process-based perspective for understanding and addressing an IT function’s ability to implement entrepreneurial practices that better align the IT function to business functions. This is done by developing the capability of process ambidexterity. Improving an IT organization’s entrepreneurial ability results in improved productivity, shorter time to market, and lower operational costs – as validated by recent practice with major firms in the USA. Developing process ambidexterity in the IT function benefits those who govern IT, the executives who lead IT, as well as their peers in the business functions that depend on IT.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, product management and delivery, business transformation and strategy, and leading organizational change. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles, and industry executive member of the Technology Innovation Management Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently provides consulting services by partnering with executives and entrepreneurs of small-to-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies to assist in building, growing, and transforming new ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Lanigan Group
Paul Renaud is Chief Executive of The Lanigan Group, which specializes in customer-driven product strategy and business-aligned IT service delivery. He is an advisor to CEOs, CTOs, and CIOs in the technology community and he is a member of industry advisory boards, including Queen’s University’s Innovation Council for the School of Computing and Ubiquity’s Chairman’s Advisory Board prior to its acquisition by Avaya. His previous roles include VP Business Intelligence Development at Cognos, Director of Computing &amp; Networking and the Advanced Computing Research Lab at Bell Northern Research, Director of Nortel’s Public Network Switching Capacity program and Chief Architect at SHL Systemhouse. Mr. Renaud authored Introduction to Client/Server Systems, which was published in four languages and widely used as a university textbook. He has a BSc degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from Queens University.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/520</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-12</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology entrepreneurship lies at the heart of many important debates, including those around launching and growing firms, regional economic development, selecting the appropriate stakeholders to take ideas to markets, and educating managers, engineers, and scientists. Unless a generally accepted definition of technology entrepreneurship is established, however, these debates lose their focus.

The purpose of this article is to identify the themes that dominate the technology entrepreneurship literature, provide a definition of technology entrepreneurship, and identify its distinguishing aspects relative to economics, entrepreneurship, and management. 

The author argues that technology entrepreneurship is an investment in a project that assembles and deploys specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets to create and capture value for the firm. What distinguishes technology entrepreneurship from other entrepreneurship types (e.g., social entrepreneurship, small business management, and self-employment) is the collaborative experimentation and production of new products, assets, and their attributes, which are intricately related to advances in scientific and technological knowledge and the firm’s asset ownership rights. 
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wes Biggs</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TIM Lecture Series - 29 Lessons Learned in Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lessons learned</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/629</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">46-48</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Triacta Power Technologies
Wes Biggs is a technology company veteran with over 30 years of experience in established technology companies such as Nortel, Mitel, and Newbridge plus several startups along the way. He has learned many lessons both as an engineer and as a founder/executive. Wes joined Triacta Power Technologies as the VP of Engineering &amp; Operations in 2003 and is now President and CEO. Prior to joining Triacta, Wes was co-founder, President, and CEO of Meriton Networks.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">What Technology Startups Must Get Right to Globalize Early and Rapidly</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">born global</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">effectuation logic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">global startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">globalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">gradual internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">international new ventures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multinational</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rapid internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/614</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-16</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Upon or shortly after inception, growth-oriented technology startups must operate in a market that is global. Management teams and investors of technology startups can benefit from approaches and models that can help them operate in a global market early and rapidly. How well a technology startup addresses the realities of globalization will determine its success. A better understanding of what management teams and investors of technology startups must get right to globalize their startups is needed. This article is an attempt to meet this need. 

In this article, lessons that have been extracted from six literature streams and from information on 21 startups founded in 12 countries are used to identify the six elements that a startup must get right to globalize early and rapidly. These six elements are: i) Problem scope, ii) Stakeholders’ commitments, iii) Collaborative entrepreneurship, iv) Relational capital, v) Legitimacy, and vi) Global capability. The main contribution of this article is that it throws the spotlight on the need to develop prescriptive rules and practitioner-oriented models that can help a technology startup operate globally from an early stage. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (&lt;a href&quot;http://carleton.ca/tim&quot;&gt;TIM&lt;/a&gt;) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ludovico Prattico</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton Entrepreneurs: The First Keystone Off-The-Shelf Application</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/433</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we describe the first application of the Keystone Off-The-Shelf (KOTS) platform. KOTS integrates software applications available under open source licenses with proprietary applications and services offered by small local technology companies, most of which are Carleton University spin-offs.

KOTS is the engine behind the website for the Carleton Entrepreneurs program. The goals of this unique program are to: i) strengthen the entrepreneurial spirit at Carleton University; ii) help graduate and senior undergraduate students transform their ideas into compelling opportunities and successful ventures; and iii) share the best opportunities with potential investors, alumni, and friends of Carleton University. KOTS will enable the Carleton Entrepreneurs collective to achieve significant system-level outcomes that are not attainable without the platform. This collective is comprised of students, mentors, internal and external reviewers, top managers of technology university spin-off companies, academics, and friends of Carleton.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April 2011</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Eric Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program and the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network. His research, teaching, and community contributions support these programs.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Ludovico Prattico is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University. His current responsibilities include operations, external content, and overall support of the Carleton Entrepreneurs program and recruiting candidates for the Lead To Win program. Most recently, he worked at Nortel Networks and Bell-Northern Research, where he led the Optical Networks architecture and standards development team, and the high capacity OC-48 hardware team with the responsibility for the development and introduction of the dense wavelength division multiplexing product. Mr. Prattico graduated from McGill University with a Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical).</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Collectives (April 2011)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/431</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The articles in this issue of the OSBR focus on collectives that harness diversity to produce significant system-level outcomes. These collectives support members that belong to different groups and carry out activities in three different horizons: today's business (Horizon 1), the next generation of emerging businesses (Horizon 2), and the longer-term options out of which the next generation of businesses will arise (Horizon 3).</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April 2011</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource
Chris McPhee is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Eric Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program and the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network. His research, teaching, and community contributions support these programs.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fostering Student Entrepreneurship and University Spinoff Companies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">spinoff</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">student entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">university</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/485</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7-12</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A student spinoff company strives to transform knowledge acquired by students into an income-generating business. This article outlines how a university can increase the number of spinoff companies created by its student entrepreneurs. 

Student spinoff companies are of interest to all forward-thinking universities, particularly those that support research and teaching programs in the field of entrepreneurship. The spinoff companies provide tangible evidence that students acquire viable entrepreneurial skills while studying at the university. In addition, student spinoff companies contribute to regional economic development, commercialize knowledge that otherwise would go undeveloped, help universities attain and expand their core missions, and increase the return on the investments in university R&amp;D. 

University policies developed specifically for student spinoff companies significantly affect the growth potential of such ventures. This article provides a model and a set of principles that universities can use to support and increase the number of student entrepreneurs at their institutions. The model and principles are grounded in research findings and practical experience. In addition, the article suggests that universities adopt a results-based management approach to plan and deploy initiatives to support student entrepreneurs. The approach is widely used by government agencies interested in increasing the outcomes from their investments. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support international co-innovation, technical entrepreneurship, and regional economic development. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mette Præst Knudsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tanja Bisgaard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Merethe Stjerne Thomsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation Policy Development and the Emergence of New Innovation Paradigms</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user-driven innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value co-creation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/496</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14-19</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The objective of the present article is to discuss innovation policy issues related to three emerging innovation paradigms: user-driven innovation, open innovation, and value co-creation. It provides a summary of insights based on innovation policy practices and challenges in Denmark. The choice of Danish innovation policy practices is not accidental. In 2008 Denmark implemented 40 different national innovation programs by allocating about 400 million euros. Since the three emerging paradigms have become globally relevant, the discussion of Danish policy development challenges and practices is expected to be insightful for innovation experts from other developed countries that are currently dealing with the adoption of these paradigms. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Institute of Technology and Innovation and member of the Integrative Innovation Management (I2M) Research Unit at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, as well as Adjunct Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering  at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he was previously a faculty member in the Technology Innovation Management Program at Carleton University. He has a MSc and PhD in Physics (jointly by the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, and the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France), a MEng in Technology Management (Carleton University, Canada), and a MA (University of Sherbrooke, Canada). His main research interests are in the fields of technology innovation management and value co-creation in technology-driven businesses. Dr. Tanev is also on the Review Board of the &lt;i&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/i&gt;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Mette Præst Knudsen is a Professor in Innovation Management at the Department of Marketing &amp; Management (Faculty of Social Sciences), University of Southern Denmark. She is the research manager of the Integrative Innovation Management research unit. She holds a PhD from Aalborg University (Denmark) on technological competencies of high- tech companies. Furthermore, she holds a Master of Economics from Odense University (Denmark).</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Novitas Innovation
Tanja Bisgaard is the founder of Novitas Innovation, a company that facilitates complex innovation processes and is working with clients such as Copenhagen University Hospital, Agro Food Park, and Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster. Previously, she was Manager of Policy Analysis at FORA, the Danish Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs, where she identified and analyzed new forms of innovation in companies. Within the areas of user-driven innovation and corporate social innovation, Tanja has worked on several projects documenting the successful results of companies’ innovation processes. She holds a MSc in Management from the London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, and a BSc in Business Economics from the University of Surrey, UK.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Merethe Stjerne Thomsen a PhD student in the Institute of Technology and Innovation in the Faculty of Engineering in the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. </style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monique Bardawil</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Key Player Identification in the Mashup Ecosystem</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/417</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">By combining multiples sources of data to create a new application, mashups represent a powerful source of innovation. Together, the various data providers, developers, mashup platforms, and users constitute an ecosystem that depends on innovation from these various players for its growth and success. This article summarizes recent research into the network structure of the mashup ecosystem, along with the positions and roles of entities within it. This research illustrates analytical methods for identifying key players in an ecosystem, while delivering new insights into the structure of the mashup ecosystem. Finally, the implications of these findings for entrepreneurs and incumbents are discussed.
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2011</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Monique Bardawil recently completed her Master's degree at Carleton University with a thesis entitled &quot;Identifying key players in the mashup ecosystem.&quot; Her research interests are social network analysis, product architecture and design, and Web 2.0. She holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Systems and Computer Engineering from Carleton University and a Bachelor of Science degree in Biochemistry from McGill University.  </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natalie Raffoul</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Art Brion</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reasons for Patent Protection and Cost-effective Patent Filing Options for SMEs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intellectual property</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patent cost</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patent filing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patent protection</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/505</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29-33</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Many innovative small and medium enterprises (SMEs) do not seek patent protection for their innovations, either because they are skeptical about the perceived benefits or wary of the perceived costs. However, by failing to protect their intellectual property with patents, they leave themselves exposed to attack by other patent holders. This article explores arguments for patent protection as well as filing options that can protract the patenting process while simultaneously reducing patenting costs. By choosing their patent application filings wisely, SMEs can keep their patenting options open for as long as possible while delaying costs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL
Natalie Raffoul is a founding partner of CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL. As a registered patent agent and lawyer with a background in electrical engineering, she has extensive experience in drafting patent applications for technologies including: electronics, wireless and optical communications and networking, telecommunications switching, optical components and manufacturing processes, optical fibre manufacturing processes, satellite components, fuel cell technologies, security devices and software processes for supply chain management. Natalie is also experienced in filing and prosecuting Canadian, U.S., and PCT international patent applications. She provides advice to her clients, in English and in French, on worldwide patent filing strategies and portfolio management. She is also a frequent speaker on intellectual property matters.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL
Art Brion is a computer engineer, lawyer, and a U.S. and Canadian patent agent. Since 1998, he has assisted clients ranging from multinational corporations to high-tech startup companies to lone inventors. Prior to founding CLANCY P.C. + BRION RAFFOUL, Art practiced with two IP boutique firms in Ottawa. His practice centers on not just the drafting and prosecution of patent applications worldwide but also on providing advice regarding portfolio management and worldwide patent filing strategies. He also provides advice on intellectual property mining and licensing strategies. Art’s fields of specialization include software/Internet-based technologies, wireless technologies, communications and computer and networking and related systems, optics/electro-optic communication systems, cryptography/encryption based technologies, semiconductors and business method systems. A former Editor-in-Chief of the UNB Law Journal, he enjoys the thrust and parry of patent prosecution as it mirrors one of his main preoccupations: fencing.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Islam Balbaa</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Software-as-a-Service Offer Differentiation by Business Unit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/419</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article summarizes the author's recent research into the fit between software-as-a-service (SaaS) tools and the requirements of particular business units. First, an overview of SaaS is provided, including a summary of its benefits to users and software vendors. Next, the approach used to gather and analyze data about the SaaS solutions offered on the Force.com AppExchange is outlined. Finally, the article describes the managerial implications of this research.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2011</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kinaxis
Islam Balbaa is a Technical Business Analyst at Kinaxis. He recently completed his Master's thesis on &quot;Software as a Service Offer Differentiation based on Suitability for Particular Business Units&quot; in the Technology Innovation Management Program at Carleton University in Ottawa. He also holds a Communications Engineering degree from Carleton University and has worked as an Application Specialist at Montera Corporation.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blueprint and Approach to Grow Revenue in Small Technology Companies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/355</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article examines a new approach to grow the revenue of small technology companies and technology startups. We name this new approach the business ecosystem approach.

The article is organized into five sections. The first section provides a blueprint to grow revenue and an inventory of growth formulas that top management teams of small technology companies and founders of startups find useful. The second section briefly defines business ecosystems, keystones and platforms. The third section describes the business ecosystem approach to grow the revenue of small technology companies and technology startups. It compares the traditional and business ecosystem approaches to growing revenue; identifies when the business ecosystem approach works better than the traditional approach; explains what small companies and startups need to do to grow revenue using the business ecosystem approach; and describes the benefits and risks of implementing the business ecosystem approach. The fourth section compares three approaches to growing revenue and highlights the differences between i) business ecosystems and development communities and ii) the business ecosystem approach and outsourcing. The fifth section identifies the key decisions a small technology company or technology startup needs to make to become the keystone that anchors a business ecosystem. 
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. His research and teaching support Carleton's Technology Innovation Management program. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network and the Executive Director of  Coral CEA. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saad Bashir</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Economic Development (November 2010)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/390</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economic development: these two simple words are excessively used and often misused in many contexts, including municipal government. In this issue of the OSBR, we offer a mainly municipal perspective under which we discuss what economic development means and what it can deliver.

Economic development acts as a headlight that can guide a city like Ottawa through a fog of national and international competition and uncertain economic realities. It is an overarching role that nudges the local government towards smart decisions around long-term investments such as infrastructure.

Achieving sustainable economic development for Ottawa means investment in the creation of a toolkit that consists of tourism development, community and social economic development, transportation access, entrepreneurship support, investment attraction, workforce development and academia, export development, and performance measurement. Such a toolkit is what encourages partnerships between stakeholders and facilitates the environment for healthy economic development conditions.

This last element, performance measurement, deserves honest attention but is often found missing in an economic development plan. Just like a private sector firm that must always have its eyes on its bottom line and profitability, a city must constantly measure its economic development execution and adapt to changing circumstances. This can be achieved through a comprehensive scorecard or dashboard that analyzes trends over time, as well as compares Ottawa's performance versus its competitors.

Economic development is no different than the business development unit of a firm that not only has the responsibility of creating market opportunities for its company's products, but also the crucial task of conveying back-market intelligence. From the City of Ottawa's perspective, the product we should be selling to both local residents and international community is the city brand, including business, tourism, and academia, as well as gathering competitive intelligence to continuously tweak our offering.

Similar to cities whose future is dependent and linked to natural resources, Ottawa's economic future is tied to a rare resource as well. However, it is not found under the earth but between the ears of the knowledge-based workers that drive innovation in Ottawa. In today's environment, where both the knowledge-based work force and investment capital are highly fluid, the economic development challenge is to relentlessly retain and grow this knowledge resource.

Economic development is the type of investment that will help Ottawa earn its way to be one of the world's leading centres for business, tourism, and academia. Conversely, lack of economic development vision and investment will undoubtedly leave the city's fortunes to luck.

In this issue, the authors provide diverse perspectives and insights that will help all of us address the challenges of economic development and the knowledge-based economy.
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource
Chris McPhee is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">City of Ottawa
Saad Bashir is Manager of Economic Development for the City of Ottawa. Previously, he was with Calgary Economic Development, as a Senior Business Development Manager with the responsibility of leading economic development activities for Calgary's Energy sector. Saad has also worked with leading international and Canadian corporations including Nortel Networks, Canadian Pacific Railway, Citibank, and Flextronics. He holds a Bachelor of Computer Engineering degree from Queen's University and is a past board member of Immigrant Services of Calgary. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keystone Off-The-Shelf</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/377</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we describe the Keystone Off-The-Shelf (KOTS), a project to create a toolkit for platform owners. The toolkit will include everything that is required to operate a platform that supports a new approach to grow the revenue of small technology companies. 

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the KOTS project and the new approach to development and commercialization that it supports. We first describe the project's goal, objective, deliverables, and leadership. Next, we compare the new approach to development and commercialization that KOTS supports with two traditional approaches. We then identify the culture that best supports the new approach and provide an overview of the three key conceptual building blocks of this approach: integration of stakeholders' interests into development and commercialization decisions, value co-creation, and trust building. Finally, we provide the conclusions. 
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. His research, teaching and community contributions support Carleton's Technology Innovation Management program. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network and the Executive Director of Coral CEA. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Burgess</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Low Cost Cellular Networks with OpenBTS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/332</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In mid-2007, Kestrel Signal Processing, Inc., a small software radio consulting shop in northern California, started writing an implementation of a GSM basestation. The initial developers were myself and Kestrel co-founder Harvind Samra. Our goal was to create a new kind of light-weight cellular network that could be built out inexpensively in remote and sparsely populated areas. Our software-radio GSM system, now called OpenBTS, was released publicly under the GPLv3 license in September 2008 and will be used in pilot deployments with small operators by the time this article goes to publication. This will probably be the first use of a free software basestation in a public cellular network, where both network operators and subscribers can download and read the full source code of the GSM protocol stack that connects their handsets to the rest of the world and where the operators will be free to modify the system to meet their specific needs. This article introduces the goals and evolution of the OpenBTS project. 
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">March 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OpenBTS
David Burgess is a Partner at Kestrel Signal Processing, Inc. and Co-Founder of The OpenBTS Project. David has nearly 15 years of experience in signal processing system development and scientific computing. Much of his work in recent years has been in the areas of signals intelligence, radiolocation, and navigation. He has also worked in electronic warfare, image processing, high-fidelity audio processing, and DSP system design. He holds an M.S. degree in computer science, and a B.S. degree in electrical engineering, both from the Georgia Institute of Technology. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tarus Balog</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. How do you make money with open source?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/359</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How do you make money with open source?</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q and A</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OpenNMS
Tarus Balog is CEO of The OpenNMS Group, Inc. and current maintainer of the OpenNMS open source network management project. He has more than 15 years of network management experience in the telecom and datacom industries.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruth Bastedo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. Why Is There a Dearth of Women on High-Growth Technology Startup Teams?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/456</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Through my work with women-led startups, I have come to the following conclusion: as an industry, we should be focusing on increasing the number of women on startup teams. We should be ensuring that women team members have an equity stake in the business and have meaningful leadership roles on the management teams. If a woman is President and CEO, that is wonderful, but I feel that it is even more important just to have women present and engaged. I believe that the diversity in viewpoint and life experience that women leaders bring to the table impact the performance of companies in a complex, global, and increasingly interconnected world. This is the world in which Canadian startups have to compete and thrive in order to boost our country's productivity levels. Women have to have a seat at the table, and by being there, have the potential to impact the success of Canadian startups. 
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">July 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q and A</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Experience Media Group Inc.
Ruth Bastedo is President of Experience Media Group Inc., a digital learning and communications firm based in Toronto, Canada. A serial entrepreneur, Ruth has produced award-winning, web-based communications products for over 13 years in Canada, the US, and the UK. As co-founder of Medium One, Ruth sold her first business during the dot-com era in 2001, and she has been a passionate proponent of entrepreneurship for women ever since. She is the Past-President of Women Entrepreneurs of Canada (WEC) and participated in consultations with International Trade Canada, Status of Women Canada, and Industry Canada. She has participated in trade missions and represented Canada at several international events for women entrepreneurs. Ruth is currently co-designer and program consultant for the Rotman School of Management's Next Steps program for experienced women entrepreneurs.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technical Entrepreneurs Benefit From Business Ecosystems</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/325</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The objective of this article is to highlight nine creative companies that are part of Lead to Win and describe how they benefit from this vendor-neutral business ecosystem.

This paper is organized into three sections. The first section provides an overview on technical entrepreneurship, creative companies and business ecosystems. The second section describes nine startups located in Canada's National Region and identifies how their founders benefit from Lead to Win. The third section provides key takeaway messages about technical entrepreneurship and business ecosystems.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. His research and teaching support Carleton's Technology Innovation Management program. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network and the Executive Director of  &lt;a href=&quot;http://coralcea.net&quot;&gt; Coral CEA&lt;/a&gt;.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">George Brown</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">When Small is Big: Microcredit and Economic Development</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/392</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Microcredit - the extension of small loans - gives people who would otherwise not have access to credit the opportunity to begin or expand businesses or to pursue job-specific training. These borrowers lack the income, credit history, assets, or security to borrow from other sources. Although the popularity and success of microcredit in developing countries has been trumpeted in the media, microcredit is established and growing in the United States and Canada as well. Its appeal comes from its capacity to provide the means for those who have the ability, drive, and commitment to overcome the hurdles to self-sufficiency.

In this article, the role of microcredit as a stimulant for economic development is examined. First, its importance for the establishment of small businesss is described. Second, the article provides an overview of the general microcredit climate in the United states and the local situation in the Ottawa area. Third, brief stories about individuals who have received this type of loan reveal the human impact behind the economic benefits. Finally, the role of microcredit in funding startups is analyzed in comparison to other sources of available funding. The article concludes with a summary of the benefits of microcredit as a win-win proposition for economic development.   
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2010</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa Community Loan Fund
George Brown is a lawyer and social entrepreneur who presently serves as President of the Ottawa Community Loan Fund (OCLF). Prior to this, George spent nine years as a City and Regional Councillor in Ottawa, where he was Chair of the City's Economic Affairs Committee and the Region's Environmental Services Committee. As Chair of Economic Affairs, George played a significant role in initiating and developing the Ottawa Entrepreneurship Centre, as well as promoting community economic development throughout the City of Ottawa including the establishment of the OCLF. George has a Master's of Science degree in Community Economic Development from New Hampshire College's Graduate School of Business (now Southern New Hampshire University) and an LL.B. degree from the University of Ottawa Law School. He was called to the Bar in Ontario in September, 2003.  </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tom Bondur</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jason Weathersby</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BIRT: Building Next Generation BI Using Open Source</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/290</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Business Intelligence and Reporting Tools Project is a highly successful open source business intelligence (BI) project developed and released as part of the Eclipse ecosystem. In this article, we look at the genesis of the BIRT project, why Actuate chose the open source development model, and the benefits that this project brings to the BI user community. 
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Actuate
Tom Bondur is a Content Development Manager in the Developer Communications group of Actuate Engineering and a member of the extended BIRT development team. He has a background in both computer science and technical writing with many years experience in technical consulting, training, writing, and publishing about business intelligence tools and database technologies. He is a co-author of the Eclipse Series book, Integrating and Extending BIRT, published by Addison-Wesley. The book introduces programmers to BIRT architecture and the reporting framework. It is the second volume in a two-book series about business intelligence and reporting technology. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Actuate
Jason Weathersby is the BIRT Evangelist at Actuate Corporation and a member of the Eclipse Business Intelligence and Reporting Tools (BIRT) Project Management Committee (PMC). Jason has over 15 years experience in the software development field, ranging from real time process control to business intelligence software. At Actuate, Jason is currently responsible for educating the Open Source community on BIRT and encouraging its adoption, and is responsible for managing the Eclipse BIRT newsgroup and website. Jason has co-authored two BIRT books and written many articles that discuss the BIRT technology. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stephen Allen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Components of Co-creation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/301</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Value co-creation is an emerging innovation, marketing and business paradigm describing how customers and users are seen as active participants in the design of personalized products, services and experiences. Often this participation is organised via the Internet to enable the opportunity for customers to integrate their knowledge, experience and skills into existing, modified or entirely new market offerings reflecting their personal preferences, needs and contexts. There is a growing body of literature dedicated to the discussion of value co-creation frameworks, mechanisms and processes. However, these typically focus on the study, discussion and analysis of a small number of cases using deep, ethnographic description of their practices aiming at conceptualization and categorization of the different types of interactions between end users, the firm and the value network. Although useful, such an approach misses the advantages of an empirically driven quantitative approach that benefits from larger size samples and is more appropriate for theory building through the development and testing of hypotheses. It is important, therefore, to seek the development of a research methodology that combines the benefits of both qualitative and quantitative research approaches for studying the nature of value co-creation.

The article provides a first attempt to identify the main research steps of such a methodology. It provides some preliminary results on the key components of value co-creation between firms and end customers based on the application of web search and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) techniques. The analysis of these preliminary results is then used as an opportunity to identify a number of research questions to be addressed in future research. The emerging research questions follow the inner logic of the value co-creation phenomenon as well as the nature of the results reported in this article. The specific nature of the results was found to be suitable for the application of small-N techniques such as the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) technique which combines the advantages of both qualitative and quantitative techniques. One of the main contributions of this article is to suggest and explore the possibility for using the QCA technique in future research on value co-creation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Stephen Allen is an Ottawa-based technology expert and manager with more than 20 years of experience in the design and development of hardware and software products and services.  In 2008 he has completed the Technology Innovation Management program in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University. Stephen is very much interested in the design and development of value co-creation platforms. This article represents some of the results of Stephen Allen's M.A.Sc. Thesis in Technology Innovation Management titled &quot;An empirical study of the components of value co-creation&quot;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network and the Executive Director of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coralcea.net&quot;&gt;Coral CEA&lt;/a&gt;. He is responsible for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leadtowin.ca&quot;&gt;Lead to Win&lt;/a&gt;.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Stoyan Tanev is Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Civil Engineering at the University of Southern Denmark. He is part of the Integrative Innovation Management Unit, a research group that operates across the faculties of social sciences and engineering. Stoyan had a similar position in the Technology Innovation Management Program in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University and he worked for several years as an optical designer in the Ottawa high tech industry.  Stoyan has a M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Physics, a M.Eng. in Technology Innovation Management, and a M.A.. His main research interests are: design and development of value co-creation platforms, value co-creation business models, value co-creation platforms for user-driven innovation, and technological infrastructures enabling value co-creation oriented business processes. He is also interested in the philosophy of technology, business ethics, and general epistemological issues at the interface of philosophy of religion and physics.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dru Lavigne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James Bowen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Open Source in Government (May 2009)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/248</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Last summer, the Center for Strategic and International Studies published the sixth update to their Open Source Policy survey. The survey &quot;tracks governmental policies on the use of open source software as reported in the press or other media.&quot; The report lists 275 open source policy initiatives. It also breaks down by country and by government level whether the policy on the use of open source is considered to be advisory, preferential, or mandatory.

The editorial theme for the May issue of the OSBR is &quot;open source in government&quot; and we are pleased that the authors have drawn upon their experiences to provide insight into public policy regarding open source for many parts of the world.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">May 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network
Dru Lavigne is a technical writer and IT consultant who has been active with open source communities since the mid-1990s. She writes regularly for O'Reilly and DNSStuff.com and is the author of the books BSD Hacks and The Best of FreeBSD Basics.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">uOttawa
James Bowen, PhD, PMP, CMC is an Ottawa technology entrepreneur and adjunct professor at uOttawa's Telfer School of Management. He has has over 25 years of experience as a technology company entrepreneur. His primary focus is bringing ideas, technology products/services, people, markets and money together into sustainable endeavours.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thierry Badard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etienne Dubé</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enabling Geospatial Business Intelligence</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/289</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Recently, interest in the huge potential of Geospatial BI has increased. It aims at combining geographic information system (GIS) and business intelligence (BI) technologies. Geospatial BI combines spatial analysis and map visualization with proven BI tools in order to better support the corporate data analysis process and to help companies make more informed decisions. 

BI is a business management term which refers to applications and technologies that are used to gather, provide access to, and analyze data and information about company operations. BI applications are usually used to better understand historical, current and future aspects of business operations. BI applications typically offer ways to mine database- and spreadsheet-centric data to produce graphical, table-based and other types of analytics regarding business operations. BI systems give companies a more comprehensive knowledge of the factors affecting their business, such as metrics on sales, production, and internal operations, in order to to make better business decisions. Be aware that BI is a different from classical databases and much more complex.

This article provides a rapid introduction to some important BI concepts. It then highlights the need for geospatial BI software and deals with the integration of the spatial component in a BI software stack in order to consistently enable geo-analytical tools. We then present different works performed and tools designed by the GeoSOA research group.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Laval
Dr. Thierry Badard is CTO of Spatialytics, a new company in geospatial BI. He is also a professor of geoinformatics at Laval University (Canada) where he heads the GeoSOA research group. He is a regular researcher of the CRG and of the GEOIDE NCE. He has more than 13 years of experience and has been involved in national and international research and development projects of importance. He acts as a chair, editor and reviewer for several international journals and scientific conferences. Dr. Thierry Badard is also actively involved in the geospatial free and open source community. He is an OSGeo charter member and a member of the OSGeo conference committee. Member of the board of the OSGeo Francophone chapter, he is also a founding co-chair of the OSGeo Quebec local chapter. He is a founding co-chair of the ICA working group on open source geospatial technologies.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Laval
Etienne Dubé is a research assistant in the GeoSOA Research Group, Laval University. He holds a Masters degree in Geomatic Science and a  Bachelor degree in Computer Engineering. He is the main developer in the GeoMondrian, SOLAPLayers and GeoKettle projects.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Boden</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entrepreneurship in an Established Company</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/280</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">There are some fundamental differences between how you go about being innovative in a startup and how you go about it when you have more than 350 customers in 75 countries already running their business on your product. Put another way, you have to approach entrepreneurship differently when you have over 2,000 active deployments serving 40 million people every day. We faced that challenge at Movius Interactive Corporation. This article provides a description of how we took on the challenge of revitalizing innovation and entrepreneurship and how open source plays a part. 
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Movius Interactive
John Boden is the CTO and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development at Movius Interactive. He brings over 20 years of strategy development, product management, development and marketing experience to the company. Most recently John held the position of senior vice president of product management at Openwave where he was responsible for the development and management of their entire suite of products and solutions. John joined Openwave from the VoIP startup, Genband, where he was the chief technology officer. Prior to that, John had a long career with Nortel, holding several leadership positions in the wireless, wireline and enterprise business units. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jennifer Bell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government Transparency via Open Data and Open Source</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/230</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Industry analyst Gartner describes web services based on open government data as having a &quot;greater potential effect on the ability to transform government than anything else in the Web 2.0 world&quot;. In his technology platform, Barack Obama has made groundbreaking promises related to increasing government accountability by: i) publishing data in open formats; and ii) using online tools to involve citizens in government decision making. These transformative ideas have not yet spread to politics in Canada.

As citizens, we trust that money is being wisely spent on the systems that run our country. We trust that the people governing us have the skills, time, and information they need to make the best decisions. We trust that bureaucracies are well-designed and that the people in them are motivated to make those bureaucracies better. Unfortunately, it's hard to trust what you can't see. By publishing information in open, machine-readable formats, governments can take a powerful step towards building public trust. By sharing information, governments can start to channel the expertise of the citizenry outside of the civil service to build more effective and inclusive ways of running the country.

The non-profit VisibleGovernment.ca is working to make online tools for civic participation based on open government data a reality in Canada. This article describes why open government data is not only a requirement for greater government transparency, but also a valuable investment in our country's infrastructure.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Visible Government
Jennifer Bell has a background in launching software start-ups. Prior to founding VisibleGovernment.ca, Jennifer was on the seed management team of Tungle Corporation, recently named one of Canada's top 10 Web 2.0 startups to watch. Previously, she was a software developer, and later architect and product manager, for Nimcat Networks, which was sold for $43M in 2005. Jennifer has degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the University of Saskatchewan, and an MBA in Entrepreneurship from McGill University.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Open Source Strengthens Business Models</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/226</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">For a company's commercialization efforts to succeed, it needs to come up with great market offers which have great business models. Open source (OS) is neither a business model nor a market offer. A market offer with a weak business model will derive little benefit from OS regardless of how good the OS may be.

Little is known about how OS strengthens the business model of a company's market offer. This article provide a conceptual tool that can be used to capture, share and communicate the strength of a company's business model and help articulate tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge. The second half of the article provides many examples that show how OS strengthens a company's business model.

This paper is relevant to: i) top management teams who must formulate their companies' business models clearly and communicate what is expected from OS; ii) top management teams who are considering investing in OS projects, participating in OS development, or influencing schedules and priorities of OS projects; iii) staff of OS foundations who must attract company investment and participation in their OS projects; and iv) academics who undertake research in the alignment of product development and OS evolution for the purpose of improving business performance</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network, the Director of the Technology Innovation Management program offered by Carleton University, and the host of the TIM Lecture Series.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Angela Byron</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lessons on Community Management from the Open Source World</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/258</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">From the outside (and often times from within, too), the success of healthy open source projects defies all logic. Scores of individuals from all over the world, all of whom have different skill levels, use cases, and experience, not to mention native languages and time zones, collaborate together in order to help make a project succeed.

How is it that all of this chaos comes together and creates something wonderful and useful? And moreover, what lessons can be taken from how open source projects work &quot;on the ground&quot; and applied to our practical, daily lives and organizations?

This article will attempt to extrapolate some of the experience gleaned from being immersed for over four years in the Drupal project. Drupal is an open source website building tool which has transformed from a small hobby project in 1999 to a robust framework powering hundreds of thousands of websites today. But behind buzzwords like &quot;social publishing&quot; and &quot;content management framework&quot; there lies a diverse, passionate, and vibrant global community. We present some of the key ingredients to the community's success, many of which can be applied to any organization.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Drupal
Angela Byron lives in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and works as a senior web consultant at Lullabot, an open source consulting and training company. She started in open source as a Google Summer of Code student in 2005, and has since completely immersed herself in the Drupal community. Her work includes leading core development on the upcoming 7.0 release and helping new contributors to get involved. Angela co-authored the O'Reilly book Using Drupal, is on the Board of Directors for the Drupal Association, and was the recipient of the Google-O'Reilly Open 2008 Source Award for Best Contributor.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark Lucas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott Bortman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Web Based Geospatial Processing with OMAR</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/236</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The availability of geospatial data sets is exploding. New satellites, aerial platforms, video feeds, global positioning system tagged digital photos, and traditional GIS information are dramatically increasing across the globe. These raw materials need to be dynamically processed, combined and correlated to generate value added information products to answer a wide range of questions.

This article provides an overview of OMAR web based geospatial processing. OMAR is part of the Open Source Software Image Map  project under the Open Source Geospatial Foundation. The primary contributors of OSSIM make their livings by providing professional services to US Government agencies and programs. OMAR provides one example that open source software solutions are increasingly being deployed in US government agencies. We will also summarize the capabilities of OMAR and its plans for near term development.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RadiantBlue Technologies
Mark Lucas has pioneered efforts in OSS development in remote sensing, image processing and GIS. Mark established remotesensing.org and has led several government funded studies and development efforts since 1996. These efforts include OSSIM projects for the National Reconnaissance Office, the Open Source Prototype Research and Open Source Extraordinary Program projects for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. He is currently leading the Open Technology Development effort within the Department of Defense Advanced Systems and Concepts in collaboration with National Information Infrastructure and the Business Transformation Agency. Mark has a BS in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the University of Arizona and a MS in Computer Science from West Coast University. He was commissioned in the Air Force and assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force Special Projects organization. He has experience as both a government and contractor program manager through a number of classified programs. He is on the Board of Directors of the Open Source Geospatial Foundation, the Open Source Software Institute, and the National Center for Open Source Policy and Research. Mark is currently a principal scientist at RadiantBlue Technologies Inc.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OMAR
Scott Bortman is the system architect and primary developer for the OMAR web processing system. He has been a primary contributor to the OSSIM software baseline over the last decade. He has a BS and MS of Computer Engineering from the Florida Institute of Technology and has worked for a number of government contractors including Computer Science Innovations, ImageLinks Inc., Intelligence Data Systems, and L3 Corporation. He is currently working as a Senior Software Engineer for RadiantBlue Technologies Inc. Scott has a strong background in database design, Image Processing, C++ and Java programming. Within the OSSIM development team, Scott is known for his ability to stay current with the latest advances in software development tools, methodologies, and approaches.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Bell</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Opening the Source of Art</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/294</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The open source community has developed a number of tools and philosophies to assist in distributed software development. The Still Water Lab at the University of Maine believes that these tools and philosophies can be adapted to facilitate other forms of distributed creative endeavours. It has developed two tools that reinterpret the ideas used in open source software through the lenses of artistic creation and preservation: The Pool and the Variable Media Questionnaire. This article discusses how several of the ideas used in software development have influenced Still Water's approach to making tools that support artistic production.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Maine
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.novomancy.org/john/portfolio/&quot;&gt; John Bell&lt;/a&gt; is a web application developer, data artist, and adjunct faculty at the University of Maine New Media department. He has contributed to the development of The Pool, a system for fostering and documenting distributed creativity in digital arts; the Variable Media Questionnaire, a tool used in the recreation of technologically obsolete artwork; released several open-source web authoring tools; and given birth to an artificial intelligence that accidentally committed suicide. Many of his projects focus on trust in online communities and maintaining intellectual integrity in environments where there are few consequences to ignoring it. His work has been featured in Wired online and at Ars Electronica's Electrolobby Kitchen.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James Bowen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. What do investors look for in a business venture?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/281</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q and A</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">uOttawa
James Bowen, PhD, PMP, CMC is an Ottawa technology entrepreneur and adjunct professor at uOttawa's Telfer School of Management. He has has over 25 years of experience as a technology company entrepreneur. His primary focus is bringing ideas, technology products/services, people, markets and money together into sustainable endeavours.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen Byrne</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using JavaScript Toolkits to Create Rich Internet Applications</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/244</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Since 2004, the number of Rich Internet Applications has increased, making them a key component of the Web 2.0 phenomenon. Many RIAs have been developed using JavaScript and AJAX. AJAX is used to access remote data sources, that reside on the server or are available through an open API, directly from within the application. The rich variety of applications would not be available today without the concurrent appearance of many, powerful JavaScript toolkits that have taken the development of these applications from labour-intensive to nearly painless. These toolkits provide an open source alternative to the proprietary products developed by Adobe (Flash/Flex/Air) and Microsoft (Silverlight).

This article provides two examples that demonstrate the evolution of RIAs, then compares the features of the most commonly used JavaScript Toolkits used to create RIAs. We then discuss how freely available toolkits are able to compete against proprietary alternatives. Finally, we provide some concluding remarks based on our experience with creating enterprise RIAs. 
 </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Travelpod
Owen Byrne is currently Senior Manager of Travelpod Labs. He is probably best known as the co-founder and original developer of digg.com where he was the primary technical decision maker for most of its period of growth, from inception to the Series A financing. Owen holds three degrees from Saint Mary's University and Dalhousie University, as well as an ABD from the University of Manitoba. He has over 20 years experience in software development and managerial roles including a brief stint as a university professor. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Hudson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Value Co-creation: Lessons from Lead to Win Ecosystem</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/308</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">While the concepts of value co-creation and business ecosystems have become dominant, there is lack of conceptual clarity as to the role of co-creation in a business ecosystem. The objective of this article is to provide concrete examples of co-creation in vendor neutral ecosystems using lessons learned from operating the Lead to Win ecosystem. In a vendor neutral ecosystem, no vendor dominates and membership is open to all individuals and organizations that meet specific criteria.

The article is organized into three sections. The first section provides a short description of the Lead to Win ecosystem. The second section uses concrete examples to illustrate the lessons learned about co-creation in vendor neutral ecosystems. The third section describes key takeaways based on our five months experience operating the keystone of the Lead to Win ecosystem.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December 2009</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. His research and teaching support Carleton's Technology Innovation Management program. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network and the Executive Director of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coralcea.net&quot;&gt; Coral CEA&lt;/a&gt;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lead to Win
David Hudson is the Director of the Lead to Win program and is with Ontario's Talent First Network. He is pursuing doctoral studies at Carleton University's Eric Sprott School of Business with a focus on how communications enabled applications selected by knowledge workers affect their productivity. Previously, Mr. Hudson was Nortel's Vice President for Advanced Research and Technology Labs and has had an extensive career in technology and product line management, working in all of Nortel's product lines. Mr. Hudson received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Callahan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blood on the Tracks: 6 Years of Technical Entrepreneurship in Ottawa</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/150</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In 2002, twenty nine engineers and computer scientists completed a Lead-to-Win (LTW) program in Technical Entrepreneurship. The LTW program was a pilot program designed for former Nortel employees to gain the skills needed to become entrepreneurs. Of the participants, fifteen started technology businesses, ten tried to attract venture capital funding, eleven tried to grow their companies with no venture capital funding, and seven established five technology businesses headquartered in Ottawa. These businesses attracted over $91 million from venture capital firms during one of the worst economic times to hit this region and created over 280 jobs globally.

On May 15th at the Partnership Conference Series, John Callahan and Tony Bailetti, directors of the LTW program, and three of the LTW graduates spoke about the lessons learned during and since the program.
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">May 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> 
  </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark Yendt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Duane Bender</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brian Minaji</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developing an Open Source Reference Implementation of the Canadian Electronic Health Records Solution</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/204</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developing a reference implementation of the Canada Health Infoway pan-Canadian Electronic Health Record Solution standard can be a useful step in ensuring the successful and cost-effective development of full scale electronic health systems in the Provincial Ministries of Health across Canada. These jurisdictions could benefit from the knowledge gained and the artifacts created in this prototype environment. The reference implementation utilizes an Enterprise Service Bus architecture and a Service Oriented Architecture design approach to build a Health Information Access Layer, as recommended by Canada Health Infoway. The system components and supporting technology developed will be released as open source. This set of technology could represent a starting point for prototyping an implementation in a production environment, for creating a standards development platform, for standards conformance testing, and/or as a test bed for evaluating alternative software components in a HIAL environment.

Mohawk Applied Research Centre for Health Informatics at Mohawk College in Hamilton, Ontario, along with public and private sector partners, is continuing to build a reference implementation of the pan-Canadian Infoway standard that demonstrates the ESB/SOA approach. This article summarizes the project to date and suggested future research areas that will reduce the cost, risk and time barriers to widespread adoption of eHealth systems in Canada.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mohawk College
Mark Yendt is a fulltime Faculty member in the Software Engineering Technology Department at Mohawk College. He graduated from the Chemical Engineering Technology Program at Mohawk College in 1983. Mark worked in the wastewater engineering industry with a focus on the development of process modeling software. In 1994, Mark was a co-recipient of the Harrison Prescott Eddy Medal for Noteworthy Research awarded by the Water Environment Federation. His current research activities include software process visualization and optimization of systems using the HL7v3 standard.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mohawk College
Duane Bender is a licensed Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) in Ontario and a fulltime Faculty member in the Software Engineering Technology Department at Mohawk College. He graduated from the Computer Engineering and Management program at McMaster University in 1996 and is currently enrolled in the McMaster MBA program. Duane is the founding faculty member of the MARC HI, and performs Applied Research in the area of eHealth. His current research interests include building large scale eHealth systems using ESB and SOA architectures and the IHE, CDA, DICOM and HL7v3 standards.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mohawk College
Brian Minaji graduated from Computer System Technology at Mohawk College in 1986. He worked as an IT professional in a number of different industries for the next 15 years. In 2001, he joined the faculty of Software Engineering Technology at Mohawk College. He has been involved with the MARC HI project since its inception. His research interests include helping build the Canadian EHRS Reference Implementation.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dru Lavigne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brian Barry</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter Tanner</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Health and Life Sciences (November 2008)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/202</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The length of Wikipedia's list of open source healthcare software  may come as a surprise to many readers. This issue of the OSBR provides an excellent introduction to the complexities and interoperability issues associated with healthcare software and the role open source can play in helping to resolve these issues. This month's authors also provide insight into an open source projects that follows open standards, lessons learned from providing a reference implementation, the benefits of a healthcare ecosystem, and the value of open source projects working closely with standards organizations.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network
Dru Lavigne is a technical writer and IT consultant who has been active with open source communities since the mid-1990s. She writes regularly for O'Reilly and DNSStuff.com and is the author of the books BSD Hacks and The Best of FreeBSD Basics.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Health Tools
Brian Barry is CEO of Bedarra Research Labs and CTO of Open Health Tools. From 1991-2002 he served variously as Chief Scientist, CEO, President and CTO at Object Technology International, Inc. Under his leadership, OTI developed the Eclipse Platform and the IBM VisualAge family of products. Dr. Barry has published a number of research papers and articles on a wide variety of technical subjects. He has served on the Program Committees for software conferences such as OOPSLA, ECOOP, AOSD and Agile Development, was a co-author of the ANSI Smalltalk standard, and actively participates on research review boards and committees.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Health Tools
Peter Tanner divides his time between being a Retiree-on-Call at IBM Canada, and handling the intellectual property policies and strategies for Open Health Tools. As Director of Business Development at Object Technology International, Mr. Tanner was directly involved with the legal and business issues during the founding of Eclipse.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dru Lavigne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Social Innovation (September 2008)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/181</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">If the overwhelming response we received to this month's call for submissions is any indication, those engaged in open source are also passionate about social innovation. We could have easily published a 100 page issue, but opted instead to save some submissions for upcoming issues as they are also suited to the themes of Building Community and Enabling Innovation.

Tony Bailetti of the Talent First Network is one of the driving forces behind the OSBR. He is guest editor this month and I think you'll agree that he has done an excellent job of finding authors from industry, academia, and non-profits who are on the frontlines of social innovation in Canada.

This issue is jam-packed with resources and examples of initiatives--enough to leave you thinking &quot;I had no idea so much was happening in Canada&quot;. They aren't meant to be exhaustive, but the insights and lessons learned can be applied to similar initiatives across the globe.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network
Dru Lavigne is a technical writer and IT consultant who has been active with open source communities since the mid-1990s. She writes regularly for O'Reilly and DNSStuff.com and is the author of the books BSD Hacks and The Best of FreeBSD Basics.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Ontario's Talent First Network, the Director of the Technology Innovation Management program offered by Carleton University, and the host of the TIM Lecture Series.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brian Barry</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Emerging Role of Open Source in Healthcare</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/203</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Healthcare has been characterized as a multi-trillion dollar cottage industry. It is highly fragmented, labour intensive, barely connected, extremely competitive, and has many different vendors and proprietary solutions. The rising cost of healthcare is straining budgets at all levels of government and imposing financial burdens on corporations and individuals alike. Against this backdrop, legitimate concerns about privacy have led to a plethora of regulations requiring complex administrative, physical and technical infrastructure to safeguard sensitive health information. Governments are attempting to impose standards and specifications from the top down to improve efficiency in healthcare delivery. These standards are broad, complex and, for the most part, lack implementations. In short, things are in a bit of a mess.

A consensus is emerging around two initiatives that promise to improve the current situation. The first is to foster widespread adoption of Electronic Health Records. The second is to improve accessibility and interoperability between EHR systems. In this article, we present Open Health Tools, an open source ecosystem where members of the health and information technology professions can collaborate to build interoperable EHR systems.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Health Tools
Brian Barry is CEO of Bedarra Research Labs and CTO of Open Health Tools. From 1991-2002 he served variously as Chief Scientist, CEO, President and CTO at Object Technology International, Inc. Under his leadership, OTI developed the Eclipse Platform and the IBM VisualAge family of products. Dr. Barry has published a number of research papers and articles on a wide variety of technical subjects. He has served on the Program Committees for software conferences such as OOPSLA, ECOOP, AOSD and Agile Development, was a co-author of the ANSI Smalltalk standard, and actively participates on research review boards and committees.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michel Bauwens</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ladder of Participation: Business Models for Peer Production</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/113</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open source software is just one part of a much wider social and economic ecosystem that is evolving around increased participation of what-used-to-be consumers. New roles are emerging, including &quot;produsers&quot;, with an intentional 's', to refer to the amalgamation of being both a user and a producer, and &quot;end-makers&quot;, another intentional concept to be contrasted with end-users.

In this new ecosystem, produsers and end-makers either partially, but sometimes fully, produce value, aided or unaided by institutions and companies. This creates new dynamics that need to be understood. One way of increasing our understanding is to look at the inter-locking dynamics of both businesses and the participant-communities, for which the following article constructs a model of Interaction. Each distinct type of relationship generates different dynamics and associated business models.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">January 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">P2P Foundation
Michel Bauwens was a serial Internet entrepreneur in his home country of Belgium, as well as eBusiness Strategy Manager for the country's largest telco Belgacom. In 2005, he moved to Chiang Mai, Thailand and created the P2P Foundation, lecturing worldwide about the implications of this social/economic re-organization of our life. Michel has created a workshop format to introduce business and policy audiences to the logic of peer production and its implications for business strategies and policy making.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jacob Brauer</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mirth: Standards-Based Open Source Healthcare Interface Engine</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/205</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Mirth Project is an open source healthcare interface engine and interface repository created and professionally supported by WebReach. Mirth provides standards-based tools to develop, test, and deploy interoperability solutions for healthcare information systems and information exchanges.

This article provides an overview of healthcare interface engines. It discusses Mirth and the healthcare and connectivity standards it supports. Lastly, the article compares Mirth to other interface engines.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WebReach
Jacob Brauer graduated cum laude from the University of California, Irvine in 2006 with a degree in Computer Science. He has been working for WebReach for 2.5 years, during which time he has been one of the lead engineers on the Mirth Project. Jacob has also contributed to other open source healthcare projects and initiatives, such as OpenMRS, an open source electronic medical record system framework designed for the developing world. He has partaken in many open source and healthcare conferences, including the Southern California Linux Expo Open Source Health Care Summit, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Health Informatics Southern Africa, Open Source Health Care Alliance, and the HL7 Working Group Meeting.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrew Back</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Need for F/LOSS (Governance) Operations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/167</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The case for the effective operation of Free/Libre and Open Source Software (F/LOSS) in the enterprise has never been stronger. Yet in some quarters, the chasm between senior management's perception of the penetration of F/LOSS within their organization, and the reality, has never been wider. And when you consider that  Gartner predicts that &quot;by 2012 more than 90% of enterprises will use open source in direct or embedded form&quot;, this suggests that the development of an effective F/LOSS policy will become increasingly necessary for business operations.

Many enterprises, for now, are sourcing the majority of their F/LOSS solutions via a vendor. This does not remove the need for governance. Even with commercial arrangements in place, it is crucial that business have an understanding of F/LOSS communities: what drives them, how to interact with them, and what obligations they may have to them. The game has changed and innovation is no longer the reserve of software vendors with large development budgets. Software development is now enabled by open licenses that afford great freedoms and, in doing so, facilitate widespread collaboration. With this unprecedented pace of innovation, comes new obligations. We argue that the need for education around F/LOSS communities and licensing is clear.

</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">July 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Osmosoft
During his tenure at BT he has been responsible for driving strategy for the effective adoption of open source technology and principles across all lines of business, and the creation of BT Design's Open Source Focus Group. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society for the encouragement of the Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, and a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society.  </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TIM Lecture Series: Ecosystem Approach to the Commercialization of Technology Products and Services</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/138</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">On March 28, 2008, Tony Bailetti, Director of Ontario's Talent First Network, launched Carleton University's TIM Lecture Series with a presentation entitled Ecosystem Approach to the Commercialization of Technology Products and Services. The TIM Lecture Series provides a forum to promote the transfer of knowledge from university research to technology company executives and entrepreneurs as well as research and development (R&amp;D) personnel. This conference report presents the key messages and insights from the three sections discussed during the inaugural presentation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of the Talent First Network. Until September 2007, he was the Director of the Technology Innovation Management program. He has taught for the Executive M.B.A. program offered by Queen's University in Ottawa since 1996.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kelly Rankin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ronald Baecker</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evolution of an Open Source Strategy</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2007</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/68</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">On June 8th, 2005, we officially launched the ePresence (http://epresence.tv/) Interactive Media Open Source Consortium, at the Knowledge Media Design Institute (KMDI), University of Toronto (UofT). We had been researching and developing ePresence, our webcasting, webconferencing, and archiving software project for about five years. Throughout the early phase of the project we used the system to produce live webcasts of KMDI's annual lecture series. Eventually word spread about our webcasting system and other universities, such as Memorial University in Newfoundland, became interested. It was obvious that the time to share our project with the world had come, but what wasn't obvious to us at the time was how we were going to do that.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October 2007</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Toronto
Kelly Rankin is the Manager for the   ePresence Open Source Consortium. She has given numerous ePresence demonstrations and has produced a number of webcast learning events, including, &quot;The Business of Software&quot; and the Project Open Source | Open Access keynote address. In addition to her activities as Consortium Manager, she is completing her Bachelor's Degree in Philosophy at the University of Toronto.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Toronto
Ronald Baecker is Professor of Computer Science, Bell University Laboratories Chair in Human-Computer Interaction, and founder and Chief Scientist of the Knowledge Media Design Institute at the University of Toronto. He is Principal Investigator of the Canada-wide NSERC Network for Effective Collaboration Technologies through Advanced Research (NECTAR) and Project Director, ePresence Interactive Media. Baecker is an active researcher, lecturer, and consultant on human-computer interaction and user interface design, and software entrepreneurship.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter Hoddinott</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Assets</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2007</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/75</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Open Source Definition or OSD defines the criteria to which the distribution terms of software must comply for it to be deemed to be open source software.  The term open source, however, is used to label a broad assortment of phenomena that fall well outside the established OSD. In addition, there is ambiguity in what is meant to be covered by the terms source and open.  

We envisage a definition of open source that equally applies to software, hardware schematics, content, and processes, not just software.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September 2007</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of the Talent First Network. Until September 2007, he was the Director of the Technology Innovation Management program.   He has taught for the Executive M.B.A. program offered by Queen's University in Ottawa since 1996.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network
Peter Hoddinott has over 25 years of experience in the Information and Communications industry. Peter has a B.Sc. and a M.Sc. in Computer Science, and recently completed the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton. He is currently employed by Carleton where he works full time on advancing the objectives of the Talent First Network.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TFN: Open Source and Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2007</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/95</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonay Bailetti explains the goals and progress of the Talent First Network Program.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">July 2007</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti holds a tenured faculty appointment in both the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering and the Eric Sprott School of Business at Carleton University, located in Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti has been the Director of the Technology Innovation Management Program from 1998 to 2005 and from 2006 to date. He is also the Director of the Talent First Network and the Research Centre for Technology Innovation. He was the Director of Carleton University's School of Business from 1981 to 1988 and worked at Bell-Northern Research (today a part of Nortel) from 1988 to 1992. Professor Bailetti has published in engineering management journals such as IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Research Policy, and R&amp;D Management. He has taught for the Executive M.B.A. program offered by Queen's University in Ottawa since 1996. In 1996 he won a Carleton University Teaching Award and in 2007 a Leadership Breakthrough Award.
</style></custom1></record></records></xml>