<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amy Xu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jim Wilmore</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Standards vs. Open Source: a Case of the OpenAccess Standard</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Source Business Resource</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/115</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article we provide some insights into the relationship between non-code based open assets, open development processes, and open standards. The insights are based on a case study of the OpenAccess Project of the Silicon Integration Initiative. The unique relationship between the OA standard's openness, evolution and adoption is an example of how open processes could be used to enable design tool interoperability, innovation, and cooperation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">January 2008</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></work-type><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Dr. Stoyan Tanev has a M.Sc. from the University of Sofia, Bulgaria and a Ph.D. jointly from the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, and University of Sofia in Physics, as well as a M.Eng. in Telecommunications Technology Management from Carleton University, Ottawa. In July 2006, Dr. Tanev joined the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University. His main teaching and research activities are associated with the Technology Innovation   Management Program and include the application of open source innovation principles in new and emerging technology domains as well as the relationship between competitive intelligence, technology marketing, and innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Amy Xu has a Bachelor in Computer Science and has just completed the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University. Her M. Eng thesis work was dedicated to the study of the OpenAccess standard development processes.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Intel
Jim Wilmore has been working in the IC CAD industry for over 30 years, first as a graduate student with Sandia Corporation, then for over 20 years at Hewlett-Packard, and most recently at Intel as Intel's Program Manager for EDA Industry Initiatives. Jim's work in IC CAD has been in many roles: as an application/tool/engine developer, as a tool customizer, as a CAD integrator, as a CAD System Architect, and finally as an Infrastructure architect and developer primarily focused in database and design management. He has worked on EDA industry standards for most of his EDA career. He has participated in OpenAccess from the outset and is now the Co-Chief Architect of the OAC's ChangeTeam.</style></custom3></record></records></xml>