<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gregory Sandstrom</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Insights (June 2020)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bitcoin</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">blockchain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crypto assets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cryptocurrencies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">developing countries.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">distributed ledger technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Employeedriven innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial finance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethereum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FinTech</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ICOs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intellectual property rights</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">job autonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mining industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">moral hazard</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">need for autonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new company</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter's Five Forces framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling company value</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling-up</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">self-leadership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">signaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological environment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology readiness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token offering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token sales</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tokenization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition alignment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venture capital</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1363</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.

Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).

Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. He completed a PhD from the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He was affiliated with the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. He is a promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diane Isabelle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kevin Horak</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sarah McKinnon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chiara Palumbo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Porter's Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labour intensity continuum via mining and IT industries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mining industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter's Five Forces framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1366</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter's Five Forces (P5F) framework, published in 1979, helps us to understand the attractiveness of an industry. The five competitive forces are: the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute products of services, and the rivalry among existing competitors. This framework has recently come under scrutiny and been called into question. To contribute to the debate, this paper investigates the relevance of Porter's framework by contrasting vastly different industries. The use cases consist of a resource-based, capital-intensive industry, the mining industry, and a knowledge-based, labor-intensive industry, the information technology industry. Drawing from research on Porter's Five Forces framework, and through an internationalization lens, the paper proposes a modified framework augmented with four additional forces. These additional forces are: the competitor's level of innovativeness, exposure to globalization, threat of digitalization, and industry exposure to de/regulation activities. These forces were added to capture the increased interconnectivity and complexity of businesses operating in the 21st century. The paper contributes to this body of knowledge by augmenting a popular framework and applying it to vital industrial sectors. The findings aim to incite researchers, managers, entrepreneurs and policymakers to go beyond the traditional five forces as a way to help monitor their business environment and enhance decision-making processes, particularly in a post-COVID-19 world.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Dr. Isabelle is an Associate Professor of International Business. Her research focuses broadly on the areas of science, innovation and techno-entrepreneurship within a global context. Specifically, her research is organized around the following three inter-related themes: 1) International entrepreneurship &amp; ecosystems, 2) Internationalization (International New Ventures and SMEs), 3) Global collaborative research and Science, Technology and Innovation policy. In addition to these themes, she is researching and publishing on Technology-integrated and international interdisciplinary experiential learning in higher education. Prior to joining Sprott in 2011, Dr. Isabelle worked in several senior executive roles related to science, technology and industrial research (Industrial Research Assistance Program - IRAP) at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), the Government of Canada’s premier research and technology organization. She started her career as a project engineer for several multinational firms, including General Electric, Esso and Boeing Aerospace.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University Graduate
Kevin Horak, B. International Business, Carleton University, is a supply chain planner at Martin-Brower of Canada Co. Fluent in Spanish, he spent a year abroad studying commerce and economics at the Universidad de Chile (Santiago).</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University Graduate
 Sarah McKinnon, B. International Business, Carleton University, is an Associate with Tailwind Associates, a Calgary-based firm dedicated to launching innovative entrepreneurs. She is inspired by the work ethic and tenacity of the entrepreneurial spirit and supports preparing small businesses for growth and investment. Previously, she worked at Sampford Advisors, a firm facilitating mergers and acquisitions for mid-market Canadian technology companies.  </style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University Graduate
Chiara Palumbo is currently pursuing a Master of Science in Finance degree from Bocconi University, while working as Real Estate Investment Analyst for Italian company Generali Real Estate. She holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Finance) degree from Carleton University. Her past work experience includes investment banking at Lazard &amp; Co. in Debt Capital Markets and equity research for the Sprott Student Investment Fund.</style></custom4><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jeremy de Beer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vipal Jain</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces: The Role of Systems and Networks</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biohacker spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biohacking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biotechnology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inclusive innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">law</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social networks</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1137</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we examine the development of biohacker spaces and their impact on innovation systems through the lens of inclusive innovation. Examining issues associated with people, activities, outcomes, and governance, we observe that biohacker spaces offer an alternative approach to biotechnological research outside the orthodox walls of academia, industry, and government. We explain that harnessing the full innovative potential of these spaces depends on flexible legal and regulatory systems, including appropriate biosafety regulations and intellectual property policies and practices, and organic, community-based social and financial networking.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Jeremy de Beer is a Full Professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology, and Society. He is a Senior Research Associate at the IP Unit, University of Cape Town and a co-founding director of the Open African Innovation Research network, Open AIR. He is online at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.JeremydeBeer.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.JeremydeBeer.com&lt;/a&gt;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Vipal Jain is a &lt;em&gt;Juris Doctor&lt;/em&gt; candidate (2018) at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section. She is a member of the Open African Innovation Research (Open AIR) network’s New and Emerging Researcher Group, focusing on intellectual property law issues in Canada and elsewhere. She holds a BSc from the University of Toronto, where she specialized in Genetics and Biotechnology.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walter Miron</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kevin Muita</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Models for Providers of Critical Infrastructure</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">adoption</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">capability maturity models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">compliance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical infrastructure</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">municipalities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">protection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">standards</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/837</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-39</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical infrastructure such as power generation and distribution systems, telecommunications networks, pipelines and pipeline control networks, transportation control networks, financial networks, and government information and communications technology (ICT) have increasingly become the target of cyber-attacks. The impact and cost of these threats, as well as regulatory pressure to mitigate them, have created an impetus to secure these critical infrastructures. Managers have many controls and models at their disposal to help them secure infrastructure technology, including cybersecurity capability maturity models to enable measurement and communication of cybersecurity readiness to top management teams, regulators, and customers, thereby facilitating regulatory compliance, corporate responsibility, and improved brand quality. However, information and awareness is lacking about which models are most appropriate for a given situation and how they should be deployed.

This article examines relevant cybersecurity capability maturity models to identify the standards and controls available to providers of critical infrastructure in an effort to improve their level of security preparedness. These capability models are described and categorized by their relevance to different infrastructure domains, and then recommendations are provided on employing capability maturity models to measure and communicate readiness. This article will be relevant to regulators, critical infrastructure providers, and researchers. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Walter Miron is a Director of Technology Strategy at TELUS Communications, where he is responsible for the evolution of their packet and optical networks. He has over 20 years of experience in enterprise and service provider networking conducting technology selection and service development projects. Walter is a member of the research program committee of the SAVI project, the Heavy Reading Global Ethernet Executive Council, and the ATOPs SDN/nFV Working Group. He is also Chair of the Venus Cybersecurity Corporation and a board member of the Centre of Excellence for Next Generation Networking (CENGN) in Ottawa, Canada. Walter is currently a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Kevin Muita is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He has a Bachelor's degree in Technology from Africa Nazarene University in Nairobi, Kenya. He has co-founded two technology startups: a network consultancy company and a systems installation and maintenance company. He has experience in logistics and supply chain management, having managed a Coca-Cola distribution network in Kenya, overseeing a successful 300% increase in sales volume, operations, and service delivery.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benoit Dupont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity Futures: How Can We Regulate Emergent Risks?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity policies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emerging risks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">forecasting</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological trends</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/700</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-11</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article reviews nine socio-technical trends that are likely to shape the cybersecurity environment over the next decade. These nine trends have reached various levels of maturity, and some – such as quantum computing – are still theoretically contentious. These trends are: cloud computing; big data; the Internet of Things; the mobile Internet; brain–computer interfaces; near field communication payment systems; mobile robots; quantum computing; and the militarization of the Internet.

What these nine trends have in common is that they will be instrumental in generating new opportunities for offending, which will result from an exponential increase in the quantity of data, number of connection points to the Internet, and velocity of data flows that irrigate the digital ecosystem. As a result, more opportunities for malicious exploitation will be available to attackers, “security by design” will be harder to achieve in such a fluid and dynamic environment, and the performance of control mechanisms is likely to erode significantly. 

Technical solutions to address these challenges are already being developed by computer scientists. This article focuses on a different and complementary approach, finding inspiration in the work of regulatory scholars who have framed promising theories such as regulatory pluralism and responsive regulation to explore options for the necessary institutional adaptation to these future changes. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université de Montréal
Benoit Dupont is the Canada Research Chair in Security and Technology at the Université de Montréal, where he is Professor of Criminology and Director of the International Centre for Comparative Criminology. Professor Dupont researches the coevolution of crime and technology, focusing on offences such as identity theft, bank fraud, computer hacking, and telecommunications fraud. His political science background also leads him to examine emerging cybersecurity policies and what forms of regulation can be developed to address the new risk landscape. </style></custom1></record></records></xml>