Export 20 results:
Author Title Type [ Year(Desc)]
Filters: Author is Dimitri Schuurman  [Clear All Filters]
2012
Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (737.93 KB)
2013
Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
PDF icon Download this article (1.06 MB)
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2013. Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743
PDF icon Download this article (792.03 KB)
2015
McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947
PDF icon Download this article (252.71 KB)
Rits, O., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2015. Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 19-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949
PDF icon Download this article (583.19 KB)
2016
McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2016. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955
PDF icon Download this article (287.14 KB)
Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
PDF icon Download this article (749.86 KB)
Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2016. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 22-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/972
PDF icon Baccarne_et_al_TIMReview_March2016.pdf (462.4 KB)
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
PDF icon Download this article (757.45 KB)
2017
Logghe, S., & Schuurman, D. 2017. Action Research as a Framework to Evaluate the Operations of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 35-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1056
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (399.78 KB)
McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1052
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (268.23 KB)
McPhee, C., Schuurman, D., Ballon, P., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (267.88 KB)
Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. 2017. Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (509.31 KB)
D’Hauwers, R., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., Coorevits, L., Schuurman, D., Rits, O., et al. 2017. Overcoming Barriers to Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 20-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1054
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (581.62 KB)
Schuurman, D., De Vocht, S., De Cleyn, S., & Herregodts, A. - L. 2017. A Structured Approach to Academic Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from imec’s 101 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1095
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (623.96 KB)
2018
McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2018. Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (280.98 KB)
Coorevits, L., Georges, A., & Schuurman, D. 2018. A Framework for Field Testing in Living Lab Innovation Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 40-50. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1204
PDF icon Coorevits_et_al_TIMReview_December2018.pdf (627.18 KB)
Schuurman, D., & Protic, S. M. 2018. Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201
PDF icon SchuurmanProtic_TIMReview_December2018.pdf (639.56 KB)
Habibipour, A., Georges, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Schuurman, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. 2018. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 5-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (1.11 MB)
2019
Schuurman, D., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., & Rits, O. 2019. Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225
PDF icon Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_March2019.pdf (596.03 KB)