Articles

Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. 2013. Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 22-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/742

Dufva, M., Koivisto, R., Ilmola-Sheppard, L., & Junno, S. 2017. Anticipating Alternative Futures for the Platform Economy. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(9): 6-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1102

Jung, H. H., & Pfister, F. M. J. 2020. Blockchain-enabled Clinical Study Consent Management. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(2): 14-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1325

Jensen, L. 2015. Challenges in Maritime Cyber-Resilience. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(4): 35-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/889

Pölönen, I., Suokannas, A., & Juntunen, A. 2021. Cloud-Based Approach for Tracking and Monitoring of Hay Bales in Smart Agriculture. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(2): 17-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1419

Dubé, L., Du, P., McRae, C., Sharma, N., Jayaraman, S., & Nie, J. - Y. 2018. Convergent Innovation in Food through Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Societal-Scale Inclusive Growth. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2): 49-65. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1139

Jackson, E. 2008. The CUE Factor: Community-University Engagement for Social Innovation. Open Source Business Resource, (September 2008). http://timreview.ca/article/189

John, P. Kan, Lear, E., Decosta, P. L. ’Espoir, Gregor, S., Dann, S., & Sun, R. 2020. Designing a Visual Tool for Teaching and Learning Front-End Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(9). http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1386

Hahn, F., Jensen, S., & Tanev, S. 2014. Disruptive Innovation vs Disruptive Technology: The Disruptive Potential of the Value Propositions of 3D Printing Technology Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12): 27-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/855

Joshi, T. 2018. The Dynamics of Knowledge Sharing in the Biotechnology Industry: An Indian Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(1): 5-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1129

Holmquist, M., & Johansson, A. 2019. Employee-Driven Innovation: An Intervention Using Action Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(5): 44-53. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1240

Juujärvi, S., & Lund, V. 2016. Enhancing Early Innovation in an Urban Living Lab: Lessons from Espoo, Finland. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 17-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/957

Jaring, P., & Bäck, A. 2017. How Researchers Use Social Media to Promote their Research and Network with Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 32-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1098

Justus, C. 2011. The Impact of External Relationships on the Growth of Young Technology Companies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(2): 26-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/498

de Beer, J., & Jain, V. 2018. Inclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces: The Role of Systems and Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2): 27-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1137

Sannö, A., Öberg, A. Ericson, Flores-Garcia, E., & Jackson, M. 2019. Increasing the Impact of Industry–Academia Collaboration through Co-Production. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(4): 37-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1232

Lukosiute, K., Jensen, S., & Tanev, S. 2019. Is Joining a Business Incubator or Accelerator Always a Good Thing?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(7): 5-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1251

Schreuders, J., Low, A., Esprit, K., & Joachim, N. 2011. Nokia's Hybrid Business Model for Qt. Open Source Business Resource, (January 2011). http://timreview.ca/article/413

Jussila, J., Kukkamäki, J., Mäntyneva, M., & Heinisuo, J. 2019. Open Data and Open Source Enabling Smart City Development: A Case Study in Häme Region. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9): 26-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1266

Jewell, T. 2010. Open to Everyone: How Open Source Communities Can Benefit from Diversity Without Disunity. Open Source Business Resource, (August 2010). http://timreview.ca/article/369

Valkokari, K., Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., & Jylhä-Ollila, S. 2017. Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(3): 12-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1061

Simonsson, J., Magnusson, M., & Johanson, A. 2020. Organizing the Development of Digital Product-Service Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 37-48. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1335

Jussila, J., Raitanen, J., Partanen, A., Tuomela, V., Siipola, V., & Kunnari, I. 2020. Rapid Product Development in University-Industry Collaboration: Case Study of a Smart Design Project. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 49-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1336

Jewell, T. 2011. Redefining "Women's Work": Tensions Between Technology, Entrepreneurship, and Social Reproduction. Open Source Business Resource, (July 2011). http://timreview.ca/article/452

Pulkkinen, J., Jussila, J., Partanen, A., Trotsk, ii, I., & Laiho, A. 2019. Smart Mobility: Services, Platforms and Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9): 15-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1265