Export 7 results:
[ Author![(Desc)](https://timreview.ca/sites/default/modules/biblio/misc/arrow-desc.png)
Filters: Author is Dimitri Schuurman [Clear All Filters]
A Structured Approach to Academic Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from imec’s 101 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1095
2017. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045
2017. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
2016. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225
2019. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743
2013. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201
2018. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606
2012. ![application/pdf PDF icon](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)