Westerlund, M., Isabelle, D. A., & Leminen, S. 2021. The Acceptance of Digital Surveillance in an Age of Big Data. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 32-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1427

Grahn, S., Granlund, A., & Lindhult, E. 2021. Barriers to Value Specification when Carrying out Digitalization Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 54-64. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1442

Call for Papers: Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Digital Economies. 2021. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(2): 1-1. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1422

Søndergaard, H. Alsted, Knudsen, M. P., & Laugesen, N. Søndergaa. 2021. The Catch-22 in Strategizing for Radical Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 4-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1425

Pölönen, I., Suokannas, A., & Juntunen, A. 2021. Cloud-Based Approach for Tracking and Monitoring of Hay Bales in Smart Agriculture. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(2): 17-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1419

Lemieux, V. L., Mashatan, A., Safavi-Naini, R., & Clark, J. 2021. A Cross-Pollination of Ideas about Distributed Ledger Technological Innovation through a Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral lens: Insights from the Blockchain Technology Symposium ’21. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 58-66. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1445

Kunttu, L., Kalliomäki, H., Dan, S., & Kuusisto, J. 2021. Developing Social Impact Evaluation Methods for Research: viewpoints on commercialization and sustainability. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 44-53. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1441

Brecht, P., Hendriks, D., Stroebele, A., Hahn, C. H., & Wolff, I. 2021. Discovery and Validation of Business Models: How B2B Startups can use Business Experiments. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 17-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1426

Sandstrom, G. 2021. Distributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines: How to “smartify” the economy with blockchain-based digital extension services?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 42-57. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1449

Shaw, J. A., & Muegge, S. M. 2021. Ecosystems, Design, and Glocalization: A multi-level study of Technovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 32-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1440

Bailetti, T., Keen, C., & Tanev, S. 2021. Editorial: Aligning Multiple Stakeholder Value Propositions (April 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(4): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1431

Tanev, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2021. Editorial: Celebrating the World of Innovation (March 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 3-3. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1429

Kunttu, I. 2021. Editorial: Digital Innovations in the Bioeconomy (February 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(2): 3-4

Muegge, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2021. Editorial: Distributed Ledger Technologies for Smart Digital Economies (June 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1444

Tanev, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2021. Editorial: Insights (January 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(1): 3. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1416

Tanev, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2021. Editorial: Insights (May 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 3-4

Zou, W., Brax, S. A., & Rajala, R. 2021. The Effects of Competence-Based, Expressive and Collaborative Service Performance on the B2B Service Relationship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 17-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1439

Brioschi, M., Bonardi, M., Fabrizio, N., Fuggetta, A., Verga, E. Sergio, & Zuccalà, M. 2021. Enabling and Promoting Sustainability through Digital API Ecosystems: An example of successful implementation in the smart city domain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(1): 4-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1412

Westerlund, M., Nene, S., Leminen, S., & Rajahonka, M. 2021. An Exploration of Blockchain-based Traceability in Food Supply Chains: On the Benefits of Distributed Digital Records from Farm to Fork. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 6-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1446

Ooi, Y. Ming, & Husted, K. 2021. Framing Multi-Stakeholder Value Propositions: A wicked problem lens. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(4): 26-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1434

Mäki, M., & Toivola, T. 2021. Global Market Entry for Finnish SME eCommerce Companies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(1): 11-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1413

Abdalla, S., & Nakagawa, K. 2021. The Interplay of Digital Transformation and Collaborative Innovation on Supply Chain Ambidexterity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 45-56. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1428

Payne, A., Frow, P., & Tanev, S. 2021. Interview: Discussing Value Proposition Research in the Context of New Companies Committed to Scaling Early and Rapidly. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(4): 6-12. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1432

Dede, S., Köseoğlu, M. Can, & H. Yercan, F. 2021. Learning from Early Adopters of Blockchain Technology: A Systematic Review of Supply Chain Case Studies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 19-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1447

Wolff, J., & Hakanen, E. 2021. Managing the Disruption of Mobility Services: How to align the value propositions of key ecosystem players. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(4): 13-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1433