Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
2016. 
Urban Living Labs for Sustainability in Suburbs in Need of Modernization and Social Uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 27-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/958
2016. 
Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 16-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/933
2015. 
The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3): 6-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877
2015. 
The Grey Areas Between Open and Closed in Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 6-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/948
2015. 
Leveraging Living Lab Innovation Processes through Crowdsourcing. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/950
2015. 
Places and Spaces within Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 37-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/951
2015. 
Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/740
2013. 
Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
2013. 
A Living Lab as a Service: Creating Value for Micro-enterprises through Collaboration and Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 37-42. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/744
2013. 
A Small-Firm Perspective on the Benefits of Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 44-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/608
2012. 
Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1): 19-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489
2011. 